Michigan
Whippets ban in Michigan: What they are, why they’re dangerous
Michigan leaders are working to ban all sales of whippets in hopes of curbing the recreational use of nitrous oxide.
Whippets are the small canisters of nitrous oxide found inside whipped cream containers — hence, the drug’s name. The use of whippets, a popular party drug, has been on the rise among teenagers and young adults in recent years, according to U.S. health experts.
When the nitrous oxide is inhaled, it creates a brief high. And while the recreational use of the gas isn’t a new phenomenon, there is a growing concern over just how accessible these canisters are — especially to young people.
Canisters of nitrous oxide aren’t only found in whipped cream; the gas is largely legal to purchase and can be found easily. But there are efforts underway in Michigan to change that.
We’re breaking down everything you need to know about the drug, and the new Michigan law just enacted this week.
What is nitrous oxide?
Nitrous oxide, also written as N2O, is a gas that is commonly used by dentists and medical professionals. Patients can be given nitrous oxide for sedation or pain relief during minor medical procedures.
The gas is also known as “laughing gas.” When given to patients in a medical setting, the gas is provided alongside a high flow of oxygen, experts say, ensuring oxygen continues flowing to the patient.
In addition to its medical use, nitrous oxide can also be found in food products — such as its use as the propellant in a can of whipped cream. The gas is also used by the automotive industry to make cars go faster.
Recreational use of nitrous oxide
Outside of its professional use, some people also inhale nitrous oxide recreationally to get high. That’s where whippets come in.
“People who use whippets inhale the gas from those chargers [in whipped cream]. Some people inhale the gas directly. Others fill something like a balloon with the nitrous oxide gas and inhale it from the balloon. Or they fill a bag with the nitrous oxide and close the bag around their head,” the Cleveland Clinic says.
Breathing in the undiluted nitrous oxide from whippet canisters can create a euphoric high that decreases physical pain and can even cause hallucinations. This high typically only lasts a few minutes. Some users will continue to inhale from multiple canisters to maintain the high.
The dangers of whippets
Recreational use of nitrous oxide cannot create a physical addiction, but can form a physiological addiction — meaning your brain likes the effect of the drug, and craves it more and more.
Apart from addictions, using whippets can lead to actual physical harm, both from short term and long term use.
Short term use
In the short term, whippets can cause the following symptoms, according to the Cleveland Clinic:
-
Dizziness, faintness and passing out.
-
Irregular heart rhythms.
-
Headaches.
-
Nausea.
-
Irritability or emotional dysregulation.
The drug can also cause hallucinations, paranoia, and impairments to your judgement and motor skills, which can lead to accidents and injuries, experts say.
Inhaling nitrous oxide directly from a canister can also cause frostbite on the lips, nose, and throat due to the cold temperature of the gas. The significant pressure of the gas in the canister can also hurt the lungs.
It’s rare, but there have been reports of people dying from asphyxiation due to inhaling nitrous oxide.
Long term use
Doing whippets continuously over a period of time can cause serious physical damage to your body, particularly the muscles, kidneys and liver, officials say.
Inhaling nitrous oxide can lead to a “severe” B12 vitamin deficiency that can cause a serious weakness of the muscles — so much so that it could land you in the hospital.
“In cases of extreme B12 deficiency, people can be hospitalized for long periods of time and even permanently lose muscle function,” the Cleveland Clinic says.
Inhaling the gas recreationally can also decrease the oxygen available in your blood, which can cause organ damage. The lack of oxygen can put significant pressure on the kidneys and liver, damaging them.
Some experts say long term use can also result in brain damage, nerve damage, hearing loss, motor control issues and more.
Why are whippets legal in the first place?
Nitrous oxide has several professional purposes, allowing it to be purchased by medical professionals, dentists, and those manufacturing products like whipped cream. It is not illegal to buy or sell, and possession of the gas is not illegal in the United States.
The gas is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA. Individuals can buy the nitrous oxide chargers for their reusable whipped cream dispensers.
Selling of the gas has become more problematic in recent years, however, given how accessible it is to be purchased for recreational use.
Where do people buy whippets?
Whippets and other canisters of nitrous oxide can be purchased in physical stores and online. Packs of whipped cream chargers can even be purchased on Amazon, or in Walmart stores.
Local 4 reporter Victor Williams was able to walk into a smoke shop this week and purchase a pack of canisters for $25.
The fact that whippets are being sold in places like smoke shops — which appears to fall out of the realm of anything related to whipped cream needs — contributed to a new law enacted in Michigan to help curb the selling of recreational nitrous oxide.
New Michigan law banning whippets
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer this week signed two bills into law that bar a person or business from selling objects designed for recreational inhalation of nitrous oxide. The new law specifically bans the sale of objects “designed for inhaling nitrous oxide for recreational purposes or drug paraphernalia.”
Simply put: Canisters of nitrous oxide that aren’t meant for professional use or food products are not allowed to be sold. This law takes effect on June 10, 2024.
Any person or business owner who defies this new law can be charged with a misdemeanor that carries a punishment of up to 90 days in prison, and a fine of up to $5,000, or both. If an adult sells the product to a minor, that punishment increases to up to 1 year in prison, and a fine of up to $7,500, or both.
It wasn’t immediately clear how this new ban would impact businesses in Michigan. It also wasn’t clear if the law would affect e-commerce websites that aren’t based in Michigan, but sell products to people in Michigan.
Some concerns lingered over whether a person or business could claim they didn’t know the nitrous oxide products they sell are designed for recreational use. The law does say, however, that a person found in violation of the ban will be notified at least two days before they face an arrest.
Some other states, like New York, have also banned the sale of nitrous oxide meant for recreational use. One grocery store even went so far as to request identification from people purchasing whipped cream just to be safe — though officials said that wasn’t the intent behind the law.
How the ban will impact the sale of whipped cream in Michigan remains to be seen.
Read: Entire Michigan bills
You can read Senate bills 57 and 58, which were signed into law by Michigan Gov. Whitmer earlier this week, below.
Copyright 2024 by WDIV ClickOnDetroit – All rights reserved.
Michigan
AIPAC draws ire of half of Michigan Democratic voters in new poll
Pollster Richard Czuba breaks latest Michigan Senate race polling
Detroit News political reporter Craig Mauger talks with pollster Craig Richard Czuba about the latest poll in Michigan’s Democratic Senate race.
About half of likely Michigan Democratic primary voters hold an unfavorable view of the pro-Israel group the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, according to a new statewide poll, but respondents overall didn’t rate a candidate’s position on Israel and Gaza as of great importance when choosing a Senate nominee.
“It is not of high interest, despite the national narrative,” pollster Richard Czuba said, referring to national news coverage of the Michigan U.S. Senate contest.
“As you ask voters to look across the spectrum about issues that matter to them, this isn’t one of them.”
The Detroit News/WDIV-TV (Channel 4) poll of 500 likely Michigan Democratic primary voters was conducted last week by Czuba’s Glengariff Group and had a margin of error of plus-minus 4.4 percentage points.
A majority of respondents said antisemitism against Jewish Americans has risen, that they support both a Palestinian state and Israel’s right to exist, and believe Israel has “gone too far” in its war against the militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah.
Overall, the likely Michigan Democratic primary voters rated a Senate candidate’s position on Israel and Gaza at 5.6 on a 10-point scale. Czuba said a measurement over 7 usually indicates some level of importance, while 8 is considered demonstrating a high level of importance.
Supporters of Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed of Ann Arbor rated the issue a 6, while those backing U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens of Birmingham rated it 5.2. Undecided voters in the survey were at 5.7.
“That’s not surprising to me at all,” said consultant Adrian Hemond, a Democrat and CEO of Grassroots Midwest.
“It’s hard to get Americans to care about foreign policy while American troops are not getting shot, and that’s not happening right now. That’s not to say they don’t care about it at all, but in terms of what influences their voting behavior? Nah.”
Half of Michigan Democrats sour on AIPAC
Israel and Gaza have been a point of contrast and contention between El-Sayed and Stevens: Stevens is a staunch supporter of Israel who has voted for U.S. military aid for that country, while El-Sayed has called Israel’s actions in Gaza a genocide. He wants to end the U.S. practice of subsidizing foreign militaries, including Israel’s.
El-Sayed has also repeatedly hit Stevens on the $49 million of outside spending — including $26 million from an AIPAC-aligned group — that’s flowed into the race to help boost her bid, according to recent ad-tracking figures.
“Explain what you’ve given away for AIPAC support in this race,” El-Sayed demanded in last week’s televised debate in Grand Rapids.
“No one owns my vote, and no one owns my policies,” Stevens shot back.
In the debate last week, Stevens pointed to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criticism of her and said Netanyahu had “failed” in securing long-term peace and in providing humanitarian aid in Gaza. The remark appeared to be an effort to put some distance between herself and the support she’s getting from AIPAC that has turned off some Democrats.
“I can say that Israel has a right to peacefully exist alongside the people of Palestine and in Gaza,” she said.
The poll conducted last week found that 49% of Democratic primary voters have an unfavorable opinion of AIPAC. About 12% view AIPAC favorably, and 39% were neutral ― with no opinion of the pro-Israel lobby group ― or said they didn’t know. About 34% of voters expressed a “very” unfavorable opinion of AIPAC.
About 65% of El-Sayed’s supporters expressed an unfavorable view of AIPAC, with 8% favorable and 26% neutral, while fewer Stevens’ voters, 38%, view AIPAC unfavorably and 16.5% favorably, with 45% neutral.
The group does not seem to be a motivating issue for undecided voters, 65% of whom were neutral on AIPAC, according to poll results.
“What this issue has become is virtue-signaling to the far left that you’re one of us,” Czuba said of AIPAC opposition.
Scott Cruz, 61, of South Lyon, said he learned about AIPAC about six months ago, but has been concerned for decades about the amount of money the U.S. gives to Israel. In more recent years, what started as Israel’s understandable response to the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas has advanced far beyond that, said Cruz, who participated in the poll.
“Just too nuts, man. Hatfields and McCoys, I don’t care,” Cruz said of the Israel-Gaza conflict. “They (Israel) had the moral high ground for a minute there and then said, ‘Let’s blow it.’”
Michelle Miller-Adams, a 66-year-old Kalamazoo resident and political scientist who also participated in the poll, said she considers herself a politically progressive Jew.
She said she understands the criticism of Israel’s leadership but is worried that opposition to Israel and AIPAC is mixing dangerously with an increase in antisemitism.
“I’m not a fan of AIPAC,” Miller-Adams said. “But I think AIPAC has been demonized among all the PACs and has been misrepresented. AIPAC gets singled out for criticism in a way that makes me very uncomfortable.”
Rebecca Cunningham, an 83-year-old Detroit resident, said she’s voting for Stevens because of her prior experience at the federal level. She’s aware of a debate over Israel and is concerned by the U.S. government’s actions there, but she doesn’t believe those concerns are the only factors in determining her vote.
“I’d have to look at the whole picture,” Cunningham said. “In my mind, I’m not really clear why we’re over there fighting. We have enough issues in the United States we could put our attention to.”
Alignment among Michigan Democrats on Mideast issues
The survey of Michigan Democrats showed they are largely in agreement on issues related to the Middle East, including 63% of whom support the creation of an independent Palestinian state in Gaza. Another 15% said they oppose a Palestinian state, while 22% said it would depend or they didn’t know.
Notably, 78% of El-Sayed supporters favor a Palestinian state with 13% unsure, compared with 51% of Stevens’ voters in support of an independent state with 26% unsure. Undecided voters fell between the two, with 61% for an independent state and 38.5% unsure.
A large majority of Democrats surveyed, nearly 77%, said Israel has a right to exist as a country, while 12% are opposed and 12% of voters were unsure or said it depends.
On this question, 67% of self-identified Democratic Socialists said they support Israel’s right to exist, while 30% are opposed, and 2% said they’re unsure or it depends. Nearly 21% of Democratic Socialists said they “strongly” oppose Israel’s right to exist.
El-Sayed, the son of Egyptian immigrants, pivoted last week when he was asked on CNN if Israel has a right to exist.
“The question about a right to exist is interesting, because nobody’s ever asked me whether I believe Palestine has a right to exist. Every single president who’s served has said they believe in a two-state solution,” El-Sayed said.
“Israel exists. The question is whether we want a politics where our money is sent over to Israel to fund genocide and apartheid instead of investing in our own kids.”
Nearly 70% of poll respondents said Israel’s actions against Hamas and Hezbollah have “gone too far.” About 3% said they’ve not gone far enough, and 13% said they’ve been about right, while 15% were unsure, according to the survey.
About 21% of Stevens’ supporters in the survey said Israel’s actions were about right, as opposed to 6% of El-Sayed voters and 2% of undecided voters.
About two in three likely Michigan Democratic voters said antisemitism against Jewish Americans has increased over the past two years, and 3% said it’s declined. Nearly 24% said the level of antisemitism has stayed the same, and 9% were unsure.
Younger voters (under 55 years old) disproportionately concluded that antisemitism has stayed the same or decreased, while higher numbers of older voters said antisemitism has grown, including 76% of respondents age 65 and older.
More Stevens supporters said that antisemitism has increased (71%) than backers of El-Sayed (57%).
mburke@detroitnews.com
eleblanc@detroitnews.com
Michigan
Michigan AD Warde Manuel says he’s been fired by social media 3 times in 10 years
Embattled Michigan athletic director Warde Manuel on Tuesday addressed the latest round of reports about his potential exit from the university, saying he has had conversations about a potential buyout.
“I think I’ve been fired by social media three times in my ten years here,” Manuel said during a previously scheduled interview on The Big 1050 WTKA.
Multiple media outlets recently suggested his job is in jeopardy amid investigations into the culture of the department and fired football coach Sherrone Moore’s relationship with his former executive assistant.
The investigations have cost the university about $12 million, and it may not release all the related reports.
“Documents related to these attorney-directed investigations are privileged and confidential and protected by attorney-client privilege,” school spokesman Paul Corliss said Tuesday. “Maintaining the confidentiality of these documents preserves the integrity of the investigative process, protects the privacy of those who participated and helps safeguard those individuals from potential retaliation.”
Michigan’s board has a meeting on Thursday, where the publicly accessible agenda does not mention Manuel or the investigations.
“I have four years left on my contract,” said Manuel, who acknowledged talks about a possible buyout. “I don’t know what the future is going to be.
“I do feel confident in the things I have done here at Michigan. I’m very proud of what we’ve accomplished.”
Manuel said he has helped the Wolverines have their best 10-year stretch, winning this year’s national championship in men’s basketball along with recent football, men’s and women’s gymnastics NCAA titles, 95 Big Ten championships and 4,000-plus student-athletes earning academic all-conference honors.
Michigan also has had a string of scandals under his watch.
Manuel fired Moore for having an inappropriate relationship with his executive assistant, who sued the school earlier this month.
The football program is on NCAA probation, was tarnished by a sign-stealing scheme and has seen many former staffers have run-ins with the law, including Matt Weiss, who is charged with hacking into the computer accounts of thousands of college athletes to find intimate images.
Manuel is also named in a lawsuit — along with the university, its board, a former school president and Big Ten Commissioner Tony Petitti — filed by fired assistant football coach Chris Partridge that claims Michigan knew about the sign-stealing scandal nearly a year before the public did.
The 58-year-old Manuel, who played football at Michigan under the late Bo Schembechler and was on the track team, was hired to lead the department in 2016. He signed a contract extension at Michigan in 2024 that runs through June 2030.
Manuel, a New Orleans native, previously served as athletic director at Connecticut and Buffalo after working in Michigan’s athletic department in various roles from 1996 to 2005.
___
AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
Note: The video above originally aired on July 9, 2026.
Michigan
Hard to see embattled Michigan AD Warde Manuel emerging unscathed
Dusty May is leaving Michigan for the Dallas Mavericks. What now?
Free Press sports writer Tony Garcia breaks down the “shocking” news of Michigan basketball coach Dusty May leaving for the NBA.
Barely three months since students flooded downtown Ann Arbor and chanted “Tt’s great … to be … a Michigan Wolverine” as they celebrated Michigan basketball’s first NCAA championship in 37 years, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone on the school’s campus who feels great about anything in the athletics department.
Instead, the university found itself in a much different and darker place Monday, July 13, when it faced new legal accusations that replaced all that happy singing with the deafening silence emitted through a barrage of “no comment” statements.
An amended lawsuit from former Wolverines linebackers coach Chris Partridge alleges former school president Santa Ono worked to hide details of the football team’s sign-stealing scandal and that athletic department leaders knew about ex-coach Sherrone Moore’s affair with staff member Paige Shriver years before it led to his firing.
And Warde Manuel – the athletic director who orchestrated that jubilation three months ago and even more jubilation three years earlier, when Michigan football won its first title in a quarter-century – finds himself in the eye of the storm as he faces the end of his highly successful but troubled tenure.
Manuel is named in Partridge’s lawsuit, which claims he knew about Moore’s relationship with Shriver “for years without taking action to protect the employee.”
He’s also a focal point of an investigation that began in December, run by Chicago law firm Jenner & Block and costing the school nearly $12 million. The Free Press has learned that higher-ups have been briefed on the findings. The U-M Board of Regents is expected to discuss that investigation at a Thursday meeting in Traverse City.
On Sunday, Yahoo Sports reported that Manuel’s future is “in doubt” based on the findings of that investigation. On Monday, Manuel told the website: “The president [Domenico Grasso] and I have had several great conversations over the past couple of days. There are no plans for me not to continue to be the athletic director for the near future.”
The near future. As in the ax may swing at any moment in the near future.
It’s impossible to say what exactly will happen to Manuel once the investigation findings are released and discussed by regents. But it’s also impossible to imagine Manuel emerges unscathed from years of scandal within the school’s prized football program.
Can anyone imagine Jenner & Block lawyers facing regents after nearly $12 million has been shelled out and saying: “Yeah, you know the guy who’s been in charge of all this? Yeah, we got nothin’ on him.”
So it’s not hard to see Manuel getting blamed in the investigation. The question is how much blame does he get – and what kind of punishment does the university want to dole out? Also, how much can the investigation truly divulge about Manuel’s role while the school contends with lawsuits from Partridge and Shriver?
Cleaning house always sounds good. But anyone who’s ever actually cleaned a house, inside out and from top to bottom, can tell you it’s no easy chore. It’s actually messy, difficult work that often reveals other structural problems, whether you’re talking about an actual house or an entire athletic department.
The closest example Michigan might follow with Manuel could come courtesy of its most hated rival. Ohio State basically gave then-AD Gene Smith a slap on the wrist in 2018 by suspending him without pay for two weeks after he and then-football coach Urban Meyer mishandled domestic-assault allegations against former assistant coach Zach Smith.
The big difference between than Manuel’s situation is twofold: First, U-M’s investigation is examining the entire department; second, he’s coming off a huge high that vaulted him into rarefied air – an AD with national titles in football and basketball on his résumé.
Does Michigan really want to get rid of the guy who proved he can hire a championship hoops coach, won the school an NCAA Tournament title and helped refill those NIL and donor coffers, just as new football and basketball coaches are about to start their first seasons in Ann Arbor?
As for Manuel deciding to step aside on his own? He’s 58 and under contract through 2030. He has too much road in front of him to imagine a quiet resignation – to decide he’s done as much as he can – after 10 years on the job.
Nah. It’d be a lot easier to imagine the man who played defensive lineman under U-M legend Bo Schembechler saying to Grasso, the regents, and the rest of an ungrateful administration: You’re gonna have to fire me.
If that’s the case, you can also imagine a new contingent on Manuel’s behalf joining the growing briefcase-carrying group that’s flooding downtown Ann Arbor these days and chanting to itself: “It’s great … to sue … the Michigan Wolverines.”
Contact Carlos Monarrez at cmonarrez@freepress.com and follow him on X @cmonarrez.
-
Maine7 minutes ago
How a tragedy changed the timeline — and the politics — of Maine’s Senate race – The Boston Globe
-
Maryland13 minutes agoMaryland police arrest alleged bank robber wielding stolen cat: ‘Tried to use her as an accessory’
-
Michigan19 minutes agoAIPAC draws ire of half of Michigan Democratic voters in new poll
-
Massachusetts25 minutes agoEditorial: Want to end poverty in Mass.? Don’t drive away wealthy
-
Minnesota31 minutes agoMinnesota conviction review unit demise dashes hopes of some incarcerated people, their families
-
Mississippi37 minutes agoMississippi teen accused of killing elderly couple had worked for them before shooting: family
-
Missouri43 minutes ago
Missouri Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 winning numbers for July 14, 2026
-
Montana49 minutes ago
Montana Lottery Mega Millions, Big Sky Bonus results for July 14, 2026