Connect with us

Minnesota

Two orchestras, two violists: a Minnesota love story

Published

on

Two orchestras, two violists: a Minnesota love story


On a recent Friday morning, two star violists readied themselves for a rehearsal.

Rebecca Albers placed one hand on the piano, using the other to scoop up her 16-month-old son. Maiya Papach kneeled on the floor, nestling a small violin beneath their 4-year-old daughter’s chin. For just a moment, their St. Paul home, which had been a blur of kids and dogs, was still.

Then the couple’s daughter began to play.

She bowed the string tentatively at first but by the piece’s end was grinning. As she took a bow, everyone, including their 16-month-old, applauded.

Advertisement

Most weekend nights, you can find Papach, 46, performing as principal violist of the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra and Albers, 40, as principal violist of the Minnesota Orchestra. They’ve played Carnegie Hall and Lincoln Center. But these are the performances they’re living for, these days.

Their life here, filled with string quartets and wood blocks and walks to the park, is made possible by the fact that the Twin Cities boasts two acclaimed orchestras, a rarity.

“To have two violists of that caliber as principals in the same city — not to mention the fact that they’re married — is pretty incredible,” said Erin Keefe, concertmaster of the Minnesota Orchestra and a friend so close the three refer to one another as “sister wives.”

Though neither grew up in Minnesota, Albers and Papach have recruited a crew from their Cathedral Hill neighborhood, loved ones who babysit during concerts and bridge the half-hour gaps when their rehearsals overlap.

Papach’s sister, who is pursuing her doctorate in composition at the University of Minnesota, lives two doors down. Albers’ sister Julie Albers became the SPCO’s principal cellist in 2014. Their mother, a Suzuki music teacher, moved nearby. In fact, so many family members have settled in Minnesota that they note which family members don’t live in town, rather than which ones do.

Advertisement

“Pretty huge viola jobs have come up — like once-in-a-generation jobs — and we’ve looked the other way because we like it here,” Albers said. “We have our family, we have our community. We’re really, really grateful to both be able to live and work here.

“Hopefully that continues to be the case.”

‘A haven for each other’

Their love story begins, fittingly, at a classical music festival.

The two had met before, at the Juilliard School in New York City, where they shared a teacher. But they didn’t get to know each other until the summer of 2006, at the Marlboro Music Festival in Vermont. Albers nursed a crush on Papach, who fascinated her, “but you had no idea,” Albers said, sitting on the rug beside Papach, as their son tugged on her shirt and their daughter pressed a picture book into her lap. “No idea,” Papach said.

The next summer, the two greeted one another with a hug. “I wasn’t really thinking about it,” Papach said, “but we hugged and my body was like, ‘I want to stay here.’”

Advertisement

They got engaged just a few months later.

Albers had moved to Michigan to join a quartet and Papach had been freelancing in New York City when Papach nabbed the SPCO job in 2008. Albers decided to follow. Then the Minnesota Orchestra had an opening, and she auditioned, becoming assistant principal viola in 2010. She won the principal position, becoming the orchestra’s lead violist and go-to soloist, in 2017.

“She takes big, bold leaps of faith,” Papach said admiringly. Same goes for having kids: “I always thought I would like to have a family,” Papach said, “but I was a little more of a scaredy-cat.”

On her instrument and in her home, Albers is the natural leader, the organizer. Friends and colleagues describe Papach as the dreamer, the searcher. The physical comedian, too. Explaining why she’ll never switch from a paper score to an iPad screen, Papach pulled her arms tight to her chest and jutted her head forward, mimicking a dinosaur.

“They’re so different from one another, but in the same way they are as players, they really complement each other,” said Keefe, who performs with both violists in Accordo, a string ensemble composed of present and former principal players from both orchestras. “They’re really able to get inside each other’s heads and become a haven for each other.”

Advertisement

A haven for their friends, too. “Our job can be very stressful and personal,” said Steven Copes, the SPCO’s concertmaster. “You need someone you can trust to talk about things with, to put your head on straight.” The two of them, but especially Papach, have “been there for me as I’ve gone through some very difficult times.”

During the Minnesota Orchestra’s lockout, then again during the pandemic’s shutdown, Keefe found herself spending most nights with Albers and Papach. They’re the kind of friends you don’t need to clean for, she said, the friends you can wear pajamas around. To most people, Keefe’s husband Osmo Vänskä is former music director of the Minnesota Orchestra. But to Albers and Papach’s daughter, he’s “ukki,” the Finnish word for grandfather.

Next month, when both Albers and Papach will perform with Accordo, creating “a scheduling nightmare,” as Papach put it, Vänskä will babysit.

Playing together is easy, the pair said. “We have different strengths on the instrument, but similar instincts,” Albers said. “So we might be doing different articulations, but the overall intention is united.”

The respect they have for one another extends to the music, she continued. “I don’t know that we could actually have a solid relationship if one of us didn’t respect the other completely musically.

Advertisement

“It’s a funny thing how much the music bleeds into our lives.”

‘It keeps opening doors’

As Albers gathered boots and mittens, hats and a helmet, Papach slung harnesses on the dogs, an 11-year-old mutt with an underbite and 5-year-old with a brindled coat. After starts and stops, they headed to the park.

Their daughter swooshed down the sidewalk on her bike. Their son toddled sideways toward a stick, then toward a tree. But half a block in, they found a rhythm.

Becoming parents has shifted their lives, their musical lives included. There are the mundane things: the lack of sleep, the scarcity of time. Papach prepares more by reading, by listening. Gone are the pre-concert naps. Albers often practices in the kitchen, once the kids are asleep.

But Albers believes having kids has made her more creative, too. “Being a parent is so much experimentation, just trying to figure out, what is going to get her to put on her jacket today,” she said, laughing.

Advertisement

As a toddler growing up in a musical family in Colorado, Albers tugged at the scrolls of her two older sisters’ instruments. She bothered them so much that finally they gave her a violin.

Papach’s mother, too, was a musician, a flutist — “orchestral music was her religion.” Born in South Bend, Ind., Papach spent much of her childhood in Japan, where she fell in love with music. It means more to her now than it ever has.

“It keeps opening doors,” she said. “The same piece can reveal itself totally differently at different points in life, depending on what you’re doing, what you’re feeling, what you’re going through.” Papach nodded toward her daughter.

“So that’s what I want her to have.”

Advertisement



Source link

Minnesota

Wild at Kraken Morning Skate Wrap Up | Minnesota Wild

Published

on

Wild at Kraken Morning Skate Wrap Up | Minnesota Wild


The Wild closes out a seven-game, 14-day road trip tonight against the Seattle Kraken at 9:00 p.m. CT on FanDuel Sports Network and KFAN FM 100.3. Minnesota has earned a point in five of the first six games of the trip (3-1-2), earning wins over Winnipeg, Vegas and Anaheim, and getting a point in shootout losses to San Jose and Los Angeles. History shows Minnesota is ending this grueling trip in a place where it has had great success. Since dropping its first ever game in Seattle in October of 2021, the Wild has won its last six games at Climate Pledge Arena, including a 4-1 win over the Kraken on December 8. With a 12-7-3 record on the road this season, Minnesota is T-6th in the NHL in road wins and points (27).

Jesper Wallstedt gets the nod for Minnesota tonight, facing Seattle for the first time in his career. He has earned a point in all three of his starts on this trip, going 1-0-2 with a 3.21 GAA and a .891 SV%. In games played away from Grand Casino Arena this season, Wallstedt owns a 5-1-3 record with a 2.20 GAA, a .922 SV% and two shutouts.

Stopping Seattle will be no easy task for Wallstedt tonight, as the Kraken comes into tonight’s game on a nine-game point-streak (8-0-1), its longest point streak of the season. Seattle is outscoring its opponents 36-18 during its streak and has only allowed more than three goals in a game once. Kaapo Kakko has been the driving force for Seattle over its nine-game stretch, as he has nine points (2-7=9) in nine games. Former Wild center, Freddy Gaudreau, has three points (1-2=3) in his last two games and six points (3-3=6) in Seattle’s nine-game stretch.

Players to watch for Minnesota:

Advertisement

Kirill Kaprizov: Kaprizov comes into tonight’s game two points behind Marian Gaborik (219-218=437) for the second-most points in Wild history. Kaprizov scored a goal in the first meeting between these teams and owns 15 points (6-9=15) in 10 games against Seattle in his career.

Matt Boldy: In 11 games against the Kraken, Boldy owns 14 points (8-6=14) and has only been held off the score sheet twice. He comes into tonight’s game with a point (8-5=13) in eight consecutive games against Seattle, including a hat trick on March 27, 2023.

Joel Eriksson Ek: In the first matchup between these two teams, Eriksson Ek recorded three points (1-2=3), a plus-3 rating and a season-high six shots. In his 11 games against Seattle, Eriksson Ek owns 10 points (4-6=10) and a plus-6 rating.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minnesota

Can Minnesota prosecute the federal immigration officer who just killed a woman?

Published

on

Can Minnesota prosecute the federal immigration officer who just killed a woman?


A federal officer shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday, shortly after the Trump administration deployed thousands of immigration agents to the city. Although the full circumstances of the killing remain unclear, video of the shooting shows an officer opening fire on the woman as she drove away.

Realistically, there’s virtually no chance that President Donald Trump’s Justice Department will bring federal charges against the officer who killed this woman. Trump already claimed on TruthSocial, his personal social media site, that the officer shot the woman in “self defense.” (The officer could potentially be prosecuted after Trump leaves office.)

But many local officials are quite upset about this incident. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey gave a press conference Wednesday afternoon where he told US Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “get the fuck out of Minneapolis.” If further investigations reveal that the shooting was not legally justified, state prosecutors could potentially charge the officer responsible with a homicide crime.

The Supreme Court’s Republican majority has made it very difficult for private citizens to sue federal law enforcement officers who break the law. But can a federal officer actually be charged with, and convicted of, violating a state criminal law?

Advertisement

Until fairly recently, the law was favorable to federal officials who allegedly violate state criminal laws while they carry out their official duties. The seminal case, known as In re Neagle (1890), held that a deputy US marshall who shot and killed a man could not be charged with murder in state court, because this federal officer did so while acting as a bodyguard for a US Supreme Court justice.

Last June, however, the Supreme Court handed down Martin v. United States (2025), which held that Neagle does not always protect federal officials who violate state law. The rule announced in Martin is vague, so it is unclear how it would apply to the shooting in Minneapolis. But the gist of the ruling is that a federal officer is only protected if they can demonstrate that “their actions, though criminal under state law, were ‘necessary and proper’ in the discharge of their federal responsibilities.”

If the officer responsible for the Minneapolis killing broke Minnesota law, in other words, any prosecution against them would turn on whether the courts decide shooting this woman was a “necessary and proper” exercise of the officer’s official duties.

There is one other potential complication. A federal law provides that state criminal charges against “any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or any agency thereof” may be removed from state court and heard by a federal judge. This statute does not prevent state prosecutors from bringing charges or from prosecuting a case. But it does ensure that the question of whether Neagle applies to this case would be decided by federal courts that are increasingly dominated by conservative Republicans.

Federal cases out of Minnesota appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, a very conservative court where 10 of the 11 active judges were appointed by Republicans. And, of course, any decision by the Eighth Circuit might be appealed to the Supreme Court, where Republicans control six of the nine seats.

Advertisement

All of which is a long way of saying that, while the law does not absolutely preclude Minnesota prosecutors from filing charges against this officer, it is far from clear that those charges will stick.

When are federal officers immune from prosecution in state court?

The facts underlying the Neagle case are simply wild. David Terry was a lawyer and former chief justice of the state of California, who had served with US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field while the two were both state supreme court justices. At the time, federal justices were required to “ride circuit” and hear cases outside of Washington, DC. And so, Field wound up hearing a dispute about whether Terry’s wife was entitled to a share of a US senator’s fortune.

At the court proceeding, where Field ruled against Terry’s wife, Terry punched a US marshal, brandished a bowie knife, and was jailed for contempt of court. After his release, he and his wife continued to threaten Field’s life, and so, the attorney general ordered Deputy Marshal David Neagle to act as Field’s bodyguard.

Then, Terry attacked Field while Field was traveling through California by train, and Neagle shot and killed Terry.

Advertisement

Given these facts, it’s unsurprising that the Supreme Court ruled that California could not bring charges against Neagle for this killing. The case involved a physical attack on a sitting justice! And, besides, Neagle acted within the scope of his responsibilities as Field’s federally appointed bodyguard.

135 years later, however, the Court decided Martin. That more recent decision focused on language in the Neagle opinion that suggested that its scope may be limited. Neagle, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in Martin, arose from concerns that “California could frustrate federal law by prosecuting a federal marshal “for an act which he was authorized to do by the law of the United States.” Protecting Field was something that “it was [Neagle’s] duty to do.” And, in shooting Terry, Neagle “did no more than what was necessary and proper.”

Thus, Gorsuch extracted a rule from Neagle that federal officials are only protected from state law when their actions “were ‘necessary and proper’ in the discharge of their federal responsibilities.”

In the wake of Martin, Minnesota may very well be able to prosecute the officer responsible for the Minnesota killing. As a general rule, federal law enforcement officers are not authorized by the law of the United States to shoot people without justification. So, if it turns out that this killing was legally unjustified, federal courts may conclude that the officer’s actions were not necessary and proper in the discharge of his official duties.

That said, Martin is a fairly new opinion, and the rule it announced is vague. And any prosecution against a federal immigration officer would be unavoidably political. So, it is unclear whether the judges who hear this case would approach it as fair and impartial jurists or as partisans.

Advertisement

The bottom line, in other words, is that the law governing when federal officers may be charged with state crimes is quite unclear. So, it is uncertain whether a prosecution against this particular officer would succeed — even assuming that a state prosecutor could convince a jury to convict.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

‘You’ll never eliminate fraud totally’: Expert says Minnesota isn’t an outlier in pandemic fraud

Published

on

‘You’ll never eliminate fraud totally’: Expert says Minnesota isn’t an outlier in pandemic fraud


Despite fresh — and so far unfounded — allegations of fraud in Minnesota, the scandal that has dogged Gov. Tim Walz for years and ultimately led him to end his bid for reelection this week got its start during the pandemic. A fraud researcher says fraud and pandemics go hand in hand, and that very few if any governments got out of the COVID-19 crisis unscathed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending