Connect with us

Midwest

Missouri law requiring photo ID to vote remains intact: 'Huge win for election security'

Published

on

Missouri law requiring photo ID to vote remains intact: 'Huge win for election security'

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey said a state law requiring a photo ID to vote being upheld in court is a “huge win for election security.”

“Missouri proved today how to handle radical activists that come into a state with secure elections and try to undermine them through the legal process,” Bailey said in an exclusive statement to Fox News Digital.

Bailey added that this was a huge victory for the Show Me State.

“We went to court, we put on the evidence, and radical activists working to undermine our elections FAILED. This is a HUGE win for election security,” Bailey said in a post on X. 

COURT UPHOLDS RED STATE’S BAN ON TRANS SURGERIES, TREATMENTS FOR MINORS

Advertisement

Andrew Bailey, Missouri’s attorney general, called the court win over photo ID to vote a “huge win for election security.” (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Elon Musk also shared his approval and praise for Missouri’s court ruling.

“Congratulations AG Bailey! Now we need this nationwide,” Musk wrote in a post on X.

The Missouri court’s decision to uphold the voter ID law came after heavy criticism from groups arguing that such requirements could disenfranchise voters.

However, Bailey’s office successfully presented evidence supporting the law’s necessity and effectiveness in maintaining the integrity of the voting process. The court’s ruling confirmed that the voter ID law does not impose a burden on voters.

Advertisement

Missouri also provides free non-driver’s licenses for voting for those who do not already have a driver’s license or have a current license. The health department’s Bureau of Vital Records provides free birth certificates to those seeking their first non-driver’s license in order to vote if the applicant does not have a current driver’s license.

PENNSYLVANIA DEM GOV. JOSH SHAPIRO SIDES WITH STATE SUPREME COURT RULING NOT TO COUNT CERTAIN MAIL-IN BALLOTS

Missouri AG talks voter ID victory

Cole County Circuit Judge Jon Beetem ruled Monday that a Missouri law requiring a photo ID to vote would remain intact. (Getty Images)

“There is not a severe burden on the right to vote as the State has gone to great lengths to help voters obtain IDs,” Bailey wrote in a previous court brief.

In October 2022, Cole County Presiding Judge Jon Beetem had already rejected a lawsuit brought by the Missouri League of Women Voters, NAACP and two voters challenging a law passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature making it mandatory that voters show photo identification to cast a regular ballot. Under the 2022 law, people with a valid government-issued photo ID are still able to submit provisional ballots, which will be counted if they return later that day with a photo ID or if election officials verify their signatures.

Missouri AG Andrew Bailey

A Missouri court decided to uphold the state’s voter ID law, something Andrew Bailey fought for. (Vanessa Abbitt/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

Republicans said the goal of the 2022 law was to deter voter fraud, but the plaintiffs in the case argued the legislation placed unconstitutional hurdles on voting, suppressing turnout.

Advertisement

Before the 2022 midterm elections, it was acceptable for Missourians to present a voter registration card, a student identification card, a bank statement or utility bill or a valid driver’s license to cast their ballots in the state.

The National Conference of State Legislatures reports that 36 states request or require identification to vote, of which at least 20 ask for a photo ID.

Other Republican-led states are moving in the same direction as Missouri, which could serve as the blueprint for national policy.

“I’m proud that Missouri will continue to lead the nation in defense of election security,” Bailey said. 

Advertisement

Critics argue that such requirements are an overreaction that could disenfranchise eligible voters.

Fox News Digital’s Danielle Wallace and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Stepheny Price is writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Detroit, MI

Suspect at large after 2-year-old boy shot in leg on Detroit’s east side

Published

on

Suspect at large after 2-year-old boy shot in leg on Detroit’s east side


Detroit police are searching for a man they say shot a 2-year-old boy Tuesday on the city’s east side.

Police said the child was in stable condition Tuesday night, though the alleged shooter remained at large.

Authorities were dispatched to the 500 block of Dickerson Avenue, between Freud Street and Essex Avenue, at 6:48 p.m. for a report that a child had been shot, Interim Detroit Police Chief Todd Bettison said.

Investigators believe Darius Lacey, 27, arrived at his ex’s home and went inside to move some items out of the house. Inside he encountered his ex’s new boyfriend, Bettison said.

Advertisement

“Ex-boyfriend gets into shootout with new boyfriend and in the exchange of gunfire his child was shot,” Bettison said.

The child was shot in the thigh and the bullet went all the way through his leg, police said.

Investigators were still working to piece together more details, including which of the men fired the first shot.

Bettison said at least 15 shell casings were discovered at the scene.

As of Tuesday night, police were searching for Lacey, who fled the scene with two companions in a black Dodge Charger, Bettison said. He was confident Lacey would be arrested soon.

Advertisement

“The public in general isn’t in danger. It was a domestic so I’m not as concerned there,” Bettison said, “but, we will have him apprehended shortly.”

mreinhart@detroitnews.com

@max_detroitnews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

'The price tag is sobering': New study estimates each fatal shooting in Milwaukee costs taxpayers $2.1 million

Published

on

'The price tag is sobering': New study estimates each fatal shooting in Milwaukee costs taxpayers .1 million


MILWAUKEE — After a recent report of a deadly shooting in Milwaukee, we received an email from a viewer named Mario.

He wrote in part, “The tragedy of a shooting is much greater than the financial cost, but people pay attention to the costs because that affects them personally.”

Our Lighthouse team did some digging and found a brand new study with a staggering figure.

“If there are 200 approximately homicides in the city of Milwaukee every year and two to three times that many non-fatal shootings, the cumulative cost to residents of Milwaukee taxpayers who live in the city is exponential,” she said.

Advertisement

Rabinowitz is the research director at the National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (NICJR). For the first time, it recently published a study that breaks down the financial costs of fatal and non-fatal shootings in Milwaukee.

Watch: Study estimates each fatal shooting in Milwaukee costs taxpayers $2.1 million

New study estimates each fatal shooting in Milwaukee costs taxpayers $2.1 million

Advertisement

The national non-profit focused on six key expenses.

Each time police and first responders go to the scene of a deadly shooting, NICJR found it costs an average of about $8,000. Average hospital costs amount to nearly $90,000. Investigating and prosecuting the crime adds up to another $55,000.

That’s followed by incarceration which is by far the biggest cost of all to the tune of $1.7 million.

When you add victim support expenses and lost tax revenue, the cost estimate for each fatal shooting exceeds $2 million, and more than 640,000 for non-fatal shootings, according to the study.

National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform

Advertisement

“There are going to be people who watch this story and say, ‘That’s hard to believe’. What would be your response to them?” TMJ4 reporter Ben Jordan asked.

“My first response to them would be that our estimates are far more conservative than the estimates of a number of other gun violence reduction organizations trying to do similar analyses and that’s because we’re only measuring the direct and measurable costs of gun violence,” Rabinowitz said.

Rabinowitz discovered Milwaukee homicides are more costly to taxpayers than similarly sized cities like Detroit, Indianapolis, and Atlanta largely because of higher incarceration costs in Wisconsin.

Comparison to other cities.png

TMJ4

“My hope is that people understand that these costs are not costs that we should be comfortable with,” Reggie Moore said.

Advertisement

Moore is the Director of Community Safety, Policy, and Engagement at the Medical College of Wisconsin. He collaborates with the city, county, and state to address violence as a public health issue. His team is now partnering with the researchers who studied the financial cost.

“What do you hope people who see this story take away from this report?” Jordan asked.

“I think it’s important. When you multiply the amount of homicides in one given year by the total cost, that’s hundreds of millions of dollars,” he said.

Moore hopes it helps people understand the value of prevention efforts and the need to invest upfront.

“For example, a program like 414 Life costs $2 million,” he said. “If it saves one life, the return on investment in preventing one homicide is clear. The price for doing nothing or not doing more to prevent these things on the front end is a cost none of us should be willing to pay.”

Advertisement

It’s important to note that Milwaukee’s homicides are down 22 percent compared to last year. According to this study, that reduction saves taxpayers an estimated $68 million.


Talk to us:

Hey there! At TMJ4 News, we’re all about listening to our audience and tackling the stuff that really matters to you. Got a story idea, tip, or just want to chat about this piece? Hit us up using the form below. For more ways to get in touch, head over to tmj4.com/tips.


It’s about time to watch on your time. Stream local news and weather 24/7 by searching for “TMJ4” on your device.

Available for download on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and more.

Advertisement

Report a typo or error





Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Court overturns murder conviction in slaying of Minneapolis youth mentor

Published

on

Court overturns murder conviction in slaying of Minneapolis youth mentor


A high-profile murder conviction in Minneapolis has been overturned on appeal after a judge finds the suspect’s trial was unfair.

Advertisement

Drew McGinley was shot and killed in June 2021 outside the Elks Club in North Minneapolis after an unrelated vigil. Last week, an appellate court judge ruled that Deandre Turner, who was convicted of the killing and sentenced to 27 years, was deprived of a fair trial.

What was the ruling?

Appellate Judge Cochran overturned the conviction, citing evidentiary errors and prosecutorial misconduct. The decision noted that the state’s case was weak, with no forensic evidence presented—no gun, no DNA, and reliance on grainy surveillance footage. Additionally, the state improperly used an out-of-court statement where its sole witness identified the shooter at the suggestion of a police sergeant. In court, that witness denied knowing who fired the fatal shot.

Advertisement

Court documents say other prosecutorial errors included:

  • Attorneys referring to witnesses who did not testify.
  • Claiming Turner was “drunk and probably high” without proof
  • Insinuating that Turner was in a gang without proof.

Context

McGinley was a respected community member who ran a T-shirt printing business and volunteered as a youth coach and mentor. He was killed after a confrontation with a former gang member.

Advertisement

McGinley’s death was devastating for the community.

Keith Cook, who played for McGinley, described him as a father figure, saying, “He was there for me, like for football, basketball, and my life, school.”

The case drew significant attention because it all started with an altercation between McGinley and Sharif Willis, a former gang leader turned peace activist. Willis spoke with FOX 9 during the trial, refusing to comment directly on the case, but saying: “We got to put some of these guns down, got to stop killing each other. It’s senseless, it’s useless, everybody’s a victim in this.”

Advertisement

What’s next?

Turner remains in prison for now.

The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office has 30 days to appeal the appellate court’s decision or decide to re-try the case.

Advertisement

The office stated it is reviewing the case: “The Court of Appeals opinion is concerning, and we are in the process of reviewing the transcript before making a decision.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending