Connect with us

Iowa

Mercy Iowa City officially becomes University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center Downtown

Published

on

Mercy Iowa City officially becomes University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center Downtown


IOWA CITY, Iowa (KCRG) – The sale of Mercy Iowa City to University of Iowa Health Care is officially complete. Wednesday, the integration of the Mercy Iowa City Hospital to the University of Iowa was completed.

Signs on the exterior of the building were changed to reflect the new owner and the new name of the downtown location. The signs outside the former Mercy Iowa City hospital now say Iowa Health Care, Downtown Campus.

The full name of the building will be called the University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center Downtown.

”We’re very excited to welcome our colleagues as new employees and to ensure our patients continue to seek care here and there’s no interruption of care,” said Dr. Denise Jamieson, vice president of medical affairs for the University of Iowa Health Care.

Advertisement

Roughly 1,000 providers from Mercy Iowa City joined the UIHC team through the transition.

In August of last year Mercy Iowa City announced it was declaring bankruptcy.

The hospital originally announced its own financial investor, Preston Hollow Community Capital had won the bid during bankruptcy auction. Just weeks later, following further discussion, the hospital said the University of Iowa actually won the bid.

”The bankruptcy proceedings will go on, but we are not a part of that process. That will proceed independently, and we’re really focused on going forward so ensuring patient care continues from here on out,” Jamieson said.

As of right now, UIHC says services the hospital provides will stay the same so care is not interrupted. Most patients who were being seen at Mercy Iowa City will not see any immediate changes in care through the transition.

Advertisement

”In the coming week’s we’re really focused on welcoming our new colleagues and ensuring access and continuity of care so no decisions have been made yet about what services will continue but we’re going to get input from the community and input from patients and make strategic decisions that make sense to Iowa City and the region,” Jamieson said.

Changes will come in other forms.

”We’re very committed to changing the electronic medical record, we’re committed to make sure everyone has access to parking and that the parking structures are safe and accessible,” Jamieson said.

UIHC is looking to switch electronic medical records over to the same system the main campus uses, Epic.

With the university being a part of the state hospital system, the connection to the Sisters of Mercy will not continue. The crosses were removed from the outside of the building.

Advertisement

An inter-denominational chapel will be available to patients.

“We’re really trying to continue the spirit of hospitality that was so important to this campus for so many decades,” Jamieson said.

Another hospital will be coming to UIHC, the North Liberty campus. That should be open mid-2025.



Source link

Advertisement

Iowa

Iowa gas prices jump 33 cents from last week, more than national average

Published

on

Iowa gas prices jump 33 cents from last week, more than national average


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – The price of regular unleaded gasoline in Iowa is 33 cents higher from last week, averaging $3.84.

Americans had a brief relief in gas prices last week when prices for brent crude oil dipped below $100 per barrel. On Wednesday it was priced at $117.20, according to AAA.

The latest numbers from AAA show Iowa’s gas prices spiked faster than the national average.

The national average price of gas Wednesday was $4.23, 21 cents higher than last week.

Advertisement

Compared to a year ago, gas is 86 cents more on average in Iowa.

Diesel is also slightly higher this week, averaging $4.94, but was still 52 cents below the national average.

Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa GOP governor candidates debate education funding, abortion at first forum

Published

on

Iowa GOP governor candidates debate education funding, abortion at first forum


JOHNSTON, Iowa (Gray Media Iowa State Capitol Bureau)-Three Republican candidates for Iowa governor debated education policy and abortion at Iowa PBS, their first forum of the campaign.

The debate featured former Department of Administrative Services head Adam Steen, state Rep. Eddie Andrews and former state lawmaker Brad Sherman. Two other Republican candidates, Congressman Randy Feenstra and Zach Lahn, did not attend.

The candidates are running to replace Gov. Kim Reynolds, who is retiring.

All three candidates disagreed with Feenstra’s position that private schools should stop turning away students because of limited space or special needs, though they offered different explanations.

Advertisement

Education Savings Accounts, or ESAs, allow state funding to follow students to private schools.

Steen said Feenstra’s position on ESAs makes him sound like Democratic candidate Rob Sand. He said private schools should receive additional funding if they choose to accept students with special needs.

“I don’t think schools should be forced to receive who they want to receive,” Steen said. “Just because we have a situation right now in our family, we are not going to force a school to accept kids that they aren’t prepared for.”

Andrews voted for the ESA program in 2023. He said private schools are already working to accept more students with disabilities.

“I think most private schools want to accept those and are now looking to expand, change their infrastructure and certainly some of the larger ones are already doing that,” Andrews said.

Advertisement

Sherman said the focus should be on curriculum, not enrollment policies.

“The content of the education the children are getting, that’s why so many people are looking at ESAs because they are not satisfied with the education coming out of the public schools,” Sherman said.

All three candidates backed banning abortion altogether. Sherman said some women who receive abortions may need to be prosecuted. Steen said he wants to ban chemical abortions. Andrews said he wants more support for pregnant women.

The Republican primary is June 2. Rob Sand is the only Democratic candidate for governor.

Advertisement

Isabella Warren covers state government and politics for Gray Media-owned stations in Iowa. Email her at isabella.warren@kcrg.com; and follow her on Facebook at Isabella Warren TV on X/Twitter@isabellaw_gray, and on Instagram@IsabellaWarrenTV.

Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.





Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Judge clears ICE’s path to deport asylum-seeker from Iowa to Congo

Published

on

Judge clears ICE’s path to deport asylum-seeker from Iowa to Congo


DES MOINES, Iowa (IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH) – A federal judge has cleared the way for ICE officials to deport a Bolivian asylum-seeker from Iowa to the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Noting that José Yugar-Cruz is part of a class of people for whom the Supreme Court has twice issued orders lifting injunctions that prohibited such deportations, U.S. District Judge Stephen H. Locher ruled this week that he had “little choice” but to deny Yugar-Cruz’s motion to have the court block his removal from the United States.

Court records show that Yugar-Cruz, who is from Bolivia, entered the United States on July 8, 2024, at the Arizona border and immediately surrendered himself to law enforcement and was taken into custody.

In October 2024, Yugar-Cruz applied for asylum, citing a threat of torture in his home country. In December 2024, an immigration judge issued a “withholding of removal” order under the Convention Against Torture, based on the torture Yugar-Cruz had previously faced in Bolivia and likely would face again if returned to that country.

Advertisement

Although the federal government did not appeal the immigration judge’s ruling, it opted to keep Yugar-Cruz detained in jail while it searched for another country that would accept him if he were to be deported.

For 17 months, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement kept Yugar-Cruz jailed while the agency tried without success to remove him to Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Mexico and Canada.

In December 2025, Yugar-Cruz took ICE to court, seeking his release and arguing that his indefinite imprisonment was a violation of his rights given his lack of criminal history. The U.S. Department of Justice agreed Yugar-Cruz should be released from the Muscatine County Jail, subject to his continued supervision by ICE.

With his asylum case pending, Yugar-Cruz is detained again

With his asylum application still pending, Yugar-Cruz was released from jail. Days later, the Trump administration finalized a “Third-County Removal Agreement” with the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo, which pledged that deportees sent there from the United States would not be subject to persecution or torture.

On March 9, 2026, ICE officials learned Congo had formally agreed to accept Yugar-Cruz for third-country removal. On April 8, 2026, Yugar-Cruz was taken into custody during what he expected to be routine, address-verification visit to an ICE field office in Cedar Rapids.

Advertisement

On the day his deportation flight was scheduled to leave the United States, Yugar-Cruz won a temporary stay in the proceedings by arguing the federal government could not legally deport him.

As part of that case, attorneys for Yugar-Cruz argued their client was a member of a certified class in the case D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In that case, a Massachusetts court had entered a preliminary injunction blocking the government from removing noncitizens to third countries without first providing those individuals an opportunity to be heard on the matter.

In Monday’s ruling on Yugar-Cruz’s deportation, Locher wrote that the Massachusetts decision is “unquestionably favorable to Yugar-Cruz’s position … The problem for him, however, is that shortly thereafter the United States Supreme Court took the unusual step of granting a stay of the injunction.”

So, although the Massachusetts case is still pending, ICE’s process for deporting individuals to third countries remains legally valid, Locher noted.

“This is all but fatal to Yugar-Cruz’s claim,” Locher wrote. “He is a member of a class of people for whom the Supreme Court has twice issued orders lifting injunctions that prohibited third country removals like the one (the federal government is) attempting to carry out here. In other words, when a different district court tried to do what Yugar-Cruz is asking this court to do, the Supreme Court intervened twice to stop it … The court cannot award relief on a one-off basis that the Supreme Court would not allow to be awarded en masse.”

Advertisement

Some human rights organizations have objected to the United States’ deportations to Congo, citing the armed conflicts, yellow fever outbreaks and widespread poverty in the area.

Two weeks ago, 15 South American migrants and asylum seekers deported from the United States to the Democratic Republic of Congo claimed to be facing pressure to return to their countries of origin where they fled persecution or torture.

Some of the 15 told the Reuters news agency that since being deported, they’d been given no viable options other than going back to their home countries, and are currently stranded in Kinshasa, a city of 15 million people, with no money and no passports.

Copyright 2026 IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending