Connect with us

North Dakota

Here’s the NRA’s grade for every North Dakota lawmaker

Published

on

Here’s the NRA’s grade for every North Dakota lawmaker


BISMARCK — A college taking pictures that left 19 kids and two lecturers useless in Texas final week has renewed cries from gun management advocates to toughen federal and state firearm laws.

Members of Congress have as soon as once more begun talks in Washington to tighten gun legal guidelines, however state legislators wield appreciable authority over firearm guidelines at an area stage.

North Dakota has among the nation’s least stringent gun legal guidelines, and legislators have not too long ago trended towards loosening restrictions on shopping for, carrying and utilizing weapons.

Final 12 months, the Republican-dominated Legislature and Gov. Doug Burgum permitted payments that

Advertisement

lowered the authorized bar for utilizing lethal drive in self-defense

,

expanded hid carry of weapons

and blocked state and native governments from closing or limiting the hours of gun ranges and shops.

Nationwide Rifle Affiliation lobbyist Brian Gosch

Advertisement

sat at a desk with Burgum and a handful of lawmakers

because the governor signed pro-gun rights laws into regulation in April 2021.

Every election, the NRA points letter grades to candidates who’re working for political workplace. The rankings are primarily based on the particular person’s public statements about gun laws, previous voting document and an NRA questionnaire, in response to Vote Good, a nonpartisan web site that compiles information about lawmakers within the U.S.

An “A-plus” grade means an official is very unlikely to vote for gun restrictions, whereas an “F” grade signifies the particular person helps gun management.

The Discussion board has determined to publish the NRA scores given to North Dakota lawmakers so residents can see how their representatives in Bismarck and Washington have voted on gun laws.

Advertisement

Rep. Ben Koppelman, a West Fargo Republican with an “A-plus” score from the NRA, stated he’s grieved for the households who misplaced kids within the Texas taking pictures, however he thinks it will be “quite foolish” to restrict Individuals’ Second Modification rights due to the regretful actions of rogue shooters.

Koppelman, who sponsored a number of of the pro-gun payments final 12 months, stated gun management measures would solely make it more durable for law-abiding residents to purchase firearms, opening the door for unhealthy actors to commit crimes with weapons they might have obtained illegally.

He added that “permitting law-abiding residents to be armed on the prepared is one of the best ways to discourage crime” when law enforcement officials or safety guards are usually not round.

Rep. Karla Rose Hanson, D-Fargo, has voted towards many pro-gun proposals and stated she’s happy with her “F-minus” score from the NRA.

Hanson stated she would assist laws to impose common background checks on these making an attempt to purchase weapons and to create a system for

Advertisement

flagging these at a excessive danger

of committing violence towards themselves or others.

She added that “sure weapons which have the aptitude of killing a mass variety of individuals haven’t any place in public areas.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum pardons Grace the turkey as Thanksgiving approaches

Published

on

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum pardons Grace the turkey as Thanksgiving approaches


BISMARCK — North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum granted clemency Monday, Nov. 25, to a fair-feathered hen named Grace, allegedly saving the turkey from what could’ve been a fateful demise come Thursday.

Grace flocked to the state Capitol in Bismarck from Fullerton to be a part of the annual, Thanksgiving-spirited event hosted by the North Dakota Turkey Federation.

She was chosen for the gig after successfully dodging the truck that took her compatriots to “their next stop,” where they will be staged to join people for Thanksgiving in a “different way,” according to Burgum.

President George W. Bush was the first president to officially pardon a turkey, according to

Advertisement

White House Archives,

but Burgum said the tradition has been a part of North Dakota’s culture since the 1970s when Gov. Art Link was in office.

North Dakota produces around

1 million turkeys

every year. That’s 39 million fewer than Minnesota —

Advertisement

the national leader

in turkey production.

The Turkey Federation will donate 32 frozen turkeys, split evenly between the Heaven’s Helpers Soup Cafe and the Abused Adult Resource Center in Bismarck.

Michelle Erickson,

Abused Adults Resource Center

Advertisement

executive director, said the center is about 2,000 shelter bed nights ahead of where the center was last year — a measure that refers to a single night a person spends sleeping in a bed provided by a shelter.

“The staff is overwhelmed, to say the least,” Erickson said. “Donations like this continually help us out and help our clients.”

Heaven Helpers Soup Cafe

founder and Director Mike Meyer said he serves upwards of 350 people daily— approximately a quarter of whom he says are experiencing homelessness.

“Our numbers have really been up as costs go up,” he said.

Advertisement

Those interested in donating or volunteering with either of the nonprofit organizations can find more information at

soupcafe.org

or

www.abusedadultresourcecenter.com/get-involved.

Advertisement
Peyton Haug joined The Forum as the Bismarck correspondent in June 2024. She interned with the Duluth News Tribune as a reporting intern in 2022 while earning bachelor’s degrees in journalism and geography at the University of Minnesota Duluth. Reach Peyton at phaug@forumcomm.com.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands • SC Daily Gazette

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands • SC Daily Gazette


A group of North Dakota tribal citizens and conservation advocates are calling on President Joe Biden to make roughly 140,000 acres of undeveloped federal land in western North Dakota a national monument.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would preserve land recognized as sacred by members of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and other Native cultures, advocates said during a Friday press conference at the North Dakota Heritage Center and State Museum.

“Maah Daah Hey” means “grandfather, long-lasting” in the Mandan language.

With its close proximity to President Theodore Roosevelt National Park, the area is popularly remembered for its ties to the former president and cowboy culture.

Advertisement

The country should honor Native historical and cultural ties to the land as well, said Michael Barthelemy, director of Native Studies at Nueta, Hidatsa, Sahnish College in New Town.

“What we’re proposing, as part of this national monument, is a reorientation around that narrative,” Barthelemy said. “When you look at the national parks and you look at the state parks, oftentimes there’s a singular perspective — as Indigenous people, we kind of play background characters.”

The monument would include 11 different plots of land along the Maah Daah Hey Trail between the north and south units of Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

Badlands Conservation Alliance Executive Director Shannon Straight likened the proposal to “stringing together the pearls of the Badlands.”

The tribal councils of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, the Spirit Lake Nation and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe have passed resolutions supporting the creation of the monument.

Advertisement

“It is important that the Indigenous history of the North Dakota Badlands is formally recognized,” state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, D-Mandaree, said during the presentation. “If created, the Maah Daah Hey National Monument would also allow Indigenous people to reconnect to our ancestral lands.”

The land is managed by the United States Forest Service. Turning the 11 plots into a national monument would protect them from future development, according to the group’s proposal.

The land is surrounded by oil and gas development, maps included in the proposal show.

In addition to being an area of significant cultural heritage for Native tribes, it’s also home to sensitive ecosystems, unique geological features and fossil sites, the proposal indicates.

Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said Friday the group has visited Washington, D.C., twice so far to speak with President Biden’s administration — including the U.S. Forest Service, Department of the Interior, United States Department of Agriculture — about the proposed monument.

Advertisement

“The reception has been pretty good,” Skokos said.

He said the group hopes to see action from Biden on the monument before he leaves office in January, but is also open to working with President-elect Donald Trump’s administration on the project.

“We believe this is a good idea, regardless of who’s president,” Skokos said.

Advocates said the designation would not impact recreational access to the land, and that cattle grazing would still be permitted.

In a statement to the North Dakota Monitor, U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., called the proposal “premature at best.” He said he was not convinced the proposal had sufficient local support from North Dakota residents and worried the project would “lock away land as conservation.”

Advertisement

“Any proposal should have extensive review as well as strong support from local communities and the stakeholders who actually use the land,” he said.

When asked for comment, the North Dakota governor’s office provided this statement from Gov. Doug Burgum, who Trump has chosen as the next Department of Interior secretary: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly and sustainably develop our vast energy resources.”

To learn more about the proposal, visit protectmdh.com. The website also includes a petition.

Presidents can designate federal land as national monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1906. The first land to receive this status was Devils Tower in Wyoming, which Roosevelt proclaimed a national monument that same year.

Should Maah Daah Hey become a national monument, it’d be the first of its kind in North Dakota.

Advertisement

Like the SC Daily Gazette, North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected]. Follow North Dakota Monitor on Facebook and X.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes’ support

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes’ support


A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres (56,546 hectares) in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the proposed monument. The National Park Service oversees many national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

Advertisement

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending