One year after Indiana policymakers enacted a law requiring pornography websites to verify users’ ages, a new bill seeks to further restrict Hoosiers under age 16 from creating social media accounts without “verified” parental permission.
Senate Bill 11, authored by Republican Sen. Mike Bohacek, would require a social media operator like Facebook or TikTok to restrict a minor from accessing the site if they did not receive “verifiable parental consent” from the minor’s parent.
As currently drafted, the bill would additionally allow parents and legal guardians to sue social media providers if their child accesses a site without consent.
Sen. Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores (Photo courtesy Indiana Senate Republicans)
Indiana’s attorney general could also issue a civil investigative demand if the office has “reasonable cause to believe” the law was violated. If a social media operator “fails to implement a verifiable parental consent method,” the attorney general would further be allowed to ask a judge to step in and stop a minor from accessing the site, and request a civil penalty of up to $250,000 for each violation, according to the bill.
Advertisement
The bill was heard Wednesday in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Chairwoman Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, said the bill is expected to be amended and voted on by the committee next week.
“We’re not trying to regulate content, of what’s going on the various social media sites — that’s not what we’re trying to do,” said Bohacek, of Michiana Shores. “We’re looking to see, is just the fact that social media itself — regardless of the content that’s inside of it — is that, in and of itself, creating the mental health issues that we’re having right now with a lot of our kids? And I believe that’s what it is.”
The bill would be effective on July 1, if passed.
During the 2024 session, state lawmakers approved Senate Enrolled Act 17, requiring pornography websites to verify user ages. They hoped to keep children from accessing pornography, but adult content companies sued, arguing the law would be costly to implement and violate First Amendment and privacy rights.
A federal judge blocked enforcement last June before its intended July effectiveness date, but an appeals court later rolled back the preliminary injunction. The law is currently in effect while the litigation continues.
Advertisement
Must get consent
Current bill language specifies that “verifiable parental consent” could be obtained “through a method that is reasonably designed to ensure that the person providing the consent is a parent or legal guardian of the minor user.” The proposal also mandates social media providers to establish a procedure to allow a parent or legal guardian to revoke their consent.
At least 10 states have passed laws requiring children’s access to social media be restricted or parental consent gained, and several states’ laws are currently on hold, according to the Age Verification Providers Association, a trade body representing age verification services providers.
What we’re trying to do is getting our kids supervised on this new space, social media, and whatever content their accessing.
– Sen. Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores
Advertisement
Bohacek said he already has multiple amendments to the bill, including to redefine social media, “because the definition we had originally was very, very broad.” The senator said the updated definition will make clear that sites requiring an account, username and password to access content would qualify. Platforms like YouTube, however — which do not necessarily require a user to sign in before accessing the website — would not be included.
Additionally, a provision in the bill to allow parents and guardians to file lawsuits against the companies if their child was subjected to bullying on the social media platform will be removed.
“We didn’t want to go down that road,” Bohacek said, referring to the bullying provision. “That’s going to be a little bit too much.”
Advertisement
Another anticipated amendment would require the attorney general’s office to give social media companies up to 30 days to remedy violations before any civil action is taken.
“The goal is not to just find and punish and penalize. It’s not what we’re trying to do here,” Bohacek said. “What we’re trying to do is getting our kids supervised on this new space, social media, and whatever content their accessing. But then also, if you feel your child is mature enough, and you feel like you want to supervise them enough, then you simply give them access to do that. And there’s a process in here to do that.”
Will restrictions keep kids off social media?
Sen. Rodney Pol, D-Chesterton, questioned whether the bill would actually keep youth from creating online accounts. A virtual private network, or VPN, for example, could allow minors to bypass technology used by social media companies to detect a user’s age.
“If a child used a VPN application in order to get around the law, well, that’s no different than jaywalking or speeding,” Bohacek argued. “You know the law, you went around the law, you just didn’t get caught.”
Concerns were also raised by committee members about joint custody cases, in which one parent or guardian consents to a child’s social media account, but the other parent or guardian does not.
Advertisement
Attorney general, adult websites clash in age verification lawsuit
Bohacek said he’d be willing to tweak the bill’s language to clarify that only “a” — meaning one — parent or guardian must provide their permission.
The Indiana Catholic Conference spoke in favor of the bill Wednesday evening. Only Chris Daley, representing the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, spoke in opposition.
He said the bill “clearly infringes on the First Amendment rights of Hoosiers 15 and down, to the degree that those rights attach at certain ages.” Daley pointed to similar laws in Arkansas and Ohio that judges have enjoined — put on hold — amid ongoing legal challenges. If Senate Bill 11 is approved, he expects the law “will eventually be blocked and overturned.”
“I think we all know that this bill will be challenged, and there’s no reason to believe that a court in Indiana — a trial court, federal trial court — will come to a different conclusion,” Daley said. “These cases in Arkansas and Ohio will be resolved, and that could be the appropriate time we all take action. Or, alternatively to that, we could try to do something meaningful.”
Advertisement
Daley recommended for lawmakers to instead invest in mental health resources for Hoosier youth and focus on educating parents “on steps they can take already” to curb their kids’ internet access.
Brown and other Republicans on the committee pushed back.
“All we’re trying to do here, in my opinion … is to try to give parents a tool which they don’t currently have,” Brown said.
INDIANAPOLIS — There’s a phrase that’s ubiquitous in Indiana. You see it on chalkboard signs outside of bars. You hear it from fans, coaches and players. It was emblazoned on T-shirts at Game 3 of the NBA Finals. It’s even the slogan for the state’s basketball Hall of Fame.
In 49 other states, it’s just basketball. But this is Indiana.
It was in 1925, after all, that the inventor of basketball, James Naismith, watched a state high school tournament and declared Indiana “the center of the sport.”
Advertisement
Now, 100 years later, between a stunning Indiana Pacers run to the finals and the exploding popularity of the Indiana Fever, Naismith’s observation has never been more true.
“I realized that basketball was really special when I took my official visit here,” said Pacers center Thomas Bryant, who played two years at Indiana University before entering the NBA in 2017. “It just felt right. You felt the energy, you felt the tenacity, you felt the love of the game, and the passion that everybody brought. That’s what made me fall in love with Indiana.”
“Basketball is king,” said actor Drew Powell, a native of the town of Lebanon whose recent credits include the medical drama “The Pitt.” “It’s everywhere. The entire state buys in. Like Brazilians are born with soccer, Hoosiers are born with basketball.”
“I’ve been here for a few years now,” Fever guard Lexie Hull explained. “And getting to go to high schools and see just even at that level, people are so passionate, excited and supportive of women’s and men’s basketball. I don’t think you find that everywhere.”
Hoosier Hysteria dates back well into the early 1900s. The state’s love of basketball in particular grew out of the single-class high school system, which pitted every school in the state against one another in one massive basketball tournament that whipped fans into a frenzy — and impressed Naismith.
Advertisement
In 1954, the Milan High School Indians, with an enrollment of only 161 students, won the state tournament, which served as the inspiration for the 1986 film “Hoosiers.” In 1955, Sports Illustrated wrote about what it deemed the “statewide mania” of basketball in a story headlined “The Hoosier Madness.”
Since then, Indiana has produced well over 100 professional players, most notably Hall of Famer Larry Bird, who, after stints as the head coach and the president of basketball operations, is an adviser for the Pacers.
Thomas Bryant of the Indiana Pacers celebrates against the New York Knicks on May 31 in Indianapolis.Justin Casterline / Getty Images
And now, Indiana is home to both another underdog story in the Pacers, who are on the cusp of their first NBA championship, and the ascending Fever, who employ the biggest star in the WNBA, Caitlin Clark.
“As someone who grew up in the state of Indiana … it’s such a fun time to be in the city,” Fever head coach Stephanie White said. “I was here the last time the Pacers were in the finals. I remember being in the building and feeling the energy. There’s no better place.”
The simultaneous success of the men’s and women’s professional teams gives Indiana a real chance to become the first state to have an NBA and a WNBA champion in the same year since 2002, when the Lakers and Sparks won for Los Angeles. (The Fever may not be title favorites, but then again, neither were the Pacers.)
Advertisement
The teams have also shown up for each other, with players from both sides often attending the other’s games this spring. (Through Game 3 of the finals, the Pacers were 8-0 in playoff games attended by Clark.)
“It’s been real fun,” said Fever forward Natasha Howard, who has attended multiple postseason games. “To see our guys come from being 10-15 to being in the NBA Finals, anything is possible. I’m extremely proud of what they overcame.”
“It’s electric,” added Hull, who attended Game 3 with Howard and Clark. “They’re selling out Gainbridge [Fieldhouse], we’re selling out Gainbridge. We love to support them and they love to support us.”
The Pacers and the Fever are not only successful, they’re capturing fans in a unique way.
Since drafting Clark last year, the Fever have routinely broken attendance and viewership records. Powell described the atmosphere at their home games as something closer to a concert because of the fanaticism.
Advertisement
The team even sold so much merchandise after drafting Clark that it was reportedly audited.
The Pacers, meanwhile, aren’t quite as much of an underdog as Milan was in ’54, but they are putting together their own run worthy of a Hollywood script.
The Pacers had the 17th-best title odds before the season, worse than some teams that didn’t even make the playoffs. They were five games under .500 over a quarter of the way into the season. And during the playoffs, they pulled off a string of comebacks en route to the finals, the chances of which were 1 in 10 million. Literally.
And the Pacers have done all of this despite their limited avenues to building a contender.
Even with the state being a hotbed for basketball, Indiana has not been a major player for free agents. The Pacers also largely refuse to tank for top draft picks. The result is a finals team very few saw coming — one that’s giving the Oklahoma City Thunder and MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander all they can handle.
Advertisement
The sport of basketball has followed Powell, who flew in from Los Angeles for Game 4, around his entire life. He was offered a chance to be in “Hoosiers” as an extra when he was in grade school, but he declined when he found out he would be required to cut his hair for the role. (He regrets it.)
He went to college in Indiana, at DePauw University in Greencastle, where he was fraternity brothers with future Butler University head coach (and current Boston Celtics general manager) Brad Stevens.
He knows how meaningful the Pacers winning it all would be for his home state.
“It puts you on the map,” Powell said about what an NBA title would do for Indiana. “For a long time, being a small-market team, there are ways in which we’re always at odds with the league. If the Pacers win, it would be the ultimate team award.
“There’s a quote in ‘Hoosiers,’ ‘Let’s win this one for all the small schools that never had a chance to be here,’ you know? I could see the Pacers saying that exact type of thing in the huddle.”
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. – When assessing the best Indiana men’s basketball players of the 2020s, the nature of a decade in which players moved around with unprecedented frequency made it difficult to compare the legacy of one-year players and players who stuck around for a while.
For example, how do you rate Trey Galloway – who played more games in program history than anyone ever – against a one-year player like Jalen Hood-Schifino?
In the case of these rankings, Hoosiers On SI tried to compare the impact of the moment. Galloway shouldn’t have his years of experience count against him, but neither should one-year stars have their impact diminished because of the length of their stay.
Trying to square that circle is how Hood-Schifino comes in at No. 4 on the list. He’s the second-best of the one-year players included in the top 16 of the 2020s.
Advertisement
Befitting a one-year player, Hood-Schifino’s Indiana resume is blessed with peak achievements, not career ones. Hood-Schifino (13.5 ppg) ranked third in scoring when taking the best seasons into account. Because he was the Big Ten Freshman of the Year, All-Freshman and an All-Big Ten selection, Hood-Schifino ranked second in the 2020s in individual honors.
Peak value is a great way to describe Hood-Schifino’s lone season in cream and crimson. He wasn’t always great, but when he was, he was as dominant as any player.
Hood-Schifino had eight games where he converted 25% or less on his shot attempts – which were always high as he was a volume shooter. He also had five games where he was 60% or better and when you’re a volume shooter? It means you’re going to put up huge numbers.
One of those performances was a 33-point game in an 84-83 home loss to Northwestern in January 2023. That was his career-high … until he had the game that lives longest in the memory of Hoosiers fans.
Few expected Indiana to go into Mackey Arena on Feb. 25 and live to tell about it. No. 5 Purdue would be Big Ten champions and spent part of the 2022-23 season ranked No. 1.
Advertisement
Hood-Schifino cut Purdue to pieces with his mid-range shooting and ability to go to the rim. He had 35 points, on just one 3-point shot made, to go with seven rebounds as the Hoosiers surprised the Boilermakers, 79-71.
Even when Hood-Schifino had a quiet game, he could still make loud contributions. In a home game against Illinois on Feb. 18, 2023, Hood-Schifino was 5 of 17 from the floor, but he calmly hit the game-tying jumper and the game-winning free throws to lift the Hoosiers to a 71-68 victory.
Hood-Schifino was a hot commodity after his freshman season and left Indiana to turn pro. His NBA adventures have been somewhat star-crossed. He’s already been dropped by the Los Angeles Lakers – the team that drafted him 17th overall in 2023, but he showed signs of life late in the 2024-25 season with the Philadelphia 76ers.
Hood-Schifino was capable of being the best player on the floor at his peak. If someone was building a team from Indiana players of the 2020s, Hood-Schifino would almost certainly be one of the first players picked.
Previous men’s basketball top 16 players of the 2020s
No. 5 – Malik Reneau No. 6 – Trey Galloway No. 7 – Oumar Ballo No. 8 – Mackenzie Mgbako No. 9 – Al Durham No. 10 – Miller Kopp No. 11 – Xavier Johnson No. 12 – Justin Smith No. 13 – Rob Phinisee No. 14 – Luke Goode No. 15 – Devonte Green No. 16 – Anthony Leal
Ben Verbrugge is a freelance sportswriter with a journalism degree from CSU Dominguez Hills. He is a member of the Los Angeles media and spends most of his time covering the NBA, NFL, and MLB. When not writing, he is either playing or watching sports.
Ben Verbrugge
Contributing Sports Network
Advertisement
news article
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Share
✓ Link copied to clipboard!
Advertisement
English (Original)
Español
中国人
Français
Deutsch
Portuguese
हिन्दी
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Read original
🎙️ Voice is AI-generated. Inconsistencies may occur.
Advertisement
With the NBA Finals deadlocked at one game each, the series between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Indiana Pacers shifts to Gainbridge Fieldhouse for a crucial Game 3 on Wednesday night, and you can catch all the action with FuboTV.
Pascal Siakam #43 of the Indiana Pacers is defended by Shai Gilgeous-Alexander #2 of the Oklahoma City Thunder during the first quarter in Game One of the 2025 NBA Finals at Paycom Center on June… Pascal Siakam #43 of the Indiana Pacers is defended by Shai Gilgeous-Alexander #2 of the Oklahoma City Thunder during the first quarter in Game One of the 2025 NBA Finals at Paycom Center on June 05, 2025 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Matthew Stockman/Getty Images
How to Watch NBA Finals Game 3 – Thunder vs Pacers
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2025
Time: 8:30 PM ET
Location: Gainbridge Fieldhouse
TV Channel: ABC
Live Stream: Fubo (TRY FOR FREE)
After stealing Game 1, the Pacers got thoroughly dominated in Game 2, leading for just 1:53 before ultimately losing 123-107. Indiana fell behind by six after the first quarter, trailed by 18 at halftime, and never got the Thunder lead back under 10.
Seven different Pacers scored in double digits, led by Tyrese Haliburton’s 17 on 7-for-13 from the field. Myles Turner added 16 points, Pascal Siakam added 15, and Bennedict Mathurin led the bench crew with 14.
For Oklahoma City, a big Game 2 win is just what they needed after losing to a buzzer-beater in Game 1. League MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 34 to go with five rebounds, eight assists, and four steals, going a sparkling 11-for-12 from the free-throw line. However, it was the reserves that did the most damage, with Aaron Wiggins ending as a plus-24 for the game, scoring 18 points on 5-for-8 from the 3-point line.
Live stream Thunder vs Pacers Game 3 for free with Fubo: Start your subscription now!
This event can be livestreamed on ABC with a one-month free subscription to FuboTV.
Advertisement
Regional restrictions may apply. If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation.