Connect with us

North Dakota

Crushing it: North Dakota ready to ride wave of demand for soybean oil and meal

Published

on

Crushing it: North Dakota ready to ride wave of demand for soybean oil and meal


In simply a few years, North Dakota will go from a state that exported 90% of its soybeans to a state that may course of and add worth to greater than half its soybean crop.

“It’s large,” mentioned Joe Morken, a farmer and former chairman of the North Dakota Soybean Council.

The transformation will include the development of soybean crushing crops at Spiritwood, close to Jamestown, and at Casselton, about 20 miles west of Fargo.

“You don’t even must ship to this plant to see the financial impacts,” Morken mentioned a day after the Casselton Metropolis Council on Might 2 permitted a allow for the North Dakota Soybean Processors to construct simply west of the city.

Advertisement

North Dakota Soybean Processors, a partnership between Minnesota Soybean Processors and Louisiana-based Consolidated Grain and Barge, or CGB, hope to start out building this summer season.

At Spiritwood, Archer Daniels Midland is partnering with Marathon Petroleum to transform the previous Cargill malt plant into North Dakota’s first devoted soybean processing plant.

The Inexperienced Bison plant will ship all of its soybean oil to the Marathon refinery in Dickinson, North Dakota, to be additional refined into renewable diesel.

It’s that renewable gas market that’s actually driving the trade, mentioned Jeramie Weller, the final supervisor of the Minnesota Soybean Processors plant in Brewster, Minnesota, which additionally produces biodiesel.

“With renewable diesel and the worth of soybean oil on the rise, there have been many crops which have been introduced and are being constructed,” Weller mentioned.

Advertisement

Minnesota has a 20% biofuel mix mandate in Minnesota for a part of the 12 months.

“We’re considered one of two main suppliers for that mandate in Minnesota,” Weller mentioned.

Vehicles line up on the Minnesota Soybean Processors cooperative of Brewster, Minnesota, on this 2017 file picture. The vehicles had been hauling 100% biodiesel to prospects who will mix with petroleum.

Mikkel Pates / Agweek file picture

Advertisement

However he mentioned what’s actually pushing the renewable trade alongside is the growth of their low carbon gas normal in states like California and Washington.

“So renewable diesel and biodiesel have each develop into a big participant within the state of California, additionally now in Washington due to the discount in carbon footprint that it offers,” Weller mentioned.

“We’re thrilled,” mentioned Connie Ova, government director of the Jamestown/Stutsman County Improvement Company, of the ADM-Marathon partnership.

She mentioned demolition on what was a Cargill malting plant is shifting alongside quickly. The Cargill plant was previous its helpful life and he or she is comfortable to see it being changed with a “cutting-edge facility.”

Advertisement

soybean aerial in cargil plant.jpg

An aerial view of the previous Cargill malt plant on the Spiritwood Vitality Park, 10 miles east of Jamestown, N.D., that Archer Daniels Midland Co. will convert to a soybean crushing plant that plans to start operations in 2023.

John Steiner / Jamestown Solar

She additionally mentioned BNSF Railway is within the technique of taking bids for added monitor on the rail loop that may serve the Inexperienced Bison plant and likewise serves the Dakota Spirit Ag Vitality plant that makes ethanol from corn on the Spiritwood Vitality Park.

“There’s lot of synergy there,” Ova mentioned.

The 2 crops are being inbuilt counties that aren’t solely the highest producers of soybeans in North Dakota, however rank among the many high 20 producing counties nationwide.

Advertisement

“North Dakota is without doubt one of the high 10 soybean producing states in the USA. It’s the just one that doesn’t have a devoted soybean processing facility inbuilt it … the least has two,” mentioned Scott White of North Dakota Soybean Processors. “The entire thought is so as to add worth to North Dakota produced soybeans.”

“Now we have had some outdoors research which have been carried out by soybean growers within the space they usually figured possibly 5 to 10 cents a bushel as a foundation differential premium for having devoted soy processing within the state of North Dakota,” White mentioned.

Processing 90 million bushels at a 5 to 10 cent premium, “the maths tells you it is a bump of $5 million to $9 million,” White mentioned.

Scott White.png

Scott White says the rail entry on the North Dakota Soybean Processors plant at Casselton might be key to its success.

Evan Girtz / Agweek

Advertisement

Nancy Johnson, government director of the North Dakota Soybean Council, mentioned a 5 cent per bushel premium is “very conservative” however she hasn’t seen detailed research on a possible financial impression.

North Dakota soybeans have largely been shipped by way of ports within the Pacific Northwest for China and another Asian markets. When a commerce battle erupted between the U.S. and China in 2018, North Dakota soybean growers had been collateral harm.

Johnson mentioned having native markets might be a welcome change.

“It’s an enormous alternative for North Dakota farmers,” Johnson mentioned. “Clearly there might be an impression.”

Advertisement

However she mentioned simply how huge an impression will develop into clearer this fall when the Inexperienced Bison plant begins providing contracts for supply in 2023.

One hoped for side-effect of the soybean crushing plant is to spur alongside North Dakota’s livestock trade, which lags behind its neighbors.

Johnson mentioned she additionally hoped that the supply of soybean meal may translate into extra livestock within the state.

“We’re optimistic that this may result in extra animal agriculture blossoming in North Dakota,” she mentioned. “Soybean meal is a top quality feedstuff for hogs and chickens specifically.”

Weller mentioned the Brewster plant sells quite a lot of soybean meal to the hog and poultry in its space of southwest Minnesota and neighboring states.

Advertisement

“This will likely give the state of North Dakota the chance to develop that trade,” Weller mentioned.

Jeramie Weller.png

Jeramie Weller is the final supervisor of the Minnesota Soybean Processors plant in Brewster, Minnesota.

Jeff Seaside / Agweek

Weller mentioned there are also market alternatives in Canada and Mexico and rising demand within the U.S.

Advertisement

“When you take a look at the home meal market over the past 10 years, it continues to develop by 3 to six% yearly due to the livestock trade,” Weller mentioned. “We count on that development to proceed.”

A lot of the soybean meal produced in North Dakota additionally will probably be shipped out by rail.

“That’s the place the railroad is essential,” mentioned White, with Casselton being served by BNSF and Crimson River Valley and Western railroads, making it the very best location it might discover in North Dakota.

Drawing of soybean crush plant

A rendering of the deliberate North Dakota Soybean Processors crush plant at Casselton, North Dakota.

Courtesy of North Dakota Soybean Processors

Advertisement

Not like Brewster, there gained’t be biodiesel popping out of Casselton, however it could possibly be shipped to a biodiesel refinery. The oil might be meals grade, that means it could possibly be used for french fries or any of a variety of different makes use of. However end-users of the oil haven’t been locked in but.

North Dakota could be a bit of late to the soybean crushing occasion however the occasion’s nonetheless going robust.

Jeramie Weller, normal supervisor of Minnesota Soybean Processors plant at Brewster in southwest Minnesota, can go searching and see soybean processing initiatives in each course:

Iowa: Work is underway at

Advertisement

Shell Rock Soy Processing

in Shell Rock, and

Platinum Crush

at Alta is predicted to be operational in 2024.

Minnesota: CHS has added capability at its crush facility in Fairmont, Minnesota, and crops to improve it Mankato, Minnesota, facility as effectively.

Advertisement

South Dakota: The South Dakota Soybean Processors in February introduced plans to construct a multi-seed processing plant close to Mitchell to be operational in 2025.It will likely be capable of course of soybeans and sunflowers.

Weller mentioned a crush plant doesn’t simply profit the co-op members or farmers that promote to the plant, however many elevators within the area. He mentioned 65% to 70% of its beans come from elevators.

“It offers the native elevators an excellent market,” mentioned Ron Obermoller, a member of the Minnesota Soybean Processors board of administrators.

“They (the elevators) watch the premise and we (the farmers) watch the worth,” Obermoller mentioned.

Obermoller mentioned he would have preferred to have seen the co-op have a better share of the possession within the Casselton plant, however they’ve a conservative board and “didn’t need to danger an excessive amount of.”

Advertisement

There is not going to be a separate set of shares for North Dakota Soy Processors. Farmers enthusiastic about shares will purchase into Minnesota Soy Processors, with Weller saying some have already got purchased shares by way of the co-op’s web site.

Weller mentioned inventory shares have been rising in worth steadily, particularly because the Casselton challenge was introduced in December.

As of Might 16, the newest transaction had been for $5.50 per share however there have been affords for $5.70 and in April there was a big transaction for $5.75 per share. The minimal buy-in is 2,000 shares.

Final 12 months, Minnesota Soybean Processors paid a dividend of 80 cents per share, Weller mentioned.

Obermuller mentioned that interprets to about one other $2 million in earnings for the two,300 or so co-op members that features producers in South Dakota and Iowa.

Advertisement

Minnesota Soybean Processors started crushing soybeans in 2003 after which in 2005 added a biodiesel plant that was expanded in 2017. About half the soybean oil it produces goes to biodiesel.

So how did the soybean crushing occasion get began?

“It form of got here along with a bunch of farmers standing in line ready to dump beans on the native elevator, mentioned Obermoller, who was a part of the group that based Minnesota Soy Processors within the late Nineteen Nineties. “Generally it took two-three hours to do away with a load of beans on the elevator. You stand round and speak, that’s actually the place it began.”

After taking about 4 years to get the Brewster plant up and operating, Obermoller mentioned the Casselton timeline appears very totally different: “What’s occurring up there may be warp velocity in comparison with what we’re used to.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands • SC Daily Gazette

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands • SC Daily Gazette


A group of North Dakota tribal citizens and conservation advocates are calling on President Joe Biden to make roughly 140,000 acres of undeveloped federal land in western North Dakota a national monument.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would preserve land recognized as sacred by members of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and other Native cultures, advocates said during a Friday press conference at the North Dakota Heritage Center and State Museum.

“Maah Daah Hey” means “grandfather, long-lasting” in the Mandan language.

With its close proximity to President Theodore Roosevelt National Park, the area is popularly remembered for its ties to the former president and cowboy culture.

Advertisement

The country should honor Native historical and cultural ties to the land as well, said Michael Barthelemy, director of Native Studies at Nueta, Hidatsa, Sahnish College in New Town.

“What we’re proposing, as part of this national monument, is a reorientation around that narrative,” Barthelemy said. “When you look at the national parks and you look at the state parks, oftentimes there’s a singular perspective — as Indigenous people, we kind of play background characters.”

The monument would include 11 different plots of land along the Maah Daah Hey Trail between the north and south units of Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

Badlands Conservation Alliance Executive Director Shannon Straight likened the proposal to “stringing together the pearls of the Badlands.”

The tribal councils of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, the Spirit Lake Nation and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe have passed resolutions supporting the creation of the monument.

Advertisement

“It is important that the Indigenous history of the North Dakota Badlands is formally recognized,” state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, D-Mandaree, said during the presentation. “If created, the Maah Daah Hey National Monument would also allow Indigenous people to reconnect to our ancestral lands.”

The land is managed by the United States Forest Service. Turning the 11 plots into a national monument would protect them from future development, according to the group’s proposal.

The land is surrounded by oil and gas development, maps included in the proposal show.

In addition to being an area of significant cultural heritage for Native tribes, it’s also home to sensitive ecosystems, unique geological features and fossil sites, the proposal indicates.

Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said Friday the group has visited Washington, D.C., twice so far to speak with President Biden’s administration — including the U.S. Forest Service, Department of the Interior, United States Department of Agriculture — about the proposed monument.

Advertisement

“The reception has been pretty good,” Skokos said.

He said the group hopes to see action from Biden on the monument before he leaves office in January, but is also open to working with President-elect Donald Trump’s administration on the project.

“We believe this is a good idea, regardless of who’s president,” Skokos said.

Advocates said the designation would not impact recreational access to the land, and that cattle grazing would still be permitted.

In a statement to the North Dakota Monitor, U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., called the proposal “premature at best.” He said he was not convinced the proposal had sufficient local support from North Dakota residents and worried the project would “lock away land as conservation.”

Advertisement

“Any proposal should have extensive review as well as strong support from local communities and the stakeholders who actually use the land,” he said.

When asked for comment, the North Dakota governor’s office provided this statement from Gov. Doug Burgum, who Trump has chosen as the next Department of Interior secretary: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly and sustainably develop our vast energy resources.”

To learn more about the proposal, visit protectmdh.com. The website also includes a petition.

Presidents can designate federal land as national monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1906. The first land to receive this status was Devils Tower in Wyoming, which Roosevelt proclaimed a national monument that same year.

Should Maah Daah Hey become a national monument, it’d be the first of its kind in North Dakota.

Advertisement

Like the SC Daily Gazette, North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected]. Follow North Dakota Monitor on Facebook and X.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes’ support

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes’ support


A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres (56,546 hectares) in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the proposed monument. The National Park Service oversees many national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

Advertisement

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Two people hospitalized following domestic assault and shooting in Fargo, suspect dead

Published

on

Two people hospitalized following domestic assault and shooting in Fargo, suspect dead


FARGO — Two people were injured in a separate domestic aggravated assault and shooting Saturday, Nov. 23, and the suspect is dead from what appeared to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the Fargo Police Department said.

Fargo police were dispatched at 2:19 a.m. to a report of a domestic aggravated assault and shooting in the 5500 block of 36th Avenue South, a police department news release said.

When officers arrived, they learned the suspect had committed aggravated assault on a victim, chased that person into an occupied neighboring townhouse and fired shots into the unit.

Another person inside the townhouse was struck by gunfire, police said. Both victims were taken to a local hospital for treatment of non-life threatening injuries.

Advertisement

Officers found the suspect’s vehicle parked in the 800 block of 34th Street North by using a FLOCK camera system to identify a possible route of travel from the crime scene, the release said.

Police also used Red River Valley SWAT’s armored Bearcat vehicle to get close to the suspect’s vehicle to make contact with the driver, who was not responding to officers’ verbal commands to come out of the vehicle.

The regional drone team flew a drone to get a closer look inside the suspect’s vehicle. Officers found the suspect was dead from what appeared to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the release said.

This investigation is still active and ongoing. No names were released by police on Saturday morning.

Anyone with information about this incident is asked to call Red River Regional Dispatch at 701-451-7660 and request to speak with a shift commander. Anonymous tips can be submitted by texting keyword FARGOPD and the tip to 847411.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending