Connect with us

Michigan

DTE, Consumers on track to reconnect power for customers, likely avoiding paying credits

Published

on

DTE, Consumers on track to reconnect power for customers, likely avoiding paying credits


play

Two days after severe thunderstorms knocked out power to a half-million Michigan customers, some of them are wondering whether they will receive the $38 utility credit that the Michigan Public Service Commission has set to help compensate them.

The short answer: Probably not.

Advertisement

There is still uncertainty about how and when the outage will be resolved, but the PSC confirmed with the Free Press on Thursday that it is likely — if the utility outage estimates and repair forecasts stay on track — neither DTE Energy nor Consumers Energy will be issuing many credits.

Both companies, when asked Thursday about credits by the Free Press, mostly sidestepped the issue.

What’s more, the lack of compensation adds to the concerns already swirling around the PSC, a state agency charged with regulating public utilities, and whether it is too close to the companies it is supposed to oversee and should do more to track, investigate and act on complaints.

Consumers Energy has said it hopes to have most repairs done Thursday; and DTE said Friday — at the latest.

Advertisement

As of 6 p.m., both utilities had made considerable progress on restoring power. Detroit-based DTE reported it was down to about 43,000 customers without power out of an estimated 300,000 on Tuesday, and Jackson-based Consumers Energy had about 18,000 more customers to reconnect out of about 200,000.

Customers are eager to have their power back on, but the thought of receiving no compensation isn’t sitting well with many of them who already feel that a $38 credit — which they explain doesn’t begin to cover what they lose in a power outage, especially during a heat wave — is insufficient.

“Into our second day of no power and now need to discard food from (the) freezer/refrigerator,” Doug Lombardi, of Livonia, wrote in an email he sent to the Free Press. “Suggest you do a follow up story on how and where to seek compensation for tossed food.”

And his reaction to the power outage was among one of more measured ones.

Advertisement

Michigan utilities under pressure

In the past few years, DTE and Consumers Energy have come under increasing fire from the public, nonprofit watchdog groups and even the state attorney general for a lack of energy reliability, which, in the freezing cold of winter or the boiling hot summer, puts Michiganders at risk.

Last year, the Free Press reported the two utilities were among the worst-performing utilities in the nation, ranked by how long it took them to get the lights back on after a power outage. At the same time, Michiganders also were paying more for electricity than their neighbors around the Great Lakes.

The criticism forced the Public Service Commission to change its utility credit guidelines, boosting the credit from $25 to $35, and now, $38, and requiring the utilities to pay them automatically, instead of making customers apply for them.

Moreover, an in-depth Free Press investigation found the PSC tends to lack decision-making transparency and, as a potential conflict of interest, gets 80% of its funding from DTE and Consumers Energy, which hold a near monopoly on providing electricity to Michigan residents.

Thursday, another Free Press investigation concluded that thousands of informal complaints lodged annually aren’t tracked well, and “most formal complaints against Michigan utilities are dismissed, and a handful of consumers have reached confidential settlements.”

Advertisement

The challenge now for Michiganders to get credits after this week’s ongoing outage is tied to the formula the PSC set for issuing them. The higher the percentage of customers caught in an outage, the more time a utility is allowed to restore power before a credit is required.

The measure gives utilities a grace period — 16 hours to four days — to make repairs.

The thinking behind this caveat is that more widespread outages require more effort to fix. The new guidelines, which rely on numbers reported by the utility companies, also call for utilities to credit more per day past the grace period when the grace period is exceeded.

But in this outage, based on the two utilities’ early estimates of how many people lost power — about 13% for DTE and more than 10% for DTE — and when it will be back on, there is a good chance each utility might avoid big credit payouts.

DTE said its goal is “to never have our customers in a situation where they incur the hardships that an outage brings or where reliability credits would have to be issued,” and Consumers Energy said “the discussion around outage credits really goes to a bigger issue over how well we keep the lights on for customers.”

Advertisement

Years of unclaimed credits

Outage credits have been around since the 1980s, as one of the measures the PSC has used to encourage utilities to enhance reliability.

But until last year, customers had to apply for them.

That meant millions in credits that customers were eligible for after frequent and long power outages didn’t get applied because customers either didn’t know the process or didn’t have time to apply and the money went unclaimed, according to a 2000 report by the Lansing State Journal.

That same year, the nonprofit Citizens Utility Board of Michigan also released a study that found when it came to reliability, Michigan’s utilities ranked among “the worst in the country.” It took days, for example, to restore power to DTE and Consumers Energy customers caught in a 2019 storm.

Advertisement

The Lansing State Journal — which, in addition to the Free Press is part of the Gannett network — noted the nonprofit study and interviewed the group’s executive director who called for changes to the credit policy. A year later, yet another storm knocked out power to hundreds of thousands of customers.

And this time, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel weighed in.

The state’s top law enforcement officer asked utilities to voluntarily credit customers affected by the outage and provide increased credits — the amount, then, just $25 — to help those who lost hundreds of dollars or more on food and hotel costs.

Adding to the pressure on the utilities, Nessel also published the results of a survey that ever since has been used by news outlets and consumer groups to question whether the credits are enough. It found 90% of the utility customers in the outage “lost between $100 to $500” and 35% “lost between $500 to $1,000.”

Amid the growing criticism, DTE said that it agreed to voluntarily issue $100 credits.

Advertisement

More: DTE: Power reliability must improve, outage cost estimate at more than $50M

It’s unclear whether the company would offer voluntary credits again.

When asked Wednesday by the Free Press about it, one of the corporate vice presidents acknowledged it could do better and said the company would have to have internal discussions, but did not commit to customer credits that weren’t required or rule it out.

Contact Frank Witsil: 313-222-5022 or fwitsil@freepress.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Michigan

Niyo: Marshall plan keeps Michigan running on schedule

Published

on

Niyo: Marshall plan keeps Michigan running on schedule


Ann Arbor — One minute, Jordan Marshall was lying on the ground on the Michigan sideline, looking like another casualty on a night full of them for the home team.

The next, he simply disappeared. But not for long.

Because the game wasn’t over — much to the dismay of a chattering crowd of 110,517 inside Michigan Stadium on Saturday night — and the workhorse wasn’t done working.

Advertisement

So there Marshall went, plowing into the line one more time. And somehow, out of the pile, there he came again, leaving little doubt about how this night would end.

But questions? Sure, there would be a few.

Starting with the one Tony Alford greeted Marshall with on the sideline after that remarkable fourth-quarter touchdown run had finally given the Wolverines some breathing room.

“Coach Alford was, like, ‘What happened?’” Marshall recalled later, laughing, after he’d helped his team escape Purdue’s upset bid.

Advertisement

His answer: “I just kept running.”

He did, all right. All night, really.

Primary role

And the redshirt freshman might be the single biggest reason Michigan has kept winning these last few weeks, picking up the slack after starter Justice Haynes was sidelined by injury — or injuries, as it were — and practically carrying the Wolverines into their bye week with a 7-2 record.

Whatever you think of Michigan’s chances going forward — wins at Northwestern (Nov. 15) and Maryland (Nov. 22) could set up another epic clash with Ohio State at the end of November — don’t overlook Marshall’s role in getting the Wolverines where they are.

Saturday night, Marshall rushed for a career-best 185 yards on 25 carries, scored all three of his team’s touchdowns, and effectively ran out the clock on the Boilermakers, who haven’t won a Big Ten game in two years but easily could’ve won one here.

Advertisement

That’s because Michigan’s passing game feels like a disjointed mess most of the time. Freshman Bryce Underwood is still rushing too many throws, receivers are still dropping too many passes and the coaching staff is still lacking the kind of confidence you’d expect from a team that’s at least pretending to be a playoff contender at this point in the season.    

Underwood followed up an underwhelming performance at Michigan State (7-of-18, 86 yards) with another one Saturday, finishing just 13-of-22 for 145 yards and a costly red-zone interception against a Purdue defense that just gave up 359 yards through the air to Rutgers a week ago in West Lafayette. And while neither the quarterback nor his head coach, Sherrone Moore, sounded any alarms after this latest outing, Moore did acknowledge, “We’ve got to be better in the passing game.”

They’ll have to be better all around, frankly. Michigan’s special-teams play remains an Achilles’ heel more than two months into the season. And a defense that was already missing a few starters lost another one Saturday when Jaishawn Barham exited with an apparent shoulder injury on the second play from scrimmage. But that’s no excuse for the way Purdue dominated time of possession through three quarters or the fact that the Boilermakers completed 77% of their passes and were only a third-down stop away from having a chance to win this game late in the fourth quarter.

Then again, Marshall made sure none of that mattered in the end. Nearly half of his 25 carries — a dozen, to be exact — came in the fourth quarter Saturday. And it would’ve been more if not for the cramping that sent him hobbling off the field in the middle of that final touchdown drive. Marshall missed a few plays getting treatment on the sideline — backup Bryson Kuzdzal filled in — yet he was determined to finish what he’d started.

“It can hurt tomorrow,” he said. “We’ve got a whole week to get our bodies right. But I gotta go out there for my team. They fought for four quarters, and I have to be out there to help seal the game and put the game away. And that’s my mindset.”

Advertisement

It showed, obviously. Just as it did a couple weeks earlier in the win over Washington here, as Marshall (25 carries, 133 yards against the Huskies) stepped into the starter’s role that likely would’ve been his all season had Michigan’s coaching staff not hit the transfer portal to bring in Haynes from Alabama last winter.

Waiting his turn

Instead, he was left to play a supporting role for the first six weeks, biding his time and waiting for a bigger opportunity. It finally came when Haynes missed that Washington game while nursing a rib injury suffered in the loss at USC. He returned last week against the Spartans and both backs went over 100 yards in that rivalry runaway. But now Haynes is out indefinitely with a different injury, one that had him using a knee scooter to get around on the Michigan sideline Saturday, his right foot stuffed in a protective boot.

Asked about Haynes’ status before Saturday’s game, Moore would only say “we hope to get him back.” But the back who’s shouldering the load in his absence certainly looks more than capable of doing just that.

Marshall has an impressive ability to absorb contact and gain extra yardage at the end of runs. And as Moore was quick to point out after Saturday’s win, of his 124 carries this season, only one has gone for negative yardage. But he packs more than a punch, too, and this career night against the Boilermakers amplified that, the way Marshall used his patience and vision to break off chunks of yardage time after time. A dozen of his carries went for 5 yards or more —Marshall gave most of the credit for that to Michigan’s young, improving offensive line — and the 54-yarder he took to the house for the game’s first touchdown was his second 50-plus yarder in as many weeks.

“But it’s not a surprise,” linebacker Ernest Hausmann said. “We all know what Jordan’s capable of doing. We go against that in practice every day. So it’s not surprise. We know who he is, and we know what he does.”

Advertisement

And for what it’s worth, Marshall says he knows he can do more.

“I don’t think I played my best today,” he said. “I think I ran well, but there’s some stuff in the pass protection I think I have to clean up, and our (running back) room has to clean up. And again, I’m very hard on myself, and there’s some runs that I wish I had back, things like that.”

And those aren’t just the kind of things coaches love to hear, either. It’s the mentality Michigan’s going to need when it gets back to work over the bye week, preparing for the stretch run.

“I promise you guys that we’re going to come out in two weeks ready to go,” Marshall said. “Next week is an opportunity. It’s not a week where we just get to sit around and relax. It’s a week to get healthy, fix things … back to the fundamentals.”

Saturday was a win, yes. But it was a “sloppy win,” Marshall added, “and we’re a way better team than that.”

Advertisement

john.niyo@detroitnews.com

@JohnNiyo



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Food banks in Michigan prepare to help if SNAP is suspended in November

Published

on

Food banks in Michigan prepare to help if SNAP is suspended in November


A federal judge has temporarily blocked the federal government from suspending food assistance during the shutdown, ruling that the USDA must continue issuing SNAP benefits using contingency funds. 

However, that doesn’t mean benefits will resume immediately.

Advertisement

Local perspective:

Mayor Duggan has authorized $1.75 million in emergency food aid if SNAP is shut down.

Advertisement

But who knows how far that will go?

FOX 2 was at Forgotten Harvest in Oak Park, where they’re operating under the assumption it will take a while for those benefits to resume.

1.4 million people in Michigan depend on SNAP, and the impact could be far-reaching. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Here’s what Forgotten Harvest and Capuchin Soup Kitchen have to say:

Advertisement

“We’re operating as if SNAP benefits aren’t being loaded. We want to make sure there’s no gap for neighbors who need to feed their families. We’re encouraged to continue making sure people are fed,” said Forgotten Harvest COO Sheila Marshall.

Here’s the reality: the next few weeks will be in limbo.

What’s next:

Advertisement

The contingency money is $5.8 billion from the USDA, and more money could come from a separate allocation known as Section 32.

Detroit



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Why are candy prices higher this Halloween season? Michigan experts weigh in

Published

on

Why are candy prices higher this Halloween season? Michigan experts weigh in


It’s time to buy candy for Halloween. But now with tariffs and inflation, experts believe your dollar will not stretch as much as it usually does.

“Prices are very, very high this year,” one shopper said.

One of the main items’ more expensive this Halloween is chocolate because of fewer cocoa powder crops overseas.

“Cocoa beans are grown out of the United States. Chocolate itself has gone up another percentage because of the tariffs, which kind of hurts it,” said Steve Sikora, who owns “The Bulk Store” in Taylor, Michigan.

Advertisement

Sikora says he buys thousands of pounds in products. This year, he noticed a change.

“The price itself gets raised, or some of my wholesalers add a line, tariff charge.  And they’re charging us additionally,” he said.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, candy and chewing gum prices are up nearly 10% over the last year. While the extra tariff charge is in effect, Steve is doing what he can to help his customers.

“We haven’t raised our prices because of it. We’re just biting our lip waiting for it to go away. Because you hate to have to charge your customers more,” Sikora said.

Financial website FinanceBuzz looked at the price of bags of candy in 2020 vs today. It found that prices have shot up almost 80%. Experts say one way to save money is to find deals.

Advertisement

“I’m going to guess places like Miejer and Target are going to have sales coming up, because they want to get rid of it. So there might be sales even coming up on Halloween day,” said Jeff Rightmer, supply chain management professor at Wayne State University.

Last year, Americans spent over $7 billion on Halloween chocolate and candy. That’s a 2.2% increase from 2023, according to the National Confectioners Association.

Experts tell CBS News Detroit that, through it all, sales of chocolate and candy this Halloween season are expected to grow roughly 3%.

“If you tend to go away from the non-chocolate things… like gummy worms or stuff like that. The prices haven’t increased as much. Inflation has certainly kicked some of that up. But as far as chocolate goes, that’s what you’re seeing the biggest increase in,” Rightmer said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending