Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan voter ID initiative submits 500k signatures too late for election

Published

on

Michigan voter ID initiative submits 500k signatures too late for election


Advocates of an initiative to tighten Michigan voting legal guidelines and require voter identification on Friday submitted petition signatures, a transfer these in opposition say was supposed to “veto proof” their efforts after the submission was beforehand delayed.

Safe MI Vote petition leaders, Michigan lawmakers and a few dozen volunteers hauled the packing containers stuffed with 514,294 signatures out of a truck and into the Richard H. Austin constructing, which homes the Bureau of Elections, in Lansing on July 29.

At a press convention earlier than the signatures have been turned in, Safe MI Vote Government Director Jeff Litton thanked these people and the 1000’s of volunteers he mentioned aided the hassle. He mentioned that the petition initiative will assist restore voter religion in safe elections.

“The final 25 years, People have been shedding confidence within the religion of our elections,” Litton mentioned. “That’s not only one aspect. That’s either side.”

Advertisement

Safe MI Vote would amend the state structure to require photograph ID for in-person voting, in addition to a photograph ID, driver’s license, state ID or partial social safety quantity for absentee poll functions. State-funded IDs can be given to folks “with hardships.” Voter registration would additionally require partial social safety quantity.

The petition failed to satisfy the Could 31 deadline to show in signatures for the November basic election poll. The delay by organizers is because of what Safe MI Vote Spokesperson Jamie Roe known as “an abundance of warning,” after the group discovered about 20,000 fraudulent signatures.

Organizers did so regardless of the 435,000 signatures secured earlier than the deadline — way over the 340,047 statutorily required — with out together with the fraudulent signatures.

Michigan voter ID marketing campaign finds fraud, delays submitting petitions for November poll

This go round, Litton mentioned 10,000 extra fraudulent signatures have been discovered, however none have been included within the petitions delivered on Friday.

Advertisement

These in opposition to Safe MI Vote imagine that delaying the signature submission was a calculated. As an alternative, the group will deliver the initiative in entrance of the Republican-led legislature, the place it has a greater probability of being voted into legislation.

Since this route was taken, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer doesn’t have the flexibility to veto the proposals if adopted.

Nancy Wang is govt director of Voters Not Politicians, Michigan’s main voting rights group. She mentioned in a written assertion that Safe MI Vote has “misled voters in its effort to make it more durable to vote in Michigan.”

“The whole lot in regards to the Safe MI Vote marketing campaign is the alternative: From day 1, the marketing campaign has made clear that this can be a bundle of voter suppression payments disguised as a citizen initiative,” Wang mentioned. “They’re delivering signatures to not qualify for the 2022 poll – as a result of they’ve missed the deadline to try this – however to place these measures to the state legislature to move veto-proof laws that may undermine our democracy.”

Sen. Tom Barrett, R-Charlotte, and Rep. Matt Corridor, R-Marshall, attended Friday’s Safe MI Vote press convention and mentioned they’re excited to vote on the initiative as soon as it’s obtained within the legislature.

Advertisement

The pair of Republican lawmakers known as on Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to shortly confirm the signatures so the legislature can vote as soon as lawmakers return within the fall and the brand new guidelines may be in place earlier than November’s basic election.

“We’re calling on Secretary of State Benson, to not delay, however to evaluation these swiftly and to certify these petitions so the legislature can get again and put these into legislation,” Corridor mentioned. “We’re going to lose a lot that holds us collectively as a state and so this can be a cheap and measured step to try this and to revive folks’s confidence.”

Petitions should be filed a minimum of 160 days previous to the final election, in November of each even 12 months, to guarantee placement on the poll. The legislature has 40 session days from the time it receives the petition to enact or reject the proposed legislation or to suggest a distinct measure on the identical query. If not enacted, the unique initiative proposal and any completely different measure handed by the legislature should go earlier than the voters within the subsequent basic election as a poll proposal.

Benson and the Bureau of Elections, below a democratic administration, may wait till 2024 to evaluation the signatures and transfer the method ahead.

Learn extra from MLive:

Advertisement

Minimal wage hike paused by Michigan court docket till a minimum of Feb. 2023

Public security advocates say ‘deceptive’ poll initiative would lower Grand Rapids police funding

Sexual orientation is now protected by Michigan’s civil rights legislation. What does that imply?

Decide will proceed to supervise abortion lawsuit regardless of contributions to Deliberate Parenthood

Michigan legislation goals to make on-line procuring safer, extra clear

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Michigan

What injury? Freshman leads Michigan State past Colorado in Maui Invitational opener

Published

on

What injury? Freshman leads Michigan State past Colorado in Maui Invitational opener


So much for Jase Richardson’s sprained left ankle.

Less than a week after rolling it late in a game and being helped off the court, he led Michigan State on it.

The freshman guard came off the bench to score a career-high 13 points as the Spartans rolled to a 72-56 win against Colorado on Monday in the opening around of the Maui Invitational at the Lahaina Civic Center.

In the first tournament setting of the season, Michigan State overcame another miserable shooting performance beyond the arc (2-for-21) with a deep rotation, explosive transition game and active defense.

Advertisement

The Spartans (5-1) will play their second of three games in three days on Tuesday (6 p.m., ESPN) in a semifinal against Memphis (5-0), which survived a late rally to knock off No. 2 UConn 99-97 in overtime earlier Monday. The other half of the bracket features No. 4 Auburn, No. 5 Iowa State, No. 12 North Carolina and Dayton, who are all playing later Monday night.

Richardson made six of eight field goals and was one of 10 different scorers for the Spartans, whose bench outscored the Buffaloes 40-13. Frankie Fidler scored nine, Jeremy Fears had eight and six assists and Coen Carr had eight points.

Julian Hammond led Colorado with a game-high 15 points while Elijah Malone scored 14.

Any concerns about Richardson’s mobility after suffering a sprained ankle late in last week’s 83-75 win against Samford were quickly erased. He checked in less than four minutes into the game and immediately got in the paint for a basket. Richardson shot 4-for-4 from the floor in the first half and Carr made all three of his shot attempts as the two combined for 14 of Michigan State’s 23 bench points in the opening 20 minutes.

That helped make up for the awful 3-point shooting that has plagued the Spartans so far this season. They entered Monday’s game ranked 352nd out of 355 teams in the nation from beyond the arc at just 22.1 percent and picked up where they left off. Michigan State shot 50 percent (15-for-30) from the floor in the opening half despite missing all nine 3-point attempts.

Advertisement

After the teams traded baskets and slim leads, the Spartans closed the half on a 17-4 run. Colorado went scoreless for more than five minutes and missed 10 straight shots at one point before going into halftime trailing 38-25.

Coming out of the locker room, the Buffaloes put together an 8-2 run with a pair of triples from Hammond but three quick turnovers prevented them from further shrinking the deficit. After Michigan State missed its first 14 triple tries, Richardson knocked one down a little more than six minutes into the second half to reestablish a double-digit advantage. The Spartans cruised down the stretch to secure a spot in the semifinals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

New bowl projections have Michigan in play at four different sites

Published

on

New bowl projections have Michigan in play at four different sites


Michigan clinched bowl eligibility by landing its sixth win of the season over the weekend, a 50-6 beat down of lowly Northwestern.

And while all eyes are on the rivalry game against Ohio State this Saturday (Noon, FOX), the postseason is fast approaching. In 13 days, the Wolverines will learn of their bowl draw. It won’t be a high-profile game like years past, but several intriguing sites remain a possibility for Sherrone Moore’s team.

The most popular pick this week is the Music City Bowl in Nashville, set for Dec. 30 at Nissan Stadium. It would mark Michigan’s first-ever appearance in the game and pit the Wolverines against an SEC school.

ESPN’s Mark Schlabach has Michigan playing Ole Miss in the Music City Bowl, CBS Sports’ Jerry Palm predicts a Michigan-Missouri matchup in Nashville, while USA Today’s Erick Smith projects the Wolverines to play Texas A&M. All three SEC schools have been in the playoff picture this year, setting the stage for an intriguing neutral-site game.

Advertisement

Three other national writers have Michigan playing in three different bowl games. ESPN’s Kyle Bonagura predicts a Michigan-Syracuse matchup in the Duke’s Mayo Bowl on Jan. 3 in Charlotte. The Action Network’s Brett McMurphy, whose track-record projecting bowl sites and matchups is among the best, has the Wolverines playing Pittsburgh in the Pinstripe Bowl on Dec. 28 at Yankee Stadium in New York. And in an interesting outlier, The Sporting News’ Bill Bender projects a Michigan-Texas A&M matchup in the Dec. 31 ReliaQuest Bowl in Tampa, Fla.

How the top of the Big Ten fares when it comes to the 12-team playoff matters here. Getting four teams in like some are projecting would help Michigan’s standing in the bowl selection process. But if one of those teams gets left out (looking at you, Indiana), it would almost certainly kill any chance of returning to Florida.

After the playoff bids are doled out, the Citrus Bowl has the first pick of the remaining bowl-eligible Big Ten teams, followed by the ReliaQuest Bowl (former Outback Bowl). An 8 or 9-win Illinois would likely be the next Big Ten team off the board, followed by a 7 or 8-win Iowa. After that, though, is anyone’s guess.

And what if Michigan pulls off the upset in Columbus and gets to seven wins? It could suddenly move the Wolverines up the pecking order and give the ReliaQuest Bowl a reason to pick them, provided that Indiana does make the playoff.

This week will help offer some clarity with the Big Ten standings. There’s also a possibility of college football having too many bowl eligible teams this year. And while that certainly won’t affect Michigan — its brand and following are too large to keep out, even at 6-6 — but could limit the number of secondary bowls available to the Big Ten.

Advertisement
  • BETTING: Check out our guide to the best Michigan sportsbooks, where our team of sports betting experts has reviewed the experience, payout speed, parlay options and quality of odds for multiple sportsbooks.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan State engineering prof, student design helmet inserts to help drown out crowd noise for QBs

Published

on

Michigan State engineering prof, student design helmet inserts to help drown out crowd noise for QBs


EAST LANSING, Mich. — The sight was a common one for Andrew Kolpacki. For many a Sunday, he would watch NFL games on TV and see quarterbacks putting their hands on their helmets, desperately trying to hear the play call from the sideline or booth as tens of thousands of fans screamed at the tops of their lungs.

When the NCAA’s playing rules oversight committee this past spring approved the use of coach-to-player helmet communications in games for the 2024 season, Kolpacki, Michigan State’s head football equipment manager, knew the Spartans’ QBs and linebackers were going to have a problem.

“There had to be some sort of solution,” he said.

As it turns out, there was. And it was right across the street.

Advertisement

Kolpacki reached out to Tamara Reid Bush, a mechanical engineering professor who not only heads the school’s Biomechanical Design Research Laboratory but also is a football season ticket-holder.

Kolpacki “showed me some photos and said that other teams had just put duct tape inside the (earhole), and he asked me, ‘Do you think we can do anything better than duct tape,?” Bush said. “And I said, ‘Oh, absolutely.’”

Bush and Rylie DuBois, a sophomore biosystems engineering major and undergraduate research assistant at the lab, set out to produce earhole inserts made from polylactic acid, a bio-based plastic, using a 3D printer. Part of the challenge was accounting for the earhole sizes and shapes that vary depending on helmet style.

Once the season got underway with a Friday night home game against Florida Atlantic on Aug. 30, the helmets of starting quarterback Aidan Chiles and linebacker Jordan Turner were outfitted with the inserts, which helped mitigate crowd noise.

DuBois attended the game, sitting in the student section.

Advertisement

“I felt such a strong sense of accomplishment and pride,” DuBois said. “And I told all my friends around me about how I designed what they were wearing on the field.”

All told, Bush and DuBois have produced around 180 sets of the inserts, a number that grew in part due to the variety of helmet designs and colors that are available to be worn by Spartan players any given Saturday. Plus, the engineering folks have been fine-tuning their design throughout the season.

Dozens of Bowl Subdivision programs are doing something similar. In many cases, they’re getting 3D-printed earhole covers from XO Armor Technologies, which provides on-site, on-demand 3D printing of athletic wearables.

The Auburn, Alabama-based company has donated its version of the earhole covers to the equipment managers of programs ranging from Georgia and Clemson to Boise State and Arizona State in the hope the schools would consider doing business with XO Armor in the future, said Jeff Klosterman, vice president of business development.

XO Armor first was approached by the Houston Texans at the end of last season about creating something to assist quarterback C.J. Stroud in better hearing play calls delivered to his helmet during road games. XO Armor worked on a solution and had completed one when it received another inquiry: Ohio State, which had heard Michigan State was moving forward with helmet inserts, wondered if XO Armor had anything in the works.

Advertisement

“We kind of just did this as a one-off favor to the Texans and honestly didn’t forecast it becoming our viral moment in college football,” Klosterman said. “We’ve now got about 60 teams across college football and the NFL wearing our sound-deadening earhole covers every weekend.”

The rules state that only one player for each team is permitted to be in communication with coaches while on the field. For the Spartans, it’s typically Chiles on offense and Turner on defense. Turner prefers to have an insert in both earholes, but Chiles has asked that the insert be used in only one on his helmet.

Chiles “likes to be able to feel like he has some sort of outward exposure,” Kolpacki said.

Exposure is something the sophomore signal-caller from Long Beach, California, had in away games against Michigan and Oregon this season. Michigan Stadium welcomed 110,000-plus fans for the Oct. 26 matchup between the in-state rivals. And while just under 60,000 packed Autzen Stadium in Eugene, Oregon, for the Ducks’ 31-10 win over Michigan State three weeks earlier, it was plenty loud. “The Big Ten has some pretty impressive venues,” Kolpacki said.

“It can be just deafening,” he said. “That’s what those fans are there for is to create havoc and make it difficult for coaches to get a play call off.”

Advertisement

Something that is a bit easier to handle thanks to Bush and her team. She called the inserts a “win-win-win” for everyone.

“It’s exciting for me to work with athletics and the football team,” she said. “I think it’s really exciting for our students as well to take what they’ve learned and develop and design something and see it being used and executed.”

___

Get alerts on the latest AP Top 25 poll throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/college-football and https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending