Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa Republicans fund fake clinics but not proven maternal health solutions

Published

on

Iowa Republicans fund fake clinics but not proven maternal health solutions


Iowa’s well being and human providers funds for the approaching fiscal 12 months features a $500,000 appropriation for a brand new “maternal well being” initiative modeled on an ineffective, wasteful Texas program.

However the invoice, negotiated by Home and Senate Republicans and accepted on party-line votes in each chambers Might 23, doesn’t lengthen postpartum protection for Iowans on Medicaid, a documented solution to cut back maternal mortality.

NEW STATE PROGRAM FOR CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTERS

The funds invoice, as amended on Might 23, directs the Iowa Division of Human Providers to create a “Extra Choices for Maternal Assist” (MOMS) program that may fund subcontractors offering “being pregnant help providers.” The subcontractors won’t be allowed to offer any abortion referrals or counseling except a doctor “confirms the termination of being pregnant is medically essential to stop the pregnant lady’s demise.”

Advertisement

The MOMS program’s enabling language is sort of similar to what Texas used to ascertain an “Options to Abortion” program. Iowa DHS Director Kelly Garcia held a senior place within the Texas Well being and Human Providers Fee earlier than coming to Iowa in 2019. The Texas program started with a $5 million funds in 2005 however obtained $100 million in state funding within the newest funds cycle.

Shannon Najmabadi and Carla Astudillo reported final 12 months for the Texas Tribune that this system has operated with little oversight, and the state has collected little information to exhibit its effectiveness. Texas nonetheless ranks among the many worst states nationally for maternal mortality.

The kind of organizations that might be eligible for Iowa’s new MOMS program are sometimes referred to as “disaster being pregnant facilities” or “anti-abortion facilities.” The facilities lure pregnant individuals with the promise of free providers, typically utilizing “misleading techniques” to steer purchasers away from abortion.

Docs Amy G. Bryant and Jonas J. Swartz wrote within the American Medical Affiliation’s Journal of Ethics in 2018 that these organizations

attempt to offer the impression that they’re medical facilities, providing professional medical providers and recommendation, but they’re exempt from regulatory, licensure, and credentialing oversight that apply to well being care amenities. As a result of the non secular ideology of those facilities’ homeowners and staff takes precedence over the well being and well-being of the ladies searching for care at these facilities, ladies don’t obtain complete, correct, evidence-based medical details about all out there choices. 

As an illustration, volunteers on the facilities could put on white coats to create the looks of being medical professionals. They sometimes supply free being pregnant checks and should supply “biased counseling in alternate for ‘free’ diapers, child garments and for dads, instruments and sporting tools.” They could additionally declare to offer ultrasound providers or prenatal care, however with out educated medical employees.

Advertisement

The organizations could select names just like established clinics or arrange store close by to confuse would-be sufferers.

NEW FUNDING INITIALLY PAIRED WITH POSTPARTUM MEDICAID EXPANSION

Iowa Senate Republicans initially proposed $2 million for “Extra Choices for Maternal Assist” as a part of a research invoice that additionally prolonged Medicaid protection for birthing mother and father to 12 months. Presently Iowa gives postpartum Medicaid protection for under 60 days.

The Iowa Maternal Mortality Evaluation Committee present in 2020 that 56 p.c of Iowa’s maternal deaths “occurred postpartum” and advisable “increasing Medicaid protection to cowl ladies who had a beginning lined by Medicaid for 1 12 months postpartum.”

Iowa DHS communications staffer Alex Carfrae instructed Bleeding Heartland in February that company Director Garcia was requested to assessment the invoice and “supplied suggestions” to legislators however didn’t draft the language. He famous that increasing postpartum Medicaid protection “helps Iowa’s Maternal Well being Strategic Plan which requires prolonged pregnancy-related protection via Medicaid and personal insurance coverage.”

After transferring from the Senate Human Assets Committee to the Appropriations Committee, the invoice was scaled again to $1 million for the MOMS program, nonetheless paired with twelve months of postpartum Medicaid protection. The revised invoice envisioned an appropriation of $5.6 million for the 2023 fiscal 12 months (which begins July 1) and $8.9 million for fiscal 12 months 2024 to fund the elevated Medicaid protection. Nonetheless, federal funds would have lined a big share of the brand new postpartum Medicaid prices underneath provisions of the American Rescue Plan, which Congress accepted and President Joe Biden signed final 12 months.

Advertisement

When the chamber debated Senate File 2381 on April 5, Republican ground supervisor Mark Costello asserted that this system wouldn’t limit abortion, however would give ladies the help they want to decide on to have a child.

DEMOCRATS TRY, FAIL TO SUPPORT EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRAMS

Democratic State Senator Janet Petersen supplied an modification to strike the invoice’s language on funding disaster being pregnant facilities whereas preserving the Medicaid postpartum protection extension. Petersen’s proposal additionally would have directed Iowa Medicaid to cowl doula providers for pregnant recipients. Peer-reviewed analysis has linked doula care to raised beginning outcomes. Doulas can educate purchasers on evidence-based practices to enhance their well being.

Doulas additionally assist cut back the racial disparities that contribute to greater maternal mortality charges for Black ladies in Iowa and throughout the nation. The Iowa Maternal Mortality Evaluation Committee’s 2020 report famous that the pregnancy-related maternal mortality fee was six instances greater for non-Hispanic Black Iowans than for non-Hispanic white ladies.

Costello urged colleagues to oppose the Petersen modification. He mentioned one of many non-public insurance coverage firms that manages Medicaid for Iowans will quickly introduce a pilot program masking doula look after 60 recipients.

Talking in favor of the modification, Democratic State Senator Sarah Trone Garriott mentioned she had benefited from having a doula whereas pregnant and wished that service to be out there to all Iowans, not simply to those that pays out of pocket.

Advertisement

Trone Garriott additionally highlighted the waste and fraud related to the Texas Options to Abortion program.

Based on Trone Garriott, “The Texas Being pregnant Care Community supplied to our committee no data on the affect or high quality of providers supplied, no public well being objectives, no metrics or measures to point out their progress towards any purpose.”

Upon digging deeper, Trone Garriott turned up “tons of of studies” about subcontractors misusing the funds to help unrelated companies or fund journey and perks somewhat than look after pregnant individuals. (This story for the American Unbiased hyperlinks to some media protection of fraud within the Texas program.)

In closing feedback for her modification, Petersen listed the seventeen communities the place labor/supply providers have closed since Iowa Medicaid was privatized in 2016: Centerville, Chariton, Des Moines, Estherville, Guttenberg, Iowa Falls, Keosaqua, Manning, Mount Nice, Muscatine, New Hampton, Crimson Oak, Rock Valley, Sibley, Sioux Metropolis, Washington, Webster Metropolis, and Marshalltown.

Advertisement

The primary drawback was insufficient reimbursements to hospitals from the for-profit insurance coverage firms referred to as “managed care organizations” for Iowa Medicaid. The pattern hurts not solely low-income individuals, however all pregnant Iowans who cannot have infants of their house communities.

A pilot doula program for 60 Iowans would not even cowl 1 p.c of the Medicaid inhabitants, Petersen mentioned. “Now is just not the time to start out a brand new program that’s not science-based.” As a substitute, she argued, Iowa lawmakers ought to fund applications that work: twelve months of postpartum care and doulas for these “who would enormously profit from having a champion by their facet.”

Senators rejected Petersen’s modification alongside get together traces, then handed the invoice by 32 votes to sixteen. Democrats Tony Bisignano and Kevin Kinney joined Republicans to help last passage. The invoice was assigned to an Iowa Home subcommittee, however went no additional.

BUDGET STRIKES PROVEN MATERNAL HEALTH POLICY

After weeks of limbo whereas high Republican lawmakers negotiated in non-public, the Iowa Home and Senate returned final week to approve last variations of a dozen appropriations invoice.

Costello offered the amended well being and human providers funds on Might 23. It contains $500,000 for the MOMS program. However as a substitute of extending postpartum Medicaid protection, the invoice instructs the DHS to report back to the legislature by December 15, 2022 on “the variety of [Medicaid] recipients of postpartum providers, the providers utilized, and the prices of such providers for the interval starting January 1, 2020, via June 30, 2022, in addition to data concerning the variety of states which have expanded Medicaid postpartum protection past 60 days.”

Advertisement

Costello claimed in the course of the Senate debate that he tried to get extra postpartum protection into the invoice, however Home Republicans did not conform to these phrases.

Carfrae of the DHS didn’t present Bleeding Heartland with any assertion from the company on this side of the human providers funds.

Anne Discher, govt director of the assume tank Widespread Good Iowa, blasted the choice in a Might 27 e mail wrapping up the 2022 legislative session. (emphasis in authentic)

Extending the interval for pregnant ladies to retain Medicaid protection from 60 days to 12 months postpartum assures continuity of care as new mother and father recuperate from childbirth. It is a vital solution to cut back our deeply troubling charges of maternal mortality, particularly amongst Black ladies. As a result of it helps new mother and father get care as they want it, as a substitute of placing it off till there’s a significant, and costly, well being emergency, it may well assist cut back well being care prices.

Postpartum protection growth has already handed in different states, together with crimson states like Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee and Louisiana. However as a substitute of approving this humane, commonsense coverage, Iowa lawmakers ordered a research of this already well-studied matter, requiring ladies to attend and hope for important postpartum well being care protection subsequent 12 months.

Sheena Dooley, communications supervisor for Deliberate Parenthood Advocates of Iowa, slammed the legislature’s motion. 

Advertisement

Lawmakers who need to ban abortion bought this dangerous program funding anti-abortion clinics to Iowans, saying they cared about new moms. In the event that they actually wished to assist Iowa mother and father, they wouldn’t have stripped the unique proposal’s growth of postpartum Medicaid protection which permits Iowans to entry precise medical care from licensed suppliers.

Governor Kim Reynolds has not publicly commented on this proposal however enthusiastically helps anti-abortion insurance policies, so will certainly signal the corresponding a part of the human providers funds into legislation.

Ultimate notice: state lawmakers adjourned with out passing a invoice that might have made it extra possible for midwives to work in Iowa. The Home accepted that midwifery licensure invoice with overwhelming bipartisan help, solely to have the Senate State Authorities Committee eviscerate the laws.

Bleeding Heartland authors Rachel Bruns and Bethany Gates have mentioned intimately why better entry to midwives would enhance maternal well being in Iowa, benefiting rural in addition to city residents (see right here and right here).

High picture: Signal promoting a disaster being pregnant middle in Cell, Alabama. Photograph by Robin Marty, out there through Flickr and revealed with permission.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Iowa

SYC: Iowa Big project focuses on helping unsheltered

Published

on

SYC: Iowa Big project focuses on helping unsheltered


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – A group of Cedar Rapids High School students are making sure people without a home have the essentials this winter.

Gavin Cornwell and his team of Iowa Big students filled 100 bags this week with a little bit of everything.

“We have some fruit roll-ups, some gushers, and a granola bar,” said Cornwell.

For this team, it’s more than just a class. Once done, the bags will go to the unsheltered population living at the winter overflow homeless shelter.

Advertisement

“People really don’t understand, everyone has their own story,” said Cornwell.

These care packages will go to each person who stays at the low-barrier shelter this winter.

“We kind of grabbed the basic necessities to include in these care packages to give them some cheer this holiday season,” he said.

The homeless population in Linn County grew by more than 40% in 2024. Denine Rushing oversees operations at the overflow shelter and said the bags provide items that those who sleep at the shelter might not otherwise get.

“Being able to have these bags that they can just throw in their backpacks or in a bag or just carry with them and utilize throughout the day,” said Rushing. “I think it is going to be really helpful for people.”

Advertisement

Rushing expected to see more people utilize the shelter this year, especially during snow events and bitter cold temperatures.

“You really have to kind of have things on the go, things that you can kind of just grab and take with you while you are out and about throughout the day,” said Rushing.

Cornwell said they planned to hand the bags out this Monday at the shelter. A place this Prairie High School senior is now closer to, a place that was more visible thanks to this school-based project.

“You might drive by and you might see somebody experiencing homelessness but you don’t really know what they’re experiencing,” said Cornwell.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa State women get back on track, hold off in-state rival Drake

Published

on

Iowa State women get back on track, hold off in-state rival Drake


Returning to Hilton Coliseum was just what the Iowa State women needed, as the eighth-ranked Cyclones held off Drake Sunday afternoon in Ames, 80-78.

Returning sophomore standout Audi Crooks had the game-winning bucket with just :00.3 seconds left in the game, finishing off a 33-point effort to lead Iowa State (5-1). 

Crooks, a preseason honorable mention All-American, added four rebounds to her night while shooting 15 of 25 from the field. 

Emily Ryan had a double-double, scoring 11 points while dishing out 12 assists. Addy Brown added 13 points and Mackenzie Hare chipped in 10. Brown led the team with eight rebounds while Ryan had six with two steals. 

Advertisement

Arianna Jackson had three steals and no turnovers in almost 31 minutes of action. 

For Drake, another former Iowa prep standout put up a big number vs. the Cyclones, as Katie Dinnebier knocked down eight 3-pointers and scored a game-high 39 points. Anna Miller had 18 with eight rebounds, as Dinnebier also had five rebounds, two steals and two assists. 

The win marked the 300th non-conference victory for Iowa State under Bill Fennelly all-time, as he improved to 616-314 with the Cyclones and 782-367 overall in his coaching career. 

Iowa State added to its NCAA-record streak for consecutive games with a made 3-pointer, stretching it to 933 straight. 

Up next for the Cyclones will be defending national champion South Carolina on Thanksgiving at 12:30 p.m. on FOX. The Gamecocks had their 43-game win streak snapped with a 77-62 loss in Los Angeles.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Double scolding to Iowa DNR is a moment to pivot and stand up for water quality | Opinion

Published

on

Double scolding to Iowa DNR is a moment to pivot and stand up for water quality | Opinion



Iowa leaders do not have to abandon or betray pro-business stances if they want to do better for Iowa water and for Iowans.

play

  • Monitoring: DNR wrongly omitted rivers from impaired-waters list, EPA says
  • Regulation: Availability cannot be the only consideration in water-use matters
  • Enforcement: Attorney general should step up its enforcement
  • Spending: Time to finally raise sales tax for the outdoor trust fund
  • The stakes: Protecting water is Iowa law

The battle for clean water in Iowa has been locked in a stalemate for years. Advocates jump up and down pointing to obvious evidence that dangerous chemicals pervade streams, rivers and lakes, threatening people’s health and taking away recreation opportunities. The state’s elected and appointed officials, citing various measures of their own, say things are getting better thanks to their strategy of working together with agricultural and industrial polluters. Little changes (except continued damage to waterways).

A pair of developments this month, though, call into question Iowa’s entire approach to managing water. A state administrative law judge and the federal Environmental Protection Agency, in unrelated writings, say the Iowa Department of Natural Resources thinks too narrowly about water pollution.

If state leaders take the criticisms seriously, they can chart a different course of more aggressive protection and restoration of this precious resource. New approaches to monitoring, regulation, enforcement and spending can spur a better future for the welfare of Iowa and its people.

Monitoring: DNR wrongly omitted rivers from impaired-waters list, EPA says

The EPA chided the DNR in a letter this month, saying stretches of the Cedar, Des Moines, Iowa, Raccoon and South Skunk rivers should have been included on the DNR’s list of impaired waters in the state. The assessments involved are technical, but the gist is that Iowa improperly treated nitrate pollution as though it does not have toxic effects on humans. Nitrates are a form of nitrogen that commonly results from manure and fertilizer runoff.

Advertisement

The rivers involved supply drinking water for large cities, including Des Moines and Cedar Rapids. It is distressing to learn that the DNR could miss the mark on such a crucial question of public health – all the more so when considering the possibility that the EPA might cease to be an effective backstop on such questions. New York congressman Lee Zeldin, Donald Trump’s announced choice to take over the EPA, pays lip service to conservation, but he, Trump and other voices likely to be influential in the new White House have made plain their top priority is removing restrictions on business. In the future, responsibility could fall solely on the DNR to correctly look out for drinking-water interests.

Regulation: Availability cannot be the only consideration in water-use matters

Another of the DNR’s tasks is to manage water-use permits for farms and other businesses that use a lot of it. According to an order by state administrative law judge Toby Gordon, the DNR’s management mostly focuses on availability of water. Gordon, reviewing a permit for a controversial feedlot in northeast Iowa, says that’s contrary to state law, which calls for environmental impact to be considered, too.

Indeed, here’s Chapter 455B of the Iowa Code: “The general welfare of the people of the state requires that the water resources of the state be put to beneficial use which includes ensuring that the waste or unreasonable use, or unreasonable methods of use of water be prevented, and that the conservation and protection of water resources be required with the view to their reasonable and beneficial use in the interest of the people.”

Advertisement

DNR Director Kayla Lyon can accept Gordon’s order or seek changes. She should agree to it in this case, but more importantly, she and her department need to adopt this reasoning in all contexts, not just water-use permitting. They should more often push back on the operations in Iowa whose proposals risk — or promise — damage to the environment.

Industry, including agriculture, drives Iowa’s economy, of course. And that will still be true if DNR personnel insist more often that industry take responsibility for side effects. The DNR has the authority it needs; it’s a matter of discretion.

Before voting no on Lyon’s confirmation this spring, state Sen. Pam Jochum, a Dubuque Democrat, told colleagues that “I think that Kayla Lyon — if she was allowed to do what a director can do, provide policy direction to this body on what the problems are and how to fix them and the funding that needs to accompany that to solve those problems — this state would have clean water.”

Many tools are available to Lyon, her DNR and state boards responsible for the environment: They can reject applications. They can impose more conditions on permits. They can fine offenders more often. They can refer more severe offenders for prosecution.

Enforcement:  Attorney general should step up its enforcement

In egregious cases, the Iowa Attorney General’s Office can take over enforcement actions and seek penalties of greater than $10,000, the statutory limit for the DNR’s administrative process.

Advertisement

If regulators believe that some Iowa businesses count those meager fines as merely a cost of doing business, then they should more freely get the attorney general involved.

Attorney General Brenna Bird’s office should have the resources to pitch in. Unlike almost all other state agencies, which have as usual requested status quo budgets for 2025-26, Bird is asking lawmakers for $1.7 million in new money to hire seven attorneys and a paralegal for various needs. In addition, Bird has unquestionably fulfilled her 2022 campaign promise to use the office’s resources to litigate furiously against the Biden administration – which won’t exist after Jan. 20. Maybe dashing off memos and briefs in favor of Donald Trump’s agenda will take just as much time. Or maybe some time could be sliced off for work more directly relevant to Iowans’ lives and communities.

Spending: Time to finally raise sales tax for the outdoor trust fund

Even if Iowa transformed its regulatory scheme on a dime into one that reliably preserved water quality, the problems that have accumulated over decades will require investment for mitigation and restoration. State appropriations and other sources can be a piece of that puzzle. But Iowa also has a ready-to-go mechanism for spending on conservation and recreation priorities: the Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Trust Fund, approved by 63% of voters in 2010 and stubbornly empty since.

Filling the trust fund’s coffers requires increasing the sales tax, which the Iowa Legislature has refused to do. Gov. Kim Reynolds proposed this in early 2020, but the idea fell apart when COVID-19 tanked most of that year’s legislative session. Lawmakers’ bills to take similar steps also have fizzled.

Advertisement

With Republican majorities passing income tax reductions and proposing to take a new bite out of property taxes, there’s no time like the present to fund some necessary government work, including conservation, with a higher sales tax.

The stakes: Protecting water is Iowa law

Private environmental groups have done laudable work bringing the DNR’s shortcomings to light and collecting wins in court and in administrative proceedings. They’ll continue to do that even if the EPA gives up on water quality. But those battles are costly, and the environmental groups lack the authority of government.

Lyon and the DNR, as well as Bird, Reynolds and majority leaders in the Legislature, do not have to abandon or betray pro-business stances if they want to do better for Iowa water and for Iowans. But they need to realize that doing better for water quality and for people is part of their charge. It’s been there in state law for decades.

Lucas Grundmeier, on behalf of the Register’s editorial board

This editorial is the opinion of the Des Moines Register’s editorial board: Carol Hunter, executive editor; Lucas Grundmeier, opinion editor; and Richard Doak and Rox Laird, editorial board members.

Advertisement

Want more opinions? Read other perspectives with our free newsletter or visit us at DesMoinesRegister.com/opinion. Respond to any opinion by submitting a Letter to the Editor at DesMoinesRegister.com/letters.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending