North Dakota
Huge dairy farms planned for eastern North Dakota • Minnesota Reformer

Two dairy farms planned for eastern North Dakota would more than quadruple the number of dairy cows in North Dakota and provide a dramatic shift to the livestock industry in a state that has fallen behind its neighbors in animal agriculture.
Riverview Dairy, based in Morris, Minnesota, hopes to build a 25,000-cow dairy farm southeast of Hillsboro in Traill County and a 12,500-head dairy north of Wahpeton in Richland County.
The Traill County dairy would create about 100 jobs and the Richland Dairy 45 to 50 jobs, Riverview officials said.
Riverview held an open house Tuesday in Halstad, Minnesota, the closest community to the proposed Traill County dairy, to provide information and answer questions. It has not held a similar event for the Richland County project.
Traill is an estimated $180 million project and Richland at $90 million.
Jim Murphy of the Traill County Economic Development Commission called it a “once-in-a-lifetime event for any community.”
Randy Paulsrud is a neighbor who rents the land. He said at first he wasn’t happy about losing a section of land that he farms for a dairy but now is interested in selling feed to the dairy and buying manure to fertilize other nearby fields.
“I’m on board with it,” Paulsrud said. He said he toured Riverview’s dairy near Gary, Minnesota, and came away impressed, with no concern about odor from covered manure pits.
“Oh man, it was clean,” he said.
Leslie Viker, who owns the Herberg Township land near Hillsboro where Riverview plans to build, said she plans to continue to live near the dairy after it’s built.
“I think this is going to be great,” she said.
Martha Koehl, Riverview spokesperson, said the cows will be kept in climate-controlled barns and milking machines will operate 22 hours a day, with the other two hours for cleaning.
Koehl said the projects are contingent on Riverview finding a market for the milk they produce. She could not offer a definitive timeline for when construction and operations might begin.
North Dakota’s dairy industry has been dwindling for decades, shrinking to about 10,000 dairy cows and just 24 dairy farms.
North Dakota state Rep. Dawson Holle, R-Mandan, who operates one of North Dakota’s larger dairy farms, said he has mixed feelings about the mega-dairy.
“I’m very concerned when it is a corporate farm that is coming in, not a family farm,” said Holle, who operates an 1,100-cow dairy farm.
Riverview is technically not a corporation, but is a limited liability partnership. It has built other large dairy farms in Minnesota and also has plans for one at DeSmet, South Dakota.
Loosening North Dakota’s restrictions on corporate farm ownership for livestock operations was one of the goals for Gov. Doug Burgum going into the 2023 legislative session.
The Legislature passed a bill that made it easier to bring in outside capital in modern livestock operations that have become major investments.
North Dakota Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring said Riverview’s business structure would have allowed it to operate in the state even without the changes. But he added the bill sent a message that the state is receptive to livestock projects.
Holle was among those who voted against the corporate farm changes. Rep. Mike Beltz, R-Hillsboro, voted in favor and gave some credit to the changes for bringing the dairy to his home district.
The Legislature also passed a bill to support infrastructure projects related to agribusiness development. Beltz said that could be tapped to help pay for improving the 1-mile road that would connect the Traill County dairy to North Dakota Highway 200 and possibly for utility work.
“There’s some opportunities for some infrastructure work around the site,” Beltz said.
The Traill dairy will be called Herberg Dairy for Herberg Township and is planned just south of North Dakota Highway 200 near the Red River, about 7 miles east of Interstate 29.
The Richland site would be in Abercrombie Township and called Abercrombie Dairy, about 7 miles north of Wahpeton. Riverview has already applied for a permit with the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality for that project.
Todd Leake of Grand Forks County questioned whether state regulators are equipped to enforce environmental regulations for concentrated animal feeding operations.
Amber Wood, executive director of the North Dakota Livestock Alliance, has been working to stimulate animal agriculture in the state.
She said she expects the growth in the dairy industry to continue to be along the Interstate 29 corridor, where there is better access to milk processing and livestock feed.
Ethanol plants, sugar beet processing plants and new soybean crushing plants at Casselton and Jamestown all provide byproducts that can be used to feed livestock.
American Crystal Sugar has a beet plant at Hillsboro. Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative has its only beet processing plant at Wahpeton.
“Cattle absolutely love beet pulp,” Wood said.
Koehl said beet pulp and soybean could be part of the feed ration that will be primarily corn and alfalfa hay.
A state Agriculture Department map of dairy farms shows none operating in Traill County and one in Richland.
Morton County, home to the iconic “Salem Sue” dairy cow statue along Interstate 94 west of Bismarck, is down to just four dairy farms, including Holle’s.
While North Dakota’s dairy industry has been shrinking for decades, the situation turned even more dire in 2023 when Prairie Farms Dairy closed its milk processing operation in Bismarck.
Holle said that is forcing him and others to send milk to a cheese plant in Pollock, South Dakota, nearly 90 miles south of Bismarck.
Holle said milk used for cheese production has a lower price than fluid milk and the extra freight cuts into profits.
“A lot of the dairy farmers are crunching the numbers and wondering what their future is,” Holle said.
North Dakota has fallen far behind neighboring states in the livestock sector and especially in dairy.
South Dakota put an emphasis on animal agriculture under Gov. Dennis Daugaard, who served from 2011 to 2019, and its dairy cow numbers rebounded. South Dakota went from 96,000 dairy cows in 2000 to 187,000 in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Holle said the North Dakota Department of Agriculture hasn’t done enough to support dairy farming.
“They can say that they’re doing a lot for farmers in North Dakota, which they are, but they’re not doing a lot for animal ag in North Dakota,” Holle said.
“There isn’t a lot that we can do,” Goehring said. “I mean, short of the Legislature wanting to do something more like build a processing facility, but I don’t see that happening either.”
He said the department can try to address some issues, “but it’s a difficult challenge.”
A key resource for large dairies is water supply, needing 28 to 30 gallons of water per cow each day, Koehl said. That would equal at least 700,000 gallons of water per day for the Traill County site and 350,000 gallons per day for the Richland site.
Koehl said the Riverview farms squeeze the liquid out of the manure, which can be piped to farm fields for fertilizer. The solids from the manure are dried and used for animal bedding.
Koehl said the Traill dairy would fill 22 tanker loads of milk at about 7,900 gallons per tanker – more than 170,000 gallons per day.
Beltz said he was impressed by a tour of a Riverview dairy in Minnesota.
“You wouldn’t know you were standing on a site with that many animals,” Beltz said. “They’ve been here for a while. They know how to do it right.”
This story first appeared in North Dakota Monitor, a sibling site of the Minnesota Reformer and part of States Newsroom.

North Dakota
Roots matter for award-winning regenerative North Dakota ranch family

MADDOCK, N.D. — On any given day, rancher Brian Maddock is out in the drift prairie near the town of Maddock that bears his family name, dropping hay bales on wind-scoured hilltops and hardpan soil where little else will grow.
From there, the cattle do the rest of the work. They eat, they trample, they fertilize.
Green rings begin to form where nothing grew, soft swells of emerald where cattle will graze again after they’re rotated in again from another paddock.
The soil, after years of careful management by the Maddock family, breathes again.
For that work, Brian and his wife Vicki, along with the entire Maddock family, recently received recognition as recipients of the Leopold Conservation Award, making them part of a growing lineage of farmers and ranchers proving that working lands can also heal themselves.
The transformations to the Maddock family’s 4,000 acres of ranchland didn’t come from a one-season fix. They were constructed one fence, one water line and one holistic grazing decision at a time.
For the Maddock family, it has been a way of life since the early 1990s when land they farmed near Devils Lake became inundated, forcing a shift to rotational grazing and other regenerative ranching practices.
The Leopold Conservation Award, administered by Sand County Foundation, is a nationally recognized honor celebrating outstanding voluntary conservation.
Named after conservationist Aldo Leopold, the award is now presented in 28 states. This is the 10th time the award has been given in North Dakota.
“We’re excited about the things we’re doing, raising the cattle the way we do, and we’ve changed so many things over the years,” Brian Maddock said. “In a lot of ways, it’s not more work, it’s easier.”
A pivot born of necessity
After attending a course on holistic land management through the Carrington Research Extension Center around 40 years back, Brian came back home with eyes wide open to a shift the family needed to make away from crops and toward cattle.
“That opened my mind up tremendously,” Brian Maddock said of the course.
The farm was struggling financially at the time, he said.
“He came back from that course and said we need to make changes in how we farm or we’ll have to quit farming,” said his son, Travis Maddock. “He realized, once he started looking at the whole of things, that as a farmer, he was failing to try to raise crops. He wasn’t making any money. It wasn’t going to work out.”
That soul searching led his father to understand where his strengths lay, which was managing cattle and grass, Travis said. The family looked at the land they had and saw a lot of dirt, but not much quality soil left.
“All the tops of these hills are blown right down to the clay. Can we build some soil? Can we look at that? So we start putting a lot of these principles into place,” Travis said.
From there, they started installing cross-fences, developing water systems and rotating cattle through around two dozen paddocks, eventually shifting marginal farmland with soils too thin to support crops to ones that can support cattle. That’s helped restore fertility to the land.
“That land is really designed to support cattle,” Travis Maddock said.
Through practices like livestock impact on the grassland and bale grazing, the family has been able to transform the land, he said.
“You put the bales out there and let the cattle graze them down,” Travis Maddcok said. “That gives you your soil health principles, you’ve got cover, you’ve got living roots in there, you’re increasing your water cycle, your nitrogen cycle. Underneath there, you get your microbes rocking and rolling, and they’ll build soil for you. That’s how you build soil.”
Travis talks about how, as a regenerative rancher, you really have to think about the two herds you need to manage.
“We’re feeding the cows, but we’re also feeding all those microbes in the soil. We need to feed them too, and they need to be thriving,” he said. “As long as we can have symbiosis between those two things, we have the opportunity to create something where good things are happening, whether it’s financially or ecologically.”
Since the first Leopold Conservation Award was given in 2003, the award has spread to recognize the positive things farmers and ranchers were doing across the country in stewarding working lands.
Lance Irving, vice president of Sand County Foundation, calls these recipients “quiet heroes” for the work they put into their farms and ranches.
“This is an opportunity to recognize actual working farms and ranches, where their livelihood is tied to their productivity, and how conservation is a tool in their toolbox to not only make them more environmentally resilient but also economically resilient,” Irving said.
Award winners are chosen by panels within their state designated by local partners that include the North Dakota Association of Conservation Districts, North Dakota Grazing Lands Coalition, and the North Dakota Stockman’s Association.
What stood out about Brian Maddock, Irving said, is that he’s never satisfied and always looking to improve his processes.
“He’s not doing it for himself, he’s thinking, how can I make it better for my kids, how can I make it better for my grandkids,” Irving said. “Folks of his generation willing to change what they’ve done for the last 40, 50 years, to try something new, is not something you see all the time, and that really stands out to me.”
Irving also points out the Maddock family motto of “Soil. Cattle. Family.” sums up their philosophy.
“If you take care of the soil, the soil will take care of the cattle. If you take care of the cattle, the cattle will take care of the family,” Irving said. “But that initial building block is taking care of the soil. You can’t do the others before you take care of the soil.”
Darrell Oswald, district manager for the Burleigh County Soil Conservation District, helped bring the award to North Dakota in 2015.
Judging is done by local leaders from agriculture, conservation, and state agencies.
“One thing I’ve noticed about all of the winners over the years is they all think holistically,” Oswald said. “They’re early adopters. They think outside the box. They’re not afraid to try things.”
The Maddock family is no exception, he said.
“Brian was an early adopter of multi-paddock adaptive grazing systems, and was thinking outside the box,” Oswald said. “They’re in an area where ranching is secondary to farming. They’ve carved out a living there, where annual cropping is generally king.”
As the
10th North Dakota family to receive the award
, the Maddocks join a roster of producers helping to shape regenerative agriculture in the state and region.
Other recent winners include Heaton Ranches in McKenzie, Bartholomay Kattle Kompany in Sheldon, Spring Valley Cattle in Glen Ullin and Sand Ranch near Ellendale.
“These are the elite of the elite of producers, in my mind,” Oswald said. “They’re profitable. They’re putting resources first. They’re in it for the long haul. They’re generational, and in theory, they want to farm and ranch forever and are working towards that. What they’re doing with the soil and resources is allowing them to do that, and that’s important.”
This mirrors national trends. Many Leopold winners began changing practices when their backs were against the wall — financially, ecologically, or both. Once they saw it work, they became advocates, showing neighbors what’s possible.
Irving notes that today’s regenerative ranchers don’t fit old stereotypes.
“The general public’s notion of what a farmer or rancher is not actually indicative of what this next generation is,” Irving said. “These are tech-savvy folks.”
Irving mentioned how they’re adopting GPS grazing collars, innovative water systems, soil sampling and tissue testing, and that there is more of this than ever before.
“In a way, agriculture kind of has its back against the wall, and you have to figure out how to do it, because not only is our food system relying on it, but also our rural communities,” Irving said. “Farms and ranches are the backbones of rural communities, and without them, that’s an entire way of life that becomes harder and harder.”
The North Dakota News Cooperative is a non-profit news organization providing reliable and independent reporting on issues and events that impact the lives of North Dakotans. The organization increases the public’s access to quality journalism and advances news literacy across the state. For more information about NDNC or to make a charitable contribution, please visit newscoopnd.org.
This story was originally published on NewsCoopND.org.
____________________________________
This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.
North Dakota
North Dakota taking steps to ban candy, soda purchases with SNAP benefits

How to host an inexpensive mystery party for Halloween
Turn your Halloween party into a thrilling mystery night with costumes, clues, prizes and themed fun.
Some foods such as soda and candy may soon be prohibited purchases in North Dakota through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, officials said Tuesday.
The North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services plans to seek permission from the federal government to prohibit certain foods from being purchased with SNAP benefits. The proposal was mentioned Tuesday to a legislative committee but details are still being developed.
The move is part of an effort to secure more federal funding through the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program. While states are guaranteed at least $500 million from the program, they can get more money if they enact certain policies the federal government favors.
States with pending or approved SNAP waivers that limit non-nutritious food purchases will be considered more competitive applicants, Sarah Aker, executive director of medical services for the North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services, told lawmakers.
The agency plans to apply for the waiver from the U.S. Department of Agriculture ahead of the Nov. 5 application deadline for the rural health funding.
“We’re working out the definitions so that the retail community can have a smooth transition, but we’re eliminating things that cause chronic disease, so candy and soda,” said Pat Traynor, interim Health and Human Services commissioner.
Traynor said the earliest the changes could affect North Dakota SNAP recipients is next year, and the new changes would take months to implement.
North Dakota had about 57,000 SNAP recipients in May, according to USDA data.
At least 12 states have received federal approval to restrict SNAP recipients from using their benefits to buy foods such as soda and candy, Stateline reported. Some states have restricted only soda, while others have included energy drinks, prepared desserts and other sugary drinks. The trend is related to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s push to “make America healthy again.”
Sen. Jeff Magrum, R-Hazelton, remarked during Tuesday’s legislative committee meeting that the government’s definition of what food is and isn’t healthy seems to differ over time.
“What if they ever classified beef as non-nutritious, or something to that effect?” he asked. “When they base the money on non-nutritious, that’s kind of a moving target.”
Aker said the state has control over how it defines non-nutritious food under the waiver.
Emily O’Brien, deputy commissioner for Health and Human Services, said the department is still working out which soda and candy products will be included in the waiver.
“We’re fine-tuning what the definitions look like,” O’Brien said. “We want to have buy-in, too, from our partners on implementation.”
John Dyste, president of the North Dakota Grocers Association, said he’s been in contact with state officials about the SNAP waiver and plans to meet with the department.
Dyste said he does not think prohibiting candy and soda from SNAP purchases would be difficult for grocery stores to implement, though may be more challenging for smaller stores without a point-of-sale system.
Senate Minority Leader Kathy Hogan, D-Fargo, said eliminating soda and candy from the SNAP program is a “fine idea,” and hoped it would give North Dakota’s application for the Rural Health Transformation Program a boost.
She also said she wants to be certain the state’s rural grocery stores are able to make the changes effectively without burdening their businesses.
“If the points of sale all have to be changed and it’s going to change the operations of the benefits, then they’ll get pushback for doing it,” Hogan said.
North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
North Dakota
Obituary for Ryan Allen Boyd Chennault at Thomas Family Funeral Home

-
World2 days ago
Israel continues deadly Gaza truce breaches as US seeks to strengthen deal
-
News2 days ago
Trump news at a glance: president can send national guard to Portland, for now
-
Technology2 days ago
AI girlfriend apps leak millions of private chats
-
Business2 days ago
Unionized baristas want Olympics to drop Starbucks as its ‘official coffee partner’
-
Politics2 days ago
Trump admin on pace to shatter deportation record by end of first year: ‘Just the beginning’
-
Science2 days ago
Peanut allergies in children drop following advice to feed the allergen to babies, study finds
-
News1 day ago
Books about race and gender to be returned to school libraries on some military bases
-
Politics21 hours ago
Hunter Biden breaks silence on pardon from dad Joe: ‘I realize how privileged I am’