Lifestyle
Gucci Taps Demna, Balenciaga’s Creative Director, as New Designer
The great Gucci reset is here. On Wednesday, the Italian fashion house named Demna, the mononymic designer who transformed Balenciaga from a niche luxury house into one of the most provocative, boundary-breaking brands of the last decade, as its new artistic director. He will be in charge of women’s wear, men’s wear and accessories.
Gucci and Balenciaga are owned by Kering, the French conglomerate that also owns Saint Laurent, McQueen, Brioni and Bottega Veneta. A new designer for Balenciaga has not been announced.
“Gucci stands for fashion authority,” Stefano Cantino, the chief executive of Gucci, said. “This is what we want to bring back.”
Demna will be the first “star” designer with a proven track record in Gucci’s 104-year history, a seeming acknowledgment of the crisis it has experienced over the last two years after an apparent attempt to recast itself as a timeless luxury brand. Revenue plunged 23 percent in 2024, and the Kering stock price has more than halved since 2023. (Gucci is by far the largest brand in the Kering stable.)
The appointment will add yet more turmoil to an already unsettled fashion world in which a record number of fashion companies have changed design heads in the last year. Half of Kering’s brands alone will have new designers in 2025.
“We were looking for a strong and opinionated designer,” Mr. Cantino said. “Demna is one of the few.” He brings with him not just design skills, Mr. Cantino said, but “an understanding of contemporary culture, of what is luxury today and a deep understanding of the new generation.”
He also brings a certain knowledge of Gucci. In 2021, Demna and Alessandro Michele, the Gucci designer at the time, “hacked” into each other’s brands to reinterpret their most recognizable designs, with Demna replacing Gucci’s famous double Gs with Bs on its classic logo canvas accessories. And he has the confidence of the Kering chief executive François-Henri Pinault, who once told The New York Times he believed Demna could create a “megabrand.”
When Mr. Pinault named the Georgian-born Demna Gvasalia (he dropped his surname in 2021) to Balenciaga in 2015, however, the fashion world was shocked.
Though Demna, now 43, had received his master’s degree from the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp, Belgium, and trained in the studios of Martin Margiela and Louis Vuitton, he made his name at Vetements, a cultlike label created in 2014 that became a fashion sensation almost overnight because of its nose-thumbingly antifashion aesthetic. (Demna left Vetements in 2019.)
Nonetheless, during Demna’s 10 years at Balenciaga, revenues grew close to $2 billion from an estimated $390 million, challenging the meaning of luxury, value and authenticity in the process.
He took the quotidian — Crocs, IKEA totes, even garbage bags — and put them on a pedestal. He almost single-handedly started the monster sneaker trend. He put all ages and genders and kinds of beauty on his runway and created shows that were immersive, apocalyptic experiences that acted as forms of social criticism as much as fashion: shows about the climate crisis, the war in Ukraine, celebrity and the rule of capitalism. He scandalized and thrilled in equal measure.
He collaborated with “The Simpsons,” made Balenciaga video games and attended the Met with Kim Kardashian. He also restarted the couture line and never lost sight of the purity of silhouette that characterized the work of Balenciaga’s namesake designer, Cristóbal Balenciaga.
Balenciaga’s momentum came to an abrupt halt in 2023, when a misjudged holiday ad campaign precipitated online allegations of pedophilia, and Demna’s deep friendship with Ye cast a shadow on the brand in the wake of Ye’s antisemitic rants. Cancellation loomed, but Balenciaga eventually distanced itself from the controversy, and it has since recovered some of its strength. In January, Demna was made a Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres in recognition of his contribution to French fashion. He wore a T-shirt.
Demna’s last Balenciaga show, held on March 9 in Paris, was a career retrospective of sorts and a reminder of just what he had brought to the house. After the show, he joked to reporters that the reason he was wearing a suit for the first time was that he was Demna 2.0.
The Gucci news suggests it was less a joke than it seemed at the time.
“Demna’s contribution to the industry, to Balenciaga and to the group’s success has been tremendous,” said François-Henri Pinault in a news release. “His creative power is exactly what Gucci needs.”
Francesca Bellettini, the deputy chief executive of Kering, called him “the perfect catalyst.”
Demna replaces Sabato De Sarno, a designer who had worked behind the scenes at Valentino before being charged with Gucci’s reset after the seven years of Alessandro Michele’s magpie maximalism. (Mr. Michele had likewise been a number two before ascending to his position, working for the former Gucci designer Frida Giannini.) Though the Michele era had buoyed Gucci to annual revenues of about 10 billion euros, tastes began to swing away from his trademark eccentricity, and Gucci management thought a return to discretion was the answer.
That turned out to be wrong. Instead of positioning the brand as a somewhat more hip equivalent of Hermès, Mr. De Sarno’s luxury minimalism simply made it seem diminished. (It turns out one Hermès is enough.) Demna’s job will be to change all that, though he will have to overcome not just the problems of Gucci, but also the challenge of a slowdown in the broader luxury industry.
In that lies a certain appeal, Mr. Cantino said.
For Demna, Mr. Cantino said, the idea of “being able to make a success at Gucci, prove he is capable of doing something different than Balenciaga and show a different point of view, was very exciting.”
Gucci did not confirm when Demna would show his first collection, but he will begin in early July after his final Balenciaga couture show. (Gucci is not a couture house.) He will split his time between his home in Switzerland and the Gucci headquarters in Milan.
Lifestyle
Malala Yousafzai on ignoring advice and being willing to change her mind : Wild Card with Rachel Martin
A note from Wild Card host Rachel Martin: You know how famous actors or musicians will sometimes talk about how hard it is to lose their anonymity? They talk about how every detail of their lives is dissected and interpreted to fit someone else’s narrative. It’s the trade off for getting to do that kind of work, and they understand that devil’s bargain. But Malala Yousafzai never agreed to this deal.
Fame and notoriety was forced on Yousafzai after the Taliban shot her for talking publicly about why girls should be allowed at school. After the attack, she was put on a pedestal in front of the entire world.
Yousafzai was awarded the Nobel peace prize when she was just 17. She wasn’t just a survivor, she was a hero on the global stage. But when does a hero just get to be a human? Malala Yousafzai spoke with me about how she’s figuring that out. Her new memoir is called “Finding My Way.”
Lifestyle
Kendrick Perkins Defends Nico Harrison After Firing, Mavericks Were Never Healthy!
Kendrick Perkins
Defends Nico Harrison
Mavs Weren’t Healthy!!!
Published
TMZSports.com
Mavericks fans couldn’t wait for Nico Harrison to get kicked to the curb after he traded Luka Doncic to the Lakers … but NBA champ Kendrick Perkins still believes both sides won the infamous deal — telling TMZ Sports we’ll find out if/when Dallas gets healthy!!
Harrison was handed his pink slip on Tuesday … an inevitable move nine months after the franchise player was shipped to L.A. in exchange for Anthony Davis.
At the time, Perk said he loved the transaction for both sides … but Mavs backers weren’t buying it — and wanted Harrison gone ASAP.
Now that they got their wish, we checked in on Perk’s previous take while at LAX on Wednesday … and he’s not ready to admit defeat just yet.
“In fairness to Nico, he lost his job — he didn’t get a chance to see that team on the floor fully healthy. We still haven’t seen Kyrie Irving and AD touch the floor together in a Dallas Maverick uniform, which is unfortunate, but when you trade an international superstar, your room for error is very, very small. And that’s what ended up happening.”
Pair the Luka trade with the 3-8 start … and ownership was ready to pull the plug.
So when we asked if Harrison got the short end of the stick, Perkins made a hilarious comparison — watch the clip for that, ’cause words can’t do it justice.
As for what’s next for the now-former GM, Perk suggests Harrison take a bit of a break to get his peace of mind back … which isn’t a bad idea since “Fire Nico” chants are still probably ringing in his ears.
Lifestyle
Ken Burns’ ‘American Revolution’ will make you think differently about U.S. history
The Death of General Mercer at the Battle of Princeton, January 3, 1777, by John Trumbull, ca. 1789-1831
Alamy Stock Photo/PBS
hide caption
toggle caption
Alamy Stock Photo/PBS
Documentary producer and director Ken Burns came to prominence 35 years ago with The Civil War, a massively popular multi-part nonfiction series on PBS. His latest effort is a six-part series called The American Revolution.
By focusing on the Revolutionary War, Burns is revisiting some very familiar territory. His long and impressive filmography includes a history of Congress, and biographies of Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin. He’s done deep dives into American military conflicts, including World War II and the Vietnam War.
Throughout his career, Burns has developed and perfected the tricks of his particular trade: the evocative use of music and quotations from speeches and correspondence; the use of actors to read the words of historical participants; the zooming in and out to reveal key details in period photos; and the painstaking attention to sound effects, from birds to bullets, to help bring those images to life.

All of that knowledge, and all of those gimmicks, are utilized in The American Revolution, an exceptional work about the founding of our country. It’s written by Geoffrey C. Ward, who wrote The Civil War and many other Burns documentaries, including the ones on Congress and Thomas Jefferson. And it’s co-directed by Sarah Botstein and David Schmidt, both of whom have worked with Burns for years.
But The American Revolution presents a challenge that even The Civil War did not. No photographs, period. To compensate, Burns and company use war re-enactors and place them in the actual historical locations.

On many — let’s say most — documentaries using a similar technique, the effect can be cheesy. But in The American Revolution, the directors avoid showing the faces of the actors re-enacting battle movements. Instead, parts of their bodies are shown in intense close-up: a bandaged hand here, a muddy boot there. Elsewhere, in an approach that borders on pure art, the directors use drones to capture the action from high, high above. It’s unusual — and beautiful.
Battles are the surprisingly dominant ingredient of this series. The American Revolution goes into more detail about individual battles than I ever learned in my own American history classes — but new and vintage maps, animated to show troop positions and movements, make it all very clear, and very vibrant. The actors quoting from the historical participants, and the historians interviewed to comment on the action, do the rest. Peter Coyote, the actor who has narrated many Burns documentaries, does so again here. He’s got a great voice for it, and leans into all the difficult place names, and people’s names, with confident authority.

In their various war documentaries, Burns and his team always have focused as much on the ground troops as on the generals — often much more so, telling their story from the bottom up, rather than the top down. The American Revolution does both: We hear important observations from George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, but also from Native Americans, revolutionary women, enslaved people and others not always given voice in such narratives.
In addition, the program’s historians make us think differently about the history we’re witnessing. In the colonies, those who were faithful to the crown were called Loyalists, and those against them called themselves Patriots. This series humanizes both sides, and also explains why some Native tribes, including the Shawnees, sided with the British in hopes of protecting their own lands.
The sheer number of the battles, and the details about them, attest to how hard our ancestors fought for the notion of a Federalist society. At the end, The American Revolution reminds us that the quest to maintain that society, and to strive to achieve a more perfect union, is far from over.
-
Nebraska6 days agoWhere to watch Nebraska vs UCLA today: Time, TV channel for Week 11 game
-
Austin, TX1 week agoHalf-naked woman was allegedly tortured and chained in Texas backyard for months by five ‘friends’ who didn’t ‘like her anymore’
-
Hawaii5 days agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
Vermont2 days agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
Southwest6 days agoTexas launches effort to install TPUSA in every high school and college
-
New Jersey4 days agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
World1 week agoIsrael’s focus on political drama rather than Palestinian rape victim
-
West Virginia3 days ago
Search for coal miner trapped in flooded West Virginia mine continues for third day