Connect with us

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis Has More Households Than Ever Before

Published

on

Minneapolis Has More Households Than Ever Before


Although Minneapolis’ population has grown in the past 15 years, its current population sits far below its mid-20th century peak. With about 425,000 residents, the city has nearly 60,000 fewer people than in 1960, when its population was about 483,000. Despite strong population growth during the 2010s, Minneapolis has still not returned to its 1960s population levels. 

One might think that this long-term population decline means Minneapolis doesn’t need to build more housing. After all, if Minneapolis was able to house tens of thousands more people a few decades ago, shouldn’t the city already have enough housing for a considerably smaller population today? 

This isn’t true for one key reason: Today, Minneapolis has more households — that is, distinct groups of people who live in the same home — than ever before. In 1970, Minneapolis had 161,141 households, but by 2020 it had 187,670 households. This reflects a 16% increase in the city’s number of households, for reasons that we explain below.

Because households nowadays tend to have fewer people, Minneapolis’ household growth has outpaced recent population growth. This reflects a wider trend in the United States, where the average size of households is shrinking.

Advertisement

An important implication of this peak in the number of households is that Minneapolis needs to build more housing in order to accommodate its residents.

What Is Household Formation? 

In seeing household growth outpace population growth, Minneapolis is no outlier. In the United States at large, the number of households has grown by around 100%, while the population has grown 60% since 1970. 

A few factors have driven this change:

  • Since the 1970s, the makeup of American households has changed significantly. For example, many more households have just one person: In 1970, around 18% of households were occupied by a single person. By 2020, that number had risen to nearly 28%.
  • In that same time frame, the number of households headed by older adults (65 and older) nearly quadrupled, while the number of young adult (under 30) households only approximately doubled. This is significant because older adults tend to live in households with fewer people. 
  • There are also relatively fewer married households than there were in 1970. From 1970 to 2024, the percentage of married households shrank by around 23%, while the percentage of non-family households (households with only one adult, or composed of non-related individuals) grew by 16%.

The graph below highlights another one of these trends in Minneapolis: Most of Minneapolis’ recent growth in its number of households has been driven by childless households. 

A graph showing the number of children in a household from 1960-2020. The section of graph representing households with 0 children has been steadily rising since 1990.

Lessons for Minneapolis Housing Policy

Despite long-term population loss, Minneapolis still needs to build more housing. That’s the only way to accommodate a higher number of households. And not only does the city need to build more housing, it needs to build more types of housing to accommodate different kinds of households.

Such changes have been the aim of many recent policy initiatives in Minneapolis. Minneapolis 2040, the comprehensive plan passed in 2018 and supported by Neighbors for More Neighbors, adjusted zoning rules to allow denser housing throughout the city, especially on neighborhood arterial streets — and the policy is showing positive results. 

In order to accommodate the city’s highest-ever number of households, Minneapolis should continue to address obstacles to providing more housing. 

Advertisement

For example, the city has seen relatively little development on many of its neighborhood side streets. That’s in part because restrictive limits on building size, including floor-area ratio and height, make triplex development unfeasible in some zoning districts. Easing these restrictions would help Minneapolis build more housing, and a wider variety of housing types. 

Furthermore, as the types of households have changed in Minneapolis, more flexibility is needed to accommodate different kinds of houses. Zoning regulations should allow many different kinds of homes, instead of favoring specific types (like single-family homes versus apartments).

For example, Minneapolis’ legalization of accessory dwelling units offers one flexible option for young singles or older people (which is why AARP supports them). Allowing all neighborhoods to have a mix of single-family homes and apartment buildings can offer families of different sizes a range of options that might work for them. Legalizing houses built on smaller lots by reducing minimum lot-size requirements are another way to let households access homeownership at a lower starting cost.

Many of Minneapolis’ neighboring municipalities, including St. Paul and nearby suburbs, also have record-high numbers of households today. This is true whether the cities have gained or lost population since 1970. 

A graph showing the formation of households versus overall population in 12 MN cities. The number of households tends to increase over time.

Similar policy approaches are necessary for these places. This is particularly true in suburban municipalities, where zoning rules are typically far less flexible than in Minneapolis or St. Paul. Such widespread growth in households suggests a stronger role for the Minnesota Legislature in setting statewide zoning standards that allow for more homes to be built. Unfortunately, such reforms have once again been halted during this year’s legislative session due to opposition from suburban localities.

Denser housing comes with other benefits, too. More housing options help people use fewer resources to travel outside of their community, thus lowering carbon emissions. Because people travel outside of their neighborhood less, these options also foster more vibrant and complete neighborhoods, where people of all backgrounds have access to secure and affordable homes. These goals all complement one another.

Advertisement

Minneapolis’ boom in households means that it needs more houses to hold them. If it fails to build more housing, Minneapolis will struggle to remain affordable and to fit the needs of an increasingly large and diverse number of households.



Source link

Advertisement

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed

Published

on

Minneapolis council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed


Minneapolis City Council’s costly encampment response plan passes, likely to be vetoed

A controversial plan addressing homeless encampments, while getting enough votes for approval, may never see the light of day.

The Humane Encampment Response ordinance does and calls for many things, creating a heavy lift for the city of Minneapolis and needs a lot of public dollars — including providing portable bathrooms, hand washing station, needle disposal supplies, and more.

It also sets up a seven-day pre-closure notice and provides free storage, which city staff says alone would cost millions. The ordinance also includes ensuring people have access to services and shelter. 

Advertisement

RELATED: Minneapolis City Council passes housing crisis policies as mayor expedites encampment closures 

“We seek to address the public health and safety concerns,” Aisha Chughtai, one of the three council members, said during Thursday’s city council meeting. “It also ensures that unsheltered individuals are given the basic dignity of time to make plans before a closure.”

Her colleague, Linea Palmisano, was first to express opposition. 

“I don’t know how we could suggest that we keep people in a situation where addiction, violence, trafficking — drug and sex trafficking and child trafficking — how that can be a humane response to encampments,” Palmisano said. 

At the posting of this article, we did not receive a statement from council member Aurin Chughtai, who said she’s supplying one — we asked how she responds to those who feel the ordinance encourages encampments to form and why it does not include steps to address crime that unfolds in encampments.

Advertisement

The one who needs to sign off on the ordinance, Mayor Jacob Frey, is clear on his stance. 

“I intend to veto it,” Frey told 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS, which will be effective as there was not enough support from council members to override it. 

“I don’t know how anybody could argue with a straight face that that is safe, and that’s the right way to do this,” Frey said, adding, “I don’t want to turn back that progress on an ordinance that would essentially make homeless encampments much easier to start open and then much harder to close.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis City Council set to take stronger stance against ICE

Published

on

Minneapolis City Council set to take stronger stance against ICE


The Minneapolis City Council will vote on Thursday to bolster a 22-year-old ordinance that restricts police officers from helping ICE agents or taking part in federal immigration enforcement.

Minneapolis’ separation ordinance

The backstory:

Advertisement

The City of Minneapolis first passed its separation ordinance in 2003, following the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and ICE under the Bush administration. Cities across the country began passing laws, including Minneapolis and St. Paul, following suggestions from Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2002 that state and local authorities should act as conduits for federal immigration enforcement.

Among other requirements, Minneapolis’ separation ordinance forbids Minneapolis police from taking part in immigration enforcement or assisting ICE agents. It also prevents city employees from investigating an individual when the only law they’ve violated is being in the United States illegally. City employees are also restricted from inquiring about immigration status except when required to do so by law.

Advertisement

Big picture view:

This week, the council presented a revised version of the separation ordinance with tougher language intended to combat ICE, amid a targeted immigration operation ordered by President Trump focused on the Somali community. In recent weeks, ICE agents have been spotted across the Twin Cities, especially in predominately Somali areas. Just this week, an enforcement operation in Cedar-Riverside ended in a confrontation with ICE agents pepper spraying protesters. During that operation, city leaders say an American citizen was arrested by ICE agents, forcefully handcuffed, and hauled down to a detention center in Bloomington.

The current review of the separation ordinance was sparked by a federal raid in June on a Mexican restaurant that turned out to be a criminal investigation. The raid did, however, spark an anti-ICE protest and a heavy police response.

Advertisement

Minneapolis council considers changes

Local perspective:

The new ordinance declares the city will “vigorously oppose” any attempt to use city resources for immigration enforcement. The revised ordinance also codifies an executive order issued last week by Mayor Jacob Frey restricting ICE from staging operations in city-owned lots, parking lots or ramps.

Advertisement

There are exemptions that allow police to work with ICE or federal authorities for operations like criminal investigations. In those cases, the new ordinance requires police officials to prepare a report detailing the operation and explaining why the city took part and submit it to the mayor, the council, and the public. The ordinance also opposes the government’s practice of hiding the identity of federal agents, saying that working alongside anyone who lacks clear agency identification, who is masked, or conceals their identity or badges would be contrary to the values of the city and harmful to the trust and public safety of city residents.

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

Along with the separation ordinance, council also approved an additional $40,000 in funding for the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota to support legal services for immigrants in Minneapolis. The law center helps immigrants detained by ICE, those seeking citizenship, and provides advice for those at risk of immigration enforcement.

What’s next:

The Minneapolis City Council will meet at 9:30 a.m. to vote on the separation ordinance and other measures on its calendar. The separation ordinance is Item 1 under the Committee of the Whole schedule titled “Employee authority in immigration matters ordinance: Title 2.” We will stream the meeting in the live player above.

Advertisement

Minneapolis City CouncilMinneapolisImmigrationDonald J. TrumpJacob Frey



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis neighbors unite: Snow emergencies prompt community spirit

Published

on

Minneapolis neighbors unite: Snow emergencies prompt community spirit


Residents in Minneapolis and St. Paul are working hard to manage the aftermath of a recent snowstorm, with snow emergencies still in effect.

Snow removal efforts continue

What we know:

Advertisement

Crews and residents are actively clearing snow from streets and sidewalks. 

Minneapolis residents must clear the entire width of city sidewalks within 24 hours to ensure accessibility.

Advertisement

Kevin Gilliam, a local homeowner, was seen snow-blowing his property to avoid dealing with hardened snow later. 

“I couldn’t get to it last night when the snow stopped around 8 or 9 o’clock,” said Gilliam. “I wanted to make sure I got the snow up, so it didn’t kind of freeze hard on the bottom.”

Neighbors lend a helping hand

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Richard Cushing helped his neighbor Robert Young, who recently moved to Minneapolis from Colorado, dig out his car. 

Young was initially using a dust pan before Cushing offered a shovel. 

Advertisement

“Three things you need for the winter in Minnesota: a good shovel, good tires, and a good neighbor,” said Young.

Cushing noticed Young’s struggle and decided to assist. 

Advertisement

“I saw him trying to dig it out with a dust pan. And I thought, I have a shovel in my car, I can probably do better than that,” said Cushing.

“You use what you have. And that’s all I could find in the house. We just moved in here from Colorado, and it’s a totally different snow altogether. And the Colorado snow is light and fluffy, and you just kind of blow it off. This has got attitude. It’s going to hang around,” Young added.

What’s next:

Advertisement

Temperatures are expected to drop – which means cleaning up snow will become more difficult in the coming days. 

Winter WeatherWeatherMinneapolisSt. Paul



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending