Connect with us

Illinois

Who’s that fool who dropped Illinois hoops from his Top 25 ballot? Fine, it was me

Published

on

Who’s that fool who dropped Illinois hoops from his Top 25 ballot? Fine, it was me


If you’ve never spent New Year’s Day being insulted from morning ’til night by aggrieved sports fans on social media, believe me, it’s almost as fun as it sounds.

“Tool.” “Clown.” “Troll.” “Dumb.” “Stupid.” “Ass.” “Loser.” “Bum.” These are just some of the things my dear old mother called me as I wished her a happy new year and explained to her what was happening.

I kid, of course. She’d never call her baby boy a bum. And it wasn’t even she who hurled the rest of those pejoratives, along with many others, at me on Monday. It was Illinois men’s basketball supporters.

Why did they do it? Because they’re maniacs. The most delightful sort, of course.

Advertisement

But also because I kind of had it coming.

Out of 63 voters in this week’s AP Top 25, I was the only one to leave the 10-2 Illini off my ballot. There are layers to why I did it, but the main reason was the indefinite suspension of star guard Terrence Shannon Jr. — charged with rape in Kansas — whom I believe was on track to be a first-team All-American until his shocking removal from the team late last week. It’s a huge loss for the Illini to suddenly be without their best player, one of the top scorers in the country and a projected first-round NBA draft pick.

As I filled out my ballot on Sunday, the Illini kept sliding down until there were three spots left and four teams I was considering for them. I moved 10-2 Auburn and 13-1 Nevada in, kept 13-0 James Madison at No. 25 and bounced the Illini (along with Creighton and Gonzaga). I figured I’d get a couple of looks at them afresh — against Northwestern on Tuesday and No. 1 Purdue on Friday — and go from there. But dropping them from No. 9 on my last ballot to out altogether on my new one surely was one of the bigger moves, up or down, I’ve made with any team in my years as a voter.

Was it an overcorrection? I can buy that charge, especially given the size of the protest after a social-media account that tracks poll results by voter outed me, along with a couple of others, for being Week 9 outliers. One of them had actually moved Gonzaga up on his ballot despite its fourth loss and ongoing poor play. Another had moved Arizona up several spots despite the Wildcats having just been blown out by sub-.500 Stanford. Then there was Illinois and me — arguably the most egregious case of all considering my fellow voters actually moved the Illini up in the poll, from 11th with Shannon to ninth without him.

Moving the Illini up was, to me, inexplicable. If Zach Edey were suspended indefinitely, would Purdue stay at No. 1? No, it would tumble like a locomotive off a collapsed bridge and rightfully so. I wouldn’t rank the Boilermakers at all without Edey, certainly not right away. I’m not sure I would view them as an upper-half team in the Big Ten without their superstar. Then again, Shannon is no Edey, who carries a bigger load for his team than any other player has in a very long time. It could be that I overestimated Shannon’s value and/or sold his teammates short. We’ll know better soon.

Advertisement

The voters didn’t drop the Illini, but some others did. Big Ten Network’s Andy Katz dropped them from second to sixth in his ranking of conference teams. Betting sites no longer have the Illini among the top 25 teams according to odds to win the national championship. If these are “hot takes,” they seem pretty sensible to me.

Meanwhile, the backlash itself was also amusing. Part of the twisted, insidious, unintended humor of social media is the absurdity of people who don’t know what the hell they’re talking about piling on to accuse others of not knowing what the hell they’re talking about. Certainly no segment of society likes to tell journalists about their jobs more than those who have never been journalists — or even dime-a-dozen poll voters.

“You should lose your voting rights!” some angry Illini fans contended, as if a single slight of the team they cheer for would ever matter in the least to anyone else, anywhere else.

Many made the point articulated by one person as, “Polls are a judgment of what a team has done to date, not a speculation on the future.” Says who? Polls are what they are, a collection of opinions of those giving them. There are no rules for voters about how to view each week of the season. In my view, the best ballots are — ideally — honest stabs at where things are at right now, not where they were in December or might be at the end of the season. Illinois isn’t the same team without Shannon that it was with him. Should I have suspended awareness of his absence just to protect Chad from Mattoon from having his feelings hurt?

Someone wrote of me and my fellow outliers, “It couldn’t be more obvious that these three voters are either clueless, lazy, don’t know basketball or hired bad interns to do it for them.” I’ll be damned if I’m going to just sit here and let anyone imply that I would ever have an intern.

Advertisement

Another common accusation was that an omission as indefensible as mine with the Illini could only have been done “for attention.” Right, because being chastised by grammatically challenged bros never fails to hit the spot.

Or maybe I’m just an Illini hater? That’s what some say. It’s childish and silly of them, though I do admit to feeling an occasional twinge of resentment for any school to which I’ve forked over tens of thousands of dollars to educate an offspring.

But, listen, New Year’s Day wasn’t all bad. At least I also whiffed on both my published College Football Playoff picks. No extra charge.





Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

New building owner addresses backlash over mural in downtown Springfield

Published

on

New building owner addresses backlash over mural in downtown Springfield


SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (KY3) – A long-standing mural honoring Robert E. Smith on the side of a building at Campbell and Walnut has been covered up, prompting community backlash against the building’s new owner.

David Pere, owner of FMTM LLC, purchased the building in downtown Springfield and said he intended it to reflect his business, which focuses on helping veterans with financial strategies and goals. Covering the mural was part of that plan.

Pere said he was out of town in Tennessee when painting began and learned about the community reaction through messages on his phone.

“I’m like, I was in Tennessee running an event. I didn’t even know he’d started painting until I got a bunch of really nasty messages on my phone,” Pere said. “And I go, oh, look, that’s our building getting painted. I guess he started.”

Advertisement

Pere said he did not anticipate the response. “You know, we didn’t. I didn’t know how much of an impact this was going to make,” he said.

Jesse Tyler, co-owner of SGFCO, said he wanted the mural to stay and expressed concern about the lack of safeguards for publicly recognized works of art.

“To paint over that is to say, like, could be interpreted as saying that his work is no longer relevant or that his story is no longer relevant. I don’t think that’s true,” Tyler said. “Robert’s artwork needs to be part of downtown for as long as we can maintain that memory and maintain that legacy.”

Tyler said the community had hoped protections would be in place for the mural. “Maybe we didn’t have those protections that we hope there would be, that maybe the sort of legacy and awareness of Robert’s work that we hope there would be wasn’t there,” he said.

The City of Springfield posted online, acknowledging the artwork held deep meaning for many residents. Because the building is privately owned, however, Pere is within his rights to make changes to its exterior.

Advertisement

Pere said he hopes to help relocate the mural to a more permanent location. “We want to help migrate that mural to a wall where it could be more permanent,” he said. “I’d love to help them find a space for it. I’d love to help. I’d love to see the city get involved to the point where that space could be a permanent space where it’s actually maintained because it is obvious now that it is very important to the city of Springfield.”

Pere is already working with an artist on a new mural for the side of the building, intended to represent veterans. That mural is expected to begin going up at the end of the month.

To report a correction or typo, please email digitalnews@ky3.com. Please include the article info in the subject line of the email.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Missed the lunar eclipse? See when the next one will be over Illinois

Published

on

Missed the lunar eclipse? See when the next one will be over Illinois


play

Millions across the United States who woke up early Tuesday were treated to a “blood moon,” the only total lunar eclipse occurring in North America in 2026, according to NASA.

Advertisement

Illinois residents who missed it will be waiting some time for the next total lunar eclipse to shine above the U.S. — several years, in fact. But a partial lunar eclipse is coming sooner.

When is the next total lunar eclipse in Illinois?

After March 3, Illinois’ next visible total lunar eclipse won’t happen again until June 2029, writes Time and Date. There is a partial lunar eclipse coming sooner, however.

Others are reading: Free Full Moon Queso at Qdoba. How to get in Illinois

When is the next lunar eclipse?

A partial lunar eclipse will be visible in Illinois on Aug. 27-28, shining over the Americas, Europe, Africa and parts of Asia, according to NASA.

Provided you’re willing to stay up late to see it, the partial lunar eclipse will be at its maximum around 11:12 p.m., Thursday, Aug. 27, in Illinois.

Advertisement

Until then, here’s what people in parts of the U.S. were seeing Tuesday morning.

See photos of the March 3 total lunar eclipse

Calendar of upcoming eclipses

When is the next solar eclipse?

The next solar eclipse will be visible to roughly 980 million people on Aug. 12, 2026, writes Time and Date.

A total solar eclipse will occur over Greenland, Iceland, Spain, Russia and a small area of Portugal, while a partial eclipse will be visible in Europe, Africa, North America, the Atlantic Ocean, Arctic Ocean and Pacific Ocean, NASA reports.

Advertisement

Need help finding stars, planets and constellations? Try these free astronomy apps

The following free astronomy apps can help you locate stars, planets, and constellations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC

Published

on

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC


COLLINSVILLE, Ill. (First Alert 4) – Right now, in Illinois, Missouri and most of the country, drivers must be at or over 0.08 to get a DUI. A proposal in the Illinois Statehouse would lower that threshold.

“Make it as safe as you possibly can out there,” said John Sapolis.

Collinsville resident John Sapolis said while lowering Illinois’ DUI threshold would not affect him, as he rarely drinks, he likes the idea of getting drinkers off the road.

“It’s bad enough out there driving around with people who are not drinking,” said Sapolis.

Advertisement

If a bill passes in the Illinois House of Representatives, the blood alcohol limit would be lowered, meaning fewer drinks could put somebody over the line for a DUI.

Two Chicago-area lawmakers propose lowering the threshold from 0.08 to 0.05.

“Your body still is not in a proper state to really be behind the wheel,” said Erin Doherty, Regional Executive Director for Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Doherty said even at 0.05, drivers are less coordinated and cannot track moving objects as well as when they are sober.

Utah is the only state in the country to have the 0.05 limit, and Doherty said one in five drivers there changed their behavior.

Advertisement

“There are so many other options before getting behind the wheel,” said Doherty.

Sara Floyd used to live in Utah and now calls Collinsville home.

“The Midwest people like to have a few beers while they watch their Little League games

“In Utah, you can barely get alcohol at a gas station,” said Floyd.

She said the culture in Utah is very different and thinks there should be some wiggle room for drivers.

Advertisement

“If one person had a beer within an hour period and then drove, they shouldn’t get a DUI for one drink,” said Floyd.

Doherty said they do not recommend driving even after a single drink.

“You really should not get behind the wheel when you’re any kind of impaired, one drink, five drinks, whatever that looks like, just don’t drive,” said Doherty.

While each body processes alcohol differently, according to the National Library of Medicine, in a two-hour period it takes a 170-pound man three to four drinks to reach 0.05, and it takes a 137-pound woman two to three drinks to reach the same state.

April Sage said she does not think this law would work, saying instead it would help more if the state added more public transit.

Advertisement

“I could have three beers and get a ride home safely,” said Sage.

First Alert 4 reached out to a spokesman for the Illinois Department of Transportation to see if they had any comments on this bill. The spokesperson said they are not going to comment because it is pending legislation.

According to the Illinois Department of Public Health, fatal crashes involving one driver who had been drinking increased 4% from 2019 to 2022, despite multiple studies showing fewer Americans are drinking.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending