Connect with us

Indianapolis, IN

Central Indiana’s Top 10 stories of 2025, from sports to Trump

Published

on

Central Indiana’s Top 10 stories of 2025, from sports to Trump


play

The onslaught of news in 2025 tested everyone’s capacity to absorb and retain information. So to put the year in perspective, we’ve rounded up our Top 10 storylines of the year.

The highlights: The inauguration of a new president and a new Indiana governor profoundly reshaped public policy, from immigration to education to property tax reform. A scandal in the Indianapolis mayor’s office and a longstanding conflict over downtown crime inflamed local politics. And every Indianapolis professional sports team showed both incredible promise and incredibly bad luck.

Advertisement

Here are the 10 biggest topics IndyStar covered in 2025.

10. State lawmakers tighten grip on education, from K-12 to college

From K-12 to higher education, Republican lawmakers exerted control over Indiana’s schools this year in sweeping ways that alarmed critics.

Closest to home, the state legislature created the Indianapolis Local Education Alliance to improve coordination between Indianapolis Public Schools and charter schools. That group recommended changes that would move some control away from the elected IPS school board.

The legislative session also proved controversial for the state’s colleges.

Advertisement

Six public universities cut or consolidated about 400 degree programs in response to a state law targeting majors with lower enrollment. Another law will subject tenured faculty to “productivity” quotas that could lead to termination. And lawmakers also gave Indiana Gov. Mike Braun sole authority to appoint Indiana University trustees — a power he swiftly used to replace alumni-backed board members.

9. IU and Purdue under fire for free-speech issues

play

FIRE review ranks Indiana University and Purdue in free speech

Indiana University is one of the worst public universities in the country for free speech, according to a national First Amendment organization.

Ahead of the intensely hyped Big Ten championship between IU and Ohio State University Dec. 6, an airplane circling downtown Indianapolis trailed a large banner bearing these words: “Indiana University hates free speech.”

Advertisement

The sign linked to a website run by a leading First Amendment nonprofit that lambasted IU for conflicts over freedom of expression. With the hiring of a new First Amendment reporter this year, IndyStar has written extensively about those issues.

This September, IU ranked as the nation’s worst public college for free speech following the university’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian protests in spring 2024. In October, IU fired the student newspaper’s staff adviser, who filed a lawsuit arguing his constitutional rights were violated.

IU was not alone in drawing backlash over its treatment of student media. Many criticized Purdue University’s decision to stop distributing the independent student newspaper across campus. The university also told the longstanding publication, known as The Purdue Exponent, to stop using the name “Purdue” in its masthead.

8. The Fever run hot — even without Caitlin Clark

The Las Vegas Aces clawed past the Indiana Fever in the WNBA semifinals and went on to win the championship. But this year showed that Indianapolis has become a center of gravity in women’s professional basketball.

Advertisement

The Fever were a hair’s breadth away from vying for the title, despite competing without the league’s brightest young star, Caitlin Clark. Because this is Indianapolis sports in 2025, where all blessings come with curses, Clark was sidelined by a groin injury in mid-July and never returned to the floor.

The league signaled the Fever’s prominence by granting Indianapolis the 2025 WNBA All-Star Game, a first for the city. Tens of thousands of fans flooded downtown streets to see why local leaders are pitching Indy as “the women’s sports capital of the world.”

7. Downtown violence inflames familiar debates

play

Prosecutor responds to Mike Braun post over Mark Sanchez investigation

Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears responds to criticism of Indy leaders amid the Mark Sanchez stabbing investigation.

Long-simmering discord over crime between the Republican-led Indiana Statehouse and Indianapolis’ Democratic leaders boiled over this year when a mass shooting and a high-profile stabbing shook downtown Indy.

Advertisement

After two teenagers were killed and five other young people were injured in a mass shooting downtown during the wee hours of July 5, the head of the city’s police union swiftly called for state leaders to intervene in local law enforcement — an idea that Braun entertained while Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett batted it away.

Months later, top state Republicans including Braun and Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith saw a salient opportunity to decry downtown violence when former NFL quarterback and Fox Sports analyst Mark Sanchez was stabbed Oct. 4 while visiting to call a Colts game.

But as more details emerged, it became clear that Sanchez, then 38, had drunkenly beaten the 69-year-old man who eventually stabbed him after a dispute over parking, according to police. He was arrested and now faces felony charges in the ongoing case.

Braun and Beckwith deleted their tweets. The man Sanchez assaulted filed a lawsuit against him and his then-employer two days after the attack. In November, Sanchez lost his job at Fox Sports.

6. Jim Irsay’s death and the Colts’ unlikely rise

Advertisement

IndyStar’s initial report on longtime Colts owner Jim Irsay’s death at age 65 described him as “the man who led the Colts out of irrelevancy and made Indianapolis into a football city.”

It’s fitting that in the fall following Irsay’s death, the Colts honored that legacy by beginning the season 8-2 — the team’s best 10-game start since the 2009-10 season, the last time they reached the Super Bowl.

The Colts’ rise came during a breakout year for quarterback Daniel Jones, a player whose unglamorous way of getting the job done made him an apt vessel for Indianapolis. And then, because this is Indianapolis sports in 2025, the team’s leader tore his Achilles.

But Irsay’s impact reaches far beyond the team’s on-field record.

His family’s signature initiative, Kicking the Stigma, has spent more than $25 million to raise awareness about mental health issues and fund organizations focused on treatment and research. His philanthropy is on display across downtown Indianapolis at the Irsay Family YMCA, Riley Hospital for Children and the Colts Canal Playspace.

Advertisement

“I’ve done everything, with the grace of God, that was asked of me,” Irsay once told IndyStar columnist Gregg Doyel. “And all that was asked of me was to do God’s will and not my will. To try to follow that image of love as best as I could.”

5. AI may be here to stay, but residents push back anyway

Six years after state lawmakers passed sweeping tax breaks to lure data centers to Indiana, the backlash reached a crescendo in 2025 as new projects kept popping up.

Business titans say hyperscale data centers are needed to power transformative artificial intelligence. The largest tech companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars replacing open fields with these hulking facilities to get ahead in the AI race. Resisting progress, they argue, is futile.

Many Hoosier residents and a growing number of politicians reject that logic. Opponents view the centers as noisy, unsightly and sprawling neighbors that require enormous amounts of electricity and water yet don’t create many local jobs.

Advertisement

Neighbors in Indy’s Franklin Township banded together to stop the conversion of family farms into a Google data center campus. Similar anti-tech fervor has since erupted in response to planned data centers in Martindale-Brightwood, Decatur Township and Pike Township.

It may be true that artificial intelligence is here to stay. But aggrieved neighbors won’t sit out the fight over where data centers are built anytime soon.

4. New governor’s push to cut property taxes squeezes local governments

When Braun became Indiana’s new governor this January, he emphasized that cutting property taxes was his No. 1 legislative priority.

The result of his efforts, Senate Enrolled Act 1, will save most homeowners up to $300 on their property tax bills and slash taxes for businesses. But the response to SEA 1 from local governments has been overwhelmingly negative, as communities prepare to go without millions in expected tax revenue over the coming years.

Advertisement

Indianapolis leaders say they face a $60 million drop in tax revenue projections through 2028 because of the new law. Hamilton County officials have paused plans for a domestic violence shelter. Carmel leaders cut arts funding and their Noblesville peers postponed trail improvements. Indiana school districts — expected to miss out on more than $700 million in property tax revenue through 2028 — are turning to voters to pass tax referendums to plug the gaps.

In order to maintain quality of life, cities and towns could be all but forced to impose new income taxes that offset some of the property tax savings. Otherwise, leaders say they risk falling behind in funding the amenities — schools, public safety, parks and transit — that make people want to live in their communities.

3. Pacers’ unforgettable playoff run ends with a gut punch

The 2024-25 Indiana Pacers gave us so many unforgettable moments.

Here’s one: In a room full of fans at Ralston’s on Mass Ave, I stood tensely as the Pacers trailed the Knicks by two with a few seconds left in regulation of Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals.

Advertisement

A video from that night shows everyone watching raptly as Tyrese Haliburton dribbled back out to the 3-point line to shoot what we all thought was a game-winner. My hands were aloft in some sort of worship. We all leaned forward as Haliburton’s last-second shot careened off the back of the rim, hung in the air and — as if blessed by the basketball gods and Reggie Miller, who was calling that night’s game — dropped straight through the net.

It turned out the shot only tied the game. But the Pacers won in overtime and then claimed the series 4-2, so the memory remains pure.

How often in life are we moved to involuntarily jump for joy, to shout in pure amazement, to hug our loved ones and high-five the nearest strangers?

In 2025, Haliburton and the Pacers gave fans more than our fair share of such moments. We crowded into stadiums and bars and momentarily forgot ourselves while we witnessed something miraculous.

But remember: This is Indianapolis sports in 2025.

Advertisement

About a month later, Haliburton tore his Achilles seven minutes into Game 7 of the NBA Finals against the Thunder — a game that any Hoosier will tell you the Pacers were poised to win and bring home the franchise’s first NBA championship.

Adrift without Haliburton, the Pacers will be lucky to win 30 games in the 2025-26 season, let alone make the playoffs. As I write this in early December, the Thunder are 24-1. So it goes.

But we will keep watching, because the Pacers taught us time and time again this year not to lose faith. You might miss something miraculous.

2. Hogsett administration weathers multiple scandals

play

Tony Cook and Peter Blanchard on their reporting of Mayor Joe Hogsett

Indy Star reporter Tony Cook and Mirror Indy reporter Peter Blanchard talk to Mirror Indy’s Ibby Ahmed about reporting on Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett.

Advertisement

New investigations into the Hogsett administration this year only deepened the fallout from IndyStar’s 2024 reporting on how multiple women accused his former right-hand man Thomas Cook of sexual misconduct and abuse — all under the mayor’s watch.

An October IndyStar/Mirror Indy investigation found that Hogsett ignored conflicts of interest involving a prohibited relationship between Cook and a former top city official, Scarlett Andrews. After Cook left the city to work for a law firm, the agency Andrews led recommended millions of dollars in city incentives to Cook’s developer clients.

Months earlier, an outside law firm found that the mayor allowed Cook to resign quietly rather than be fired after he learned of Cook’s covert relationship with Andrews. Around the same time, an IndyStar investigation revealed that Hogsett himself sent late-night and personal texts to multiple Cook accusers, who said the messages made them uncomfortable.

Through all of this, Hogsett has refused to step down, despite calls for his resignation by five councilors. The mayor has stood behind his administration’s process for reviewing economic incentives and pledged to update sexual harassment policies. Councilors are still debating which harassment reforms to mandate.

1. Indiana Republicans’ embrace — and rejection — of Trump

Advertisement

From the time President Donald Trump took office Jan. 20, he’s flooded the zone with new policies.

Indiana Republicans embraced the president’s mass deportation efforts and slashed DEI language in state policies. The Miami Correctional Facility became an ICE detention facility, the “Speedway Slammer.” Trump’s directives ran the gamut, affecting agriculture, health research, health insurance, food assistance, clean energy programs and the arts.

But in December, Senate Republicans rejected Trump on the national stage by refusing his demand to redraw congressional maps to eliminate Indiana’s only two Democratic seats.

From the start, critics condemned mid-cycle redistricting as a brazen suppression of liberal voters in Indiana’s most diverse communities. Ultimately, facing down death threats and the specter of Trump-backed primary challengers, most Senate Republicans voted against a new map.

On the cusp of the 250-year-anniversary of the United States, Hoosiers twice this year protested on the lawn of the Indiana Statehouse with a topical message: “No Kings.”

Advertisement

Trump supporters see that message as a hysterical overreaction. Trump opponents see it as an urgent cry to resist tyranny.

Here’s what both groups believe: We’ve just lived through the first year of a presidency that will change our nation’s trajectory.

Email Indianapolis City Hall Reporter Jordan Smith at JTSmith@usatodayco.com. Follow him on X @jordantsmith09 and Bluesky @jordanaccidentally.bsky.social.





Source link

Advertisement

Indianapolis, IN

How IMPD Chief Chris Bailey will center public safety as Hogsett’s new chief of staff

Published

on

How IMPD Chief Chris Bailey will center public safety as Hogsett’s new chief of staff


play

  • After more than two decades in law enforcement, IMPD Chief Chris Bailey will move into one of the city’s top civilian roles.
  • In a sit-down interview, Bailey discussed how public safety is the start of good governance, Statehouse politics and his future political aspirations.
  • Bailey also discussed what he wants to see in the next Indianapolis police chief.

Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Chief Chris Bailey says he didn’t see his new job coming.

He expected to remain police chief through the rest of Mayor Joe Hogsett’s third term, digging into IMPD’s core issues as part of a new five-year strategic plan that he oversaw. But after two years leading the police department, Bailey will become Hogsett’s chief of staff Feb. 2, moving from one of the city’s top law enforcement jobs to one of its most influential civilian roles.

Advertisement

The job, also known as chief deputy mayor, has been the source of controversy and repeated turnover. Bailey will be Hogsett’s fourth chief of staff in a decade as mayor.

Former Department of Public Works Director Dan Parker stepped down from the role Dec. 31, halfway through Hogsett’s third term, after more than three years as the mayor’s right-hand man.

The mayor’s first chief of staff, Thomas Cook, quietly resigned in late 2020 after Hogsett discovered Cook’s prohibited sexual relationship with a subordinate. In a 2024 IndyStar article, Lauren Roberts, Caroline Ellert and a third anonymous woman accused Cook of sexual misconduct; Ellert also accused him of sexually assaulting her in 2019. A Marion County grand jury is now investigating city development deals involving Cook, as well as allegations of “unlawful touching.”

In a sit-down interview with IndyStar Jan. 9, Bailey said none of that fraught history gave him pause as he considered the new job. “I’m focused on service and governing,” he said.

Advertisement

To that end, Bailey’s more than two decades of law enforcement experience — starting as an IMPD patrol officer in 1999 and rising through the ranks to become chief in February 2024 — taught him something that he plans to keep top of mind: Good governance starts with public safety.

Bailey also discussed how he will navigate tensions over violent crime between the Democrat-led capital city and the Republican-dominated state legislature, what the city needs in its next police chief and whether he plans to run for political office someday.

Read the full Q&A with Bailey below:

IndyStar’s full Q&A with incoming Chief of Staff Chris Bailey

This conversation has been edited for length, brevity and clarity.

Advertisement

Question: In late December, you told an IndyStar colleague the following: “The average tenure for a police chief is about three years. My goal while I’m here is to do the right thing, and to leave this organization better than I got it.” So you’ve been chief for two years. Was the offer to become chief of staff a surprise? Why leave IMPD now? 

Answer: Yeah, it’s a surprise. It wasn’t on my bingo card to be the chief of staff for a major metropolitan city mayor.

But as I contemplated the offer, I think everything in my career, in my life, has set me up for this opportunity, and it’s always been an interest of mine to govern. I did that as a police chief. I wasn’t really a police officer, as a police chief — I was an administrator. I managed a $350 million budget, 1,800 employees responsible for the safety of millions of people that either live or visit and come and go in our city every single day.

My intention when I said ‘yes’ to the mayor to take the police chief’s job was to finish this term as the police chief, and then walk away. But as fate has it, the opportunity came. And after careful reflection and discussions with my family, I thought it would be a great opportunity to help continue my service to the city.

Advertisement

And it will be a different way of serving. How will the ways you try to influence the city’s direction as chief of staff differ from how you did so as police chief? 

I think that leadership generally is about people and relationships. And I think I’ve done a good job, from my time as deputy chief of investigations through assistant chief and chief, of building relationships across the political spectrum, across our city, across our state and across our country. [Through] my work with the Major Cities Chiefs Association, I have friendships with chiefs all over the country, and that allows me to have great perspectives and understand things that are happening in whatever city, things that may come here eventually. 

A lot of people [make this transition], and I didn’t realize that until one of my close advisers sent me a bunch of articles about all these police chiefs that transfer to city manager, to public safety director, and some even to mayor — which, by the way, I have no interest in. So I’ll just answer that question for you now. 

But [there are] skills that you learn in those positions, managing people, navigating obstacles, working through interdepartmental issues. An issue for [the Department of Public Works] is an issue for the police. An issue for [the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services] is an issue for the police. [Working] through those issues has prepared me for this role, and for Mayor Hogsett to see that is truly an honor for me.

Advertisement

On that note, after more than two decades in policing, what perspective will you bring to the mayor’s office about how public policy decided up here on the 25th floor of the City-County Building affects what’s happening on the ground in neighborhoods? 

Everything that we do as a government revolves around public safety to start. If you don’t feel safe in your neighborhood, if you don’t feel like a city is safe, then you don’t come here. You don’t visit here. You don’t live here. You don’t raise your family here. You don’t invest your money here.

I think having that perspective helps lead everything else among the priorities that the mayor has: better roads, investments in parks, ending chronic homelessness, removing the barriers for housing, making the price of housing more affordable so people can have a home and then create some generational wealth that comes along with being a homeowner. All those things play a part, with public safety being at the top of that. 

As chief of staff, how will you handle the often contentious relationship between the mayor’s office and the state legislature, whose members frequently are talking about intervention in local law enforcement after episodes of violent crime?

I really am going to lean into the example that was set by [former Chief of Staff] Dan Parker. Dan Parker has a great relationship with people at the state on both sides of the aisle, and I think that our shared interests are to make sure that Indianapolis is great.

Advertisement

Same thing with me: I’ve spent a lot of time being apolitical and being focused on doing what’s right and what’s best for the people of this city and working with both sides of the [Indianapolis City-County] Council, with both sides of the General Assembly, to pass bills like the Indiana Crime Guns Task Force bill or to work with the council on a bipartisan effort to help us combat issues related to street takeovers and street racing. 

I think when the focus is on governing, which is mine — I am not an elected person —
and so my obligation is to every single person who lives, works and visits Indianapolis. Politics play a part in everyday life. I play politics at home with my kids. You can’t escape it. But I’m here to govern and work with people to make Indianapolis better tomorrow than it is today. 

Obviously, there’s been some turnover in the chief of staff role. Currently, development contracts involving Hogsett’s first chief of staff, Thomas Cook, are being looked at by a Marion County grand jury. There’s been a lot of strife over the last year and a half regarding Cook’s impact in this role. Did any of that give you pause when you considered taking the role as chief of staff? 

No, because my focus is on the city. Everything I have in my life is because of this city. I’m focused on service and governing.

There’s challenges in every single administration and every single agency within any giant enterprise. There’s been steps taken to mitigate issues related to those things, but what I’m focused on now is continuing to push Mayor Hogsett’s agenda forward for the next two years and making sure that the people of Indianapolis have what they need to live in the greatest city in the country, in my opinion.

Advertisement

Moving to your current department: Now IMPD will be without a chief. What do you want to see from the next police chief, and are there any specific people you’ll vouch for to the mayor? 

Between myself and [former IMPD Chief Randal Taylor], and my time as assistant chief and now as chief, we’ve spent a really large amount of time creating a deep bench and a leadership legacy within the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. And I’m proud of our team. Any successes that we’ve had in my tenure as a chief … you can give [my team] credit for them, and our officers, our professional staff, and our partnerships in the community and other city enterprises. 

So I think we all want someone who is visible, who is supportive, who will listen, who is accessible in the community, who is service-oriented, who understands what our mission is, who understands what the goals are that we’ve worked together on in the last two years. … And there’s someone within our existing team that I think fits that bill. Multiple people.

So the mayor’s choice is going to be very hard. I’ll provide input in all that, and whoever he decides on will be a much better chief than I could ever have imagined. 

Advertisement

Do you think it’s important that someone from the current rank and file is promoted from within?

I think at this time, where we are right now, the best candidate to be police chief comes from right here within our department.

During your time as chief, IMPD dealt with some controversies related to outbursts of downtown violence, a number of officers being charged with sex crimes. Are there regrets from your time as police chief that you want the next chief to focus on improving?

Yeah, those are challenges. Any time you’re dealing with human beings, you’re going to have people that unfortunately step out from under their oath. And those things have to be dealt with. I think what you saw from us is that those things were dealt with, they were dealt with quickly and in the right way. It’s super unfortunate that it happened. 

I think I could have done a better job at fixing our recruitment and retention issues. This is a national issue, no doubt. The issues of 2020 and George Floyd and the racial reckoning, and all the things that occurred over the last five years in policing, definitely have impacted people who want to be police not just in Indianapolis, but across the country. There were tremendous investments made by Mayor Hogsett in starting pay in this last labor agreement to push our pay up significantly. And this is a great job if you have a mind for service.

Advertisement

So I want the next chief to really — and it was going to be part of our strategic plan — to dive deeper into hiring practices. The whole process, from start to finish, which includes recruiting and all those things. We had just gotten started in doing some of those things and I have no doubt the next chief will continue those efforts to improve that area. 

You said you won’t run for mayor. That’s not in the works. Does this new job mean that you’re thinking of a future in elected office? 

I didn’t expect this job, and so I don’t know what the future holds. I may have my fill of governing in the next two years and just want to escape to some deserted island and stare at a palm tree. I don’t know.

I don’t want to box myself into anything, but at this point, I have no desire to run for political office.

Email Indianapolis City Hall Reporter Jordan Smith at JTSmith@usatodayco.com. Follow him on X @jordantsmith09 and Bluesky @jordanaccidentally.bsky.social.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Indianapolis Colts highest and lowest PFF grades on offense in 2025

Published

on

Indianapolis Colts highest and lowest PFF grades on offense in 2025



These Colts’ players on offense received the highest and lowest PFF grades over the 2025 NFL season.

With the Indianapolis Colts’ season now behind us, let’s take a look at which players on offense received the highest and lowest grades from Pro Football Focus.

Below is a look at PFF’s grading system for some context. While this metric is very helpful when it comes to quantifying a player’s performance, PFF’s grading system isn’t the be-all and end-all either. It is one metric out of many that are out there.

Advertisement
  • 90.0+: Elite
  • 80-89.9: High quality
  • 70-79.9: Good
  • 60-69.9: Above average
  • 50-59.9: Average
  • 40-49.9: Below average
  • 39.9 or less: Poor

Now, here are the Colts’ five highest graded players on offense from the 2025 NFL season.

Colts’ five highest graded players for 2025 season

  • LG Quenton Nelson: 84.5
  • C Tanor Bortolini: 82.6
  • LT Bernhard Raimann: 82.0
  • WR Alec Pierce: 79.3
  • RB Jonathan Taylor

In both pass-blocking efficiency and run-blocking grade, Nelson was one of the highest-rated guards in all of football by PFF’s metrics. Bortolini wasn’t credited with allowing any sacks, but what really boosted his overall grade was his performance as a run-blocker.

Raimann was steady across the board, grading out very well as both a run blocker and pass blocker.

Pierce led the Colts in receiving, totaling over 1,000 yards, and he also led the NFL in yards per catch. Taylor was the NFL’s second-leading rusher this season.

Colts’ three lowest graded players in 2025

  • OL Dalton Tucker: 39.3
  • QB Phillip Rivers: 51.0
  • WR Anthony Gould: 52.0

Tucker’s pass-blocking grade is what brought down his overall grade. He allowed eight pressures and two sacks in just 86 pass-blocking snaps.

Remember at the beginning of this I said take these grades with a grain of salt? Rivers’ grade is an example of that. Overall, he provided the Colts’ with stability at quarterback and kept them in games. However, the late interceptions and lack of explosive plays brought his grade down.

Gould has a very small sample size to pull from, but of his two receptions, he generated just six yards of offense.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Best available 2026 NFL free agents on defense for Indianapolis Colts

Published

on

Best available 2026 NFL free agents on defense for Indianapolis Colts



According to a few different rankings, here are the best available NFL free agent defenders for the Indianapolis Colts.

As the Indianapolis Colts attempt to get back to the playoffs for the first time since 2020, free agency will have to be a big part of that equation.

The Colts will have money to spend this offseason. According to Over the Cap, the Colts have $45.77 million in available cap space. Compared to the rest of the NFL, this is the ninth-most in football currently.

Advertisement

As GM Chris Ballard said on Thursday, salary cap-wise, the Colts are in “good shape.”

The Colts also have the ability to create more cap room if needed.

Last offseason, we saw Ballard take a much more aggressive approach in free agency. From the sounds of it, he will “continue down that path” this offseason.

There are always reasons to address just about every position group over the course of an offseason, but two specific areas Ballard mentioned on Thursday were the defensive front and getting faster on defense as a whole.

So, with a focus on the defense, specifically the front seven, here are the top available free agents this offseason at those positions.

Advertisement

Best available 2026 NFL free agents on defense for Indianapolis Colts

  • DE Trey Hendrickson
  • DE Jaelan Phillips
  • IDL John Franklin-Myers
  • LB Quay Walker
  • LB Devin Lloyd
  • DE Odafe Oweh
  • DE Boye Mafe
  • LB Nakobe Dean
  • DE Joey Bosa
  • IDL Travis Jones
  • DE Khalil Mack
  • LB Demario Davis
  • DE Kyle Van Noy
  • IDL Teair Tart
  • IDL DaQuan Jones

*This list was compiled by rankings from Sports Illustrated, The Ringer, and Bleacher Report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending