Connect with us

Michigan

NCAA issues suspension and show-cause penalty to Jim Harbaugh for Michigan recruiting violations

Published

on

NCAA issues suspension and show-cause penalty to Jim Harbaugh for Michigan recruiting violations


Los Angeles Chargers coach Jim Harbaugh has been suspended for a year and given a four-year show-cause penalty by the NCAA for recruiting violations.

The penalties announced Wednesday by the NCAA are not related to the Connor Stalions advance scouting scandal that got Harbaugh suspended by the Big Ten for the end of the 2023 regular season when he was still at Michigan.

Rather, the penalties relate to the three-game suspension Harbaugh served at the start of the season for an NCAA investigation into recruiting violations during the COVID-19 dead recruiting period.

The Division I infractions committee determined that Harbaugh “violated recruiting and inducement rules, engaged in unethical conduct, failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance and violated head coach responsibility obligations.” The panel also raised the violation to a “Level I-Aggravated,” citing Harbaugh’s “intentional disregard for NCAA legislation and unethical conduct.”

Advertisement

Michigan won the national championship at the end of the 2023 season after a 15-0 campaign. Harbaugh missed six of the team’s games but returned for the Big Ten title game and the College Football Playoff.

The three-game suspension Harbaugh served at the start of the year was self-imposed by Michigan after negotiations with the NCAA for a four-game suspension fell apart. The NCAA has long accused Harbaugh of being uncooperative in its recruiting investigation and again said that he had denied meeting with two recruits despite proof that he did.

From the NCAA’s decision:

“During the investigation in this case, Harbaugh denied meeting with the two prospects. Initially, he told Michigan and the enforcement staff that he had no recollection of meeting either prospect or their fathers. In a subsequent interview he went further, unequivocally disputing that either meeting happened. Despite his denials, the weight of the factual information—including statements from the prospects, their fathers, and other football staff members, as well as documentation such as receipts and expense reports — demonstrates that Harbaugh was physically present and engaged in these meetings.

“By denying his conduct, which was plainly supported by the record, Harbaugh violated NCAA ethical conduct legislation and thereby amplified the severity of his case.”

The NCAA made clear in its statement that Harbaugh would be banned from all athletic activities at a college for the next four seasons and would serve a complete one-year suspension in the first season. However, it seems unlikely that Harbaugh will coach at the college level in the near future now that he’s returned to the NFL.

Former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh led his team to a title last season, despite missing several games as a result of two separate violation incidents. (Joe Robbins/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh led his team to a title last season, despite missing several games as a result of two separate violation incidents. (Joe Robbins/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

And his lack of cooperation with the NCAA reached a new level after the decision was announced, via a statement from his attorney Tom Mars.

Advertisement

“The way I see it, from Coach Harbaugh’s perspective, today’s COI decision is like being in college and getting a letter from your high school saying you’ve been suspended because you didn’t sign the yearbook,” Mars said.

“If I were in Coach Harbaugh’s shoes and had an $80 million contract as head coach of the Chargers, I wouldn’t pay any attention to the findings of a kangaroo court which claims to represent the principles of the nation’s most flagrant, repeat violator of the federal antitrust laws.”

In its decision, the NCAA outlined that it sent Michigan a notice of allegations regarding the recruiting violations in December of 2023 before Michigan played in the College Football Playoff. Harbaugh left for the Chargers in January, not long after Michigan beat Washington for the national title. Per the NCAA, Harbaugh responded in writing to the notice of allegations in March and said that he had “no intention of appearing at a COI hearing” regarding the accusations.

As the investigation into the recruiting violations unfolded, a cheeseburger became the focus and a rallying cry for some Michigan fans. As the negotiations for the four-game suspension broke down in August of 2023, the NCAA said in a statement that the Michigan’s infractions case was “not a cheeseburger” in a direct call to the online burger references.

And its penalty report makes sure to detail the bacon cheeseburger at the center of one of the meetings it says Harbaugh lied about.

The following morning, prospect 2 and his father met the recruiting director and Harbaugh at a local diner. In an interview with the institution and the enforcement staff, prospect 2 stated he and his father had “pretty much a one-on-one breakfast with Coach Harbaugh” where they discussed prospect 2’s future and potentially playing football at Michigan. During the recruiting director’s interview with the institution and enforcement staff, he did not specifically recall prospect 2’s visit, but he did remember being present at a breakfast with Harbaugh and a prospect at the diner during the COVID-19 recruiting dead period. The recruiting director also provided an expense report and a receipt showing he paid for breakfast at the diner on February 28, 2021, and the order included a bacon cheeseburger. This mirrored prospect 2’s and his father’s account of the date and time of the meal and the type of food eaten by Harbaugh. Specifically, prospect 2 recalled that Harbaugh ordered a hamburger for breakfast, which “kind of stood out” to him.

Wednesday’s announcement may not be the only NCAA decision that impacts Michigan football in the coming weeks and months. A report emerged from ESPN over the weekend about a draft notice of allegations relating to Stalions’ scouting scheme. The draft reportedly mentions new Michigan head coach Sherrone Moore and Moore could be directly punished as part of the investigation.





Source link

Advertisement

Michigan

Michigan Lottery Daily 3, Daily 4 results for June 3, 2026

Published

on

Michigan Lottery Daily 3, Daily 4 results for June 3, 2026


play

The Michigan Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at June 3, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Daily 3 numbers from June 3 drawing

Midday: 4-5-2

Evening: 6-9-6

Check Daily 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Daily 4 numbers from June 3 drawing

Midday: 5-3-2-6

Advertisement

Evening: 6-7-7-1

Check Daily 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Poker Lotto numbers from June 3 drawing

AH-4C-7C-9C-2S

Check Poker Lotto payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Fantasy 5 numbers from June 3 drawing

05-10-21-34-37

Advertisement

01-03-16-27-32

Check Fantasy 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Daily Keno numbers from June 3 drawing

05-09-16-29-31-34-38-43-45-47-48-49-50-52-55-60-62-66-67-76-77-79

Check Daily Keno payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Classic Lotto 47 numbers from June 3 drawing

08-09-20-26-34-45

Advertisement

Check Classic Lotto 47 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto Double Play numbers from June 3 drawing

01-11-23-33-36-44

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Michigan Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes up to $99,999.99, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Michigan Lottery’s Regional Offices.

Advertisement

To claim by mail, complete a ticket receipt form, sign your winning ticket, and send it along with original copies of your government-issued photo ID and Social Security card to the address below. Ensure the names on your ID and Social Security card match exactly. Claims should be mailed to:

Michigan Lottery

Attn: Claim Center

101 E. Hillsdale

P.O. Box 30023

Advertisement

Lansing, MI 48909

For prizes over $100,000, winners must claim their prize in person at the Michigan Lottery Headquarters in Lansing located at 101 E. Hillsdale in downtown Lansing. Each winner must present original versions of a valid government-issued photo ID (typically a driver’s license or state ID) and a Social Security card, ensuring that the names on both documents match exactly. To schedule an appointment, please call the Lottery Player Relations office at 844-887-6836, option 2.

If you prefer to claim in person at one of the Michigan Lottery Regional Offices for prizes under $100,000, appointments are required. Until further notice, please call 1-844-917-6325 to schedule an appointment. Regional office locations are as follows:

  • Lansing: 101 E. Hillsdale St. Lansing; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Livonia: 33231 Plymouth Road, Livonia; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Sterling Heights: 34700 Dequindre Road, Sterling Heights; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Detroit: Cadillac Place, 3060 W. Grand Blvd., Suite L-600, Detroit; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Grand Rapids: 3391-B Plainfield Ave. NE, Grand Rapids; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Saginaw: Jerome T. Hart State Office Building, 411 E. Genesee Ave., Saginaw; Phone: 844-917-6325

For additional information, downloadable forms, and instructions, visit the Michigan Lottery’s prize claim page.

When are Michigan Lottery drawings held?

  • Daily 3 & Daily 4: Midday at 12:59 p.m., Evening at 7:29 p.m.
  • Fantasy 5: 7:29 p.m. daily
  • Poker Lotto: 7:29 p.m. daily
  • Lotto 47: 7:29 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily
  • Daily Keno: 7:29 p.m. daily
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Michigan editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Gotion wants Michigan township to pay the $23.7M it owes in incentives

Published

on

Gotion wants Michigan township to pay the .7M it owes in incentives


play

Gotion Inc. has asked a federal judge to order the Michigan township where it was supposed to call home to repay the roughly $23.7 million it owes the state in taxpayer-funded incentives.

Advertisement

Green Township’s actions opposing Gotion’s planned battery parts plant made it all but impossible to move forward, the company argued, leaving Gotion in default under its agreement with the state and on the hook for the $23.7 million in taxpayer-funded incentives it received for land purchases and improvements.

“Now that it is clear the project cannot move forward in the face of this continued opposition and the state of Michigan’s withdrawal of support, Gotion seeks to add these constitutional claims and request damages as a result of the township’s breach of the development agreement and violation of Gotion’s constitutional rights,” a May 29 court filing in the case said.

Last week’s filing seeks to amend an earlier lawsuit Gotion filed against Green Township over zoning changes that made its development all but impossible to proceed.

In February, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked Gotion’s lawsuit, arguing that it was moot because the state had already found the project in default and had demanded back roughly $23.7 million that had been given to the subsidiary of a Chinese company to purchase and prepare land in Green Township. In light of that ruling, Gotion is seeking to amend its lawsuit to seek additional damages.

“…the Sixth Circuit implied that given the facts of the dispute at this point, the correct form of damages for Gotion’s breach of contract claim against the township is likely monetary damages and no longer injunctive relief,” Gotion said in the May 29 filing.

Advertisement

The amended filing includes demands for damages arising from the “millions” Gotion paid or spent in reliance on the project moving forward, lost profits the company would have made if the manufacturing facility were built, attorney fees and an amount “not less than $23,670,873.56 for funds advanced towards land and development costs related to the project that the state of Michigan is now claiming should be repaid.”

Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office, which is seeking to recoup the $23.7 million on behalf of the Michigan Strategic Fund, said it was aware of Gotion’s May 29 filing against Green Township and is “monitoring the situation.” The office declined further comment, citing attorney-client privilege.

Gotion first sued Green Township in March 2024 after the board — all of whom had been replaced in November 2023 with members concerned about the Gotion project — rescinded two resolutions needed for the project to move forward. Gotion sued in federal court for breach of contract, and a U.S. district court judge issued a preliminary ruling in Gotion’s favor.

But the Sixth Circuit later blocked the case after Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s administration, last fall, found Gotion to be in default of its grant agreement.

Advertisement

The state’s finding of default was in part due to the Green Township lawsuit. The company’s agreement with the state prohibits involvement in a suit that “would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the project or the grantee’s performance of its obligations under this agreement.”

The state also maintained Gotion’s “cessation of eligible activities” for a period of 120 days constituted an “abandonment” in violation of the grant agreement.

The Michigan Strategic Fund said it would seek to recoup the $23.7 million used to purchase and prepare land for Gotion in Green Township.

The Gotion project in Green Township was fraught with controversy shortly after its announcement. The company had planned to locate a battery parts plant in the Big Rapids area, creating up to 2,350 jobs and receiving about $175 million in taxpayer-funded incentives for the project.

Advertisement

Local opponents pushed back on the project because of the secretive nature with which it was negotiated, the unknown environmental effects of the project and Gotion’s parent company in China. Those concerns were amplified by Republican candidates in 2024, including both Vice President JD Vance and President Donald Trump.

The legal maneuverings with Gotion have already come at a cost to the township.

For the past three years, the state Treasury Department has flagged Green Township in Mecosta County because its expenditures have exceeded the amount of money authorized in its annual budget. In a corrective action plan submitted to Treasury last month, the township said its deficits were “primarily due to the legal fees.”

eleblanc@detroitnews.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Residents in Taylor, Michigan, fight against possible rezoning

Published

on

Residents in Taylor, Michigan, fight against possible rezoning


A group of residents on Holland Road in Taylor, Michigan, say they are now doing everything they can to keep their neighborhood the way it is after some of them received a letter saying the city is considering rezoning their neighborhood. 

“People across the street from me could have warehouse front property instead of woods and nice residential homes,” said Matthew Streicher.

Streicher, whose family has owned property on Holland Road for more than 100 years, says that has been his concern after he received a letter from the city about a proposed rezoning from residential to light industrial directly behind his home near Wick and Holland roads. 

“So that’s when I also decided to start knocking on doors around here and saying this is what is going on, we need to speak out and have a voice as to what happens in our backyards, literally,” said Streicher.

Advertisement

Streicher told CBS News Detroit that three of his neighbors received that letter, informing residents that there’s a possibility of a new cold storage warehouse development if this land is rezoned.

“Nothing that belongs in a neighborhood,” said Tim Adkins.

“Heartbreaking, heartbreaking, you know,” said Denise Haggadone.

Many who live on Holland Road say this possibility is even more disturbing because of how long everyone has lived on this quaint road. And these same homeowners say that an industrial facility would only bring in more traffic and take away natural green space, most likely hurting their property value as well.

“It’s nice to see the wildlife, you know, there’s so few places left,” said Adkins.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, CBS News Detroit spoke off-camera with City Council Chairman Charley Johnson, who also lives on Holland Road. Johnson says he understands all of his neighbors’ concerns and agrees with them. 

He says the company proposing this rezoning has every right to do so, and that the planning commission will vote on it Wednesday evening. 

“It’s sad, I raised my kid here, and he’s planning on having this home after I pass or retire or what have you,” Haggadone said,  

The residents hope to see a big turnout at Wednesday’s planning commission meeting at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, at Taylor City Hall. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending