Connect with us

Nebraska

Nebraska senators not among those voting in support of bill protecting same-sex marriage

Published

on

Nebraska senators not among those voting in support of bill protecting same-sex marriage


Democrats are celebrating their win within the U.S. Senate with a razor-thin majority. Now the nation waits to study the destiny of the the Home of Representatives, which is leaning towards Republican management.


LINCOLN — The U.S. Senate cleared a significant procedural hurdle Wednesday to enshrine protections for same-sex and interracial marriages, although it did so with out the assist of Nebraska’s two senators.

Sen. Deb Fischer, citing issues over non secular liberties, joined 36 of her Republican colleagues in voting in opposition to advancing the laws, whereas Sen. Ben Sasse missed the vote to remain in Nebraska the place his spouse, Melissa, was recovering from a seizure.

Advertisement

She suffered the seizure, described by a spokesman as important however non-life-threatening, over the weekend whereas Sasse and their son Breck had been deer looking. Spokesman James Wegmann famous that Melissa suffered a life-threatening vertebral dissection in 2007 and has suffered occasional seizures in recent times.

“Melissa is recovering effectively however Ben will stay in Nebraska along with her the subsequent few days specializing in neurology consultations,” Wegmann wrote in an e-mail.

Individuals are additionally studying…

Advertisement

The choice to stay in Nebraska meant Nebraska’s junior senator, who plans to resign in January to grow to be the subsequent president on the College of Florida, didn’t vote on the laws, dubbed the Respect for Marriage Act.

Sasse’s choice to guide Florida’s flagship college drew opposition from college students and workers, who expressed concern over the senator’s stance on same-sex marriage. Throughout his first go to to campus, he confronted a big scholar protest that prompted a short lived ban on protests inside campus buildings.

Through the closing vote that sealed his choice as the subsequent president, Sasse informed officers that he believes people had been created with “immeasurable dignity.” He additionally repeated a promise to fulfill with an LGBTQ+ rights group on the college.

Sasse’s spokesman didn’t reply to an e-mail asking if the senator had indicated whether or not he would have supported the Respect for Marriage Act Wednesday.

Advertisement

The laws would repeal the Clinton-era Protection of Marriage Act and require states to acknowledge all marriages that had been authorized the place they had been carried out. The brand new legislation would additionally shield interracial marriages by requiring states to acknowledge authorized marriages no matter “intercourse, race, ethnicity, or nationwide origin.”

Although the laws nonetheless wants closing approval within the Senate, Wednesday’s vote was important in that it signaled sufficient bipartisan assist to in the end move. In whole, 12 Republicans voted with all 50 Democrats to maneuver ahead on the laws. A closing vote might come as quickly as this week, or later this month.

In a press release, Fischer cited arguments echoed by a few of her Republican colleagues, together with the assumption that the laws is pointless as a result of same-sex marriages have been authorized throughout the U.S. for the reason that Supreme Courtroom’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

“I consider each American deserves to be handled with dignity and respect,” Fischer mentioned. “Presently, same-sex marriages throughout the nation are authorized, and have been for the reason that Obergefell ruling. They’ll proceed to stay authorized whatever the passage of this laws.”

Efforts to enshrine protections for same-sex marriage have gained regular momentum for the reason that Supreme Courtroom’s June determination that overturned Roe v. Wade and the federal proper to an abortion. An opinion at the moment from Justice Clarence Thomas instructed that an earlier excessive courtroom determination defending same-sex marriage might additionally come underneath risk.

Advertisement

Public assist for same-sex marriage has risen sharply in recent times, together with amongst Republicans. Latest polling has discovered greater than two-thirds of the general public helps same-sex unions.

The Respect for Marriage Act handed the Home of Representatives earlier this 12 months with bipartisan assist. Rep. Don Bacon, who represents the Omaha space in Congress, was one among 47 Home Republicans who voted in favor of the laws.

Nonetheless some Republicans had been reluctant to assist the act. Along with arguments that it was pointless, some expressed issues that the laws would infringe on non secular liberties.

Lawmakers sought to assuage these worries through a proposed modification to the invoice. The modification clarifies that the invoice doesn’t have an effect on rights of personal people or companies which are already enshrined in legislation. One other tweak makes clear {that a} marriage is between two folks, an effort to chase away some far-right criticism that the laws might endorse polygamy.

The adjustments didn’t seem to allay issues for all lawmakers, together with Fischer.

Advertisement

“Nonetheless, I’ve issues that this invoice might infringe upon non secular liberties — a basic constitutional proper. For these causes, I voted no,” she mentioned in her assertion.

The Republicans who voted for the laws had been Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Thom Tillis and Richard Burr of North Carolina, Rob Portman of Ohio, Todd Younger of Indiana, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Mitt Romney of Utah, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming and Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan of Alaska.

Senate Democrats are shortly shifting to move the invoice whereas the social gathering nonetheless controls the Home, which might want to vote on the amended laws. Republicans received the Home majority Wednesday and are unlikely to take up the problem subsequent 12 months.

In a press release after Wednesday’s vote, President Joe Biden mentioned that he would signal the invoice as soon as it’s handed.

“Love is love, and People ought to have the appropriate to marry the particular person they love,” Biden mentioned.

Advertisement

 gained regular momentum for the reason that Supreme Courtroom’s June determination that overturned Roe v. Wade and the federal proper to an abortion. An opinion at the moment from Justice Clarence Thomas instructed that an earlier excessive courtroom determination defending same-sex marriage might additionally come underneath risk.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nebraska

Nebraska Baseball at Michigan State Friday Game Thread

Published

on

Nebraska Baseball at Michigan State Friday Game Thread


Nebraska Cornhuskers (33-18) at Michigan State Spartans (23-26)

Location: McLane Baseball Stadium at Kobs Field, East Lansing, MI

Date/Time: May 17th at 4pm CDT

Head Coaches: Jake Boss Jr. (16th season, 432-393) & Will Bolt (5th season, 130-93-1)

Advertisement

TV/Stream: BTN

Radio: Huskers Radio Network, Huskers.com, Huskers App

Probable Pitchers: RHP Mason McConnaughey (6-3, 3.09 ERA) vs. LHP Nick Powers (6-4, 5.69 ERA)

Nebraska has achieved objective #1 on the weekend and clinched a top 3 seed in the Big Ten Tournament, which means they will play on Tuesday. That gives them an extra day of rest for the bullpen and potentially a lot of rest if they win their first game or 2.

Now for the primary objective. They sit 1 game back of Illinois still, but hold all tiebreakers. So any combination of 3 Purdue or Husker wins gives NU not only a tie for the championship, but the top seed in Omaha.

Advertisement

Michigan State has one consistently good pitcher on their staff, and he started yesterday’s game. They often have to win Saturday games 12-10 or in that neighborhood, and almost never win on Sundays. So Nebraska should feel good having McConnaughey and a hot Brockett in waiting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Grand Island gallery serves as an outlet for Nebraska artists

Published

on

Grand Island gallery serves as an outlet for Nebraska artists


GRAND ISLAND, Neb. (KOLN) – During a visit to Studio 10 Art Gallery in downtown Grand Island, we discovered art work on display produced by artists from all over the state.

We talked with owner Heidi Sack about her business. “I’m showcasing statewide artists,” Sack said. “This is a place where they can display their work for the public. All of the artists in the gallery are either from Nebraska, or have some roots in Nebraska.” The kind of media you’ll find in the gallery ranges from pottery to acrylic and oil paintings. “Pretty much anything you want to see out of art, you’ll find here in the gallery,” Sack said. “All of the art in the store is for sale. The fun part about buying a local piece of art is, you will always have something totally different from anything else.”

The building that Studio 10 Art Gallery is housed inside used to be a mortuary, then it was First National Bank. Then it was Gorman’s men’s clothing store, and since then, it’s served as an art gallery for 25 years. The business is located in downtown Grand Island, and Sack says downtown an exciting place to be. “There is so much going on in this area,” Sack said. “They are really building up Railside. There are fun activities, and it’s just a great place for people to come and enjoy.”

Gallery owner Heidi Sack has always had an interest in art. “I grew up in Oshkosh,” Sack said. “I loved art from a young age. My mom was an artist. I also had an amazing art teacher in high school that was very supportive. I’ve always wanted to own an art gallery, and I’m blessed to run something like this.” Sack has been operating Studio 10 Art Gallery since 2022. “My artists spend a lot of time and talent doing what they love,” Sack said. “They need a place to showcase what they love to do.” The Studio 10 Art Gallery is on this year’s Nebraska Tourism passport program, and Sack says she’s already seeing plenty of visitors thanks to the passport.

Advertisement

Click here to subscribe to our 10/11 NOW daily digest and breaking news alerts delivered straight to your email inbox.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska lawmakers unanimously pass privacy law • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Nebraska lawmakers unanimously pass privacy law • Nebraska Examiner


In 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Americans have a right to privacy when supporting nonprofit causes. This year, Nebraska lawmakers unanimously passed legislation to implement that ruling and guard against privacy violations by state agencies.

The Personal Privacy Protection Act, included in Legislative Bill 43, prohibits state officials from going beyond existing law to demand or expose Nebraskans’ personal information and donation records to nonprofits. The law ensures that citizens can safely and privately give to the causes they care about without fear of their data being leaked or abused by government agencies.

The rise of doxing and an increasingly heated political environment have raised awareness of the need to enhance privacy protections in current law. Nonprofits depend on the ability to protect their members when speaking out about contested issues in government and society. Every American should be free to join and support groups that advocate for their beliefs without harassment or retaliation.

State Sens. Rita Sanders, a Republican, and Danielle Conrad, a Democrat, cosponsored LB 43. The bipartisan legislation passed unanimously, without a single vote against the bill at any stage of the legislative process. On March 27, Gov. Jim Pillen signed the bill into law.

Advertisement

“I see it as really the right to associate with your fellow citizens, with your neighbors in support of causes that you believe in and free from government interference,” said Conrad at a hearing on the initial version of the bill.

“I may support organizations that Senator Conrad doesn’t and the same may be true the other way around,” said Sanders. “But we both believe in protecting everyone’s right and freedom of speech, specifically by supporting nonprofit organizations privately and without harassment. This is something we can all agree on.”

The law was also supported by a variety of nonprofit groups, some of whom disagree passionately on most policy issues. Among the supporters were the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, Alliance Defending Freedom, Americans for Prosperity, Nebraska Cattlemen, Nebraska Family Alliance, People United for Privacy, Platte Institute, and the University of Nebraska System. Several groups testified in support of the bill as a vital protection for the First Amendment right to collective expression and the related right to associational privacy.

The Supreme Court’s concern for donor privacy is longstanding. In the 2021 case,

Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFPF) v. Bonta, California’s attorney general demanded that all registered nonprofits in the state submit their confidential donor list to state officials. In striking down the demand, the Supreme Court pointed to a litany of previous cases defending the right to privacy in association.

Advertisement

In the 1950s, Alabama state officials sought to force the NAACP to disclose its membership list. The state’s demand

 was a straightforward and brazen attempt to smother the burgeoning  Civil Rights Movement in Alabama. Fortunately, the court struck down the state’s demand unanimously and ruled that Americans have a constitutional right to join and support nonprofits without being monitored by state officials.

NAACP v. Alabama was followed by several other cases further establishing the right to privacy in association. Yet, despite these rulings and 

AFPF v. Bonta, some state officials and activists continue to seek ways to compel nonprofits with missions they oppose to expose their supporters’ names and home addresses. The goal is always the same: to name-and-shame donors, intimidate and harass them into silence, and ultimately, shut down groups they disagree with.

Nebraskans now have an additional layer of privacy to protect them from those harms. They are not alone. Eighteen other states have adopted similar laws in recent years in response to the court’s 2021 decision and growing concerns about personal privacy and political violence.

Advertisement

The bipartisan privacy movement in Nebraska and elsewhere is a hopeful sign for our country. The Cornhusker State now becomes a landmark in that movement through the unanimous passage of LB 43.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending