Connect with us

Detroit, MI

Amon-Ra St. Brown pops champagne in celebration of new contract with Detroit Lions

Published

on

Amon-Ra St. Brown pops champagne in celebration of new contract with Detroit Lions


play

Detroit Lions wide receiver Amon-Ra St. Brown has 120 million reasons to celebrate, so why not pop some champagne?

The Lions and their breakout star — famous for being able to recite every wide receiver selected before him in the 2021 NFL draft — agreed to a four-year contract extension on Wednesday. The deal includes $77 million guaranteed and has a maximum value of more than $120 million, according to NFL Network. The new deal makes St. Brown one of the highest-paid receivers in the NFL at $28 million per season, per CBS Sports, for the first three years of the contract.

Advertisement

NFL DRAFT LIVE UPDATES: ‘The scene in Detroit is insanity’: Maximum capacity reached at NFL draft

The Lions also signed right tackle Penei Sewell to a massive extension Wednesday worth up to $112 million, one day before the NFL draft got underway in downtown Detroit, giving football fans plenty of reasons to celebrate as they made their way to the event.

After officially inking his new deal with the Lions, St. Brown was met by a group who sprayed him with silly string as they all jumped up and down in celebration of the mammoth new contract.

In a video the Lions shared on social media, St. Brown celebrated the big news properly by shaking up what appeared to be a bottle of champagne, spraying it like he just won a championship.

Advertisement

Can you blame him?

St. Brown, a former fourth-round pick out of USC, has come to represent much of what the new Lions regime under general manager Brad Holmes and head coach Dan Campbell is all about. St. Brown is the epitome of a “chip on the shoulder” player, and now he will be with the Lions for the foreseeable future.

[ Lions fans: Celebrate the team’s epic 2023 season with a new book from the Free Press, “From Grit to Glory.” Order now! ]  





Source link

Advertisement

Detroit, MI

Lions defense thrives when facing sudden change: ‘We’re the firefighters’

Published

on

Lions defense thrives when facing sudden change: ‘We’re the firefighters’


Allen Park — Kelvin Sheppard knows what people have thought about the Detroit Lions in years past.

The Lions, under a head coach who came up under Sean Payton, have predominantly relied on their offense to win games in recent seasons. It’s easy to see why. Dan Campbell spent a decade in the NFL playing on that side of the ball, and the Lions roster some the league’s best offensive talent. Why not lean into it?

But in his first season as defensive coordinator, Sheppard set out for his half of the ball to pull more weight. He desired a complementary situation, with the defense helping out the offense as much as the offense had been helping out the defense.

Sheppard’s efforts have largely been successful through 10 games. The defense having the offense’s back is best illustrated in sudden-change situations, when the opponent takes over possession after an interception, fumble, turnover on downs, missed field goal or blocked punt.

Advertisement

The Lions have faced 20 of these moments this season. They’ve given up only two touchdowns, and that’s despite the opponent’s average drive starting within five yards of midfield. There were six sudden-change instances in last week’s loss to the Philadelphia Eagles. The Lions held the Eagles out of the end zone each time, limiting the damage to three made field goals.

“It started back in the offseason, and it started at training camp. We went into this thing understanding that we wanted to play complementary football,” Sheppard said this week. “We didn’t want to just live on the back of our offense. … That narrative has been such in Detroit, that we win games because of offense. As a defensive player, as a defensive coach, that’s a luxury. But at the same time, it makes you feel a certain type of way.”

The Lions have allowed an average of 21.6 points and 291.8 yards per game this season, numbers that rank 10th and fifth in the NFL, respectively. They’re also near the top of the league in run defense (99.7 yards, eighth), pass defense (192.1, eighth) and, notably, third-down defense (34.4%, fourth).

Getting off the field in those critical moments goes a long way when there’s sudden change.

Advertisement

“We’re the firefighters on this team,” Sheppard said. “What does that mean? If Jack Fox, which he rarely does, shanks a punt, we’re not complaining, nobody’s sucking their teeth. We’re running on the field even faster to make sure we’re able to go put out that fire. That’s the mentality you’ve got to have as a defensive player. No pointing the fingers. No ‘what if’ this, no ‘what if’ that.”

With the defense playing as well as it’s been, and with the offense — outside of an exception versus the Washington Commanders — sputtering since Week 7, some have suggested it’s time for Campbell to have a philosophy change. Campbell’s aggression on fourth down is well documented. It’s worked well in the past because the Lions needed their offense to win them games. Maybe that’s no longer the case, and maybe Campbell should prioritize putting the defense in positions to succeed.

Ask Sheppard, though? He sees Campbell’s gambling mentality as a nod to his group: “I love it. I absolutely love it. Because that speaks volumes to me directly that our head coach believes, no matter where I put this defense, they’re going to put the fire out. So, I don’t care if Dan goes for it on every fourth down. It’s our job as defense to go out there and stand tall in that test.”

“We want this to be a complementary team. … We want to win because we win in all three phases of the game, and I think that’s something this team is trending towards. … You see it, when the offense is on, when the defense is on, when the special teams is on, man, we have a chance to do something special this year,” Sheppard said.

rsilva@detroitnews.com

Advertisement

@rich_silva18



Source link

Continue Reading

Detroit, MI

Detroit schools among 68 in Michigan released from state oversight

Published

on

Detroit schools among 68 in Michigan released from state oversight


More than 60 Michigan schools will be released from state oversight after meeting graduation and performance-based benchmarks set by the education department.

Included in the list of 68 schools that no longer need help from the state are 24 Detroit schools, according to a news release from the Michigan Department of Education.

Advertisement

Big picture view:

Schools in Detroit, Warren, Melvindale, Oak Park, Highland Park, and Madison Heights make up just some of the Southeast Michigan school districts no longer in need of oversight and support from the state.

The release from state monitoring includes 23 schools under the Detroit Public Schools Community District. Another six Detroit schools will also no longer be identified for specialized targeted support.

Advertisement

In total, there are 68 schools that will be released from oversight. There are still 113 schools that will fall under the umbrella for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI).

Michigan Oversight Eligibility 

Schools are identified as needing Comprehensive Support and Improvement when they meet one of the following criteria:

Advertisement

  • The school is in the bottom 5% of schools in Michigan
  • Is a high school with a four-year graduation rate of 67% or less
  • The school was in a CSI cohort but did not meet CSI exit criteria
  • The school was in an ATS cohort but did not meet ATS exit criteria and so supports are elevated to CSI

There is another category for state support called Targeted Support and Improvement. The eligibility criteria for that program includes:

  • Schools having at least one student group (such as a racial group, economically disadvantaged students, or students with disabilities) performing in the bottom 25% of each of the school’s components on the Michigan School Index.
  • Identified annually

The backstory:

Advertisement

Schools are determined to need state support through the Michigan School Index, which is a requirement from the federal government that states maintain some sort of school accountability system.

The program is used to identify schools that are in need of additional support to help students perform better. Academic outcomes, attendance, and graduation rates are some of the parameters the state measures for signs of improvement. 

Schools may leave the state program if they no longer meet the criteria that made them eligible in the first place, like math and English proficiency over two years. 

Advertisement

Catching up:

According to the 2023-24 results, there were slight gains among Michigan’s schools. 

Advertisement

Of the 3,324 public schools in Michigan, 113 were identified for state support – about 3.4% of all schools in the state. That includes 57 districts entering partnership agreements with MDE, which means they will get specialized support.

“I am very pleased to see that 68 schools—including 33 out of 98 schools that were in partnership agreements with MDE—no longer require additional supports from the department because of the hard work by local district and intermediate school district staff, children, parents, community members and MDE employees,” said Interim State Superintendent Dr. Sue C. Carnell. 

Schools no longer under oversight

Advertisement

There are 68 schools that will no longer use the CSI program for state help:

  • Academy for Business and Technology High School, Melvindale
  • Academy of Warren
  • Barack Obama Leadership Academy, Detroit
  • Beecher High School (Beecher Community School District)
  • Fair Plain East Elementary School (Benton Harbor Area Schools)
  • Buchanan Virtual Academy (Buchanan Community Schools)
  • Detroit Academy of Arts and Sciences (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Detroit Leadership Academy K-8 (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Ann Arbor Trail Magnet School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Blackwell Institute (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Bunche Preparatory Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Burns Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Carver STEM Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Central High School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Cooke STEM Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Davis Aerospace Technical High School at Golightly (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Frederick Douglass Academy for Young Men (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Garvey Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Henderson Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • J.E. Clark Preparatory Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Mackenzie Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Marquette Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Martin Luther King Jr. Senior High School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Noble Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Nolan Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Palmer Park Preparatory Academy (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Priest Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Pulaski Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Wayne Elementary School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Oak Park Service Learning Academy
  • Pleasantview Elementary School (East Pointe Community Schools)
  • FlexTech High School, Brighton
  • Eisenhower School (Flint Community Schools)
  • George Washington Carver Elementary School, Highland Park
  • Ottawa Hills High School (Grand Rapids Public Schools)
  • Dickinson West Elementary School (Hamtramck Public Schools)
  • International Academy of Flint
  • John R. Lewis Elementary School (Jackson Public Schools)
  • Joy Preparatory Academy, Detroit
  • Washington Writers’ Academy (Kalamazoo Public Schools)
  • KEYS Grace Academy, Madison Heights
  • Gardner International Magnet School (Lansing School District)
  • Lyons School (Lansing School District)
  • Mt. Hope School (Lansing School District)
  • Wexford Montessori Academy (Lansing School District)
  • Mildred C. Wells Academy, Benton Harbor
  • Multicultural Academy, Ann Arbor
  • Oakland FlexTech High School, Farmington Hills
  • Woodrow Wilson Elementary School (Port Huron Area School District)
  • Saginaw Preparatory Academy
  • Arthur Eddy Academy (Saginaw Public Schools)
  • Jessie Loomis School (Saginaw Public Schools)
  • Westfield Preparatory High School, Redford

There are also schools that will exit additional targeted support:

  • Burton Glen Charter Academy
  • Bow Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Detroit International Academy for Young Women (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Munger Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Spain Elementary-Middle School (Detroit Public Schools Community District)
  • Dove Academy of Detroit
  • Hamilton Virtual School (Hamilton Community Schools)
  • Tyrone Elementary School (Harper Woods School District)
  • Holt Junior High School (Holt Public Schools)
  • Michigan Collegiate Middle/High School, Roseville
  • New Paradigm College Prep, Detroit
  • Parchment Middle School (Parchment School District)
  • Beech Elementary School (Redford Union Schools)
  • Grogan Elementary School (Southgate Community Schools)
  • Clarence Randall Elementary School (Taylor School District)

The Source: A news release from the Michigan Department of Education. 

Advertisement

EducationMichigan



Source link

Continue Reading

Detroit, MI

Thompson: Detroit Riverfront Conservancy leadership has a lot to prove

Published

on

Thompson: Detroit Riverfront Conservancy leadership has a lot to prove


Recent revelations that the Detroit Riverfront Conservancy, which has been one of the city’s premier jewels, is making major changes, after a massive corruption scandal that took its former chief financial officer William Smith to jail for embezzling $44.3 million is good news. 

The internal financial controls the conservancy is putting in place, including periodic independent audits, is necessary, considering this public body has been the recipient of millions of dollars in taxpayer money as well as private funding over the years. 

No one should provide an excuse for how the conservancy was running its finances under Smith. Yes, Smith was the culprit but the blame should also be placed on everyone who had collective and overall fiduciary responsibility of the organization. The nonprofit should recognize they dropped the ball as a whole and then move forward in a way that instills public trust so it continues to draw support to beautify the riverfront. 

The reduction of its board seat to 30 members from 50 is a good sign. Organizations with that many board members sometimes are bogged down in unnecessary bureaucracy which slows swift decision-making and can lead to less engagement from those who oversee the agency. Some members may feel sidelined because the major decisions often are made by an executive committee. 

Advertisement

In the wake of the riverfront conservancy scandal, some board members reached out to me privately about their own take of events that led to how they believed Smith was running a fraudulent scheme that siphoned millions of dollars, the largest in the region’s history of public corruption scandals. 

For example, one particular board member during a Saturday breakfast meeting told me he was actually not surprised about what happened with Smith because some of them were hardly engaged with the internal activities, especially the financial direction of the group. It was known to most members that only a few people were running the conservancy and that some board members felt like their role was simply ceremonial.

It looked good on a professional resume to be a member of the board of directors of the conservancy. Some of the individuals who were chosen for the board reveled only in the association instead of the responsibilities that came with the title. They knew that being on the board gave them some social capital and allowed them to be in the company of some of the region’s most influential individuals. 

The group must also rethink how it selects board members as well. Simply choosing who has a bigger title in this town should no longer be the qualifier. It should be made up individuals with a deep and profound commitment to the concept and mission of making the riverfront one of the best in the nation. 

Advertisement

The new leadership of the conservancy under CEO Ryan Sullivan has a lot to prove over the next couple of years beyond the issuance of press releases that promise strong changes and a new direction. People want to see that change is not only promised but is self-evident and that this much celebrated institution will continue to serve Detroiters and the region.

The financial scandal was not only a black eye on the organization itself, but also the city.  Organizations like the Detroit Riverfront Conservancy must be exemplary in their conduct and this corruption saga must never happen again. 

 X (formerly Twitter): @BankoleDetNews

bankole@bankolethompson.com

Advertisement

Bankole Thompson’s columns appear on Mondays and Thursdays in The Detroit News.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending