Connect with us

Nebraska

Summer EBT in Nebraska rolled out after governor’s controversial denial

Published

on

Summer EBT in Nebraska rolled out after governor’s controversial denial


LINCOLN – Sherry Brooks-Nelson has been very busy in her kitchen preparing chili, spaghetti and meatballs with bell peppers, and even fresh cornbread. The 66-year-old retiree most recently worked as a middle school cafeteria worker, and as the sole provider for her two teenage granddaughters, she doesn’t always have the resources to cook these big meals.

Nebraska’s Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer program, a federal initiative to feed hungry kids during the long summer months, helped Brooks-Nelson and thousands of families that would’ve otherwise gone hungry.

Over the summer, the extra $40 per month per child for three months helped families across the state buy fresh produce they don’t usually have in their grocery budget, such as cabbage, spinach, cauliflower, broccoli, apples and bananas.

“We’re able to get some things that we’re not used to eating because we just don’t have the money,” Brooks-Nelson said. “It’s a lot of money for me because I know how to stretch it. We love spinach and cabbage around here.”

But families like Brooks-Nelson’s in Nebraska almost didn’t get summer EBT benefits.

Advertisement

Last December, Nebraska was under the national spotlight when Gov. Jim Pillen rejected $18 million in grocery-buying federal funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to help feed low-income Nebraskans, telling the media he didn’t “believe in welfare.” But in February, Pillen changed course after young Nebraskans and state lawmakers from both political parties convinced him to opt into the program.

Pillen’s initial reasoning for not opting into summer EBT was his argument that Nebraska’s Summer Food Service Program, which created a system of sites where children could access free meals, was adequate enough and helped provide important touch points for check-ins with families.

But advocates and lawmakers said it wasn’t enough, including Republican state Sen. Ray Aguilar, who prioritized a bill urging the state to opt into summer EBT. He had heard from former and current school administrators in Grand Island, a city in his district just west of Lincoln, that the area had the highest rate of students eligible for free and reduced lunches in the state.

“They were well aware that in the summertime, without cafeteria service, there’s kids going hungry,” Aguilar told USA TODAY. “That was an important reason, as far as I was concerned. Hearing from them, and coupled with the fact that I don’t want to see any kids go hungry, I thought it was kind of a no-brainer for me to jump on that.”

Advertisement

But more than a dozen states — all with Republican governors — refused the federal funds, including Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Wyoming, according to the USDA.

According to the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, the state distributed about $28 million in summer EBT funding to over 76,000 households.

“Under Governor Pillen’s direction, DHHS successfully developed the “Nebraska way” of implementing the S-EBT program while also identifying additional needs of children and their families through multiple touchpoints,” the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Service said in a statement to USA TODAY.

Advertisement

Eric Savaiano, a program manager at Nebraska Appleseed, a non-profit that advocates for underserved communities, said they heard from families who were “excited” about receiving EBT cards. He noted that while summer meal sites help families while school is out, they aren’t as accessible in the state’s rural areas, and summer EBT helped fill those gaps.

“We’re a very rural state, and it’s hard to go to those summer food service program sites,” Savaiano said. “Although there’s some new options that make it a little bit easier and spreads a bit more of the meals around, this is a program that reaches a ton more kids and can be a real lifeline.”

‘It’s just one thread’

While Nebraska rolled out summer EBT, across the state’s eastern border in the neighboring state of Iowa, Gov. Kim Reynolds chose not to have the state participate in the program this year, arguing that it was unsustainable and didn’t adequately address the state’s high childhood obesity rates.

“An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Reynolds said in a December press release.

Advertisement

Luke Elzinga, chair of the Iowa Hunger Coalition, saw the negative impacts of the decision, with more children using food pantries this summer compared to past years when pandemic benefits were going out.

“In Iowa, we had 245,000 kids who would have qualified for this. It was $29 million in benefits could have gone out, and that certainly would have had an impact,” Elzinga said.

Alicia Christensen, the director of advocacy and policy for Together Omaha, an organization focused on combating homelessness and hunger, said there was a difference in traffic between their food pantry in Omaha, Neb., and their Council Bluffs location right across the border in Iowa.

Christensen noted that although the differences in food pantry usage can’t be attributed to one program, it didn’t hurt to have summer EBT in Nebraska, saying it worked in combination with other food and nutrition programs to help strengthen both food and nutrition security.

Advertisement

“It’s just one thread in different things that make up the whole cloth of that supportive system,” Christensen said. “The school lunch and breakfast program is a component, along with SNAP and WIC. And then summer EBT is just another. The more threads you have woven in there, the stronger it’s going to be, and when you take one of those out, it shifts all those resources downstream.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nebraska

Badger women's basketball loses by 31 at Nebraska

Published

on

Badger women's basketball loses by 31 at Nebraska


LINCOLN, Ne. (WMTV) – Wisconsin women’s basketball lost 91-60 at Nebraska on Monday.

This was the Badgers’ seventh-straight loss. They have no won a game since December 20 and have only one Big Ten win this year.

Junior forward Serah Williams had a game-high 20 points and eight rebounds. Freshman Carter McCray had 14 points and junior Ronnie Porter had 11. The Cornhuskers went on a 15-0 run in the second quarter.

Wisconsin only shot 38% from the floor, while Nebraska shot 54%.

Advertisement

Up next, the Badgers will play at no. 23 Minnesota on Sunday at 2:00 PM.

Click here to download the WMTV15 News app or our WMTV15 First Alert weather app.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nebraska

Central Nebraska service center sells discount gas for President Trump's inauguration

Published

on

Central Nebraska service center sells discount gas for President Trump's inauguration


LINCOLN, Neb. (KLKN) – A central Nebraska service center made an impactful statement Monday, selling discount gas for President Trump’s inauguration.

Palser Service Center in Central City sold gas for .47 cents per gallon, honoring Trump as the 47th President of the United States.

Elliot Grosshans, the owner of the gas station, said about 80 cars showed up, with the line wrapping around the corner and leaking onto the highway.

The gas station sold out of gas in about two hours, according to Grosshans.

Advertisement

At the end of the day, Grosshans lost about $10,000, but he said it’s more important to leave a lasting impression in his community.

“Giving back to my community is way more important than money ever will be,” said Grosshans. “I lost thousands of dollars today, but bringing the community together like this was a lot of fun and very rewarding. This was one thing I could do to give back to the community, save people some money and show support for our 47th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. Being a proud American, I am excited for what the future holds for our great country!”





Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska Think-Tank Mimics ‘DOGE’ with ‘G.O.A.T. Initiative’ Bill Package

Published

on

Nebraska Think-Tank Mimics ‘DOGE’ with ‘G.O.A.T. Initiative’ Bill Package


A new package of bills introduced in the Nebraska Legislature, inspired by Elon Musk’s forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is set to continue a game of hack ‘n slash against red tape and regulations on industry in the state.

The “Regulatory Modernization Package” authored by The Platte Institute, a local libertarian/free-market-oriented think-tank, has chosen a different eponymous animal acronym for the initiative — G.O.A.T. (Government Oversight, Accountability, and Transparency).

The GOAT Initiative is comprised of six legislative bills, all seeking to rework the states regulatory landscape in different ways. Each bill has either a republican and democrat lawmakers sponsoring the legislation, presenting a bipartisan front in Nebraska’s technically non-partisan, one-house political body.

Those six lawmakers, plus Speaker of the Legislature John Arch, spoke on these bills during a Jan. 16 press conference in the Capitol Rotunda alongside officials with the Platte Institute, namely, former State Senators Dr. Laura Ebke and Nicole Fox.

Advertisement

“We believe that the time is right for rethinking how we regulate economic activity in our state,” Ebke began the conference, citing President Trump’s forthcoming DOGE department and Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds announcing plans to establish a similar agency during her Condition of the State address last week. “The senators introducing legislation in this package have decided not to wait on an advisory body to make recommendations and instead are taking the goat by the horns.”

The six proposals of the G.O.A.T. Initiative are:

(1) The REINS Act, introduced by Sen. Merv Riepe (R) of Omaha, would require legislative review and approval of any regulation with an annual economic impact exceeding $1 million over five years, or $200,000 per year. It will allow the Legislature to reconsider the authorization of legislation if an economic impact statement shows the impact to be significant.

(2) LB 29, introduced by Sen. Danielle Conrad (D) of Lincoln, would codify a 2017 Executive Order from then Governor Pete Ricketts which would mandate regular reviews (every 3 years) of existing regulations and submission of reports to the Legislature.

(3) Establish a Federal Fund Inventory, a bill to be introduced by freshman Sen. Bob Andersen (R) of Omaha, would mandate an audit of federal funds received by Nebraska, except those going to the University of Nebraska and state colleges. The bill would require auditors track how long the grant program lasts, if there are state matching requirements, or if there are maintenance requirements attached. It requires that an operating plan be in place should the federal receipts be reduced by 25% or more from the preceding fiscal year.

Advertisement

(4) A bill to allow for Venue Freedom, or in other words, allowing businesses to resolve disputes with state agencies in their local courts, not necessarily in Lincoln/Lancaster County as is now required by law. This bill is to be introduced by Sen. Tanya Storer (R) of Whitman.

(5) The creation of an Office of Regulatory Management in the executive branch, which would be tasked with conducting cost-benefit analyses of rules and regulations. A similar office established in Virginia was cited as a successful version of this program. This bill is to be introduced by Sen. Dan McKeon (R) of Sweetwater.

(6) Reform to Regulatory Advisories, a bill to be introduced by Sen. Dan Quick (D) of Grand Island, which would prevent regulatory advisories issued by agencies from being binding on businesses and others regulated by the agency unless required to remain in compliance with federal regulations, in which case the binding advisory cannot be stricter than that required by the federal rule.

While Speaker Arch isn’t sponsoring any of these bills, he spoke in support of the package and headlined a related bill he has introduced at the behest of Gov. Jim Pillen — LB 346 — which seeks to eliminate or consolidate the duties of over 40 of the state’s 225 boards, commissions, committees, councils, funds, panels, task forces, etc.

“These bills that are being brought, I think will improve the function of government, and that’s certainly been my passion,” said Arch, noting that certain regulations are established in reaction to a recent event or finding. He said the a periodic review of these regulations, through LB 29, will “make sure that the value that these regulations are providing are still there.”

Advertisement

Speaking on LB 29, Conrad said, “One of the most significant problems when it comes to regulatory reform and bureaucratic bloat is that it gets on autopilot and it evades review… We will ensure that there will be legislative eyes and ears on every rule and regulation that emanates from the bureaucracy on a periodic basis.”

When then Gov. Ricketts first issued this executive order in 2017, according to the Platte Institute, Nebraska had 100,627 rules and regulations on the books. Over several years, this order shrunk that number to 76,201 — a reduction of about 24.3%.

“That was an excellent first start, but we can’t rest on those laurels,” said Conrad.

Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, Chair of the Government, Military, and Veterans Affairs Committee, the committee which all of these bills are likely to be referred to, said the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 reversal of the Chevron deference “generated a great deal of national interest of regulatory reform.”

The deference, set in 1984 in a case involving the oil giant, gave federal agencies wide powers to interpret laws and decide the best ways to apply them. In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court weakened the powers of federal agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency.

Advertisement

“Every Senator swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it’s our responsibility to honor that commitment by ensuring the legislative process remains the cornerstone of decision making in our state,” said Sanders. “I look forward to hearing [these bills in committee] and finding ways to advance as many of these measures as possible.”

Officials with the Platte Institute repeatedly thanked the Americans for Prosperity (AFP) Nebraska chapter and it’s director, John Gage, for helping author the package. Founded in 2004, AFP is a conservative political advocacy group affiliated with Charles Koch and the late David Koch, who have been prominent funders of think-tanks that lobby to oppose environmental regulation.

Asked for an estimate on the cost-saving potential of this package, Ebke cited a recent study done for the Platte Institute by Patrick McLaughlin, a Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center, another free-market-oriented think-tank, also with ties to the Koch family.

McLaughlin’s study argues that regulatory “burdens” can hamper the growth rate of a state’s gross domestic product (GDP), or the total value of everything a state produces in goods and services. While a growing GDP is a useful sign of economic health, it’s not the whole story. Economists often look at other indicators — like income distribution, environmental health, and quality of life — to get a fuller picture. McLaughlin argues for a generic “one in, one out” or “net zero” approach to state regulations.

Leaning on studies produced by the Mercatus Center, McLaughlin also claims that government regulations on industry impose a disproportionate cost on low-income households. The data framework used to draw this conclusion does not account for any benefits to wellbeing reaped by regulatory safeguards.

Advertisement

According to Mercatus’ methodology, the state facing the “worst” federal regulatory burden is Louisiana. As is the case, Louisiana has a large presence of certain highly regulated sectors, such as “chemical products manufacturing” and “oil and gas extraction.” The Center for Progressive Reform, a left-of-center political research and advocacy group, sites the 2010 BP oil spill and Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley” — an 85-mile stretch in the River Parishes of Louisiana which is home to over 200 petrochemical plants and refineries — as reasons for increasing/maintaining regulations on industry. Regulations which have resulted from these occurrences are, albeit, lumped together pejoratively with all regulations in the Mercatus methodology.

“No one here is saying that we’re going to eliminate every single rule and regulation,” Conrad said to reporters when asked about striking the right balance. “What we are saying is that rules and regulations should only be utilized under clear legislative guidance to advance consumer safety, public health and welfare.”

“When we remove red-tape and require precision in lawmaking through [the legislature], we’re standing up for the people,” she continued. “There will still be rules and regulations for certain areas we cannot legislate to a certain level of precision. But they should only be there to protect the consumer’s health, welfare, and safety. They shouldn’t be there to expand the power of unelected bureaucrats.”

Critics of this package may cite the powerful influence of money in politics and partisan nature of the state legislature as reason not to trust the fate of each regulation, on a fluid basis, with an elected political body. But, as warped as it can seem, the will of the people of Nebraska is ideally reflected in it’s lawmakers who are held accountable by voters.

Lawmakers will begin to hold hearings on these bill this week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending