Connect with us

North Dakota

Doug Leier: Insight on a bounty system for coyotes

Published

on

Doug Leier: Insight on a bounty system for coyotes


Every few years the question of whether North Dakota should offer a bounty on coyotes surfaces again. It usually follows a tough fall deer season, a hard, cold, snowy start to winter, or a combination of it all. It’s been asked for years.

But from a wildlife management standpoint, a bounty system simply doesn’t make sense — biologically or economically.

Coyotes are adaptable survivors, and they can be tough neighbors for ranchers and hunters alike.

Doug Leier is an outreach biologist for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department. Reach him at dleier@nd.gov.
Advertisement

Let’s start with biology. Coyotes are one of the most resilient species on the landscape. Studies from across the Great Plains show that even when populations are heavily reduced, coyotes respond by increasing reproduction rates. Litter sizes grow, and survival among pups improves when competition is lower. In short, widespread killing often creates a temporary dip followed by a rebound — sometimes to even higher numbers than before.

That’s not theory; it’s decades of data. State and federal wildlife biologists have seen that removing large numbers of coyotes rarely results in long-term population control. Their range has expanded, not contracted, despite generations of organized removals and private incentives. Coyotes thrive in grasslands, cropland edges, and even on the outskirts of towns. It’s not realistic to “eliminate” them and bounties have never changed that.

I’ve suggested a parallel in the past when you deal with weeds or dandelions. You can put as much time, money and effort into controlling the yellow flowers and year after year they come back. If your neighbor doesn’t do the same, they continue to spread into your yard. Even after every dandelion is killed, they magically appear. Again. Year after year.

Then there’s economics. Administering a bounty program is expensive and inefficient. Every dollar spent on bounties is a dollar not spent on habitat restoration, access programs, wildlife management or youth education — efforts that provide measurable benefits to all North Dakotans. Paying for coyote tails or ears might feel like action, but it diverts resources from programs that actually improve wildlife management outcomes.

Advertisement

The North Dakota Game and Fish Department already works closely with USDA Wildlife Services and local landowners to address legitimate livestock depredation issues. Targeted control — where specific problem animals are removed — is far more effective than broad, untargeted bounty programs. It’s about precision, not just numbers.

At the end of the day, managing coyotes isn’t about eradicating them; it’s about understanding how they fit into our ecosystems and addressing conflicts responsibly. Coyotes help control rodents and other small mammals. Like all wildlife, they play a role and our job as stewards is to manage, not to eliminate.

When we focus on sound science and fiscal responsibility, we get better results for wildlife, producers and taxpayers. And that’s what good wildlife management has always been about in North Dakota.

Doug Leier

Doug Leier is an outreach biologist for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department. Reach him at dleier@nd.gov.

Advertisement





Source link

North Dakota

Morton County did not violate North Dakota’s open records law when the County Auditor, within a reasonable time, informed the requester that the requested records were not in the County’s possession.. – North Dakota Attorney General

Published

on


Morton County did not violate North Dakota’s open records law when the County Auditor, within a reasonable time, informed the requester that the requested records were not in the County’s possession..

February 27, 2026

Media Contact: Suzie Weigel, 701.328.2210

BISMARCK, ND – Karen Jordan requested an opinion from this office under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.1 asking whether Morton County violated N.D.C.C. § 44-04-18 by failing or refusing to provide records.

Conclusion: It is my opinion that Morton County’s response was in compliance with N.D.C.C. § 44-04-18.

Advertisement

Link to opinion 2026-O-06

###



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

ND Supreme Court Justice Daniel Crothers retiring, stepping onto new path

Published

on

ND Supreme Court Justice Daniel Crothers retiring, stepping onto new path


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – The North Dakota Court System threw a reception for a retiring member of the state Supreme Court.

Justice Daniel Cothers is leaving after serving for more than 20 years.

He plans to step down on Feb. 28.

Before Crothers became a judge, he served as a lawyer and as president of the State Bar Association of North Dakota.

Advertisement

Mark Friese is set to replace Crothers starting March 9.

“He knows what is important and what to keep focused on. Justice Friese will be an exceptional replacement to me on the bench,” said Crothers.

Crothers plans to keep up on teaching gigs and spend time at his family’s farm as he steps into retirement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota ambulance providers losing money on every run, according to survey

Published

on

North Dakota ambulance providers losing money on every run, according to survey


By: Michael Achterling

FARGO (North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota ambulance service providers lost nearly $500 on average for every patient transported to a medical facility last year, according to a survey.

The recent survey of three dozen providers in the state, conducted by PWW Advisory Group, was the result of a study created by House Bill 1322 passed during the 2025 legislative session.  The group presented the results to the Legislature’s interim Emergency Response Services Committee on Wednesday.

The average revenue generated from an ambulance transport was about $1,100 during 2025, but the expenses were nearly $1,600, said Matt Zavadsky, an EMS and mobile health care consultant with PWW, based in Pennsylvania.

Advertisement

“They are losing money every time they respond to a call,” Zavadsky said during the meeting. “That financial loss has to be made up, typically, by local tax subsidies, fundraisers, bake sales, or all too often, service reductions to try and match expenses with the revenue they can generate.” 

He said the problem cannot be fixed by billing reform alone because the revenue generated isn’t enough to fund the cost of readiness, such as personnel, equipment and supplies, among other items.

The survey highlighted 74% of ambulance provider expenses went to personnel costs, but equipment costs have also increased in recent years.

Zavadsky said survey respondents plan to invest about $12.9 million into vehicle and equipment purchases over the next five years, averaging to about $358,000 per provider. However, the cost of a new ambulance has risen to between $275,000 to $480,000 per vehicle. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new ambulance could cost up to $250,000, he said.

There are more than 100 ambulance service providers in North Dakota. The 36 survey respondents represented a diverse group of providers from city and county services to district-owned, hospital-based and private providers, he said. The average patient transport distance is 34 miles, according to the survey.

Advertisement

Zavadsky said the survey respondents reported 53% of their total revenue was generated from fees for service with the remaining 47% coming from local tax subsidies, state grants and other fundraising.

“What you guys are experiencing in North Dakota and what is happening in the local communities … is not the fault of the local communities, not the fault of the state, this is just our new normal,” Zavadsky said.

Rep. Todd Porter, R-Mandan, owner of Metro-Area Ambulance Service which serves Morton and Burleigh counties, said Medicare patients reimburse ambulance providers at a much lower rate than private insurance and Medicaid patients. He added Medicare patients make up about 60% of the call volume in the Bismarck-Mandan area.

“If we’re being underpaid for 60% of our call volume, then we have to make it up some place,” Porter said.

He said some providers can make up that difference in reimbursement with tax dollars, but not all providers have that option.

Advertisement

“We do other contracted work for nursing homes, hospitals, funeral homes in order to make up that difference,” Porter said. “This is a federal government problem. This is a CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) problem that we’ve known about for years.”

Porter also said ambulance services are not reimbursed for responding to a call with a Medicare patient that doesn’t require a transport to a hospital. According to the survey, about 17% of all ambulance calls don’t require transport to a medical facility.

The survey also showed about 2,300 of the nearly 33,600 patient transports billed last year ended up in collections after being more than 90 days delinquent, totalling $2.7 million, Zavadsky said. The average total of a claim sent to collections was about $1,100.

Zavadsky estimated the total of unpaid claims for more than 100 providers across North Dakota was about $5.8 million in 2025. Some providers don’t have procedures to pursue delinquent billing in collections, he said.

Rep. Jim Grueneich, R-Ellendale, chair of the committee, said the committee will take a deeper look at the data presented on Wednesday and may have recommendations, and possible draft legislation, to address the issue in the 2027 legislative session.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending