Connect with us

Kansas

Veterans around Kansas City may have to wait longer and travel farther if VA closes rural facilities

Published

on

Veterans around Kansas City may have to wait longer and travel farther if VA closes rural facilities


Staff at Kansas Metropolis-area Veterans Affairs facilities say the potential closure of a number of services within the area can be unhealthy for veterans.

Veterans and members of the American Federation of Authorities Workers (AFGE) District 9 union protested throughout the road from the Heartland VA Community on Tuesday. They are saying they oppose the Division of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) proposed closure of many services throughout the nation.

The proposal was made by the VA to the Asset and Infrastructure Evaluate (AIR) Fee to overtake its well being community to assist handle recruitment challenges and reducing demand for providers in some areas. If applied and permitted by Congress, the federal government would shut 172 of its greater than 800 clinics. The division additionally recommends growing its medical specialty clinics by 56%, to 388, and relying extra on non-public sector suppliers.

Janet Constance, a PTSD psychologist on the VA in Kansas Metropolis and a member of the AFGE Native 9, worries that regional closures will lower entry for veterans who want specialised care or stay in rural areas.

Advertisement

“This can be very necessary that our veterans proceed to have entry to specialty providers inside their communities and closures are gonna imply longer wait occasions, longer drives, and that is simply unacceptable,” Constance mentioned. “Our veterans have already paid for his or her care with their service – they should proceed to obtain that prime notch care. If extra veterans come to Kansas metropolis, that is gonna result in doubtlessly a lower in well timed care for everybody.”

These adjustments would have a serious impression on the Kansas Metropolis area. If permitted, the VA would:

  • Discontinue emergency, inpatient medical and outpatient surgical providers on the Topeka, Kansas, medical middle
  • Scale back the 23-bed inpatient medical middle in Leavenworth, Kansas, to a 12-bed remark hospital
  • Shut the Platte Metropolis, Missouri, community-based outpatient clinic and open a brand new web site in northwest Kansas Metropolis
  • Shut a community-based outpatient clinic in Excelsior Springs, Missouri, and change it with a brand new web site in Liberty, Missouri
  • Set up a brand new stand-alone group residing middle – or nursing house – in Kansas Metropolis, Missouri, about 10 miles southeast of the Kansas Metropolis medical middle.

Savannah Hawley

/

KCUR 89.3

Gladys (L) and Eugene (R) Martin attended the protest in hopes no veterans will lose their VA suppliers

In between chants of “Don’t privatize my VA,” and “They fought for us, we struggle for them,” AFGE members spoke about how the closures would trigger mass layoffs and drive many into costlier, non-public care.

Advertisement

Eugene Martin, an AFGE native 9 member, says these adjustments put veterans prone to discovering their very own non-public healthcare.

“Now we have tons of veterans in the USA who want healthcare and who’re serviced by VA hospitals and clinics. I merely do not need to see our veterans must go discover healthcare elsewhere,” mentioned Martin. “There are various veterans who stay out in rural areas. Lots of them who beforehand went to outlying clinics will now must go a protracted distance to attempt to discover service.”

Elevated reliance on the Kansas Metropolis medical middle and personal suppliers would add sufferers to space hospitals. Keena Smith, a veteran and legislative political organizer for AFGE, thinks the proposed adjustments solely profit higher-ups who would revenue from the privatization of the VA. As an alternative, she desires to see a revitalization of the VA.

“The healthcare system is already fractured. They’re already drained, they’re already exhausted. And these veterans have paid a lot – they sacrificed a lot,” Smith mentioned. “The cash that they use to outsource could possibly be [used] to fill these positions which are vacant inside VA hospitals, to revamp and rework these services that want the work. I simply assume it is a slap in a veteran’s house to inform them that we hear you, however we’re not listening as a result of we need to contract this out.”

Veterans and members of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) District 9 union protested across the street from the Heartland VA Network on Tuesday. They oppose the possible closure of nearly 200 VA centers.

Savannah Hawley

Advertisement

/

KCUR 89.3

Veterans and members of the American Federation of Authorities Workers (AFGE) District 9 union protested throughout the road from the Heartland VA Community on Tuesday. They oppose the potential closure of practically 200 VA facilities.

Kevin Ellis works on the VA medical middle in Poplar Bluff, Missouri, and is president of the AFGE native 2338. He attended the protest as a result of the plan would cut back his medical middle to a nursing house. In his small city, that may drive lots of these they look after to drive three hours to the closest hospital.

“Surveys have instructed us time and again and over: veterans really feel valued after they come to the VA medical middle, not after they go to the general public,” Ellis mentioned. “I need [the VA] to cease this, come sit with us and be taught firsthand what the ramifications can be.”

The AIR Fee may have a 12 months to assessment the VA proposal and make its personal proposals to the White Home. If it strikes ahead, Congress must settle for the entire suggestions.

Advertisement

Protests additionally befell lately in New York, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Kansas

Kansas State players of the game vs UT-Martin

Published

on

Kansas State players of the game vs UT-Martin


Kansas State offensive MVP: DJ Giddens

It was another nice and easy day at the office for Kansas State running back DJ Giddens.

The Junction City running back went over 100 yards for the fifth consecutive game. His five game streak of going over the century mark is tied for fourth in K-State school history. Giddens finished the game with 124 rushing yards and added six receiving yards.

Dylan Edwards provided a nice spark for the Wildcat offense in his first game after transferring from Colorado. Edwards scored multiple times in the contest Saturday night with one on the ground and a receiving touchdown.

In the first home start for Avery Johnson, there were some ups and downs.

Advertisement

However, Johnson still finished with two touchdowns through the air and added some nice runs as well. Jayce Brown was a major bright spot receiving as well with 71 receiving yards. The true sophomore led Kansas State in receiving and had the most receptions with five.

Defensive MVP: Tobi Osunsanmi

For defense there was a few different options for MVP. I really wrestled back and forth between two.

Ultimately, I decided on Tobi Osunsanmi. The Wichita native was a man possessed in his snaps. He showed his elite burst and was able to get to the quarterback at a very high clip. Osunsanmi finished the game with 1.5 sacks (2.5 if he completes one instead of letting the quarterback escape).

He also added another quarterback hit to go along with the sacks.

Desmond Purnell was also flying around the field Saturday evening. He led K-State in tackles with seven and was tied for first in tackles for a loss with 1.5.

Advertisement

K-State special teams MVP: Ty Bowman

Anytime you can create a touchdown on special teams, it is an easy choice for special teams MVP. Ty Bowman blocked his second career punt in the season opener versus UT-Martin. The beneficiary of Bowman blocking the punt was Colby McCalister who returned the ball one yard for a touchdown.

Chris Tennant was also perfect on all of his kicks. Tennant knocked in a 45 and 43-yard field goal and was perfect on all of his extra points.



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Tulane Football’s Path to Victory Must Exploit Inexperienced Kansas State

Published

on

Tulane Football’s Path to Victory Must Exploit Inexperienced Kansas State


The stage is set for Tulane football’s highly anticipated Week 2 matchup against the Kansas State Wildcats as they seek to become contenders on a national stage.

Intriguingly, the Green Wave and the Wildcats have some parallels on offense. Kansas State kicks off the season Saturday against FCS opponent UT-Martin, much like Tulane opened against Southeastern Louisiana.

Sophomore quarterback Avery Johnson will make his first regular season start, much like redshirt freshman Darian Mensah led Tulane to their 52-0 victory Thursday night. Johnson did appear in eight games as a true freshman and started for the team in the Pop-Tarts Bowl, beating North Carolina State.

However, he did so behind an offensive line that looks nothing like the one that will take the field next Saturday at Yulman Stadium. The Wildcats must replace four of five starters, including third-round draft pick Cooper Beebe. Just as Tulane had to find Vincent Murphy to take over for Sincere Haynesworth.

Advertisement

Though the group of returners isn’t exactly inexperienced, they don’t have any time playing together in concert. The lone starter remaining is right guard Hadley Panzer, who likely is starting this season at left guard. Presumed starting left tackle Easton Kilty is making his first FBS start.

It helps that Kansas State’s offensive line coach, Conor Riley, was promoted to coordinator. He has pieces to work with that have credible game snaps. The challenge is whether they can come together as a unit.

While Avery Johnson has more experience than Darian Mensah, Mensah benefits from a much more stable offensive line. Tulane returned both starting guards and right tackle and brought in key transfers to fill the remaining holes. In their season debut, they gave Mensah time in the pocket, but the run blocking left much to be desired.

Tulane brought in transfers on the defensive line to bolster their pass rush. They got to the quarterback twice with two sacks last Thursday, but the Bandit role was a point of concern. Their three-man front is spaced to spread out their top playmakers, Adin Huntington at defensive end and Patrick Jenkins at tackle.

With Huntington to the field and Jenkins to the boundary, it forces defenses to either focus attention on one side of the line or just shut down the best two players. That awards a lot of one-on-one opportunities for the rusher at Bandit. The players who rotated in the first game didn’t make much of a case.

Advertisement

Terrell Allen didn’t make any standout plays, nor did Matthew Fobbs-White, though the latter showed some disruptive abilities off the line of scrimmage. Frankly, Shi’Keem Laister was the most productive in a packaged role. Laister had a hurry and forced Southeastern to throw quickly, leading to incompletions on the drive.

Tulane doesn’t need the Bandit to be the hero, but they need a player to step up and credibly command attention to open up lanes for Huntington, who only recorded one hurry in his debut for the team.

Importantly, the team likely didn’t show their cards on the ways they might get to the quarterback. It might come from the second level. Linebacker Sam Howard had more pressure snaps than Fobbs-White and Allen, and he recorded a hurry and beat his blocker on another.

Could Tulane rely on blitzing and utilizing defensive backs and linebackers as rushers? Not all season. But creativity and confusion might just be enough to rattle the Wildcats as both teams race to figure out what the other is made of with merely one game of film.

The secondary came together as Tulane’s season opener went on, and should be a point of strength, but the best coverage is a pass rush. Especially with an opponent that has similar turnover and areas to exploit. For the Green Wave to pull off a victory on Sept. 7, the key lies in the lane to the quarterback.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Lawmakers plan brazen power grab, pushing aside Kansas voters and Gov. Laura Kelly • Kansas Reflector

Published

on

Lawmakers plan brazen power grab, pushing aside Kansas voters and Gov. Laura Kelly • Kansas Reflector


Let’s be clear about what Kansas Republican legislative leaders are doing with their planned overhaul of budgeting: They are launching a personal and political power grab against Gov. Laura Kelly.

They have never accepted or respected her mandate. Despite Kelly winning a second term and having two years left to go, they have continually attempted to usurp the executive branch’s authority. They have tried a constitutional amendment and prohibiting her ability to negotiate Medicaid contracts. Now they’re going after her yearly state budget proposal.

Usually, the Legislature begins its yearly budget process with a proposal from the governor. Her office submits it when lawmakers arrive for the annual session, in January. Now an interim committee wants to start the process earlier, as soon as October of the previous year.

In this new process, the governor’s budget would be a suggestion, not a starting point.

Advertisement

And never mind that it’s a direct attack on Kelly. House Speaker Dan Hawkins, R-Wichita, assured the audience that these changes had nothing to do with the governor.

“This process has nothing to do with the governor,” he said at the meeting earlier this month, according to Kansas Reflector reporter Tim Carpenter. “If you’re going to focus on the governor, probably not the wisest thing to do, because this process has happened over time with many, many different governors.”

He was contradicted by Senate President Ty Masterson, R-Andover, who let the proverbial cat out of the figurative bag.

“You’ll have a Republican governor, for example, or somebody you trust, and you trust the administration to build the budgets, and then you kind of rubber stamp stuff,” Masterson said. “And, then, you switch, and you have (the) opposition party and then there’s all that same power.”

Oh. So it’s like that, then.

Advertisement

All of this might seem like so much partisan mud wrestling, except for the fact that the leaders have also decided to do an end run around Kansas voters.

Did you notice that the proposed new process could start as early as October? While details at the hearing were scarce, leaders appeared to suggest that they would start working on budget without knowing whether they would be elected. What happens if all the folks on the budget committee are voted out of office? Who takes the lead then?

Once again, we see Kansas legislative leaders trying to concentrate power. They don’t want the governor to even have the first say in the budgeting process, and they apparently don’t trust the rest of their colleagues. You know, all the people who drive to Topeka in January to actually make laws.

Sen. Carolyn McGinn, a Sedgwick Republican, raised concerns that these changes would also limit the ability of constituents to speak about budget priorities.

Advertisement

McGinn might have decided to retire, but she has a point. Leaders apparently don’t even trust their constituents when it comes to spending.

In there interest of fairness, I should note that the reform committee considered several worthwhile proposals. Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill, discussed ending lawmakers’ de facto three-day work week. Yes, they usually take Mondays and Fridays off, at times slowing progress to a crawl. The panel also targeted budget earmarks for favored programs that don’t go through a regular committee process.

In the interest of perspective, however, I’m not falling over myself with gratitude. It’s obvious that legislators should work throughout the week, and it’s obvious they shouldn’t be larding up the budget with unvetted spending.

It’s like going through life without running over someone with your car. I mean, I’m glad that you didn’t, but surely you don’t deserve a plaque.

Lawmakers might still be able to make worthwhile changes to the budgeting process. They could start with increasing transparency, which Carpenter noted wasn’t discussed by members of either party. But until they stop jostling for partisan advantage and making themselves look foolish, don’t expect much.

Advertisement

Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending