Connect with us

Michigan

PFF Performance Analysis, Snap Counts, Trends: Michigan vs. Iowa

Published

on

PFF Performance Analysis, Snap Counts, Trends: Michigan vs. Iowa


Over the weekend, Michigan was on the street for the primary time in 2022 contained in the unfriendly confines of Kinnick Stadium, a spot the place the Wolverines hadn’t gained since 2005. Jim Harbaugh and Co. rolled into Iowa Metropolis with confidence and blasted again to Ann Arbor nonetheless unblemished at 5-0. Regardless that Iowa boasted the No. 1 protection within the nation forward of Saturday’s matchup, Michigan was very properly ready and beat the Hawkeyes 27-14. Listed here are the issues price when dissecting the sport snap by snap.

PFF High Performers (15 Snap Minimal)

Offense

1. Blake Corum (82.3)

Corum was incredible once more carrying the ball 29 occasions for 133 yards and a rating. He additionally caught two balls for 9 yards and greater than held his personal as a go blocker. Corum performed a whopping 50-of-67 snaps, which is loads for a working again, and did nearly all the things proper whereas on the sphere.

Advertisement

2. Trente Jones (76.3)

Jones performed all 67 offensive snaps and was stable throughout the board. He was in the best spot on the proper time and did not make many errors in any respect whether or not he was go blocking or getting a push within the run recreation.

3. Olu Oluwatimi (72.8)

I may just about write the very same factor for Olu as I did for Jones. The veteran switch heart was good throughout the board and did job as a go blocker and within the run recreation. He additionally performed each single offensive snap.

Protection

1. Mike Morris (80.4)

Advertisement

Cash Mike was incredible towards the Hawkeyes. He completed the day with 4 whole quarterback pressures and two sacks. He additionally did a very nice job by way of being in place on working performs per PFF.

2. Jaylen Harrell (75.2)

Harrell was additionally stable towards Iowa with three tackles of his personal and loads of exercise across the quarterback. He was actually good within the “conventional” roles as an edge rusher but in addition graded out properly as a canopy man, which is one thing he is doing increasingly of.

3. Eyabi Okie (73.1)

Okie completed the day with three tackles and half a sack, together with the one which primarily ended the sport for the Hawkeyes. He graded out properly, flashed on the sphere and likewise, and maybe most notably, performed 27 snaps, which is just about on par with Harrell’s 39, Morris’ 32 and is greater than Taylor Upshaw’s 18.

Advertisement

PFF Backside Dwellers (15 Snap Minimal)

Offense

1. Joel Honigford (43.8)

The offensive lineman-turned-tight finish struggled a bit towards Iowa as a run blocker. He was a lot better on passing performs, however while you’re the weak hyperlink as a run blocker on a given day, it tends to face out a bit.

2. Cornelius Johnson (52.2)

Johnson performed 55 snaps, greater than another huge receiver, however was not focused. That would converse to him not getting open or it might be that the quarterback is solely not trying his manner. Nonetheless it occurred, that is loads of enjoying time and not using a likelihood to catch a ball.  

3. Trevor Keegan (59.1)

Advertisement

Keegan was again from damage and should have been feeling the results from his damage a bit? He was extraordinarily stable in go professional however struggled some as a run blocker, which is not regular for him. On word, he did play all 67 snaps after lacking time resulting from damage.

Scroll to Proceed

Protection

1. Mike Sainristil (39.0)

For the primary time this season, Sainristil didn’t grade out properly. Per PFF, Sainristil was nice by way of positioning towards the run and as a go rusher, however actually struggled as a tackler and in protection. If the numbers are right, Sainristil missed no less than one deal with and gave up three receptions on 5 targets.

2. Junior Colson (46.1)

Advertisement

Colson has additionally been fairly stable all yr, however not essentially towards Iowa, per PFF. As I identified in my Three Up/Three Down article, Colson was out of place a number of occasions in protection and that is mirrored in his 39.9 protection grade. The sophomore backer was focused six occasions and all six have been caught for 84 yards.

3. DJ Turner (56.3)

But one other participant we’re used to seeing on the high of the grading scale, Turner finds himself close to the underside after giving up a 19-yard catch. PFF graded Turner harshly as a canopy man and as a defender normally. 

Freshmen Contributors (Snap Rely)

1. Mason Graham (30)

2. Will Johnson (15)

Advertisement

3. Colston Loveland (7)

4. Jimmy Rolder (7)

5. Darrius Clemons (6)

6. Derrick Moore (6)

7. Kenneth Grant (1)

Advertisement

Whole Snap Counts

Notes

• Andrel Anthony was really the second-highest graded participant on offense (82.2), however he performed simply 11 snaps on the day. He completed the day with only one catch for 29 yards.

• Clearly the rotation is getting tighter and tighter as Huge Ten play continues. Solely 40 gamers performed within the recreation and of that 40, solely seven have been true freshmen. At this level within the season, the freshmen who aren’t going to redshirt are probably those listed above and nonetheless enjoying.

• It looks like Blake Corum is getting stronger and stronger. He has carried the ball 59 occasions over the previous two video games and is grading out properly week in and week out. As Jim Harbaugh stated earlier within the week, Corum is a five-tool again. He is doing all of it and doing it properly.

• Donovan Edwards clearly seemed wholesome as he performed and scored a landing, however he performed solely 18 snaps within the recreation. It isn’t a problem if Corum is consuming like he has been, however Edwards is certainly a weapon that might be utilized extra usually. 

• Mazi Smith paced the protection with 57 snaps performed. That’s extremely spectacular for a 340-pound nostril deal with particularly contemplating what he does on a snap-by-snap foundation. Smith is routinely consuming up double groups, filling gaps and battling with different 300 pounders. For him to play extra snaps than anybody else on the protection is extraordinarily noteworthy.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Michigan

Ohio State’s Ryan Day: Losing to Michigan ‘one of the worst things that’s happened to me’

Published

on

Ohio State’s Ryan Day: Losing to Michigan ‘one of the worst things that’s happened to me’


Ryan Day has felt a large sting in each of Ohio State’s losses to Michigan in the past three seasons. He’s hoping to change that when the two hated rivals play on Saturday (noon ET on FOX and the FOX Sports app).

The Ohio State head coach admitted that his team’s three straight losses to Michigan were one of the toughest moments of his life and only topped by the loss of a loved one. 

Advertisement

“We felt what it’s like to not win this game, and it’s bad. It’s one of the worst things that’s happened to me in my life, quite honestly,” Day said in an interview on WBNS’ “Game Time with Ryan Day.” “Other than losing my father and a few other things, like it’s quite honestly, for my family, the worst thing that’s happened. So we can never have that happen again, ever. And that’s been the approach all season.”

While Day has been one of college football’s winningest coaches since he was promoted by Ohio State in 2019 (66-9), his inability to win in the majority of the Buckeyes’ biggest games has led to scrutiny. Day is 1-3 against Michigan, with his only win coming in 2019 (the two teams did not play in the COVID-shortened 2020 season).

Entering Saturday’s game, Ohio State holds a clear edge over Michigan. The Buckeyes are 10-1 and Day has notched two top-five victories in November, improving his record against top-five opponents to 4-6. The Wolverines, meanwhile, have struggled offensively in their first season under Sherrone Moore, causing them to enter The Game with a 6-5 record.

Even though Ohio State seems to be on a playoff track regardless of what happens Saturday, it still seems imperative for Day to beat Michigan. Ohio State hasn’t lost four straight games to Michigan since its 0-5-1 stretch from 1988-93. 

When you consider that Day’s predecessor, Urban Meyer, won all seven of his matchups against Michigan, he understands the pressure the rivalry brings, saying it’s “not just a game — it’s our life.”

Advertisement

“We know what this game means and certainly I know what this game means. And there’s a lot of people counting on this game,” Day said. “This is our identity. It’s who we are. We don’t have anything else. So it’s a big responsibility. And the last couple of years, when it doesn’t get done, it just eats at your core. And so it just motivates you every single day to come back, to get this done, to stand on the field and sing the (alma mater) Carmen Ohio after winning this game.”

Ohio State takes care of business & Is Indiana a playoff team?

Ohio State’s shortcomings against Michigan in each of the last three seasons could have arguably been the difference between it winning and losing a national championship. The Buckeyes were left out of the College Football Playoff in the 2021 and 2023 seasons due to their loss to the Wolverines. Ohio State was included in the four-team field in 2022, but as the No. 4 seed had to face defending champion Georgia in the semifinal rather than the title game. The Buckeyes lost that playoff game when they missed a potential game-winning field goal as time expired.

Ohio State came close to beating Michigan last season but fell 30-24 in Ann Arbor to the eventual national champs. After the 2023 loss, the vast majority of its draft-eligible players returned for another season, including wide receiver Emeka Egbuka and defensive linemen Jack Sawyer and JT Tuimoloau. Day is hoping that Saturday will mark the day that this senior class will get over the hump and get its first win over Michigan.

“It’s not about me … it’s about these seniors who decided to come back,” Day said. “They’re the ones that are on the field. They’re the true warriors that go put it on the line every game. And they came back for a reason: It’s to win this game. And they’ve made that very clear. So, you know, while we’re all involved in it and I appreciate what they said, this is about these players.”

[Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.]

Advertisement


Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more




Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan steps back from developing 1,400-acre rural megasite

Published

on

Michigan steps back from developing 1,400-acre rural megasite


Michigan is no longer pursuing a plan to turn farmland into an industrial site after facing community pushback on developing the controversial megasite.

The Michigan Economic Development Corp. and the Lansing Area Economic Partnership, LEAP, put together a 1,400-acre megasite in Eagle Township to attract a largescale, job-creating investment.

But after the state disbursed nearly $6 million to the project, it’s been halted.

“We continue to believe the site could have great potential given its proximity to infrastructure, workforce and other adjacent industrial uses,” said Otie McKinley, a spokesperson for the Michigan Economic Development Corp. “We also recognize that this is not the right time to pursue additional development on the site.”

Advertisement

‘At what cost?’ Michigan communities fight mega sites despite promise of jobs

The Eagle Township megasite, also known as the Michigan Manufacturing Innovation Campus, was one of four megasites the state started assembling two years ago as a part of its strategy to land major billion-dollar investments.

Named for their size, each “build-ready” megasite is at least 1,000 acres.

Others are located in Mundy Township near Flint, Shiawassee County and Marshall, where Ford Motor Co. is building a $2.5 billion electric vehicle battery plant.

The Michigan Strategic Fund earmarked $75 million two years ago to make these megasites “build ready” with infrastructure upgrades and real estate acquisition.

Advertisement

For the Eagle Township property, the state distributed $5.95 million to LEAP for site prep. LEAP did not respond to questions about how the funding was spent.

A former map of the Michigan Manufacturing Innovation Campus, a 1,400-acre megasite located in Eagle Township. (Photo provided by the Lansing Area Economic Partnership)

LEAP says there was a “sense of urgency” because of Michigan’s need for “sites of that magnitude to pursue important semiconductor and EV-related industry investment projects to reshore US manufacturing and technology jobs.”

It took six months of “confidential real estate assembly” to put together the Eagle Township megasite, according to LEAP. This included farmland donated to Michigan State University by late farmer David Morris and private properties under a three-year option agreement.

LEAP has since allowed the real estate options to expire after “the local municipality leaders and neighbor sentiment turned from initial unanimous support into significant opposition.”

Advertisement

“We took the further step of offering early termination to all affected property owners in recent weeks,” LEAP said in a statement.

Michigan assembling 1,000-acre ‘mega sites’ to attract big investments

This decision comes after the project faced significant backlash from community members who objected to the large swath of rural land becoming a major industrial site.

Opposition gained momentum over the past two years through a 3,200-member Facebook group called “Stop the Mega Site, Eagle MI.” Red signs proclaiming “No Eagle Megasite” have also dotted the rural community located about 15 miles west of Lansing.

Eagle Township Supervisor and local farmer Troy Stroud, 54, says he’s cautiously optimistic about the news.

Advertisement

“We’re not all farmers in Eagle, but it’s a very strong part of how we identify and what we enjoy about where we live,” he said. “It’s what matters to us, and you have to fight for what matters to you.”

Eagle Township

Michigan is no longer marketing a 1,400 megasite in Eagle Township for future industrial development. (Photo by Rose White | MLive)Rose White | MLive

A key sticking point for opponents was that Morris, a former Eagle Township supervisor and longtime farmer, donated his centennial family farm to Michigan State University with the stipulation it must remain farmland until 2031. MSU previously said the agreement would extend to any future owner, but the university was sued last year for allegedly redacting too much information about the deal.

Stroud says a “lack of transparency” was another major issue after former township supervisor Patti Schafer signed non-disclosure agreements about the project.

“We just wanted some transparency around what it was,” he said. “It just became this quest of wanting to know the knowledge, the details, what was really happening.”

State approves $250M grant for new Genesee County megasite

Advertisement

This led to Schafer, Township Treasurer Kathy Oberg and Trustee Richard Jones facing recall efforts over the NDAs. Schafer lost her seat to Stroud while Oberg and Jones both resigned last November.

Secrecy around economic development has also been contentious in Lansing where lawmakers have signed confidentiality agreements tied to big deals.

It remains unclear what the future holds for the Eagle Township megasite.

Both LEAP and the Michigan Economic Development Corp. said it is not currently being marketed for development. A website for the Michigan Manufacturing Innovation Campus is now password protected. And the “primary economic opportunity” LEAP was trying to land chose another location outside the region.

Additionally, Eagle Township adopted a 220-page master plan in September that reflects residents’ will “to maintain the cherished natural and rural charm of the community.” It also updated its zoning rules around industrial sites.

Advertisement

“The future of a site in Eagle Township remains in the hands of the community,” McKinley said. “We are always open to any future engagement should their vision or plans for development on that site change from what they are today.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan State’s leading rusher a familiar name for Rutgers football fans

Published

on

Michigan State’s leading rusher a familiar name for Rutgers football fans


play

PISCATAWAY – It’s been a long college football journey for Michigan State’s leading rusher, but it’s one that started five years ago with Rutgers football.

Running back Kay’ron Lynch-Adams spent the 2019 and 2020 seasons with the Scarlet Knights before transferring to UMass, but now he’s with the Spartans and a player Rutgers’ defense will need to limit Saturday (3:30 p.m., FS1) at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing.

Advertisement

The 5-foot-10, 215-pound Ohio native returned to the Power 4 level with the Spartans as a sixth-year graduate transfer, and through 11 games has a team-leading 580 yards rushing on 124 carries (4.7 yards per attempt) with two touchdowns.

Lynch-Adams’ production isn’t surprising to Rutgers coach Greg Schiano, who on Monday said he believed Lynch-Adams had this type of potential.

“I was disappointed when he left. I liked the young man, and I also really liked the football player,” Schiano said. “And I can remember exactly where I was when he called me to tell me he was leaving. I was truly disappointed, and really tried to keep him.”

Lynch-Adams played in nine games for Rutgers in 2019, finishing with 161 rushing yards on 48 carries. Then in 2020, he ran for 159 yards and one touchdown on 35 carries in the pandemic-shortened nine-game season.

Advertisement

The problem for Lynch-Adams was that there was a stellar running back atop the depth chart – now two-time Super Bowl champion Isiah Pacheco of the Kansas City Chiefs.

While Schiano didn’t want Lynch-Adams to leave, he couldn’t blame him either.

“I understood why,” Schiano said. “You know, you had this guy by the name of Pacheco in front of him, and he’s a pretty good player, too.”

Lynch-Adams was productive at UMass – last season he rushed for 1,157 yards on 236 carries with 12 touchdowns.

Advertisement

“It’s not like I have stayed in touch with him but I have a little bit,” Schiano said. “I really respect him. He’s a hard-working kid. He’s a really tough football player and I love the way he played. I loved what he did. He was a team guy. I was disappointed when we lost him, and I’m not surprised that he’s having success.”

Lynch-Adams will be the latest challenge for Rutgers’ run defense, which has been up and down this season. He splits carries with Nate Carter, who’s rushed for 452 yards and four touchdowns this season.

The Scarlet Knights are hoping to pick up a seventh regular-season victory, something they haven’t done since 2014.

Limiting Lynch-Adams will be a key to making that happen.

“He’s someone that we have to stop now for sure,” Schiano said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending