Connect with us

Missouri

Missouri House committee wary of court fee to fund sheriff’s retirement

Published

on

Missouri House committee wary of court fee to fund sheriff’s retirement


(The Middle Sq.) – Asking Missouri voters to determine on including a civil court docket price to fund the Sheriffs’ Retirement Fund raised issues in a Home committee.

Home Joint Decision 136, sponsored by Rep. Barry Hovis, R-Whitewater, would require voters to approve a constitutional modification to allow a price of $7 for any preliminary submitting of any civil case in Missouri state courts. The price could be despatched to the State Treasurer and deposited into the Sheriffs’ Retirement Fund.

The Sheriffs’ Retirement Fund was defunded final yr by a Missouri Supreme Courtroom ruling.

Advertisement

Daven Fowler and Jerry Keller pleaded responsible after getting rushing tickets in 2017 within the Kansas Metropolis space. As they paid their fines, they seen a $3 price was added for the Missouri Sheriffs’ Retirement System. The Missouri Legislature permitted a $3 surcharge in 1984 on all civil actions and legal circumstances filed within the courts, together with violation of any county ordinance or any violation of legal or visitors legal guidelines, together with infractions, and ordered the funds payable to the Sheriffs’ Retirement System.

The Missouri Supreme Courtroom unanimously overturned the legislation, stating court docket prices used to reinforce compensation paid to govt officers will not be “fairly associated to the expense of the administration of justice” and violated the structure.

“This positioned the Sheriffs’ Retirement Fund in an untenable place except they discover a new income supply,” Hovis stated.

The decision’s fiscal observe said the six-year common of civil circumstances was roughly 320,000. At $7 per case, the Sheriff’s Retirement Fund would obtain roughly $2.2 million per yr.

“I’m simply curious,” Rep. Michael O’Donnell, R-St. Louis, stated throughout a Home Pension Committee listening to on April 6. “Why are we going with this funding supply? Clearly, they want the funding. However why cannot we do one thing with the finances?”

Advertisement

Chuck Hatfield, an lawyer for the Sheriff’s Retirement Fund, testified the group reviewed funding sources.

“There are plenty of methods to do it,” Hatfield stated. “You might impose another tax or give you the cash someplace else. This concept is to mainly proceed what’s been completed prior to now, which is to proceed charging a price on filings. We did transfer from legal fillings to civil filings.”

Rep. Invoice Owen, R-Springfield, prompt the Sheriffs’ Retirement Fund may very well be added to a different state retirement system, such because the Missouri Native Authorities Staff Retirement System, often known as LAGERS.

“There’s at all times plenty of dialogue – and this committee has in all probability had some – about what makes essentially the most sense and the way will we mix the entire investments,” Hatfield stated. “We now have plenty of completely different retirement methods for an entire bunch of causes.”

Scott Walterbach of the Missouri Collectors Bar stated the retirement system is a worthy trigger, however testified in opposition to including the price.

Advertisement

“We predict court docket charges ought to mirror the price of administering justice and court docket functioning,” Walterback stated. “And so actually that is simply our objection to together with it as a court docket value. We imagine it isn’t good for enterprise.”

The laws has but to be voted on throughout subsequent conferences by the Pension Committee.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Missouri

Messenger: Are there still debtors’ prisons in Missouri? This case suggests yes.

Published

on

Messenger: Are there still debtors’ prisons in Missouri? This case suggests yes.


BENTON, Mo. — Carl Rose is in debtors’ prison.

It pretty much says so on the order that Scott County Associate Circuit Court Judge Julia Koester signed to send Rose to jail for at least seven days. It was for a civil contempt charge related to a business dispute lawsuit. Rose can’t get out of the Scott County Jail, Koester’s order says, unless he pays the court $10,500.

He doesn’t have it. He said so in a court document he filed himself to seek his release. His husband says Rose doesn’t have any money. His lawyers in another case say he doesn’t have any money.

He’s been in jail 11 days and counting.

Advertisement

“He’s exhausted all his resources and he’s going to let fate run its course,” says Rose’s husband, Drew Rodgers-Rose.






Advertisement

Carl Rose, left, and his husband, Drew Rodgers-Rose, pose for a photo with their daughter, Novie, and their dog, Maggie.




The couple has lived in Scott County, in southwest Missouri, for more than a dozen years. It’s where Rose grew up, where he used to be a police officer and a sheriff’s deputy.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

Rose was sent to jail because the judge found him in civil contempt amid a two-year-old legal battle with his former business partner, John Caudle.

The two men started a funeral home business together in 2020. Things went sour. Caudle accused Rose of improper financial transactions and using company money to buy a truck and an SUV. Caudle, who is represented by attorney Phil Dormeyer of Cape Girardeau, filed a lawsuit. Rose hired an attorney, later fired him and ended up representing himself.

Advertisement

Last year, as the case was about to go to trial, Rose was charged with 50 counts of criminal fraud, including 47 felonies, related to the dispute. After seven days in jail, he bonded out. He has been monitored by an ankle bracelet, which costs him $160 every two weeks. That case, based on the same underlying issues as the civil case, was moved to Butler County and is scheduled for a trial in October.

But the civil trial, with Rose representing himself, took place last summer. In a one-day trial — Rose skipped the afternoon part of it — Koester ruled against him. She also issued a civil judgment of more than $400,000 against him.

Caudle tried to collect, including seizing items from the Sikeston house where Rose and Rodgers-Rose live. That’s when St. Louis attorneys Hugh Eastwood and Chris Hoell got involved. When the sheriff showed up at the house with Caudle and Dormeyer to seize Rose’s assets, they started taking at least some things that were marital property.

“Basically, anything that wasn’t bolted down, they took,” Rodgers-Rose says.

That’s an unconstitutional taking of marital property, Eastwood and Hoell contend. They filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in February, naming former Scott County Sheriff Wes Drury, Dormeyer, Caudle and Scott County as defendants.

Advertisement


Tony Messenger | Post-Dispatch



The search was meant to “humiliate and harm” the homeowners, not to collect on the civil judgment, the lawsuit contends.

Advertisement

In the suit, Rose’s attorneys address the underlying small-town drama that is difficult to separate from the case. Rose used to be a sheriff’s deputy. Drury fired him after Rose announced a plan to run for sheriff against his boss. Drury won the race. Rose later ran and lost a race for coroner.

Last year, as Rose and Caudle were involved in their legal dispute over the failing business partnership, Caudle ran for and won the office of coroner.

The sheriff’s sale of the property that was seized from Rose and Rodgers-Rose netted only a couple thousand dollars. Then, Dormeyer filed a motion for contempt in the Scott County case because Rose hadn’t fulfilled elements of the civil judgment.

Earlier this month, the judge found Rose in contempt, in part because he didn’t follow her instructions to open an account at a specific bank to track deposits he would have to make.

Though it’s not clear in court records how she determined it, Koester found Rose was “willfully” refusing to comply with her order. That’s important, says Peter Joy, a Washington University law professor. Joy says a judge can only hold a person in jail over a failure to pay monetary damages if the judge believes they have the ability to pay.

Advertisement

“If the person doesn’t have the capacity to pay, then they can’t be put in jail,” Joy says.

Eastwood and Hoell say Rose doesn’t have any money. He’s unemployed. Caudle and Dormeyer already took whatever possessions they could, including Rose’s truck. He isn’t going to magically come up with the money to get out of jail, his husband says.

“It is shocking and outrageous that in a 2025, a judge is willing to indefinitely lock up a person until they pay a $10,000 ransom that they cannot afford simply at the request of an overzealous attorney,” Hoell says.

Because of ethics rules, Eastwood and Hoell can’t represent Rose in the civil lawsuit in Scott County to try to get him out of jail. That’s because they filed the federal lawsuit that also names Dormeyer, an attorney on the state case.

Attorneys for Caudle, Dormeyer and the other Scott County defendants have said in court documents that the search and seizure of Rose’s property was lawful. They have sought to get the federal lawsuit dismissed, arguing it is essentially a state matter already being handled by a different judge.

Advertisement

“Plaintiffs’ repeated casting of Mr. Rose as a victim of ‘political lawfare’ is a transparently disingenuous framing of the underlying civil and criminal cases against him,” Dormeyer alleges in a filing.

To date, Rose hasn’t been convicted of a criminal offense. But he sits in jail, with an ankle monitor attached, as a judge tries to help the elected county coroner collect a business debt. The folks at the jail, under the supervision of a new sheriff, have been nice, Rodgers-Rose says. They don’t seem to understand why Rose is there, he says.

“How long is Carl supposed to sit behind bars before the judge decides enough is enough and releases the man whose only crime is not having $10,000 laying around?” Hoell asks.


Messenger: A post-tornado plea from north St. Louis: ‘We don’t want to feel alone.’

Advertisement


Messenger: A siren is blaring in storm-weary America. Is Trump administration listening?


Messenger: SLU law school grad is ready to fight for the ‘defenseless and oppressed’


Messenger: Want to get charges dropped in St. Louis? Promise not to sue.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 winning numbers for May 23, 2025

Published

on


The Missouri Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at May 23, 2025, results for each game:

Winning Mega Millions numbers from May 23 drawing

07-18-40-55-68, Mega Ball: 18

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 23 drawing

Midday: 2-9-6

Advertisement

Midday Wild: 8

Evening: 4-3-0

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 23 drawing

Midday: 3-5-7-8

Advertisement

Midday Wild: 4

Evening: 2-5-5-6

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash4Life numbers from May 23 drawing

12-31-37-53-59, Cash Ball: 01

Advertisement

Check Cash4Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash Pop numbers from May 23 drawing

Early Bird: 07

Morning: 06

Matinee: 04

Prime Time: 08

Advertisement

Night Owl: 06

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Show Me Cash numbers from May 23 drawing

06-15-20-27-30

Check Show Me Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Missouri Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Missouri Lottery’s regional offices, by appointment only.

To claim by mail, complete a Missouri Lottery winner claim form, sign your winning ticket, and include a copy of your government-issued photo ID along with a completed IRS Form W-9. Ensure your name, address, telephone number and signature are on the back of your ticket. Claims should be mailed to:

Ticket Redemption

Missouri Lottery

P.O. Box 7777

Advertisement

Jefferson City, MO 65102-7777

For in-person claims, visit the Missouri Lottery Headquarters in Jefferson City or one of the regional offices in Kansas City, Springfield or St. Louis. Be sure to call ahead to verify hours and check if an appointment is required.

For additional instructions or to download the claim form, visit the Missouri Lottery prize claim page.

When are the Missouri Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Pick 4: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Cash4Life: 8 p.m. daily.
  • Cash Pop: 8 a.m. (Early Bird), 11 a.m. (Late Morning), 3 p.m. (Matinee), 7 p.m. (Prime Time) and 11 p.m. (Night Owl) daily.
  • Show Me Cash: 8:59 p.m. daily.
  • Lotto: 8:59 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Missouri editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Humane Society of Missouri hands out 4,000+ pounds of pet food, water after STL tornado

Published

on

Humane Society of Missouri hands out 4,000+ pounds of pet food, water after STL tornado


ST. LOUIS, Mo. (First Alert 4) – In the aftermath of the deadly tornado that swept through parts of the St. Louis region, one organization is taking a unique approach to recovery, helping both people and their pets.

The Humane Society of Missouri (HSMO) has deployed a fleet of supply-packed vehicles, delivering pet food, water and offering temporary boarding for animals impacted by the severe weather.

For Damian Webb, a North City resident, the storm was a first for both him and his seven-month-old puppy, Juju.

“She was under the bed shaking,” Webb said. “It was her first storm.”

Advertisement

Webb lives in the Greater Ville neighborhood, one of the areas hardest hit by the storms. His home remains standing, but the storm left busted windows, a leaking ceiling and a roof in need of repair.

“You can never prepare for it until you’re actually going through it,” he said.

With money tight and repairs looming, Webb is doing what he can to keep things together, including feeding Juju. That’s where HSMO comes in.

“This is our home, this is where we’re at, so we’re ready to go above and beyond,” said Ella Frank, HSMO Director of the Animal Cruelty Task Force.

Inside HSMO’s downtown shelter, shelves that were once packed with pet food now sit nearly empty. More than 4,000 pounds of food have already been distributed since the storm seven days ago, all donated by Purina.

Advertisement

“In a disaster, in a crisis, being able to keep your pet near you can be such a comfort,” Frank said.

That comfort is exactly what Juju has been for Webb.

“She did good for her first storm,” he said.

And while the damage is overwhelming, Webb says the community response has been just as powerful.

“Neighborhoods and community came out and started helping, that was a wonderful thing to witness.”

Advertisement

The Humane Society of Missouri is currently at capacity and is strongly encouraging fostering to make room for incoming animals. To learn more, click here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending