Connect with us

Michigan

Would Michigan investigators be able to prove murder in Dee Warner’s case without a body?

Published

on

Would Michigan investigators be able to prove murder in Dee Warner’s case without a body?


It was Sunday April 25, 2021, a spring morning in the farmland of Lenawee County, Michigan. Rikkell Bock drove the short distance from her house to her childhood home for her weekly breakfast with her mother, Dee Warner.

Rikkell Bock: Sundays … we would … go up to my mom’s first thing. 

Rikkell Bock and Dee Warner
“Always ready to go … and beautiful,” Rikkell Bock, left, said of Dee Warner. “My mom was a very bubbly outgoing person.”

Rikkell Bock

Advertisement


Rikkell says that when her mom was not there, and not answering calls or texts, it just didn’t feel right.

Rikkell Bock: If my mom could glue her phone to her hand, she would … If I didn’t respond to a text message in five minutes, I was getting another one, “Hello?”

One of Dee’s cars, a Hummer, was parked at the farm office, just down the road.

Erin Moriarty: What about your mother’s car that you drove all the time, the Cadillac?

Rikkell Bock: It was parked in the garage.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: So, all your mother’s cars are there?

Rikkell Bock: Yes.

Erin Moriarty: And she’s not responding to any kind of calls or texts?

Rikkell Bock: No.

The fertilizer sprayer, usually parked in a barn, was gone, and Rikkell’s stepfather, Dale Warner, was out on it — working.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: Was that normal?

Rikkell Bock: Yeah. … it was pretty normal for him to work any day, any time of day.

Rikkell went down the road to the home of Gregg and Shelley Hardy — Dee’s brother and sister-in-law.

Shelley Hardy: She said, “We can’t find her.” And I’m like, “what do you mean you can’t find her?” They said, “Her car is here. We have called everybody. We don’t know where she’s at.”

Gregg Hardy: The first thing I did was call her number … If she was somewhere, she would answer my phone call … and then I text her.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: And did you —

Gregg Hardy: And nothing.

WHERE’S DEE WARNER?

Rikkell and her Aunt Shelley went driving to look for Dee. They returned to her house with only more questions.

Shelley Hardy: There were blankets … laying on the couch and tissues, tissues everywhere … Everywhere. There were these tissues. 

They looked upstairs in the bedroom and bathroom for clues.

Advertisement

Rikkell Bock: Her make-up bag was gone. Her curling iron, and all of that stuff was gone.

Later they learned Dee’s phone and passport were missing, too.

 

Rikkell Bock: The feeling that I had in my stomach was … nothing but fear.

Zack Bock, another of Dee’s four children from her first marriage, soon came over to join the search. He went down to the farm office to look for any sign of his mom.

Advertisement

Zack Bock: There’s cameras here in the office. I’ll look at the cameras.

There was a security camera inside the office and a few more outside.

Zack Bock: I never saw her walk to the office. I never saw her drive a vehicle. … I didn’t see her.

And there was something else out of the ordinary. Their 9-year-old sister Lena, Dee and Dale’s only child together, had stayed at her cousin’s house the night before and Dee hadn’t yet called or come to get her. 

Rikkell Bock: Lena went everywhere with my mom. … They were very, very close.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: And would she ever leave Lena behind with Dale?

Rikkell Bock: Never.

Zack Bock: I called my siblings. We met up at my house, and we called the sheriff’s department.

By now, it was late in the day on Sunday, and the Lenawee County Sheriff’s Office sent a deputy, Austin Hall, to talk to Dale Warner. The conversation was recorded on a body camera:

DEPUTY HALL (bodycam  | April 25, 2021 ): Hi, I’m Deputy Hall from the Lenawee County Sheriff’s Office. How are you, sir?

Advertisement

DALE WARNER: Good.

Dale Warner speaks to a deputy on bodycam
A still from bodycam video shows Dale Warner talking with a deputy from the Lenawee County Sheriff’s Office about the whereabouts of his wife Dee on April 25, 2021. Warner spoke with investigators many times and allowed them to search his property multiple times.  

Lenawee County Sheriff’s Office


DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 25, 2021): She was sleeping on the couch.

Dale told police he had last seen Dee that morning before he went out to work.

Advertisement

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 25, 2021): And then this morning around 6 o’clock, I got up and, you know, she was snoring away … I texted her and she didn’t answer. So, I figured, well, she’s still sleeping.

Dale seemed to believe his wife was alive and well — and that she left intentionally.

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 25, 2021): Well, her hair curler’s gone, her hair dryer’s gone, her make-up bag is gone … I went and seen all that stuff gone, I wasn’t real concerned.

He said she might be using another phone.

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 25, 2021): I told the other kids she’s got a second phone …

Advertisement

DEPUTY HALL: Do you have a phone number?

DALE WARNER: No. It’s a secret phone that she doesn’t know that I know she has it.

Dale also told police that Dee had been upset and suffering from a migraine the night before after an argument with two of her employees.

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 25, 2021): I came home last night, and she was really upset. She was talking … bad things as far as employees, the one employee decided to quit …

DALE WARNER: (bodycam | April 25, 2021): We got three different businesses here. So, the tensions are high all the time.

Advertisement

Dale and Dee Warner ran three main businesses from their farm. Zack Bock was their bookkeeper.

Zack Bock: My mom ran essentially the office for all three businesses.

There was a trucking business with about 15 employees that Dee managed.

Zack Bock: She always referred to it as her trucking business.

Dee and Dale Warner property
Dee and Dale Warner owned a trucking business with about 15 employees. They also had a farm business, raising crops, and a chemical company that sold fertilizer and seed, all based on their rural property. 

Advertisement

CBS News


And there was the farm itself, and a chemical company, that sold fertilizer and seed.

Erin Moriarty: Which was the most successful? Which did the best?

Stephanie Voelkle: 100% … the trucking company.

Stephanie Voelkle worked for the Warners and describes Dee as a good businessperson: tough, generous and hard-working. But Rikkell says that running that trucking business was not easy for Dee.

Advertisement

Rikkell Bock: I know that she had a hard time getting respect from some of the farmers because she was a woman and younger and pretty.

Dale told police that conflict between Dee and their employees was nothing new.

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 25, 2021): I mean, she’s had altercations with quite a few people. I mean, she’s pretty wired, if you know my wife. 

DEPUTY HALL: I — I don’t know, but —

DALE WARNER: She’s in your face and tells you how it is.

Advertisement

On Saturday, the day before she went missing, Dee had texted Voelkle asking her how to block the driver who had quit from the company’s Facebook page. 

Stephanie Voelkle (reading her texts) I told her how to do it. … that was at 4:34.

Erin Moriarty: On Saturday afternoon, April 24th.

Stephanie Voelkle: Yep. And then at 4:44, I said, “did you tell Zack?” At 7:43, I said, “How are you?” (crying) And she never answered.

Erin Moriarty: That’s the very last time you ever heard from Dee Warner?

Advertisement

Stephanie Voelkle: Yeah.

Shelley Hardy wondered if the pressures had just become too much for Dee.

Erin Moriarty: You’re thinking at that point, she might have taken her life?

Shelley Hardy: I did.

Gregg Hardy: We were worried because of everyone’s report of her emotional behavior.

Advertisement

Shelley Hardy: She had been upset and had an argument on Friday and Saturday …

Gregg Hardy: The crescendo was building up … There might have been a breaking point …

QUESTIONS FOR DALE WARNER

Erin Moriarty: Can you think of a day when no one knew where your mother was? A full day.

Rikkell Bock: No.

After hearing nothing from Dee, some of those closest to her feared she may have harmed herself and they noticed that her husband Dale didn’t seem very worried.

Advertisement

DALE WARNER (bodycam): She’ll cool off and she’ll come back home.

Dale had told the sheriff’s deputy that Dee, when upset, had a history of spending the night elsewhere.

DALE WARNER (bodycam): She took all her bags. So, somebody picked her up.

And he said he thought she might come back eventually.

DALE WARNER (bodycam): I mean, I don’t know what else to do other than wait a day or so, and see what –

Advertisement

DEPUTY HALL: Sure.

DALE WARNER: — she shows up.

But the sheriff’s office did not wait for Dee to show up. They came out on Monday and Tuesday to conduct interviews and search the property. On Thursday, four days after Dee disappeared, they searched the farm again. And Dale agreed to talk to them, at length, at the kitchen table.

Dale now told the investigators that he and Dee had had a fight on Saturday. He said she had accused him of talking about her, behind her back, to the employees she had fought with—which Dale denied.

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 29, 2021): And she hang up the phone and I had no more contact with her the rest of the day. … I tried calling her several times and she wouldn’t answer her phone.

Advertisement

He said he didn’t talk to Dee again until that evening, at home, when their fight continued.

DALE WARNER (bodycam | April 29, 2021): She says, “you don’t care about me, nobody cares about me, and what does it matter if I’m even here?”

Dale and Dee Warner
Dale and Dee Warner were married in 2006. It was Dee’s second marriage. Her friends and family said they weren’t an obvious pair.

Rikkell Bock


Dale and Dee Warner had been partners in life and business since they started their first company together in 2005—the year before they got married.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: Was this a love match? Did you feel that way?

Gregg Hardy: No. … She had a desire for success.

Shelley Hardy: Yes.

Gregg Hardy: I believe that’s what her attraction was, I really do.

They weren’t an obvious pair. Dee’s family and friends say she loved to have fun, dress up, go out, and dance. Dale, they say, just seemed to work a lot.

Advertisement

Stephanie Voelkle: I don’t know what she’s seen in him. I really don’t. … He doesn’t like to do things with her. I went on a cruise with her because he didn’t want to go. 

Zack Bock: Dale … was fairly quiet, kind of distant from all of us kids.

Rikkell Bock: When he did communicate, it was usually — he kind of liked to poke at people … where he knew would hurt the worst.

Rikkell says Dale helped feed Dee’s insecurities.

Rikkell Bock: I don’t think she ever felt, good enough … like she felt like she had to prove constantly everything in her life, her looks, her — her money, her businesses—everything.

Advertisement

Dee’s family later learned she had been having an affair. It didn’t surprise them, they said, given the state of her marriage. But police say her affair partner was out of town the weekend she went missing and could not have had anything to do with the case. A week after her disappearance, Dee’s brother Gregg Hardy organized a search of the land around her home.

Gregg Hardy: We all went on foot … And we walked up probably 5, 6, 700 acres —

Erin Moriarty: Wow.

Gregg Hardy: We — we came up zero.

By now, Dee’s family was growing suspicious of Dale. On the day Dee went missing, Dale told each of them what happened, but they say they all heard slightly different versions. 

Advertisement

Gregg Hardy: She had a bad migraine headache. She was laying on the floor. He gave her a massage. She went to sleep. He picked her up and put her on the couch about 12:30. … he got up about 6, 6:30, he left, but she was snoring on the couch.

Zack says Dale told him he had had a fight with Dee.

Zack Bock: He said that they had a really big fight the night before.

But Rikkell says Dale told her the fight was no big deal.

Rikkell Bock: He said that — they had a little fight the night before … and she was all mad and she won’t answer him now.

Advertisement

And there was another odd detail in the story Dale told Dee’s family and police that Sunday.

DALE WARNER (April 25, 2021 | bodycam): The only thing that’s really strange, too, is this time she put her wedding ring on my desk, in the office and left it. You know and now she’s gone.

DEPUTY HALL: Yeah.

DALE WARNER: She’s never done that before.

Rikkell Bock, Zack Bock and Gregg Hardy all say Dale showed them that ring on Sunday too, seeming to offer it as proof that Dee had left intentionally, and maybe for good. But Gregg says that ring is worth as much as $40,000. And leaving it behind didn’t sound like Dee.

Advertisement

Gregg Hardy:  That’s not my sister. … Not only would she not give him the wedding ring back, she probably would’ve thrown a Molotov cocktail in the house on her way out.

As time passed the family’s suspicions that Dale had harmed his wife only grew. About six weeks after Dee went missing, Gregg says he confronted Dale about how he thought the investigation was progressing.

Gregg Hardy:  I ask him point-blank, “Dale, what do you think about … your wife is still missing? … She just disappeared on thin air?” And he said to me … “Well, it could be a little faster, but I think they’re doing a good job. And that’s when I — I told him, I said, “you know what? You’re a liar” … And I told him, “I’ll get you.”

Erin Moriarty: You told him that? 

Gregg Hardy: Yeah.

Advertisement

But believing Dale had something to do with Dee’s disappearance was very different from being able to prove it. The Michigan State Police and the FBI helped the county sheriff conduct a large-scale search of their properties again in October, but there was still no sign of Dee alive or dead.

Shelley Hardy: We had been struggling because everybody said you don’t have a body; you don’t have a body.

In February 2022, 10 months after Dee had gone missing, Shelley was watching an episode of “48 Hours” featuring an investigator named Billy Little.

BILLY LITTLE (from “48 Hours”‘ “Searching for Maya Millete“) You don’t have a body. So what? You don’t get to get away with murder because you’re good at disposing of bodies.

Shelley Hardy: So I thought, “Oh my gosh, I — I got to have Gregg see this.” … so he watched it and immediately when he said that, he said, “get me that guy’s number.”

Advertisement

A BROTHER’S “GUT FEELING”

Gregg Hardy was convinced Dale Warner was behind his sister’s disappearance.

Although the sheriff’s office had conducted at least seven searches and interviewed Dale Warner several times, Gregg was growing impatient by what he saw as a lack of progress. Authorities, says Gregg, told him that without a body it would be difficult to charge Dale Warner with murder. Which is why Gregg called Missouri-based attorney and investigator Billy Little.

Billy Little: Maybe you’ll find the body, maybe you won’t. But don’t sit around waiting for Santa Claus to come. You gotta solve this case. 

Little made his first trip to Lenawee County in the spring of 2022.

Billy Little (driving with Moriarty in Lenawee County): My goal is always to just discover the truth, find out what happened … the nice thing about the truth is it doesn’t have a side.

Advertisement

Little got to work on his own investigation and learned from Dee’s family that the couple argued frequently — especially about money.

Billy Little: This was not a happy marriage, a marriage of … endless love.

Dee’s adult children told Little their mom had often talked about divorce but said she didn’t want to split custody of their little sister Lena with Dale Warner. Still, the day before Dee disappeared, they say, something had changed.

Erin Moriarty: Had you really seen your mother like that before?

Rikkell Bock: Upset, yes. … But this was just very different. She was, like, almost calm.

Advertisement
Dee Warner
Dee Warner

Parker Hardy


Dee’s kids say that she had finally had enough and was going to tell Dale that night she wanted to sell the profitable trucking business and end her marriage.

Erin Moriarty: This was Dee’s life. Why did she want to sell the business?

Billy Little: … Because it had become too difficult emotionally and personally for her … That’s how bad the marriage had gotten.

Advertisement

Gregg told Little that he thought Dale was moving money between the businesses after Dee disappeared. Gregg had already filed a civil suit to protect Dee’s interests and to get more information about what Dale was doing.

Gregg Hardy: Call it a gut feeling if you’d like, whatever you’d call it.

In court documents, Dale says he did move money—on the advice of professionals. The more Little learned, he says, the more he — like the family — became convinced that Dee was no longer alive.

Billy Little: The evidence that she’s dead is the absence of evidence that she’s alive. … No surveillance cameras, no electronic signature, her phone’s not found, her bank accounts were never accessed … cash wasn’t taken from the house. Even the ring … She didn’t even take that.

Dale and Dee Warner billboard
Dee Warner’s brother, Gregg Hardy, says he was being sarcastic when he wrote the billboard in Lenawee County, Michigan, that read “Help Dale Find Dee.” Dale Warner denies he ever harmed his wife.

Advertisement

CBS News


Gregg and Little tried to increase the pressure on Dale. Friends had started a social media campaign called “Justice for Dee.” And Gregg paid for a billboard that he says he wrote sarcastically, saying “Help Dale Find Dee.” It went up at a big intersection near Dale Warner’s farm — where, Hardy says, drivers from the trucking company would be sure to see it every day.

Billy Little  (driving with Moriarty): “Help Dale Find Dee.”  It was part of almost psychological operations.

But Little says he and Gregg were mostly focused on trying to find evidence to help build a murder case … without a body.

Billy Little: You’ve got a lot of equipment, you’ve got a lot of chemicals, there are a lot of ways to dispose of the body on a farm.

Advertisement

And they continued to search relentlessly for any trace of Dee.

Gregg Hardy (with Moriarty): You can see there is a silo right over there. That’s the location of where the buildings were.

The property Gregg showed Moriarty, about three miles from Dale and Dee Warner’s home, is one of the places that stood out to Gregg. Six months after Dee disappeared, there was a fire where the old farmhouse used to be, and Hardy says the neighbors told him they thought Dale—who owned the property with Dee—had set that fire. The fire was determined to be a controlled burn, which are common in the area. Police searched the site in October 2021, just a few days after that fire. It’s not known what, if anything, they learned. Gregg and Little came here themselves the next year.

Gregg Hardy (with Moriarty at the property): We used a drone to fly, not only this site, but every site we could find around here. We flew a couple thousand acres of drone footage.

They found nothing conclusive. But that old farm was just one site they thought was suspicious.

Advertisement

Gregg Hardy: There is basically three or four major sites that bother me.

There was a field near Rikkell’s house that Dale had farmed. And another field, two towns over, that Dale had access to. And many more places Gregg wanted police to check further.

Erin Moriarty: And is it the really hard part about this, Gregg, is there’s just so many places?

Gregg Hardy: There are so many places.  

In August 2022, the Michigan State Police took over Dee’s case. Gregg and Little had pushed for this because they say the state police had more experience and resources than the county sheriff.

Advertisement

After the state police took over the case, they interviewed Dale again and pressed him on his story. Warner told them that the argument with that employee just before Dee disappeared was partly about Dee taking money from the business

DALE WARNER (Dec. 2022 police interview): Dee said he [that employee] called her out and said, I know what you’ve been doing. You’ve been taking this money you know you’ve been doing this … and she’d been had, she couldn’t hide it anymore.

But police did not have evidence that Dee had stolen money. In September, the family filed another suit to have Dee Warner declared legally dead. Gregg says he wanted to be able to file a wrongful death suit against Dale one day. The family waited for news on the criminal case and then —

Gregg Hardy: It was pretty crazy because we had a meeting with the prosecutor the same day … and she gave me no indication.

On Nov. 21, 2023, two-and-a-half years after Dee Warner went missing, the news came that her husband, Dale, was under arrest. Stephanie Voelkle was preparing for her mother’s funeral when she got the call.

Advertisement

Stephanie Voelkle: Rikkell’s boyfriend, called me … and he said Dale was arrested for murder. And I fell to my knees at the funeral home. [I was] just so happy.

Dale Warner was charged with the murder of his wife Dee. He pleaded not guilty, and Dee’s family braced themselves for a long legal battle ahead.

Rikkell Bock: However long it took, we wouldn’t stop fighting.

DEE WARNER’S FAMILY GETS THEIR DAY IN COURT

On May 1, 2024, just a little more than three years after Dee Warner disappeared, her friends and family gathered at the Lenawee County District Court for the first day of Dale Warner’s preliminary hearing.

Erin Moriarty: You had to testify. … Were you nervous?

Advertisement

Rikkell Bock: Yeah … I mean, all you do is tell the truth. So that’s what I kept telling myself.

It would be up to Judge Anna Frushour to decide if the case should move to trial.

Stephanie Voelkle: I was worried … because there is so little physical evidence.

Dee had been recently declared dead in civil court, but Dale’s defense attorney, Mary Chartier, said this was a fact prosecutors would need to establish themselves in the criminal case.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): There is no body. There are no body parts. … Whether Ms. Warner is dead is something that the government needs to prove.

Advertisement

But the state was determined to show that while there was no body, there was also no evidence that Dee was still alive.

JACKIE WYSE (in court): Since April 24th, 2021, have you seen Dee Warner?

STEPHANIE VOELKLE: No.

JACKIE WYSE: Have you heard from Dee Warner?

STEPHANIE VOELKLE: No.

Advertisement

And prosecutor Jackie Wyse worked to show there was no evidence that Dee had taken off on her own. She asked Voelkle about that secret phone that Dale claimed his wife had.

JACKIE WYSE (in court): Did she ever discuss getting a second phone with you?

STEPHANIE VOELKLE: She did. … She had asked me to look into pricing and trying to find one for her, yes.

JACKIE WYSE: OK. So, up until April 25th, 2021, did you ever purchase that phone?

STEPHANIE VOELKLE: No.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: Could she have bought the phone on her own?

Stephanie Voelkle: Yeah. She could have bought it on her own, but she would’ve had somebody else set it up. She was not tech savvy.

Michigan State Police Detective Daniel Drewyor is the lead investigator on this case. He testified at the preliminary hearing about the exhaustive searches law enforcement did to find any trace of activity from Dee over the three years she had been missing.

DET. DREWYOR (in court): We did, search warrants for healthcare records, phone records. We searched numerous vehicles … We got records for social media. We did several land searches.

All their searches came up empty—but Dee’s daughter, Rikkell, had noticed something curious at the Warner home. On the stand, she said that on the day her mother disappeared she saw tire tracks by the back of the house.

Advertisement

RIKKELL BOCK: There were two tracks that led up to the sliding glass door.

Warner property
The prosecution suggested that the tracks Rikkell Bock saw at the back of the house the day her mother disappeared were left by Dale Warner using the farm’s JCB front-end loader to remove Dee Warner’s body from their home. 

Michigan State Police


There were no security cameras pointed at this part of the property, but the prosecution suggested that the tracks Rikkell saw were left by Dale Warner using the farm’s JCB front-end loader to remove Dee’s body from their home.

DET. DREWYOR:  When parking the front-end loader, the JCB, in this spot, the bucket attached to it fits between those two pillars and you can set it on the deck up against the back door.

Advertisement

DALE WARNER (Dec. 2022 | police interview): I didn’t see anything in the house. Dee was still sleeping.

In his 2022 interview with police, Dale Warner had an explanation for those tracks — he said he thought he used the loader to go back to the house and get his worksheet for the sprayer at around 6:30 a.m.

DALE WARNER (Dec. 2022| police interview): I think I had to run and grab my damn sheet, my load sheet. I don’t remember for sure … I come got the JCB, the loader, pulled around by the house and I run in. I had to grab something out of the house and I run back out, got in the loader, backed back out.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): No evidence that Ms. Warner is dead … and no evidence that she was murdered was found, correct?

DET. DREWYOR: Yes, ma’am.

Advertisement

The defense emphasized there was no evidence Dale had anything to do with Dee’s disappearance. And, in fact, his statements about what he was doing that morning were supported by security videos around the farm. The videos, played in court, show Dale at 7 a.m., using that front-end loader. At 7:45 a.m., police say, he sends Dee this text that was read out loud in court, “Going to be spraying. call you later :)” He is seen three minutes later driving a sprayer onto the road and returning at 8:13 a.m.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): So, you had the sprayer records for the John Deere and then did you actually even do a sprayer reenactment?

DET. DREWYOR: We did. Yes, ma’am.

MARY CHARTIER: Consistent with what Mr. Warner said, right?

DET. DREWYOR: Consistent with the time that occurred on that morning, yes.

Advertisement
Dale Warner in court
Dale Warner, who pleaded not guilty, listens in court during his preliminary hearing in the case involving his wife Dee Warner’s disappearance and alleged murder. A judge would decide if the case should move to trial.

CBS News


The defense also argued that Dale had not acted like a guilty man. He allowed police to search his properties and spoke to them many times after Dee disappeared. Only parts of a few of those interviews were played in court, but his attorney said that Dale had repeatedly denied harming Dee.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): Of all the phone calls and interviews with Mr. Warner, he never once said he harmed his wife, correct? 

DET. DREWYOR: Correct.

Advertisement

MARY CHARTIER: He was always adamant that he did not, correct? 

DET. DREWYOR: Yes.

Over and over, the defense underscored the lack physical evidence in the case.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): Do you have a murder weapon in this case? 

DET. DREWYOR: No, ma’am.

Advertisement

MARY CHARTIER: Big pool of blood, anything like that? 

DET. DREWYOR: No, we have no forensic evidence of that nature. No, Ma’am. 

In her final statement to the judge, Chartier argues that there is no basis for the charges.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): They hone in on Mr. Warner from the beginning.

MARY CHARTIER (in court): If he murdered his wife, where on earth is Ms. Warner?

Advertisement

JACKIE WYSE (in court): Since 4/25/2021, nobody has heard from or seen Dee Warner.

Prosecutor Jackie Wyse maintained that the state’s case was strong.

JACKIE WYSE: All we’re required to prove at this stage is, probable cause to believe that Dale Warner killed Dee Warner. And … probable cause standard has been met.

The decision was now with the judge—and Dee’s supporters were worried. Would Dale now face the murder charge at trial—or would he walk out as a free man?

Rikkell Bock: The thought of him getting out was just scary. … Do we have enough?

Advertisement

AN IMPORTANT DISCOVERY CLOSE TO HOME

On June 7, 2024, Judge Anna Frushour returned to court with her decision. She first spoke about Dee.

JUDGE ANNA FRUSHOUR:  Dee Warner was a woman with a big heart and a temper. She cared for her children and grandchildren, and employees. … There was nothing, in the evidence, that suggested she would disappear intentionally, especially from her children.

And there was nothing she heard, the judge said, that made her feel differently.

JUDGE ANNA FRUSHOUR: The statements by Dale Warner … of a secret phone … and someone coming to pick up Dee Warner were not supported by any facts or evidence in this case.

But there was enough evidence, she said, to believe that Dee Warner was dead and that her husband was likely the one behind it.

Advertisement

JUDGE ANNA FRUSHOUR: There is probable cause that Dee Warner died by homicide at the hands of the defendant, Dale Warner.

Rikkell Bock: This is reality. … They think that there’s enough evidence that he killed our mom to go to trial.

Dale has been ordered to stand trial for the murder of his wife, but Little knows the real work is still ahead.

Billy Little: My fear for getting past a preliminary hearing was probably a one out of 10. My fear of getting a conviction at trial is probably an eight out of 10.

Erin Moriarty: It’s a high bar.

Advertisement

Billy Little: Yeah.

Law enforcement was still searching for physical evidence and in August 2024, two months after that preliminary hearing concluded, that’s exactly what they found. Dee’s family heard about it first.

Rikkell Bock: I received a message … that said we need to have an emergency meeting with the detectives.

They met detectives at Gregg and Shelley Hardy’s farm. Police told them they had gone back to a property that Dale and Dee Warner owned and taken away a large metal tank that was used to store fertilizer. According to a search warrant, that tank had a “non-factory weld on the back” and a sign on it that said, “out of service”… “do not fill.” When the tank was scanned, investigators finally found what they had been looking for.

Rikkell Bock: It was my mom. Well, it was a body in a tank.

Advertisement
Ferilizer tank on Warner property
Dee Warner’s remains had been hiding in plain sight – her body discovered in a fertilizer tank on the property she owned with her husband.   

WTOL


It took just days, authorities say, to confirm that the body inside that tank was Dee Warner. Her death was ruled a homicide.

Erin Moriarty: And how did she die?

Gregg Hardy: They’re not sharing that with me.

Advertisement

Authorities are not granting any interviews about this case before the trial, but that warrant also says that security video from the day Dee was reported missing showed Dale in one of the farm buildings “searching for something near the welding equipment.” For three years, police had been looking for Dee’s body underground, and now they had come to believe that she might have been concealed above ground.

Gregg Hardy: The tank was in this … agricultural storage building right behind me.

Erin Moriarty: And was the cylinder right in here?

Gregg Hardy: Yeah, it was parked here.

Erin Moriarty: So, Dale would have access to all this?

Advertisement

Gregg Hardy: He did.

Gregg says he has no doubt now that Dale killed Dee and hid her body.

Gregg Hardy: All these things … point in one single direction, clearly, without any question.

Erin Moriarty: And that’s to Dale?

Gregg Hardy: That’s correct.

Advertisement

Dale’s defense attorney declined to speak to “48 Hours” on camera, but she told us that Dale maintains his innocence and said in an email they’re “prepared to vigorously fight for him in court and present his defense.”

Erin Moriarty: Isn’t it likely that Dale’s going to argue, well, that was a cylinder sitting out in a barn, anybody had access to that cylinder, someone could have come into his own barn and put your mom?

Rikkell Bock: Absolutely. I mean, he — he can say — anything.

Rikkell says finding her mom’s body after these three long years gave the family a sense of peace.

Rikkell Bock: I wanted to shout from the rooftops to everybody that she didn’t leave us willingly.

Advertisement
Dee Warner
Dee Warner

Rikkell Bock


Dee’s family laid her to rest in a private burial soon after her body was identified. Her daughter Lena, now 12, was with them.

Gregg Hardy (emotional): The one thing that she knows for sure, that was her mother there. … That her mother didn’t leave her. It was real.

Shelley Hardy (crying):  It’s like you get hit in the stomach every time … I miss her laughter and her comfort.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: You miss her?

Stephanie Voelkle: Very much … I miss her every day.

Rikkell and Zack Bock say they miss their mother deeply, and that her death has changed them in profound ways.

Zack Bock: I’m now three years sober. … And, shortly after she went missing, I started my own real estate company. … I stopped being scared of failing on something ’cause there was nothing left to lose.

Rikkell Bock: He’s my mom’s spirit, very hardworking and driven and determined.

Advertisement

Erin Moriarty: Your children will grow up hearing about Dee.

Rikkell Bock: Yeah.

Erin Moriarty: What will you tell them about your mother?

Rikkell Bock: Oh, my mom enjoyed being a grandma so much … They will always remember … how she would have been there. My mom would’ve been there for everything.

Dale Warner’s trial is scheduled to begin on Sept. 2, 2025.

Advertisement

Produced by Sarah Prior. Cindy Cesare is the development producer. Chelsea Narvaez is the field producer. Doreen Schechter, Diana Modica and Joan Adelman are the editors. Lourdes Aguiar is the senior producer. Nancy Kramer is the executive story editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer



Source link

Advertisement

Michigan

AIPAC draws ire of half of Michigan Democratic voters in new poll

Published

on

AIPAC draws ire of half of Michigan Democratic voters in new poll


play

About half of likely Michigan Democratic primary voters hold an unfavorable view of the pro-Israel group the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, according to a new statewide poll, but respondents overall didn’t rate a candidate’s position on Israel and Gaza as of great importance when choosing a Senate nominee.

“It is not of high interest, despite the national narrative,” pollster Richard Czuba said, referring to national news coverage of the Michigan U.S. Senate contest.

Advertisement

“As you ask voters to look across the spectrum about issues that matter to them, this isn’t one of them.”

The Detroit News/WDIV-TV (Channel 4) poll of 500 likely Michigan Democratic primary voters was conducted last week by Czuba’s Glengariff Group and had a margin of error of plus-minus 4.4 percentage points.

A majority of respondents said antisemitism against Jewish Americans has risen, that they support both a Palestinian state and Israel’s right to exist, and believe Israel has “gone too far” in its war against the militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah.

Overall, the likely Michigan Democratic primary voters rated a Senate candidate’s position on Israel and Gaza at 5.6 on a 10-point scale. Czuba said a measurement over 7 usually indicates some level of importance, while 8 is considered demonstrating a high level of importance.

Advertisement

Supporters of Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed of Ann Arbor rated the issue a 6, while those backing U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens of Birmingham rated it 5.2. Undecided voters in the survey were at 5.7.

“That’s not surprising to me at all,” said consultant Adrian Hemond, a Democrat and CEO of Grassroots Midwest.

“It’s hard to get Americans to care about foreign policy while American troops are not getting shot, and that’s not happening right now. That’s not to say they don’t care about it at all, but in terms of what influences their voting behavior? Nah.”

Half of Michigan Democrats sour on AIPAC

Israel and Gaza have been a point of contrast and contention between El-Sayed and Stevens: Stevens is a staunch supporter of Israel who has voted for U.S. military aid for that country, while El-Sayed has called Israel’s actions in Gaza a genocide. He wants to end the U.S. practice of subsidizing foreign militaries, including Israel’s.

El-Sayed has also repeatedly hit Stevens on the $49 million of outside spending — including $26 million from an AIPAC-aligned group — that’s flowed into the race to help boost her bid, according to recent ad-tracking figures.

Advertisement

“Explain what you’ve given away for AIPAC support in this race,” El-Sayed demanded in last week’s televised debate in Grand Rapids.

“No one owns my vote, and no one owns my policies,” Stevens shot back.

In the debate last week, Stevens pointed to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criticism of her and said Netanyahu had “failed” in securing long-term peace and in providing humanitarian aid in Gaza. The remark appeared to be an effort to put some distance between herself and the support she’s getting from AIPAC that has turned off some Democrats.

“I can say that Israel has a right to peacefully exist alongside the people of Palestine and in Gaza,” she said.

Advertisement

The poll conducted last week found that 49% of Democratic primary voters have an unfavorable opinion of AIPAC. About 12% view AIPAC favorably, and 39% were neutral ― with no opinion of the pro-Israel lobby group ― or said they didn’t know. About 34% of voters expressed a “very” unfavorable opinion of AIPAC.

About 65% of El-Sayed’s supporters expressed an unfavorable view of AIPAC, with 8% favorable and 26% neutral, while fewer Stevens’ voters, 38%, view AIPAC unfavorably and 16.5% favorably, with 45% neutral.

The group does not seem to be a motivating issue for undecided voters, 65% of whom were neutral on AIPAC, according to poll results.

“What this issue has become is virtue-signaling to the far left that you’re one of us,” Czuba said of AIPAC opposition.

Scott Cruz, 61, of South Lyon, said he learned about AIPAC about six months ago, but has been concerned for decades about the amount of money the U.S. gives to Israel. In more recent years, what started as Israel’s understandable response to the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas has advanced far beyond that, said Cruz, who participated in the poll.

Advertisement

“Just too nuts, man. Hatfields and McCoys, I don’t care,” Cruz said of the Israel-Gaza conflict. “They (Israel) had the moral high ground for a minute there and then said, ‘Let’s blow it.’”

Michelle Miller-Adams, a 66-year-old Kalamazoo resident and political scientist who also participated in the poll, said she considers herself a politically progressive Jew.

She said she understands the criticism of Israel’s leadership but is worried that opposition to Israel and AIPAC is mixing dangerously with an increase in antisemitism.

“I’m not a fan of AIPAC,” Miller-Adams said. “But I think AIPAC has been demonized among all the PACs and has been misrepresented. AIPAC gets singled out for criticism in a way that makes me very uncomfortable.”

Rebecca Cunningham, an 83-year-old Detroit resident, said she’s voting for Stevens because of her prior experience at the federal level. She’s aware of a debate over Israel and is concerned by the U.S. government’s actions there, but she doesn’t believe those concerns are the only factors in determining her vote.

Advertisement

“I’d have to look at the whole picture,” Cunningham said. “In my mind, I’m not really clear why we’re over there fighting. We have enough issues in the United States we could put our attention to.”

Alignment among Michigan Democrats on Mideast issues

The survey of Michigan Democrats showed they are largely in agreement on issues related to the Middle East, including 63% of whom support the creation of an independent Palestinian state in Gaza. Another 15% said they oppose a Palestinian state, while 22% said it would depend or they didn’t know.

Notably, 78% of El-Sayed supporters favor a Palestinian state with 13% unsure, compared with 51% of Stevens’ voters in support of an independent state with 26% unsure. Undecided voters fell between the two, with 61% for an independent state and 38.5% unsure.

A large majority of Democrats surveyed, nearly 77%, said Israel has a right to exist as a country, while 12% are opposed and 12% of voters were unsure or said it depends.

On this question, 67% of self-identified Democratic Socialists said they support Israel’s right to exist, while 30% are opposed, and 2% said they’re unsure or it depends. Nearly 21% of Democratic Socialists said they “strongly” oppose Israel’s right to exist.

Advertisement

El-Sayed, the son of Egyptian immigrants, pivoted last week when he was asked on CNN if Israel has a right to exist.

“The question about a right to exist is interesting, because nobody’s ever asked me whether I believe Palestine has a right to exist. Every single president who’s served has said they believe in a two-state solution,” El-Sayed said.

“Israel exists. The question is whether we want a politics where our money is sent over to Israel to fund genocide and apartheid instead of investing in our own kids.”

Nearly 70% of poll respondents said Israel’s actions against Hamas and Hezbollah have “gone too far.” About 3% said they’ve not gone far enough, and 13% said they’ve been about right, while 15% were unsure, according to the survey.

About 21% of Stevens’ supporters in the survey said Israel’s actions were about right, as opposed to 6% of El-Sayed voters and 2% of undecided voters.

Advertisement

About two in three likely Michigan Democratic voters said antisemitism against Jewish Americans has increased over the past two years, and 3% said it’s declined. Nearly 24% said the level of antisemitism has stayed the same, and 9% were unsure.

Younger voters (under 55 years old) disproportionately concluded that antisemitism has stayed the same or decreased, while higher numbers of older voters said antisemitism has grown, including 76% of respondents age 65 and older.

More Stevens supporters said that antisemitism has increased (71%) than backers of El-Sayed (57%).

mburke@detroitnews.com

eleblanc@detroitnews.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan AD Warde Manuel says he’s been fired by social media 3 times in 10 years

Published

on

Michigan AD Warde Manuel says he’s been fired by social media 3 times in 10 years


Embattled Michigan athletic director Warde Manuel on Tuesday addressed the latest round of reports about his potential exit from the university, saying he has had conversations about a potential buyout.

“I think I’ve been fired by social media three times in my ten years here,” Manuel said during a previously scheduled interview on The Big 1050 WTKA.

Multiple media outlets recently suggested his job is in jeopardy amid investigations into the culture of the department and fired football coach Sherrone Moore’s relationship with his former executive assistant.

The investigations have cost the university about $12 million, and it may not release all the related reports.

Advertisement

“Documents related to these attorney-directed investigations are privileged and confidential and protected by attorney-client privilege,” school spokesman Paul Corliss said Tuesday. “Maintaining the confidentiality of these documents preserves the integrity of the investigative process, protects the privacy of those who participated and helps safeguard those individuals from potential retaliation.”

Michigan’s board has a meeting on Thursday, where the publicly accessible agenda does not mention Manuel or the investigations.

“I have four years left on my contract,” said Manuel, who acknowledged talks about a possible buyout. “I don’t know what the future is going to be.

“I do feel confident in the things I have done here at Michigan. I’m very proud of what we’ve accomplished.”

Manuel said he has helped the Wolverines have their best 10-year stretch, winning this year’s national championship in men’s basketball along with recent football, men’s and women’s gymnastics NCAA titles, 95 Big Ten championships and 4,000-plus student-athletes earning academic all-conference honors.

Advertisement

Michigan also has had a string of scandals under his watch.

Manuel fired Moore for having an inappropriate relationship with his executive assistant, who sued the school earlier this month.

The football program is on NCAA probation, was tarnished by a sign-stealing scheme and has seen many former staffers have run-ins with the law, including Matt Weiss, who is charged with hacking into the computer accounts of thousands of college athletes to find intimate images.

Manuel is also named in a lawsuit — along with the university, its board, a former school president and Big Ten Commissioner Tony Petitti — filed by fired assistant football coach Chris Partridge that claims Michigan knew about the sign-stealing scandal nearly a year before the public did.

The 58-year-old Manuel, who played football at Michigan under the late Bo Schembechler and was on the track team, was hired to lead the department in 2016. He signed a contract extension at Michigan in 2024 that runs through June 2030.

Advertisement

Manuel, a New Orleans native, previously served as athletic director at Connecticut and Buffalo after working in Michigan’s athletic department in various roles from 1996 to 2005.

___

AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports


Note: The video above originally aired on July 9, 2026.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Hard to see embattled Michigan AD Warde Manuel emerging unscathed

Published

on

Hard to see embattled Michigan AD Warde Manuel emerging unscathed


play

Barely three months since students flooded downtown Ann Arbor and chanted “Tt’s great … to be … a Michigan Wolverine” as they celebrated Michigan basketball’s first NCAA championship in 37 years, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone on the school’s campus who feels great about anything in the athletics department.

Instead, the university found itself in a much different and darker place Monday, July 13, when it faced new legal accusations that replaced all that happy singing with the deafening silence emitted through a barrage of “no comment” statements.

Advertisement

An amended lawsuit from former Wolverines linebackers coach Chris Partridge alleges former school president Santa Ono worked to hide details of the football team’s sign-stealing scandal and that athletic department leaders knew about ex-coach Sherrone Moore’s affair with staff member Paige Shriver years before it led to his firing.

And Warde Manuel – the athletic director who orchestrated that jubilation three months ago and even more jubilation three years earlier, when Michigan football won its first title in a quarter-century – finds himself in the eye of the storm as he faces the end of his highly successful but troubled tenure.

Manuel is named in Partridge’s lawsuit, which claims he knew about Moore’s relationship with Shriver “for years without taking action to protect the employee.” 

He’s also a focal point of an investigation that began in December, run by Chicago law firm Jenner & Block and costing the school nearly $12 million. The Free Press has learned that higher-ups have been briefed on the findings. The U-M Board of Regents is expected to discuss that investigation at a Thursday meeting in Traverse City.

Advertisement

On Sunday, Yahoo Sports reported that Manuel’s future is “in doubt” based on the findings of that investigation. On Monday, Manuel told the website: “The president [Domenico Grasso] and I have had several great conversations over the past couple of days. There are no plans for me not to continue to be the athletic director for the near future.”

The near future. As in the ax may swing at any moment in the near future.

It’s impossible to say what exactly will happen to Manuel once the investigation findings are released and discussed by regents. But it’s also impossible to imagine Manuel emerges unscathed from years of scandal within the school’s prized football program.

Can anyone imagine Jenner & Block lawyers facing regents after nearly $12 million has been shelled out and saying: “Yeah, you know the guy who’s been in charge of all this? Yeah, we got nothin’ on him.”

Advertisement

So it’s not hard to see Manuel getting blamed in the investigation. The question is how much blame does he get – and what kind of punishment does the university want to dole out? Also, how much can the investigation truly divulge about Manuel’s role while the school contends with lawsuits from Partridge and Shriver?

Cleaning house always sounds good. But anyone who’s ever actually cleaned a house, inside out and from top to bottom, can tell you it’s no easy chore. It’s actually messy, difficult work that often reveals other structural problems, whether you’re talking about an actual house or an entire athletic department.

The closest example Michigan might follow with Manuel could come courtesy of its most hated rival. Ohio State basically gave then-AD Gene Smith a slap on the wrist in 2018 by suspending him without pay for two weeks after he and then-football coach Urban Meyer mishandled domestic-assault allegations against former assistant coach Zach Smith.

The big difference between than Manuel’s situation is twofold: First, U-M’s investigation is examining the entire department; second, he’s coming off a huge high that vaulted him into rarefied air – an AD with national titles in football and basketball on his résumé.

Advertisement

Does Michigan really want to get rid of the guy who proved he can hire a championship hoops coach, won the school an NCAA Tournament title and helped refill those NIL and donor coffers, just as new football and basketball coaches are about to start their first seasons in Ann Arbor?

As for Manuel deciding to step aside on his own? He’s 58 and under contract through 2030. He has too much road in front of him to imagine a quiet resignation – to decide he’s done as much as he can – after 10 years on the job.

Nah. It’d be a lot easier to imagine the man who played defensive lineman under U-M legend Bo Schembechler saying to Grasso, the regents, and the rest of an ungrateful administration: You’re gonna have to fire me.

If that’s the case, you can also imagine a new contingent on Manuel’s behalf joining the growing briefcase-carrying group that’s flooding downtown Ann Arbor these days and chanting to itself: “It’s great … to sue … the Michigan Wolverines.”

Contact Carlos Monarrez at cmonarrez@freepress.com and follow him on X @cmonarrez.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending