GALLAGHER The “N” might be the riskiest thing on the shoe! Who puts a logo there? That to me is part of the appeal. They’re giving something new to a hype consumer (after all, they keep selling out) while knowingly dipping into geriatric territory.
CARAMANICA Can I offer two more reference points for shoes that tried to walk this tightrope before? First, my beloved Jordan Two3 Cavvy from the early 2000s, which is essentially a Prada loafer with an athletic tilting sole and an accentuated elastic top. A messy blend of casual and formal. And second is the Nike Air Verdana, a golf shoe, also from the early 2000s.
In their day, I disliked both of these. But at least on the Cavvy, I have come around to its elegance. Which is to say, maybe the 1906L will just need two decades to be normalized and appreciated.
BUGBEE I put them more in the category of the Nike Air Rift Tabis — sneakers with mutant ambitions.
CARAMANICA Yes, but the Rifts don’t pretend to any kind of formality.
BUGBEE The 1906Ls do not feel formal to me. They retain their sneakerness.
CARAMANICA Then it sounds like what you want is … a sneaker?
BUGBEE No, I wanted a comfy slip-on, with the shape of a loafer and the sole of a sneaker that would make my whole family want to walk 10 feet away from me in public.
GALLAGHER So you wanted the repulsion?
BUGBEE Yeah, I like a little troll.