Lifestyle
For David Byrne, Talking Heads was about making emotional sense — not literal sense
TERRY GROSS, HOST:
This is FRESH AIR. I’m Terry Gross. Today we’re featuring the interview I recorded with David Byrne last fall.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED NPR BROADCAST)
GROSS: He’s a founding member of the band Talking Heads, one of the seminal bands of the punk-new wave period of the ’70s. They weren’t exactly punk, but they weren’t like any band that came before them. They recorded eight albums between 1977 and 1988, when they stopped playing together. When we spoke last fall, the 40th anniversary restored edition of their concert film “Stop Making Sense” had just been released with a remastered soundtrack. Many music critics and fans consider it among the best concert films ever made.
DAVID BYRNE: It is a long way to go. Who would have thought?
GROSS: So who would have thought? David Byrne, welcome to FRESH AIR. Welcome back.
BYRNE: Thank you. Good to be back.
GROSS: Great to have you on the show.
BYRNE: It’s been a really long time.
GROSS: Yes. So let’s start with “Psycho Killer,” the first song Talking Heads wrote, which is on their first album, “Talking Heads: 77.” And it also starts off “Stop Making Sense.” So you walk on stage with a boom box. You put down the boom box. It plays the rhythm track. You play along on your guitar and start singing.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “STOP MAKING SENSE”)
BYRNE: (Singing) Can’t seem to face up to the facts. I’m tense and nervous, can’t relax. Can’t sleep, bed’s on fire. Don’t touch me. I’m a real live wire. Psycho killer, qu’est-ce que c’est? Fa-fa-fa-fa-fa-fa-fa-fa-fa-fa (ph), better run, run, run run, run away. (Vocalizing).
GROSS: So, David Byrne, “Psycho Killer” was the first song that you wrote with drummer Chris Frantz and bass player Tina Weymouth. What was the germ of the idea? Was it your idea to write a song about a serial killer? Do you think of him as a serial killer or just a kind of really bad date?
BYRNE: Yes. Well, I don’t know if he’s a serial killer. But, yes, somebody who’s kind of deranged and is a killer. And it was an experiment to see if I could write a song. Chris and I had a band, and we played, you know, other people’s songs at school dances and things like that. And I thought, oh, let me see if I can write a song. I tried years ago when I was in high school and failed miserably. I said, let me try again. So I thought I would try and write something that was maybe a cross between Alice Cooper and Randy Newman.
GROSS: Were you fans of each of them?
BYRNE: Oh, yeah.
GROSS: ‘Cause they’re kind of on opposite extremes.
BYRNE: Kind of on opposite extremes. So I thought I’d have the dramatic subject that Alice Cooper might use but then look at an interior monologue the way Randy Newman might do it. And so I thought, let’s see if we can get inside this guy’s head. So we’re not going to talk about the violence or anything like that. But we’ll just get inside this guy’s kind of muddled up, slightly twisted thoughts. I imagine that he would imagine himself as very erudite and sophisticated. And so he would speak sometimes in French. And so I went…
GROSS: Oh, so that’s why.
BYRNE: I went to Tina, who had grown up some of the time in Brittany, and her mother’s French. I said, oh, can you help me? We want him to say something pretty grand here – better say it in French so that – as if he’s going to tell us what kind of ambitions and how he sees himself. So…
GROSS: What does he say in French? I don’t – I’ve never – it’s like…
BYRNE: Oh. It’s like, I realized my destiny. It’s very kind of old-fashioned. I think Tina said, this is very Napoleonic kind of French. It’s very kind of, I realize my destiny. I must do what I must do – things like that.
GROSS: I love that song so much. Now, you also sing the fa-fa-fa in there.
BYRNE: Oh, yeah. That was a little reference to Otis Redding.
GROSS: Otis Redding.
BYRNE: Yeah.
GROSS: OK. I was wondering about that.
BYRNE: Yes, absolutely it was.
GROSS: …’Cause he had – “Sad Song” has – it’s also called the “Fa-Fa-Fa.”
BYRNE: Yes. So that was a little…
GROSS: It’s a parentheses song.
BYRNE: Yeah, a little parentheses, a little thing where I reference an Otis Redding song in there. I’m not sure exactly why.
GROSS: You do the deranged version of it.
BYRNE: (Laughter) Yes. But, you know, well, that’s the subject. That’s the voice of the guy who’s singing.
GROSS: Yes, no, exactly – a character song like Randy Newman.
BYRNE: Yes. So – but that was – to me, that song was unique in everything that we did in that once we did it and we started playing it around the schools in Providence, people liked it. They said, we want to hear you play that song. And I realized, Oh, OK, now I realize I can write a song. So now let me write some that are a little more what I want to say and how I want to say it. Now to experiment with the song format and the way the songs are constructed. So, yeah, that song to me seemed like a unique early experiment.
GROSS: So Talking Heads started by stripping everything away and then later adding things in. So I’m going to quote you from your book “How Music Works” in terms of what you stripped away. You wrote you wanted no rock moves or poses, no pomp or drama, no rock hair, no rock lights, no rehearsed stage patter, definitely no noodling guitar solos. So why did you want to remove all of that? And is there anything you left out in that sentence that you wanted to remove?
BYRNE: I think that covered a lot of it right there.
GROSS: OK.
BYRNE: The idea was I was aware that other contemporary acts, people around us – some of them were adopting poses or clothes or guitar styles or whatever that seemed to be from a previous era, from a previous generation. And I thought to myself, well, those were invented or created by other people, and they belong to them, and they express something about their generation. But how do I do something that belongs to us, that speaks to our generation, that speaks to our concerns? And I thought, well, then I have to jettison everything that went before and be very careful not to adopt any of that stuff.
GROSS: But then you started adding things in, and it wasn’t the things that you wanted to take out. But it was things like, you know, more – an expanded rhythm section, a more theatrical presentation, as we see in “Stop Making Sense.” And what you’re doing on stage during that concert in “Stop Making Sense” is – for a lot of the film, you’re basically jogging in place very rhythmically and very energetically. And I don’t know how you managed to do that and sing at the same time. Then the backup singers end up doing that, too. So, like, you’re not doing fancy dance moves, but it’s so kinetic, and your – I don’t know. Your body – even when you’re not doing the jogging thing, your body just seems to be pulsing with the rhythm. Like, your chest is pulsing. Your head is pulsing. So that’s the choreography for you.
BYRNE: Yeah. I mean, there’s other things that are a little more elaborate, but, yes, a lot of it is really kind of just moving with the rhythm of the songs. When we expanded the lineup – the performing lineup and added more musicians, our recent records became more kind of rhythmically oriented, although we were always very kind of a rhythmic band.
GROSS: It was maybe more of a twitchy rhythm, but it was rhythm.
BYRNE: Yeah. It was more twitchy, and then now it became more funky and more sensuous in a way. And I thought, oh, this makes me want to move in a different way. And I can’t stop. I can’t resist moving.
GROSS: So I just want to ask you about the big suit that you wear for a little bit of the performance in “Stop Making Sense.” And in the credits, it says the suit was built by. It doesn’t say costume designer or designed by. It says built by as if it were, like, architecture.
BYRNE: That’s true. It is. And it’s also true that I didn’t go to someone and say, I just want a big suit. I had a little drawing of what I wanted the end product to look like – very sketchy. It was just a little line drawing. Now – but it was basically a rectangle with feet sticking out the bottom and a little tiny head on top. And so I went to a kind of small clothing manufacturer designer in downtown New York, Gale Blacker, and I said, how can we do this? I want to kind of – I’m influenced by kind of Japanese theater, the noh costume where it’s wide. It’s rectangular, but when you turn sideways, it’s not fat. So it’s not really a fat suit. It’s…
GROSS: More like a box.
BYRNE: It’s more like a box, a flat box that’s facing the audience. And it’s meant to face forwards. So we had to realize I had to wear a kind of girdle underneath and put the pants on. The pants attached to this padded girdle thing. And so the pants kind of just hung down. They barely touched my legs and same with the jacket. The jacket had a big shoulder armature, and the jacket just kind of hung down from that and barely touched my chest.
GROSS: The suit has become iconic, but what was it like to inhabit it? How did it change you as a performer onstage?
BYRNE: When I started wearing the big suit, I realized that it had a life of its own because it kind of just draped down like curtains from my hips and shoulders. I could wiggle a little bit, and it would ripple like curtains or sheets or whatever. So you could do all these things with it. If I wiggled side to side, it would kind of shimmy around. I could do all these things with it that I couldn’t do just by myself. It had its own properties that you could kind of activate that way. I thought it was kind of odd, kind of slightly surreal. It meant something. I don’t – wasn’t sure what it meant. And…
GROSS: I didn’t matter. It sure made an impression.
BYRNE: Yeah. Yes. People have interpreted it as meaning, like, oh, this is the archetypical businessman kind of imprisoned in his suit, imprisoned in his whole situation.
GROSS: That’s not what it was.
BYRNE: Well, it might have been. That might be unintentional, but it might be there, but I don’t deny it. But it wasn’t my intention to kind of – oh, I want to kind of make fun of businessmen.
GROSS: Right. My guest is David Byrne. The restored version of the Talking Heads concert film “Stop Making Sense” is streaming. We’ll be right back. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF TALKING HEADS SONG, “THE BIG COUNTRY”)
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. Let’s get back to my interview with David Byrne, a founding member of the band Talking Heads. A restored and remastered 40th anniversary edition of the band’s concert film, “Stop Making Sense,” is streaming. After Talking Heads, Byrne went on to start his own record label, collaborate on experimental theater pieces, win an Oscar and be nominated for another and create Broadway shows, including “American Utopia” and “Here Lies Love.”
GROSS: So let’s hear another song from the film, “Stop Making Sense.” And I want to play “Burning Down The House,” which is one of your best-known songs. And it holds up so well so many years later. So now it’s sometimes interpreted about being about global warming, climate change, you know, burning down the house, fight fire with fire. What were you really thinking of when you wrote it?
BYRNE: The phrase burning down the house I’d heard being used as a chant at a Parliament Funkadelic concert that I’d seen. They didn’t have it in a song. It was just a kind of chant that they started chanting, and the audience joined in. It meant, like, we’re going to blow the roof off the sucker. We’re going to set this place on fire. It’s going to be – you know, we’re going to have a really amazing time here. Yeah. It didn’t mean literally, let’s set fire to our houses, or anything else.
GROSS: Or the world is burning.
BYRNE: Yes.
GROSS: Yeah.
BYRNE: And the rest of it – I thought, let me see if I can make a song that is basically a lot of non sequiturs that have a kind of – some kind of emotional impact. They have some kind of emotional resonance, but literally they don’t make any sense.
GROSS: I’m so glad you said that because, you know, I’ve never understood exactly, what is this song about?
BYRNE: (Laughter).
GROSS: I love it, and I love the individual lines. But, yeah, I can never find, like, what is the narrative here?
BYRNE: Yes. So, like the film title, it doesn’t make literal sense, but it makes emotional sense.
GROSS: Sure, yes, and rhythmic sense.
BYRNE: Yes.
GROSS: Yeah. All right. Let’s hear it. This is the version from the concert film “Stop Making Sense.”
(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, “STOP MAKING SENSE”)
TALKING HEADS: (Singing) Watch out. You might get what you’re after. Cool babies – strange but not a stranger. I’m an ordinary guy burning down the house. Hold tight. Wait till the party’s over. Hold tight. We’re in for nasty weather. There has got to be a way – burning down the house. Here’s your ticket. Pack your bags. Time for jumping overboard. Transportation is here. Close enough but not too far – maybe you know where you are. Fighting fire with fire. All wet – hey; you might need a raincoat. Shakedown – dreams walking in broad daylight. Three hundred sixty-five degrees – burning down the house. It was once upon a place. Sometimes I listen to myself, going to come in first place. People on their way to work said, baby, what did you expect? Going to burst into flames – go ahead.
GROSS: That’s Talking Heads from the 40th anniversary restored edition of “Stop Making Sense,” the Talking Heads concert film. So I’m going to quote you again from – this is from your book “How Music Works.” And you’re talking about dancing, and you say, (reading) a nerdy, white guy trying to be smooth and Black is a terrible thing to behold.
(LAUGHTER)
GROSS: (Reading) I let my body discover little by little its own grammar of movement, often jerky, spastic and strangely formal.
How did you come up with who you were onstage moving in space and not doing, you know, either, like, Temptations moves or hip-hop moves?
BYRNE: Wow. Yes. I had to resist kind of adopting moves that I loved that I’d seen other people do. And so I think – yeah. By that time, I’d worked with Twyla Tharp. She did a evening-length dance piece called “The Catherine Wheel.”
GROSS: Yeah, and I’m going to interrupt you right there for a second because one of the things you do in addition to jogging in place is you kind of stagger or stumble around stage – around the stage very intentionally. You know, and it looks like you’re almost going to fall, but you don’t. And I thought, like, that is so Twyla Tharp because she – her choreography is, like, normal movements elevated to dance. And, like, stumbling, staggering – that’s one of those normal movements that I’ve seen her use.
BYRNE: Yes. So I was around when they were rehearsing things and doing a lot of that kind of movement – not that I lifted any directly. But I thought, oh, there’s – oh, this is the vocabulary of what’s available. What you can do is really wide.
GROSS: So you were inspired by her approach to movement.
BYRNE: I was inspired by her and the stuff that she was doing. I was inspired by a lot of folk dance or dance that I’d seen on kind of ethnographic films of rituals, stumbling and the stuff on “Once In A Lifetime” by kind of the Baptist church, people going into trance, whether it was in Baptist church or in Santeria or whatever. I thought, oh, this is – they might not think of it this way, but it’s a kind of dance. It may not be choreographed in the same kind of way, but it is a kind of dance. It’s definitely movement, and it’s definitely connected with music. So I thought, OK, I’m not going to copy that, but that direction is some place I can go as well.
GROSS: My guest is David Byrne. The new restored version of the Talking Heads concert film “Stop Making Sense” is streaming. Let’s listen to the concert film version of the Talking Heads song “Life During Wartime.” We’ll hear more of my interview with David Byrne after a break. I’m Terry Gross, and this is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “LIFE DURING WARTIME (LIVE)”)
TALKING HEADS: (Singing) Heard of a van that is loaded with weapons, packed up and ready to go. Heard of some gravesites out by the highway, a place where nobody knows. The sound of gunfire off in the distance – I’m getting used to it now. Lived in a brownstone. I lived in a ghetto. I’ve lived all over this town. This ain’t no party. This ain’t no disco. This ain’t no fooling around. No time for dancing or lovey-dovey – I ain’t got time for that now. Transmit the message through the receiver. Hope for an answer someday. I got three passports, couple of visas – don’t even know my real name. High on a hillside, the trucks are loading. Everything’s ready to roll. I sleep in the daytime. I work in the night time. I might not ever get home. This ain’t no party. This ain’t no disco. This ain’t no fooling around. This ain’t no Mudd Club or CBGB. I ain’t got time for that now.
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. I’m Terry Gross. Let’s get back to my interview with David Byrne, a founding member of the band Talking Heads. A restored and remastered 40th anniversary edition of the band’s concert film “Stop Making Sense” is streaming. Byrne has since gone on to start his own record label, Luaka Bop, collaborate on experimental theater pieces, win an Oscar and be nominated for another and create Broadway shows, including “American Utopia” and “Here Lies Love.”
Let’s talk about the early music in your life. Was guitar the first instrument that you got?
BYRNE: No, it was a violin. First I had a hand-me-down violin.
GROSS: How’d you like it?
BYRNE: It’s a very difficult instrument to get it to sound nice. It’s not like you can – once you can play some notes, that they sound good. You can play notes, but they sound bad for a long time. So it’s not a very satisfying instrument in that way for a young person to learn to me. But I persisted. I kept playing it. I ended up with a friend playing it on the street sometime, you know, busking for money, that sort of thing.
GROSS: The guitar became more comfortable for you.
BYRNE: Oh, yeah, yeah. And it was just – it was the iconic instrument for kind of…
GROSS: Yeah, absolutely.
BYRNE: …Rock music.
GROSS: Yes. Good and bad musicians all played guitar (laughter). Was rhythm the first thing that really captured you in music?
BYRNE: No, I think it was texture. I think that one of the first things I heard was on a little transistor radio – was The Byrds’ version of “Mr. Tambourine Man.” And I’d never heard any sound like that, the kind of – this jangly guitar and these really kind of lush harmonies mixed with that. And I thought, that’s a sound that I’ve never heard before. I’ve never heard it on any of – on my parents’ “Sound Of Music” record.
GROSS: (Laughter).
BYRNE: It doesn’t sound like that.
GROSS: No, it doesn’t.
(LAUGHTER)
BYRNE: I thought, there’s another world out there.
GROSS: Is that what your parents had – is mostly Broadway?
BYRNE: No. They had some. They also had Scottish folk music and Mozart.
GROSS: OK. Yeah, so The Byrds would definitely be different.
BYRNE: And so that said, There’s a whole another world out there. This is just – you’re getting a peek at it.
GROSS: What were the first songs you learned to play?
BYRNE: I decided to teach myself. So I think I went and got a Bob Dylan songbook and probably a folk songbook that had, you know, the chords written in, maybe a Beatles songbook, maybe some other kinds of things, maybe Smokey Robinson songs. You could buy these songbooks of the songs that were in the radio, and I thought, let me just learn the easy ones – so start with the easy ones and see if I can do that. And to me, that was immensely satisfying. Of course, I’m just doing this in my bedroom.
And I realized that for learning something like this, I thought what’s really important is that you get this positive, satisfying feedback as fast as possible. That was the problem with the violin. It took a long time before you got the positive. I thought, no. This way, you get – you’re singing a song within, you know, hours or a day or something like that, a song that you love. And I thought, that’s a great way to learn.
GROSS: So what did you think of your singing voice then?
BYRNE: Oh, I didn’t think much of it. I thought it was – of course, it sounded better to me in my head than what I heard on recordings. But I thought, I’m doing this because I’m writing the material, so I’m going to – it looks like I’m going to be singing it, too. And later on, I realized how very peculiar my singing at that time was.
GROSS: Well, apparently the choir teacher in your junior high or high school felt the same way. What I read is – tell me if this is true – that you were rejected from choir because you were off-key and – what? – too self-conscious or uncomfortable.
BYRNE: Yeah, definitely off-key. Yes, yes. I was asked to leave the school choir. Yeah.
GROSS: So did that make you think, OK, give up? Like, this – you’re bad. No one wants to hear you. You should stop singing for anyone. Give up.
BYRNE: Why is it that people don’t give up? That’s a real puzzle to me. I didn’t…
GROSS: Yeah. When somebody tells you you’re not even fit for high school choir…
BYRNE: Yes, or they tell you your paintings are ugly, or, this idea you have of doing this project or company or whatever – it’s a stupid idea. And sometimes people persist, and they’re – sometimes they’re right. It’s kind of – it’s really puzzling. What makes them persist? I mean, I don’t remember thinking to myself, I’m right. They’re wrong. I just thought, no, I love this. I’m going to keep doing it myself. I’ll just do it in my bedroom or to a smaller group and do that. I didn’t think, oh, that stupid choir leader. You know, what does he know? I just thought, no, I’ll do it myself and keep – because I enjoy it. Yeah. So I kept going and started singing again and eventually started singing in local – they called them coffee shops around town. They were, like – the local university had one, and there were some others. And they usually had folk singers in. And at that time, folk singers only sang kind of songs within a prescribed repertoire. So I went in kind of as a folk singer, but I sang what I felt were very literate rock and pop songs. And they’d never heard them before. They would say, who wrote that song?
GROSS: The songs…
BYRNE: You know, songs by The Who or The Kinks or different people like that.
GROSS: Let’s take a short break here, and then we’ll be back with more of my interview with David Byrne. This is FRESH AIR.
TALKING HEADS: Hey.
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. Let’s get back to my interview with David Byrne, who is, among other things, a founding member of the band Talking Heads. A 40th anniversary restored and remastered edition of the band’s concert film “Stop Making Sense” is streaming.
I want to go back to the early days of Talking Heads. I want you to describe your first night at CBGB on a double bill with the Ramones. You opened for them. CBGB was, like, the most famous of the New York punk-new wave clubs in the 70s. Did you already know the Ramones when you opened for them?
BYRNE: We opened for the Ramones. I think probably the first time, we didn’t know them that well personally. We’d maybe said hello.
GROSS: But musically…
BYRNE: But musically, yes, we’d seen them play a couple of times there. And we knew what we were dealing with. We knew that…
GROSS: What were you dealing with?
BYRNE: We knew that they did kind of hilarious pop songs, but musically, it was like this roar. It was like standing next to a jet engine or something. And so – and we often got called, you know, an art rock band. But I think we also thought that the Ramones were very much an art rock band. It was very conceptual, what they did and how they did it and how they looked, and it was all very considered. So we really liked it. We didn’t want to sound like them. That wasn’t what we were doing. But we liked it. But we realized, wow, I don’t think we can play after them. The audience will be kind stunned and maybe slightly deaf. But – so we’ll go before. It was a wonderful time when the audiences were just curious about what was this new kind of pop music that was emerging downtown and in different places in London and elsewhere. They didn’t know much about any of it. So they were just curious, and they would go, oh, this band sounds like a jet engine playing pop music, and this one is kind of this twitchy, kind of angsty songs as well. They accepted all of it.
GROSS: So you were considered part of the punk-new wave scene in New York. When I interviewed Seymour Stein, the co-founder of Sire Records, the label that signed Talking Heads, he told me that he came up with the expression new wave because the promotion people for Sire were describing Talking Heads as punk. But Stein thought you were, quote, “the furthest thing from punk.” Did you feel like the furthest thing from punk?
BYRNE: We felt that, yes, musically, we sounded very, very different. And visually, we felt very, very different than what was then considered punk rock. But this kind of DIY, the do-it-yourself idea that was prevalent amongst the punk rockers and us – we felt we have that in common. We have in common the fact that we can do it, and we can do it with the means that we have available. And we can speak to the concerns of our generation and our contemporaries. And they felt the same way.
GROSS: You’ve often been described as not the most social person. I read one description that, at a party, you’d be the person sitting alone in the corner. So as somebody who, I assume, is something of a loner socially – I don’t know. I’m just…
BYRNE: Less so now. Yes, there was definitely a time when that was the case.
GROSS: So…
BYRNE: I have to make clear that it didn’t mean I was unhappy.
GROSS: No, no, right, right.
BYRNE: Yeah.
GROSS: Right. But being somebody who was more of a loner than, you know, a group person, what was it like for you to be or at least be perceived as part of a scene?
BYRNE: (Laughter) At first, I found it really annoying because I thought of myself and what we were doing as being very unique and being part of a whole kind of scene or style or name or whatever it might be. I thought, no. It’s – no, just listen to us for what we are. But then later on, I realized, oh, having a kind of handle like this has been very handy for the press to say, OK, we’re going to write an article about punk rock. And we’d get included in that, which was for us, not a bad thing. And I realized, oh, oh, we kind of – we benefited by writing on the coattails of that. And then eventually, people got to know us for what we were.
GROSS: You’ve described yourself as being on the autism spectrum, although you’ve never been officially diagnosed. Can I ask what makes you think you’re on the spectrum?
BYRNE: A friend told me. This was – what year was it? – early 2000s, late ’90s, maybe. A friend of mine picked up a book about the autism spectrum, which was kind of a – it’s an old idea, but it’s an old idea that had come back into vogue at that point. And she read aloud to me the various aspects of people who are on the spectrum. And then she said, David, this sounds like you. And I couldn’t disagree, at least on the mild end of the spectrum.
GROSS: So what sounded like you, what characteristics?
BYRNE: Kind of the ability to kind of intensely focus on something that interested you, to kind of exclude other things and really kind of be intensely focused, maybe being somewhat socially awkward, socially uncomfortable a little bit, taking things sometimes very literally. I still do that a bit (laughter). Like, when – sometimes having a conversation with someone, they’ll say something. And by the tone of their voice or their look or whatever, they’ll understand that they’re telling me no. But I’ll hear them say yes, the word, you know, yes or whatever. And so I’ll go, but you said yes. What? I don’t understand. So, yeah, there’s a little confusion there sometimes. But most – those were the main symptoms that I can remember.
GROSS: What about, like, repeating things over and over, whether it’s, like, listening to something over and over again or seeing something over and over again or doing a gesture or a movement over and over again?
BYRNE: Wow. I hadn’t even thought of that. I think you might be right. I mean, some of that is what dancing is.
GROSS: Especially when you’re doing the same movement over and over.
BYRNE: Yes. That – sometimes there’s a kind – yeah. There’s an attachment to that kind repetition that it actually has a – when something is repeated, it has a different meaning than when it’s done just once.
GROSS: Do you find it soothing?
BYRNE: Yes. Yes.
GROSS: So when your friends had suggested that maybe you’re on the autism spectrum and you thought, yeah, yeah, maybe. Why didn’t you bother to get an official diagnosis?
BYRNE: Probably because I thought, this is just me. I’m not unhappy. I might be a little bit different than some other people, but I’m not unhappy. This is the way I experience the world. But I’m doing fine. I really enjoy writing the songs and performing and the other things that we do. So why act like I have something wrong that needs to be treated?
GROSS: My guest is David Byrne. We’ll be back after a short break. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF TALKING HEADS SONG, “THIS MUST BE THE PLACE”)
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. Let’s get back to my interview with David Byrne, who is a founding member of the band Talking Heads. A 40th anniversary restored and remastered edition of the band’s concert film “Stop Making Sense” is streaming.
I don’t think Talking Heads was ever famous for, like, love ballads and that – you know, those kind of songs. But you’ve recorded them. And I wanted to play one. I don’t think this is one of your best-known songs, but it’s from your 1997 album “Feelings,” which was your fifth studio album, and it’s a song called “A Soft Seduction.” I think it’s a really good song, and it’s just really interesting to hear you singing a ballad like that. Can you say a little bit about it?
BYRNE: That – I was – thank you. I really like that song, too. I realized as life went on that I could write really beautiful, moving melodies occasionally.
GROSS: When did you realize that?
BYRNE: Oh, little by little. It was a very gradual process. I also was listening to other people, other musicians, whether it was, you know, like, Paul McCartney or Caetano Veloso or others, who could write these beautiful melodies and had, you know, amazing voices. And I realized, oh, how do they do that? How do they do that? – and, little by little, learn, oh, oh, I can do a little bit of that.
GROSS: Well, let’s hear it. This is David Byrne singing his song “A Soft Seduction.”
(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “A SOFT SEDUCTION”)
BYRNE: (Singing) The words of love are not enough, though sweet as wine, as thick as blood. Passionless moments and we are homeless, out on the street. But life is cool, and things aren’t bad – got what he wants, lost what he had. He soon adjusted and got accustomed to these new ways. Blame God. How can you lose singing such sweet rhythm and blues? Strange days, she said to me. Being in love don’t mean you’re free. But night reveals what daytime hides.
GROSS: So that was David Byrne from his 1997 album “Feelings,” and the song was called “A Soft Seduction.” It’s a song he wrote. You know, when I think of “Feelings,” I think of that song, “Feelings.” Were you concerned that people would think that that was one of the songs that you did on it?
BYRNE: I thought that would be very funny if they thought that I was doing that song, and I thought it was also funny that myself – it was intentional that…
GROSS: Really?
BYRNE: I was often portrayed as being a little bit cold and analytical in my songwriting and performing. So I thought it might be funny to call a record “Feelings,” especially coming from me. And I also put a picture of me as a kind of Ken doll on the…
GROSS: How timely now.
BYRNE: Yes.
(LAUGHTER)
GROSS: That would be back in fashion. One of the things you do in some of your songs is a kind of speak-singing that reminds me of, like, a cross between some Kurt Weill songs and Lou Reed. And I’m wondering if either of them have been inspirations to you in that style that you have.
BYRNE: Both of them have been inspirations to me. I was a big fan of Velvet Underground when I was younger, and I had never heard anything like that – not the kind of music they did but also the kind of subjects they were singing about. I thought, wow. This is the – this is not peace and love here. But it was also – but that’s part of the world as well. They’re acknowledging a different part of the world.
And, yes, Kurt Weill and Brecht – those songs where they had sometimes these beautiful melodies interspersed with kind of talking, talk-singing parts. I’d also heard things like preachers, whether it was on the radio or in a church, where the sermon would start and the energy would get higher and higher and higher. And then it would cross over a line, and it became like singing. It became like an incantation, a rhythmic incantation that then kind of the band or organist or whoever is playing along – and it was crossing over a line and becoming music. It started, and it kind of gradually transformed from one thing into another.
GROSS: I want to get back to something that you said earlier. You know, you said that you’ve changed in terms of being social, that you think you’re more social than you used to be more comfortable around people. What changed? Like, how did that change evolve?
BYRNE: That’s a really good question. I think it changed – music helped me socially that – as you can see in “Stop Making Sense” – and “Stop Making Sense,” this concert and film, is kind of a model of what happened to me. You see this person in the beginning who’s kind of angsty and twitchy and stumbling around and well singing about “Psycho Killer.” And then by the end, he’s surrendered to the music and is fairly joyful, as much as he could be at that point. And he’s found a kind of community. This happens in the “American Utopia” show as well. He finds a community that’s diverse, that’s made of all sorts of different people that are very different from him, but they’re all making music together. And the music together is something that none of them could make by – just by themselves. It’s a very collective enterprise.
GROSS: It seems like that’s a great way of having a community without having to have – without necessarily having to have, like, heart-to-heart, personal, emotional discussions because it’s…
BYRNE: (Laughter).
GROSS: You know, seriously. Like, you’re relating through music, and you’re with each other, like, onstage. You have this, like, totally engaged, like, loving audience, but you don’t have to interact with them. You know, like, you’re separated from them. You’re onstage. They’re in the audience. So it’s kind of both at the same time, the sense of connection with people but also being a part.
BYRNE: I think you’re right. There’s a real kind of safety net there (laughter). There wasn’t this feeling of danger of falling into total social engagement. But there was enough that kind of it opened the door.
GROSS: I just want to say it has been so much fun to talk with you. Thank you so much.
BYRNE: Thank you. Thank you. It’s been too long.
GROSS: Yes, you were on our show in 1992…
BYRNE: (Laughter).
GROSS: …A long time ago.
BYRNE: Yeah.
GROSS: Yeah. It’s great to talk again.
BYRNE: You, too. Thank you very much.
GROSS: David Byrne co-founded Talking Heads. His record label is called Luaka Bop. The 40th anniversary restored and remastered edition of the Talking Heads concert film “Stop Making Sense” is streaming. We’ll close with a song from the film, the band’s cover of Al Green’s “Take Me To The River.”
(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “TAKE ME TO THE RIVER (LIVE)”)
TALKING HEADS: (Singing) Take me to the river. Drop me in the water. Take me to the river. Drop me in the water, water. Don’t know why I love her like I do, all the trouble you put me through. Take my money, my cigarettes. I haven’t seen the worst of it yet. I want to know. Can you tell me? Am I in love to stay? Oh, take me to the river. Take me to the river. Drop me in the water. Drop me in the water. Dip me in the river. Take me to the river. Drop me in the water. Drop me in the water, water.
GROSS: To keep up with what’s on the show and get highlights of our interviews, follow us on Instagram at @NPRFreshAir. Monday on FRESH AIR, our guest will be Taffy Brodesser-Akner, author of the novel “Fleishman Is In Trouble,” which she adapted into a Hulu series. She’ll talk about her new novel, “Long Island Compromise,” which is about the kidnapping of a rich businessman and its impact on his children who discover their wealth will only go so far to save them. I hope you’ll join us.
FRESH AIR’s executive producer is Danny Miller. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham, with additional engineering support by Joyce Lieberman, Julian Herzfeld and Al Banks. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Amy Salit, Phyllis Myers, Ann Marie Baldonado, Sam Briger, Lauren Krenzel, Therese Madden, Thea Chaloner, Susan Nyakundi and Joel Wolfram. Our digital media producer is Molly Seavy-Nesper. Our co-host is Tonya Mosley. I’m Terry Gross.
(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “TAKE ME TO THE RIVER (LIVE)”)
TALKING HEADS: (Singing) Love me. Tease me till I can’t till I can’t, I can’t take no more. Take me to the river. Drop me in the water. Drop me in the water. Dip me in the river. Take me to the river. Push me in the water. Drop me in the water, water. Get down, Bernie. Get down, Jerry. Listen, y’all. Y’all ready? Are you ready, LA? Come on. Let’s go.
Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Lifestyle
Baz Luhrmann will make you fall in love with Elvis Presley
Elvis Presley in Las Vegas in Aug. 1970.
NEON
hide caption
toggle caption
NEON
“You are my favorite customer,” Baz Luhrmann tells me on a recent Zoom call from the sunny Chateau Marmont in Hollywood. The director is on a worldwide blitz to promote his new film, EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert — which opens wide this week — and he says this, not to flatter me, but because I’ve just called his film a miracle.
See, I’ve never cared a lick about Elvis Presley, who would have turned 91 in January, had he not died in 1977 at the age of 42. Never had an inkling to listen to his music, never seen any of his films, never been interested in researching his life or work. For this millennial, Presley was a fossilized, mummified relic from prehistory — like a woolly mammoth stuck in the La Brea Tar Pits — and I was mostly indifferent about seeing 1970s concert footage when I sat down for an early IMAX screening of EPiC.
By the end of its rollicking, exhilarating 90 minutes, I turned to my wife and said, “I think I’m in love with Elvis Presley.”
“I’m not trying to sell Elvis,” Luhrmann clarifies. “But I do think that the most gratifying thing is when someone like you has the experience you’ve had.”
Elvis made much more of an imprint on a young Luhrmann; he watched the King’s movies while growing up in New South Wales, Australia in the 1960s, and he stepped to 1972’s “Burning Love” as a young ballroom dancer. But then, like so many others, he left Elvis behind. As a teenager, “I was more Bowie and, you know, new wave and Elton and all those kinds of musical icons,” he says. “I became a big opera buff.”
Luhrmann only returned to the King when he decided to make a movie that would take a sweeping look at America in the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s — which became his 2022 dramatized feature, Elvis, starring Austin Butler. That film, told in the bedazzled, kaleidoscopic style that Luhrmann is famous for, cast Presley as a tragic figure; it was framed and narrated by Presley’s notorious manager, Colonel Tom Parker, portrayed by a conniving and heavily made-up Tom Hanks. The dark clouds of business exploitation, the perils of fame, and an early demise hang over the singer’s heady rise and fall.
It was a divisive movie. Some praised Butler’s transformative performance and the director’s ravishing style; others experienced it as a nauseating 2.5-hour trailer. Reviewing it for Fresh Air, Justin Chang said that “Luhrmann’s flair for spectacle tends to overwhelm his basic story sense,” and found the framing device around Col. Parker (and Hanks’ “uncharacteristically grating” acting) to be a fatal flaw.
Personally, I thought it was the greatest thing Luhrmann had ever made, a perfect match between subject and filmmaker. It reminded me of Oliver Stone’s breathless, Shakespearean tragedy about Richard Nixon (1995’s Nixon), itself an underrated masterpiece. Yet somehow, even for me, it failed to light a fire of interest in Presley himself — and by design, I now realize after seeing EPiC, it omitted at least one major aspect of Elvis’ appeal: the man was charmingly, endearingly funny.
As seen in Luhrmann’s new documentary, on stage, in the midst of a serious song, Elvis will pull a face, or ad lib a line about his suit being too tight to get on his knees, or sing for a while with a bra (which has been flung from the audience) draped over his head. He’s constantly laughing and ribbing and keeping his musicians, and himself, entertained. If Elvis was a tragedy, EPiC is a romantic comedy — and Presley’s seduction of us, the audience, is utterly irresistible.
Unearthing old concert footage
It was in the process of making Elvis that Luhrmann discovered dozens of long-rumored concert footage tapes in a Kansas salt mine, where Warner Bros. stores some of their film archives. Working with Peter Jackson’s team at the post-production facility Park Road Post, who did the miraculous restoration of Beatles rehearsal footage for Jackson’s 2021 Disney+ series, Get Back, they burnished 50-plus hours of 55-year-old celluloid into an eye-popping sheen with enough visual fidelity to fill an IMAX screen. In doing so, they resurrected a woolly mammoth. The film — which is a creative amalgamation of takes from rehearsals and concerts that span from 1970 to 1972 — places the viewer so close to the action that we can viscerally feel the thumping of the bass and almost sense that we’ll get flecked with the sweat dripping off Presley’s face.
This footage was originally shot for the 1970 concert film Elvis: That’s The Way It Is, and its 1972 sequel, Elvis on Tour, which explains why these concerts were shot like a Hollywood feature: wide shots on anamorphic 35mm and with giant, ultra-bright Klieg lights — which, Luhrmann explains, “are really disturbing. So [Elvis] was very apologetic to the audience, because the audience felt a bit more self conscious than they would have been at a normal show. They were actually making a movie, they weren’t just shooting a concert.”
Luhrmann chose to leave in many shots where camera operators can be seen running around with their 16mm cameras for close-ups, “like they’re in the Vietnam War trying to get the best angles,” because we live in an era where we’re used to seeing cameras everywhere and Luhrmann felt none of the original directors’ concern about breaking the illusion. Those extreme close-ups, which were achieved by operators doing math and manually pulling focus, allow us to see even the pores on Presley’s skin — now projected onto a screen the size of two buildings.
The sweat that comes out of those pores is practically a character in the film. Luhrmann marvels at how much Presley gave in every single rehearsal and every single concert performance. Beyond the fact that “he must have superhuman strength,” Luhrmann says, “He becomes the music. He doesn’t mark stuff. He just becomes the music, and then no one knows what he’s going to do. The band do not know what he’s going to do, so they have to keep their eyes on him all the time. They don’t know how many rounds he’s going to do in ‘Suspicious Minds.’ You know, he conducts them with his entire being — and that’s what makes him unique.”
Elvis Presley in Las Vegas in Aug. 1970.
NEON
hide caption
toggle caption
NEON
It’s not the only thing. The revivified concerts in EPiC are a potent argument that Elvis wasn’t just a superior live performer to the Beatles (who supplanted him as the kings of pop culture in the 1960s), but possibly the greatest live performer of all time. His sensual, magmatic charisma on stage, the way he conducts the large band and choir, the control he has over that godlike gospel voice, and the sorcerer’s power he has to hold an entire audience in the palm of his hands (and often to kiss many of its women on the lips) all come across with stunning, electrifying urgency.
Shaking off the rust and building a “dreamscape”
The fact that, on top of it all, he is effortlessly funny and goofy is, in Luhrmann’s mind, essential to the magic of Elvis. While researching for Elvis, he came to appreciate how insecure Presley was as a kid — growing up as the only white boy in a poor Black neighborhood, and seeing his father thrown into jail for passing a bad check. “Inside, he felt very less-than,” says Luhrmann, “but he grows up into a physical Greek god. I mean, we’ve forgotten how beautiful he was. You see it in the movie; he is a beautiful looking human being. And then he moves. And he doesn’t learn dance steps — he just manifests that movement. And then he’s got the voice of Orpheus, and he can take a song like ‘Bridge Over Troubled Water’ and make it into a gospel power ballad.
“So he’s like a spiritual being. And I think he’s imposing. So the goofiness, the humor is about disarming people, making them get past the image — like he says — and see the man. That’s my own theory.”
Elvis has often been second-classed in the annals of American music because he didn’t write his own songs, but Luhrmann insists that interpretation is its own invaluable art form. “Orpheus interpreted the music as well,” the director says.
In this way — as in their shared maximalist, cape-and-rhinestones style — Luhrmann and Elvis are a match made in Graceland. Whether he’s remixing Shakespeare as a ’90s punk music video in Romeo + Juliet or adding hip-hop beats to The Great Gatsby, Luhrmann is an artist who loves to take what was vibrantly, shockingly new in another century and make it so again.
Elvis Presley in Las Vegas in Aug. 1970.
NEON
hide caption
toggle caption
NEON
Luhrmann says he likes to take classic work and “shake off the rust and go, Well, when it was written, it wasn’t classical. When it was created, it was pop, it was modern, it was in the moment. That’s what I try and do.”
To that end, he conceived EPiC as “an imagined concert,” liberally building sequences from various nights, sometimes inserting rehearsal takes into a stage performance (ecstatically so in the song “Polk Salad Annie”), and adding new musical layers to some of the songs. Working with his music producer, Jamieson Shaw, he backed the King’s vocals on “Oh Happy Day” with a new recording of a Black gospel choir in Nashville. “So that’s an imaginative leap,” says Luhrmann. “It’s kind of a dreamscape.”
On some tracks, like “Burning Love,” new string arrangements give the live performances extra verve and cinematic depth. Luhrmann and his music team also radically remixed multiple Elvis songs into a new number, “A Change of Reality,” which has the King repeatedly asking “Do you miss me?” over a buzzing bass line and a syncopated beat.
I didn’t miss Elvis before I saw EPiC — but after seeing the film twice now, I truly do.
Lifestyle
L.A. Affairs: Sick of swiping, I tried speed dating. The results surprised me
“You kinda have this Wednesday Addams vibe going on.”
I shrieked.
I was wearing my best armor: a black dress that accentuated my curves, a striped bolero to cover the arms I’ve resented for years and black platform sandals displaying ruby toes. My dark hair was in wild, voluminous curls and my sultry makeup was finished with an inviting Chanel rouge lip.
I would’ve preferred the gentleman at the speed dating event had likened my efforts to, at least, Morticia, a grown woman. But in this crowd of men and women ages ranging from roughly 21 to 40, I suppose my baby face gave me away.
My mind flitted back to a conversation I had with my physical therapist about modern love: Dating in L.A. has become monotonous.
The apps were oversaturated and underwhelming. And it seemed more difficult than ever to naturally meet someone in person.
She told me about her recent endeavor in speed dating: events sponsoring timed one-on-one “dates” with multiple candidates. I applauded her bravery, but the conversation had mostly slipped my mind.
Two years later, I had reached my boiling point with Jesse, a guy I met online (naturally) a few months prior who was good on paper but bad in practice.
Knowing my best friend was in a similar situationship, I found myself suggesting a curious social alternative.
Much of my knowledge of speed dating came from cinema. It usually involved a down-on-her-luck hopeless romantic or a mature workaholic attempting to be more spontaneous in her dating life, sitting across from a montage of caricatures: the socially-challenged geek stumbling through his special interests; the arrogant businessman diverting most of his attention to his Blackberry; the pseudo-suave ladies’ man whose every word comes across rehearsed and saccharine.
Nevertheless, I was desperate for a good distraction. So we purchased tickets to an event for straight singles happening a few hours later.
Walking into Oldfield’s Liquor Room, I noticed that it looked like a normal bar, all dark wood and dim lighting. Except its patrons flanked the perimeter of the space, speaking in hushed tones, sizing up the opposite sex.
Suddenly in need of some liquid courage, we rushed back to the car to indulge in the shooters we bought on our way to the venue — three for $6. I had already surrendered $30 for my ticket and I was not paying for Los Angeles-priced cocktails. Ten minutes later, we were ready to mingle.
The bar’s back patio was decked out with tea lights and potted palm plants. House-pop music put me in a groove as I perused the picnic tables covered with conversation starters like “What’s your favorite sexual position?” Half-amused and half-horrified, I decided to use my own material.
We found our seats as the host began introductions. Each date would last two minutes — a chime would alert the men when it was time to move clockwise to the next seat. I exchanged hopeful glances with the women around me.
The bell rang, and I felt my buzz subside in spades as my first date sat down. This was really happening.
Soft brown eyes greeted me. He was polite and responsive, giving adequate answers to my questions but rarely returning the inquiry. I sensed he was looking through me and not at me, as if he had decided I wasn’t his type and was biding his time until the bell rang. I didn’t take it personally.
Bachelor No. 2 stood well over six feet with caramel-brown hair and emerald eyes. He oozed confidence and warmth when he spoke about how healing from an accident a few years prior inspired him to become a physical therapist.
I tried not to focus on how his story was nearly word-perfect to the one I heard him give the woman before me. He offered to show me a large surgery scar, rolling up his right sleeve to reveal the pale pink flesh — and a well-trained bicep. Despite his obvious good looks and small-town charm, something suspicious gnawed at me. I would later learn he had left the same effect on most of the women.
My nose received Bachelor No. 3 before my eyes. His spiced cologne quickly engulfing my senses. He had a larger-than-life presence, seeming to be a character himself, so I asked for his favorite current watch.
“I love ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty,’” he actually said.
“Really?”
“Oh yeah, it’s my favorite. Oh, and ‘Wednesday.’ You kinda have this Wednesday Addams vibe going on.”
I was completely thrown to hear this 40-something man’s favorite programs centered around teenage girls, and by his standards, I resembled one of them. Where was the host with the damn bell?
Although a few conversations clearly left impressions, most of the dates morphed into remnants of information like fintech, middle sibling, allergic to cats, etc. Perhaps two minutes was too short to spark genuine chemistry.
After a quick lap around the post-date mingling, we practically raced to the car. A millisecond after the doors closed, my friend said, “I think I’m going to call him.” I knew she wasn’t referring to any of the men we met tonight. The last few hours were all in vain. “And you should call Jesse.”
I scoffed at her audacity.
When I arrived home and called him, it only rang once.
The following three hours of witty banter and cheeky innuendos were bliss until the call ended on a low note, and I remembered why I tried speed dating in the first place.
Jesse and I had great chemistry but were ultimately incompatible. He preferred living life within his comfort zone while I craved adventure and variety. He couldn’t see past right now, and I was too busy planning the future to live in the moment.
Still, in a three-hour call, long before the topic of commitment soured things, we laughed at the mundanity of our day, traded wildest dreams for embarrassing anecdotes, and voiced amorous intentions that would make Aphrodite’s cheeks heat.
Why couldn’t I have had a conversation like that with someone at the event?
It’s possible I was hoping to find the perfect replica of my relationship with Jesse. But when I had the opportunity to meet someone new, I reserved my humor and my empathy.
Also, despite knowing Jesse and I weren’t a good match, I thought we had a “chance connection” that I needed to protect. In reality, if I had shown up to speed dating as my complete self, that would have been more than enough to stir sparks with a new flame.
It would be several more weeks before I was ready to release my attachment to Jesse. But when I did, I had a better appreciation for myself and my capacity for love.
The author is a multidisciplinary writer and mother based in Encino.
L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@latimes.com. You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.
Editor’s note: On April 3, L.A. Affairs Live, our new storytelling competition show, will feature real dating stories from people living in the Greater Los Angeles area. Tickets for our first event will be on sale starting Tuesday.
Lifestyle
In reversal, Warner Bros. jilts Netflix for Paramount
Warner Bros. Discovery said Thursday that it prefers the latest offer from rival Hollywood studio Paramount over a bid it accepted from Netflix.
Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg
hide caption
toggle caption
Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Bloomberg
The Warner Bros. Discovery board announced late Thursday afternoon that Paramount’s sweetened bid to buy the entire company is “superior” to an $83 billion deal it had struck with Netflix for the purchase of its streaming services, studios, and intellectual property.
Netflix says it is pulling out of the contest rather than try to top Paramount’s offer.
“We’ve always been disciplined, and at the price required to match Paramount Skydance’s latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive, so we are declining to match the Paramount Skydance bid,” the streaming giant said in a statement.
Warner had rejected so many offers from Paramount that it seemed as though it would be a fruitless endeavor. Speaking on the red carpet for the BAFTA film awards last weekend, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos dared Paramount to stop making its case publicly and start ponying up cash.
‘If you wanna try and outbid our deal … just make a better deal. Just put a better deal on the table,” Sarandos told the trade publication Deadline Hollywood.
Netflix promised that Warner Bros. would operate as an independent studio and keep showing its movies in theaters.
But the political realities, combined with Paramount’s owners’ relentless drive to expand their entertainment holdings, seem to have prevailed.
Paramount previously bid for all of Warner — including its cable channels such as CNN, TBS, and Discovery — in a deal valued at $108 billion. Earlier this week, Paramount unveiled a fresh proposal increasing its bid by a dollar a share.
On Thursday, hours before the Warner announcement, Sarandos headed to the White House to meet Trump administration officials to make his case for the deal.

The meetings, leaked Wednesday to political and entertainment media outlets, were confirmed by a White House official who spoke on condition he not be named, as he was not authorized to speak about them publicly.
President Trump was not among those who met with Sarandos, the official said.
While Netflix’s courtship of Warner stirred antitrust concerns, the Paramount deal is likely to face a significant antitrust review from the U.S. Justice Department, given the combination of major entertainment assets. Paramount owns CBS and the streamer Paramount Plus, in addition to Comedy Central, Nickelodeon and other cable channels.
The offer from Paramount CEO David Ellison relies on the fortune of his father, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison. And David Ellison has argued to shareholders that his company would have a smoother path to regulatory approval.
Not unnoticed: the Ellisons’ warm ties to Trump world.

Larry Ellison is a financial backer of the president.
David Ellison was photographed offering a MAGA-friendly thumbs-up before the State of the Union address with one of the president’s key Congressional allies: U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a Republican.
Trump has praised changes to CBS News made under David Ellison’s pick for editor in chief, Bari Weiss.
The chair of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, told Semafor Wednesday that he was pleased by the news division’s direction under Weiss. She has criticized much of the mainstream media as being too reflexively liberal and anti-Trump.

“I think they’re doing a great job,” Carr said at a Semafor conference on trust and the media Wednesday. As Semafor noted, Carr previously lauded CBS by saying it “agreed to return to more fact-based, unbiased reporting.”
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology6 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making