Indiana
Knicks vs. Pacers: Our betting advice on spread, total & moneyline for Saturday

The New York Knicks (33-19, 2nd in Atlantic) wrap up their five game homestand as they welcome in the Indiana Pacers (29-24, 3rd in Central) on Saturday night at Madison Square Garden.
New York suffered its second defeat in three games as three starters — Jalen Brunson, Julius Randle and OG Anunoby — all missed the team’s 122-108 loss versus the Dallas Mavericks.
To add insult to injury, Isaiah Hartenstein, who’s starting for an injured Mitchell Robinson, left Thursday’s game early due to a sore left Achilles.
The Pacers are coming off of a 131-109 loss against the Golden State Warriors, where two-time MVP Stephen Curry scored 29 points in the first half versus Indiana, and finished with 42 points and 11 three-pointers.
These two teams met not long ago when the Knicks took care of business in a 109-105 victory on Feb. 1 at MSG.
Can the short-handed Knicks get back on track against the Pacers? Here’s my betting breakdown for this Eastern Conference matchup.
More: Here are three Super Bowl 2024 special bets you can wager on for Chiefs vs 49ers
NY Knicks vs. Pacers spread: Advantage Pacers
After covering in seven straight games, the Knicks are now 0-3 against the spread (ATS) since their nine-game winning streak came to an end.
The Pacers have not been much better, going 4-5-1 ATS over their last 10 contests, but importantly have failed to cover in five of their previous seven matchups.
With New York likely down multiple starters, take Indiana to cover in this one.
They’re 4-2 ATS when they’ve been a road favorite this season and are 13-9-2 in the following game after a loss.
Even though this line hasn’t come out yet, I expect the Pacers to be between a three-to-five point favorite and that’s comfortable enough for me to advise taking them to cover on Saturday night.
Prediction: Pacers cover the spread
NY Knicks vs. Pacers total: Bet the over
If both these teams were at full strength, this would’ve been a must-watch matchup as you have the best offenses (Pacers) against a top three scoring defense in the Knicks.
Indiana averages nearly 124 points per game (PPG) this season and ranks top-10 in field goal percentage made (46.6 percent), three-point percentage (37.8 percent) and three-pointers made per game (13.6 per contest).
Thanks to a 28th-ranked scoring defense, the Pacers excel at going over this year.
The problem for the over hitting an expected high line is not on Indiana due to a high-powered offense and an inadequate defense.
The way this game hits the implied over is if New York’s offense, down multiple top options, can still take advantage here.
That being said, even with the Knicks expected to be missing at least 60 percent of their starting five, I believe they’ll put enough points up on the board for the total to be the right play in this matchup.
Prediction: Bet the over
NFL: Super Bowl 2024 props: Gatorade color, coin toss and OT to bet on for Chiefs vs. 49ers
NY Knicks vs. Pacers moneyline: Pacers
Down their top players, New York failed to keep up last time out on their home court against the Mavericks.
Donte Divincenzo has stepped up in a big way with the absences of Brunson, Anunoby and more.
The former first round pick is averaging 28.5 PPG in February and scored 30+ in three of his last five games.
In fact, Divincenzo put up a season-high 38 points against these Pacers back on Dec. 30 in Indiana.
The good news is the Knicks, who were one of the most active teams at the NBA trade deadline, should have recently acquired Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovic in the lineup after trading for the duo Thursday afternoon.
I do believe New York can keep it close versus this struggling Pacers defense. However, after Thursday’s performance and potential chemistry concerns following two new players having to play a majority of the minutes, I think the Knicks will lose three out of four games for the first time since the New Year.
Bet the Pacers on the moneyline when the odds are available.
Prediction: Pacers 119, Knicks 113

Indiana
Bill to expedite squatter removals passes Indiana House, heads back to Senate

INDIANPOLIS (WISH) — The author of a bill to expedite squatter removals said Monday existing trespassing laws could tie up property owners in unrelated landlord-tenant regulations.
The bill defines a squatter as anyone who occupies someone else’s property and does not have and never had a rental agreement or the owner’s permission. A property owner could provide a sworn statement that someone was a squatter, whereupon law enforcement would have to remove the person within 48 hours. Bill author Sen. Mike Gaskill, R-Pendleton, said police in his district are encountering an increasing number of squatters. He said under current laws, a squatter could claim to be a tenant. At that point, any effort to remove them would have to be diverted into landlord-tenant procedures.
“What has happened around the country is people have had trespassers, squatters, and then had to go through a court proceeding and wait for a hearing to get them removed,” he said.
A person accused of squatting could defend themselves by providing documentation showing they had permission to be on the property, at which point the property owner could face perjury charges.
The bill passed the Senate 48-1 earlier this session and cleared the House by a vote of 72-18 on Monday. Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, said the bill turns law enforcement into finders of fact in the absence of a judge. He said the state already has laws to expedite the removal of unauthorized persons from private property.
“We don’t need to create an entire new body of law that has no judicial officer, no finder of fact, no determiner of law in the whole process,” he said. “Once the person is removed from the property, now the burden is on them to go into court and fight it out.”
The measure has to go back to the Senate because the House made some changes in committee. Gaskill said he worked with the House on those changes and will ask the Senate to accept them.
Indiana
Indiana needs Planned Parenthood and Medicaid. That’s just the truth. | Opinion
On the state and federal levels, Medicaid is under attack, with politicians spreading exaggerations and falsehoods, trivializing the program, and working hard to strip Indiana of affordable care.
Camille Beeson on Medicaid waitlist affecting Indiana seniors, assisted living facilities
Camille Beeson, regional director of operations at the Wyndmoor of Castleton, speaks on how Indiana’s waitlist for Medicaid waiver services is affecting seniors and assisted living facilities.
Reading the news right now, you might get the idea that Medicaid is expendable. On the state and federal levels, Medicaid is under attack, with politicians spreading exaggerations and falsehoods, trivializing the program, and working hard to strip Hoosiers of affordable health care.
In Indianapolis, legislators are pushing Senate Bill 2, their effort to kick hundreds of thousands of people off of the program.
The reality isn’t reported as often: that Medicaid is a program that makes our state and country great. There are 1.8 million people in Indiana who are enrolled in Medicaid. About 40 percent of births are Medicaid-covered.
Indiana relies on the care provided by Planned Parenthood
Planned Parenthood is a key provider of essential care for Medicaid recipients in Indiana. We are here for Hoosiers when they need birth control, wellness exams, and preventive screenings, with roughly one-third of our patients using Medicaid to cover that care.
This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case out of South Carolina that could threaten this care and Planned Parenthood’s role in the program. Federal law requires that Medicaid include “any qualified provider” in the program. But in South Carolina, lawmakers are attempting to cut Planned Parenthood out solely because of its association with abortion care.
If the Supreme Court allows states to ignore federal law and target a trusted provider solely based on politics, Indiana will be less free and less healthy. With cuts to care and removal of access, unplanned pregnancies will go up, cancer diagnoses will be missed, and sexually transmitted infections will go untreated.
Most patients on Medicaid are people with low incomes who don’t have access to private health insurance and already face significant barriers to care — and, in Indiana, 65% are working while enrolled in the program.
Seniors depend on Medicaid to pay for long-term care. Families depend on Medicaid to keep their kids healthy. As many as one-third of our patients in Indiana rely on Medicaid to access essential family planning and reproductive health care.
Medicaid provides coverage of birth control, sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and treatment, annual wellness exams and preventive screenings, life-saving cancer screenings, and more.
Medicaid is under attack, and Indiana will suffer because of it
Attacks on Medicaid are coming from politicians, too. In Congress, it has been widely reported that Republican leaders are weighing enormous national cuts to Medicaid to pay for an extension of tax cuts for the wealthy.
And here in Indiana, Republican legislators are advancing Senate Bill 2, which would kick more than 200,000 people off the Healthy Indiana Plan, one of the state’s largest Medicaid programs.
If any of these efforts succeed, the consequences for Indiana will be catastrophic. Indiana already has some of the highest health care costs in the country and one of the worst infant mortality rates in the country. Rural hospitals continue to close, and more than half have eliminated labor and delivery services. If Medicaid cuts limit or close Planned Parenthood health centers, pregnant patients in rural Indiana — already driving a median of 30–35 minutes for OB care — may go without necessary services.
The state cannot afford to lose Planned Parenthood’s services. If Indiana copies South Carolina to block Medicaid patients from accessing Planned Parenthood, other providers will not be able to absorb the patient load.
We’ve already seen what happened in Indiana when Planned Parenthood was forced to close some of our health centers– defunding led to an HIV epidemic. Elsewhere, removing access to Planned Parenthood through Medicaid has had negative consequences, too. When Texas blocked Medicaid from covering Planned Parenthood, pregnancy-related deaths doubled.
The politicians pushing for Medicaid cuts and blocking free choice of Medicaid recipients to choose Planned Parenthood don’t seem to care about this. What they care about is punishment: punishing our organization and punishing the patients who rely on us.
To our patients, please know that we are fighting this every step of the way – no matter what. We will be providing care as long as we can, and we are advocating to state and federal elected officials about the importance of Medicaid and the health care safety net. Medicaid is a critical program in Indiana and across the country, and if politicians do the right thing, it can continue to be for years to come.
Rebecca Gibron is the CEO for Planned Parenthood in Indiana.
Indiana
Fast-moving storms cause damage in Northwest Indiana

Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Film Review: Rachel Zegler is the Best Part of an Otherwise Dull Remake of ‘Snow White’ – Awards Radar
-
News1 week ago
Shooting at Park in New Mexico Leaves at At Least 3 Dead and 16 Injured
-
Education1 week ago
ICE Tells a Cornell Student Activist to Turn Himself In
-
News6 days ago
Trump Is Trying to Gain More Power Over Elections. Is His Effort Legal?
-
Politics1 week ago
EXCLUSIVE: Groundbreaking new prayer book designed for demographic most targeted for abortion
-
News1 week ago
Washington Bends to RFK Jr.’s ‘MAHA’ Agenda on Measles, Baby Formula and French Fries
-
News1 week ago
Left-Wing Democrats Wait on AOC’s Decision as They Look to 2028 Election
-
News6 days ago
Companies Pull Back From Pride Events as Trump Targets D.E.I.