Connect with us

Lifestyle

Writer Thoreau warned of brain rot in 1854. Now it's the Oxford Word of 2024

Published

on

Writer Thoreau warned of brain rot in 1854. Now it's the Oxford Word of 2024

“Brain rot” is the term of the year for 2024, referring to concerns that endlessly scrolling through social media videos and other content can cause harm. Here, TikTok’s logo is seen on a mobile phone in front of a computer screen showing a TikTok home screen. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File)

Michael Dwyer/AP/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Michael Dwyer/AP/AP

It’s not unusual for the words of influencers to gain popularity. But the influential philosopher Henry David Thoreau was born more than 200 years ago — and now a term he’s credited with introducing, “brain rot,” is the Oxford University Press’s word or phrase of 2024.

Brain rot was selected by thousands of online voters. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re well-versed in Thoreau’s work, particularly his 1854 book Walden, or Life in the Woods, where he wrote about “brain-rot.” It was the first recorded use of the term, according to Oxford University Press.

Today, brain rot reflects a worry that consuming the internet’s endless waves of memes and video clips, especially on social media, might numb one’s noggin.

Advertisement

In Walden, Thoreau used the term as he railed against oversimplification.

He asked, “Why level downward to our dullest perception always, and praise that as common sense?”

Thoreau ended that paragraph with another question: “While England endeavors to cure the potato-rot, will not any endeavor to cure the brain-rot, which prevails so much more widely and fatally?”

So, is the new rot the same as the old rot?

Oxford’s language experts say brain rot gained traction on platforms such as TikTok this year, thanks to Gen Z and Gen Alpha. Frequency of the term’s use grew by 230% from 2023 to 2024, according to the publisher’s monitoring tools.

At first glance, the connection to Thoreau may seem odd, but consider this: when Thoreau relocated to his cabin near Walden Pond to get back to basics in 1845, he was 27 years old — the same age as the oldest Gen Z members.

Advertisement

To better get a sense of how Thoreau saw brain rot in the 1800s, NPR contacted Cristin Ellis, an authority on Thoreau who teaches literature at the University of Mississippi.

“For Thoreau, ‘brain-rot describes what happens to our minds and spirits when we suppress our innate instincts for curiosity and wonder,” Ellis says, “and instead resign ourselves to the unreflective habits we observe all around us — habits of fitting in, getting by, chasing profits, chatting about the latest news.”

In today’s usage, brain rot is seen as a bad thing, sort of a cautionary term for what might happen to us if we get too distracted.

“I think the definitions are related but Thoreau’s sense of brain rot is way more extreme,” Ellis says.

“It’s not just TikTok dance crazes but virtually our entire 24/7 media culture — including the “serious” news of newspapers — that Thoreau would accuse of trivializing our minds,” she adds.

Advertisement

“Thoreau really values direct experience over our habits of consuming other peoples’ ideas at second hand,” Ellis says. “He wants us to go outside to feel and think something for ourselves; he wants us to get to know the places where we actually live.”

Popularity hints at online anxieties

Words of the year often mark shifts in thought and concerns about where society is heading — see “climate emergency” from 2019 and “vax” from 2021.

Compared to Oxford’s recent words of the year, brain rot suggests a reflective mood, after the more indulgent vibes of “goblin mode” in 2022 and “rizz” in 2023.

Casper Grathwohl, president of Oxford Languages, said in a news release sent to NPR that he finds it fascinating that “brain rot” is being embraced by younger people. “It feels like a rightful next chapter in the cultural conversation about humanity and technology,” he said.

“There’s an anxiety coming through about striking the right balance between the online world and losing touch with the real world,” Oxford Languages product director Katherine Martin said. “I think it’s great that young people also use this term to refer to the type of language used by people who overindulge in online content, which is wonderfully recursive and self-referential.”

Advertisement

“Brain rot” beat out five other contenders: demure; dynamic pricing; romantasy; slop; and lore.

Demure became a sensation — and is Dictionary.com’s word of 2024 — largely thanks to online content creator Jools Lebron’s catchphrase, “very demure, very mindful.”

Back to Thoreau — how might he have seen our culture?

“I think he might actually see us as in a more or less similar predicament as the society he lived in,” Ellis says. “He had no time for the complaint that societies in the past were somehow better, nobler, smarter than the present day.”

Shortly after Thoreau raises the specter of “brain rot” in Walden, he warns readers against being distracted by questions about the deterioration of society’s collective intellect. He also returns to a central theme: people should aim for their own personal achievements.

“His point here is that whether or not things are worse now than they were (and in general he’s skeptical of that kind of nostalgia), our task at all times is the same: to try our hardest to commit ourselves to the things that matter most in our brief and miraculous lives,” Ellis says.

Advertisement

“Devote your attention to what you know, in your heart of heart, really matters: meaning, beauty, love, wonder, and gratitude for this earth.”

Lifestyle

A new ‘Cape Fear’ remake rolls out one surprise after another

Published

on

A new ‘Cape Fear’ remake rolls out one surprise after another

Javier Bardem plays villain Max Cady in the Apple TV series Cape Fear.

Apple TV


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Apple TV

Cape Fear, based on a 1957 novel by John D. MacDonald, already has inspired two intense films about a man who, recently released from prison, goes on to terrorize his former attorney. Now there’s a new 10-part miniseries from Apple TV, which premieres its first two episodes June 5.

The first Cape Fear movie was in 1962, starring Robert Mitchum as ex-convict Max Cady, and Gregory Peck as attorney Sam Bowden. Peck’s Bowden was heroic and strong, but Mitchum’s ex-con was a playful, vengeful force of nature. One of the most powerful scenes in that movie was when Cady cornered Bowden’s wife, played by Polly Bergen, in a kitchen, grabbed and crushed a raw egg, then smeared it across her exposed shoulders as she shuddered with fear.

Mitchum’s very verbal sociopath has provided the template for dozens of movie and TV predators since. Those would include, most prominently, the eccentric killers played by Javier Bardem in No Country for Old Men, and Billy Bob Thornton in the first season of TV’s Fargo. And Robert De Niro, of course, who played Max Cady in the 1991 remake of Cape Fear, opposite Nick Nolte as the defense attorney.

Advertisement

The most gripping and uncomfortable scene in that version, which was directed by Martin Scorsese, may have been the moment in which DeNiro’s Cady is alone with Bowden’s teenage daughter, played by Juliette Lewis, and approaches her with a mix of charisma and menace. Scorsese kept Cady as evil as before, but made Bowden a much less noble protagonist. And that’s why, I suspect, Scorsese has returned as an executive producer, along with Steven Spielberg, to present Apple TV’s new, expanded version of Cape Fear. This time, the shades of gray are everywhere you look.

Nick Antosca, who created and oversaw this new miniseries, has made some bold choices from the start — beginning with the casting and the primary characters. In the two movies, Bowden’s wife and family were targeted by Cady purely to get revenge on Bowden. In this new story, Bowden’s wife, Anna, was Cady’s defense attorney, and Bowden was the prosecutor. It puts her in the narrative more centrally, and pays off.

Amy Adams and Patrick Wilson are really, really good as the Bowdens, and play their parts with shifting layers of innocence and guilt. And playing Cady? It’s none other than Bardem, who already has embodied one world-class villain — and here he comes again.

Apple TV provided eight of the 10 episodes for preview, so I don’t know how this Cape Fear ends. But I know how cleverly it updates and expands the story. It’s set in today’s world, so there are cell phones, podcasters, rideshares, catfishing and public shaming — all of which figure into the plot.

There are also flashbacks, not only to Cady’s prison years, but to Bowden’s childhood, which is similarly fleshed out. And best of all, major new supporting characters are presented — some of whom inherit the stalking behaviors exhibited by Cady in the film versions. And those films are echoed with respect. Just as Scorsese found room for Peck and Mitchum to appear as other characters in his 1991 remake, this new Cape Fear pulls the same trick by casting someone from Scorsese’s film.

Advertisement

Bardem is riveting here, but he’s by no means the only reason to watch. The story may be familiar, but this new Cape Fear rolls out one surprise after another. Some scenes are scary, some are violent and some are creepy. And part of the suspense, in this new adaptation, is figuring out who the creeps really are — and where the evil really lies.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Inside the Push Towards Footwear Manufacturing in Portugal

Published

on

Inside the Push Towards Footwear Manufacturing in Portugal
BoF and APICCAPS convened designers, brand leaders, and sourcing executives at The Hotel Chelsea in New York City to examine why Portugal has become a compelling answer to the supply chain disruptions reshuffling where footwear gets made.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

‘How to Rule the World’ explores education and power at Stanford University

Published

on

‘How to Rule the World’ explores education and power at Stanford University

Students walk on the Stanford University campus on March 14, 2019, in Stanford, Calif.

Ben Margot/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ben Margot/AP

When Theo Baker arrived at Stanford University a few years ago, he joined the student newspaper, following the path of his journalist parents, Peter Baker, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, and Susan Glasser, a writer for The New Yorker.

Through his reporting as a student journalist, he eventually broke a story about manipulated data in Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne’s neuroscience research that helped lead to the university president’s resignation.

Theo Baker’s book, How to Rule the World: An Education in Power at Stanford University was released May 19. In it, Baker describes Stanford as a place where proximity to Silicon Valley gives rise to a parallel system of influence, recruitment and money, with investors looking to identify promising students almost as soon as they arrive on campus.

Advertisement

He told Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep there was “a sort of Stanford inside Stanford,” where elite students are drawn into an “alternate reality” of excess and access to cut corners.

In the interview, he discusses how Stanford is not just a university but also a pipeline where status and power can matter as much as ideas.

We reached out to Stanford University for comment and have not heard back.

Listen to the interview by clicking play on the blue box above.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending