Connect with us

Minnesota

Our View: How can Minnesota still be so unprepared?

Published

on

Our View: How can Minnesota still be so unprepared?


We certainly saw this coming. For years and even decades, the professionals who care for aging Minnesotans have been hollering and waving proverbial red flags about the rapidly graying baby-boomer generation; how it could overwhelm assisted-living facilities, nursing homes, and other senior-care services; and how there just won’t be enough space or workers to care for everyone. In just the last decade, the population of Americans over 65 has ballooned by a third. And in Minnesota, by 2030, a fourth of the state is predicted to be older than 65, the age when long-term care is more likely a necessity.

Knowing all this, Minnesota is ready, right, after heeding the many, many calls for action? Right?

Hardly. Instead, 12,500 caregiving positions statewide are currently vacant, and while experts determined 27,000 additional nursing-home beds would be needed by 2045 to meet the coming demand, one in three beds have disappeared since 2000. Since the pandemic, especially, nursing homes and other senior-care facilities, rather than expanding, have been closing off wings, shutting down floors, or going out of business entirely, due to a lack of public and health-insurance funding and a dearth of workers willing to care for the elderly at wages clearly not competitive enough.

“At a time where we should be ramping up services for seniors (and) access to services, we’re actually seeing the access to senior care decline,” Kari Thurlow, president and CEO of

Advertisement

LeadingAge Minnesota

, an advocacy nonprofit in Minneapolis, said in an exclusive interview last week with the News Tribune Editorial Board. “Especialy in rural communities (like so much of Northeastern Minnesota), it is very difficult to staff nursing homes. Then it becomes a cycle. If you’re not able to admit residents even when they need it, you’re not able to generate revenue to sustain the operations. That leads to further financial fragility. …

“It’s heartbreaking and quite frankly shouldn’t be the way that we should be treating our seniors,” Thurlow additionally said.

Her organization and the Bloomington nonprofit

Care Providers of Minnesota

Advertisement

together make up the

Long-Term Care Imperative

, a collaborative advocating for seniors and senior care, especially at the state Capitol in St. Paul — where there’s lots of overdue work to be done this session.

Minnesota’s elected state representatives and state senators are uniquely positioned to address the coming crisis. They’re the ones who set the rates nursing homes and other care facilities charge both Medicaid and private-paying patients. And those rates are what determine caregivers’ salaries and benefits, the services residents receive, and the number of residents served by each facility.

“But lawmakers are apathetic,” Care Providers of Minnesota charges on its prepared materials. “Despite public support, the Legislature has chosen not to invest in long-term care.”

Advertisement

In 2023, the Legislature did allocate $300 million to struggling facilities. However, it was one-time funding, not a long-term solution, and it has since ended. Also, new mandates from the Legislature have heaped nearly $200 million in additional costs on already struggling facilities, specifically $20 million for time and a half pay for 11 holidays for care-facility workers and $175 million for minimum-wage increases. And Gov. Tim Walz’s budget proposal this year would cut $700 million from those same facilities.

“(With the) mandates, plus the governor’s cuts, you’re going to see financial conditions worsen and you’re going to see an increased lack of access,” Care Providers of Minnesota CEO Toby Pearson said in the interview with the Editorial Board. “And it’s going to hit in rural Minnesota first, because that’s where we have more of an aging population.”

To be sure, without legislative action this session, Minnesotans can expect even more wings, floors, and entire facilities to close — all with that boom of aging baby boomers about to be in need of care in those facilities.

One pair of bipartisan measures

in the House

Advertisement

and

in the Senate

would modify elderly waiver rates and nursing facility reimbursement rates. Another pair of companion bills in the

House

and

Advertisement

Senate

would make necessary changes to Minnesota’s Nursing Home Workforce Standards Board. Rep. Natalie Zeleznikar is a co-author of the House version of each. The Republican from Fredenberg Township, whose district includes a bit of Duluth, is a former senior-care operator and long-time advocate for the industry and the residents it serves.

Even just the introduction of legislation is reason for optimism, according to Pearson and Thurlow. But it needs to be followed by overdue action.

“We feel like the committees are listening to us,” Thurlow said. “Obviously, it’s a great thing when it’s bipartisan.”

“We have been at the table at the Legislature saying we need more money to pay workers’ wages and benefits,” said Pearson. “They have repeatedly said no. … It’s frustrating on two levels. On one level, for a long time we were trying to get people’s attention (about the coming crisis), and now it’s hard because people have heard it so much it’s hard for them to hear the actual urgency.”

Advertisement

That urgency isn’t new. Neither is Minnesota’s long-time lack of meaningful action in response. That demands to end. This legislative session. Now.

the News Tribune Editorial Board

Opinion by
the News Tribune Editorial Board

“Our View” editorials in the News Tribune are the opinion of the newspaper as determined by its Editorial Board. Current board members are Publisher Neal Ronquist, Editorial Page Editor Chuck Frederick, and Employee Representative Kris Vereecken.

Advertisement





Source link

Minnesota

Colorado Avalanche top Minnesota Wild in high-scoring opener

Published

on

Colorado Avalanche top Minnesota Wild in high-scoring opener


In just the 10th playoff game in NHL history with at least 15 combined goals, the Colorado Avalanche overcame blowing a three-goal lead to defeat the Minnesota Wild 9-6 in Denver Sunday night in a wacky Game 1 of this Western Conference semifinal series.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Speculation Swirls Around Vikings Sale, but Evidence Falls Short

Published

on

Speculation Swirls Around Vikings Sale, but Evidence Falls Short


Speculation is brewing about Minnesota Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf possibly preparing to put the franchise up for sale, though reader beware, it seems like wild conjecture.

The buzz has roots in St. Paul Pioneer Press reporter Charley Walters’ Saturday column.

Why does he think the Wilfs could be on the verge of selling? He appears to be connecting dots, noticing how Minnesota reduced its player spending from $350 million in the 2025 offseason to $226 million so far this offseason.

Advertisement

It is significant to go from spending more money on the roster than any other team to the second-lowest one year later, but there are logical reasons for it that don’t point to a sale. More on that in a moment, but Walters suspects the Wilfs could get $8 or $9 billion for the Vikings, which is just a sliver more than the $600 million they bought the team for in 2005.

Why the speculation doesn’t add up

Selling the team doesn’t make much sense when you stop and consider how hard the Vikings and Minnesota leaders are pushing to host the 2028 NFL Draft. Minnesota is reportedly the favorite to win the bid for the ’28 draft, which could provide an economic boom to the Vikings, Twin Cities, and entire state.

A more logical reason the Vikings have slashed payroll from 2025 to 2026 is that they whiffed on their aggressive move to win a Super Bowl. They were all-in last year, but quarterback J.J. McCarthy didn’t live up to lofty expectations as a first-year starter, and the offensive collapse was too much to overcome. They had to hit the reset button.

Advertisement

Cutting big-money players like defensive tackles Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave, who are in the later stages of their careers, allowed the Vikings to draft Caleb Banks and Domonique Orange in the first and third rounds of the draft, respectively. They got younger, more athletic, and cheaper on the interior defensive line.

Advertisement

Another reason to second-guess reporting about a sale is that the Vikings just picked up wide receiver Jordan Addison’s fifth-year option that’ll pay him $18 million 2025. That’s an indicator that they want to re-sign him, and that could cost them upwards of $30 million annually.

That’s far from a cost-cutting move, and it could very well be the reason why the Vikings traded edge rusher Jonathan Greenard instead of giving him a new contract. The NFL has a salary cap, and the Vikings were pressed up against it after last year’s spending spree. Giving Greenard a more lucrative extension would’ve made the salary cap situation even more difficult in 2027 and beyond. If they believe 2024 first-round pick Dallas Turner replace Greenard, then the move makes sense.

Minnesota also has to be prepared to pay Kyler Murray a big-money quarterback contract. He’s playing for the league minimum of $1.3 million in 2026, but if he succeeds and the Vikings want to re-sign him, then it’s going to be expensive.

Everything the Vikings have done looks to be aimed at getting younger and cheaper ahead of a potentially expensive 2027 offseason. The cost-cutting moves aren’t anywhere close to the fire sale and payroll slashing the Minnesota Twins owners did last year before they put the team up for sale and then abruptly changed their minds when their price wasn’t met.

Advertisement

The Wilfs have been committed to building a championship team for 21 years, and there’s really nothing to indicate they’re considering a sale beyond wild guesswork.

Advertisement

Maybe Walters knows something everyone else doesn’t, but his latest writings seem to be connecting dots more than reporting facts. Consider that Walters, when he has inside info, is known for using the phrase “a little birdie says.” Although he used it while talking about the Twins later in this column, he didn’t when talking about the Wilfs and selling the team.

Move forward with caution. There’s no hard evidence to support the notion that a sale is coming.

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

WWII soldier from Minnesota laid to rest more than 80 years after his passing

Published

on

WWII soldier from Minnesota laid to rest more than 80 years after his passing


On a pristine Saturday afternoon, there was a Blackhawk helicopter flyover, and American flags were everywhere.

“It was hard today in some ways,” Scott Torpey said quietly. “But it was also a joyous occasion that we got to bring him home.”

At the New Ulm City Cemetery, it was a long-awaited homecoming as U.S. Army Captain Willibald Bianchi — ‘Uncle Bill’ to his family — was laid to rest with full military honors.

“You know, the sense of closure,” says Steve Marti, one of Bianchi’s nephews. “Who would have thought, after all these years, we get the call that guess what? They’ve identified his remains.”

Advertisement

Bianchi, 29 years old, previously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, was killed on a POW transport ship when it was bombed and sunk by an American plane in January 1945.

His remains were buried in a mass grave in a military cemetery in Hawaii.

For decades, Bianchi’s family didn’t know if he would ever be formally identified.

“He was lost to the war,” explains Joseph Marti, another nephew. “He was Uncle Bill, who left and never came back.”

Until a phone call last September: the Defense POW-MIA Accounting Agency had painstakingly searched through remains in the cemetery and used family DNA samples for a match.

Advertisement

“My cousin Scott, my Aunt Mary Louise, his sister and another cousin donated DNA, and they used that to use some of his bones to extract mitochondrial DNA and get the match,” Joseph Marti explains.

After a dignified transfer at MSP, Bianchi’s remains were brought to New Ulm.

Dozens and dozens of people from across the country — brothers, sisters and cousins attended the burial ceremony.  

The American flag on Bianchi’s coffin was given to his family.

“They gave it to my sister Sue, who was so deserving,” Steve Marti says. “She’s done so much to keep Uncle Bill’s legacy alive in our home, here in her home.”

Advertisement

For years, family members had passed down Bianchi’s story.

Now, they say, it has an ending befitting his service, and after an 80-year journey, Bianchi is now at honored rest.

His family says their hearts, once empty, are now full.  

“So, to have him back home, I think, is so special for everybody associated,” Joseph Marti exclaims. “We’re overwhelmed and humbled.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending