Connect with us

Lifestyle

A completely subjective ranking of Los Angeles neighborhoods by walkability

Published

on

A completely subjective ranking of Los Angeles neighborhoods by walkability

Admit it, you’re here because you want to see how walkable your favorite (or least favorite, I suppose) L.A. neighborhood is. You want bragging rights, you want your biases confirmed, you want a totally unscientific, more than a little opinionated ranking of Los Angeles neighborhoods by walkability. And we’re here to give it to you.

L.A. really is a walking city.
Explore our ground-level guide to the people and places keeping our sidewalks alive.

Why unscientific? For starters because those kinds of number-crunching rankings already exist in urban planning master’s degree projects and on apartment-rental websites such as walkscore.com. And let’s face it, while data tells a story, it doesn’t tell the whole story.

Advertisement

That’s why I put together this list: to highlight the things that make walking in a neighborhood, and in our dear city, especially unique. Those include celebrity adjacency (Will I see someone famous?), L.A.-ness (Is there an instantly-recognizable palm-tree dotted backdrop?), pedestrian density (If I saw someone walking here, would I immediately suspect something’s amok?). I also consulted many a friend and colleague — folks who’ve actually lived in these neighborhoods.

Finally, as an Angeleno who’s lived here for 27 years and likes to explore the city on foot after a few drinks (or a puff or two of the herb), I took a few — how shall I put it? — personal liberties. In short, this is my highly particular list. Perhaps you have one of your own?

Be forewarned: This is not an exhaustive overview (L.A. is big! And many neighborhoods are mostly residential.) but one that touches on the four least- and most-walkable neighborhoods (at the top and bottom of the list, respectively), along with some handpicked in-betweens you’re probably familiar with.

Illustrated black Prada platform loafer shoes
Swan Lake at the entrance to the Hotel Bel-Air located at 701 Stone Canyon Road in Los Angeles.

(Al Seib / Los Angeles Times)

18. Bel-Air
It’s a fact: L.A.’s wealthiest neighborhoods are, for the most part, the least pedestrian-friendly, more concerned with privacy hedges than the safe passage of foot traffic. Exhibit A: this sidewalk-free enclave where people once, presumably, moved about without vehicular assistance, but no longer seem to. I’ve never once seen a pedestrian here. Nor have I met anyone who has. Are there celebrities to be found on these icy manicured streets? Undoubtedly, but chances are you won’t have the opportunity to lay eyes on the likes of Rupert Murdoch (who recently tied the knot at his winery here), Joni Mitchell or Jennifer Lopez. Unless, that is, you’re a paparazzo who’s specifically called on to do so. Oh, and don’t bother looking for the original “Fresh Prince” house either. That’s actually in Brentwood.

Advertisement
A hiker at Inspiration Point in Will Rogers State Historic Park in Pacific Palisades.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

17. Pacific Palisades
No one walks to — or from — anywhere in the Palisades. And, if anybody looks like they’re walking, it’s probably because they’ve just parked the car or are popping from one store to the next at Rick Caruso’s Palisades Village. I walked here — just once — and felt like I was sporting the scarlet letter (“P” for pedestrian, naturally) the entire time. And what good is a stretch of coastline if you can’t walk there without taking your life in your hands? Even so, the neighborhood has plenty of idyllic, Californian backdrops and its fair share of celebrity residents. You could easily find yourself next to a soup-slurping Cheech Marin at Casa Nostra Ristorante or crossing paths with Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson, who have a house here.

Drone view overlooking the Hollywood sign in Griffith Park in Los Angeles.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

16. Hollywood Hills
A rabbit warren of steep, narrow, twisty streets and near-total lack of sidewalks make foot traffic in most of this hilly neighborhood not just challenging but downright dangerous. And, since it’s overwhelmingly residential, places — other than hillside homes — to walk to and from are all but nonexistent. While plenty of celebs call the hills home, your best bet at laying eyes on a star is to find a spot where you can gaze out at the Hollywood sign on nearby Mt. Lee in Beachwood Canyon. (P.S.: No one likes to admit it, but there’s also a serious rat problem in them there hills. And the last thing I want to worry about if I’m trying to outrun a rapacious rodent is dodging traffic.)

A couple walking in Elysian Park

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

15. Elysian Park
Notably home to two things: Dodger Stadium — itself so inaccessible on foot that there has been a years-long effort to build a gondola to ferry people there from Union Station — as well as the neighborhood’s namesake 600-acre park, which may put it toward the top of a strollability index. But as far as access to shopping and dining options, not so much (the seasonal Dodger Dog notwithstanding).

Rodeo Drive shopping mall

(Al Seib / Los Angeles Times)

14. Beverly Hills
A dense concentration of high-profile places to go and things to do in the Golden Triangle certainly make this swanky slice of Greater L.A. seem walkable. Which it is — up to a point. But most of Beverly Hills is, well, hills. North of Sunset Boulevard and the part known as “the flats” are mostly residential, so neither really lend themselves to robust pedestrian traffic. The only thing that keeps it from ranking worse on the list is that you’d be hard-pressed to find a better backdrop for the socials than the shops of Rodeo Drive. Case in point: I recently watched a a young influencer-type stick her smartphone to the front window of the Gucci boutique— literally, using some sort of suction cup phone case — so she could step back and beam her whereabouts to TikTok.

A view of Sua in the neighborhood of Larchmont in Los Angeles

(Shelby Moore / For The Times)

13. Larchmont/Hancock Park
It pains me to give one of my favorite neighborhoods in the entire city a sub-par rank but the delightful meander that is two bustling blocks of Larchmont Boulevard isn’t enough to offset the quick transition into full residential territory just a block in either direction. But if you are strolling that one lovely thoroughfare, be on the lookout for Kiernan Shipka, who likes to grab her coffee at Go Get Em Tiger, or Emma Roberts, who stocks up on periodicals at the newstand there. The farmers market, held on Wednesdays and Sundays, isn’t bad either.

Advertisement
Fountains in Grand Park in Los Angeles

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

12. Downtown L.A.
I have a theory: Downtown L.A. ranks near the top of a lot of walkability rankings because it’s just expected that a dense urban core that serves as a major transit hub would, by default, be a great place for people to live their best car-free lives. But here we’re grading on a curve — and factoring in the reality that the same place where we can easily dash out on foot to grab a French dip sandwich or take in the symphony is also a place filled with enough dark alleys, vacant storefronts and litter-strewn sidewalks to make the on-foot feel on guard after dark.

Street scene on Western Avenue in Koreatown

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

11. Koreatown
This is a neighborhood that ticks all the boxes for walkability — it’s densely packed with shopping and dining options (like a lot of delicious dining options), it’s easily navigable on foot, and parking is so scarce, having a car is more a liability than an asset. But it’s densely populated too, and that combination of pedestrian traffic and the cars zooming along the main arteries of Wilshire and Olympic boulevards and Third Street, take a little bloom off the rose.

Edo by Edoardo Baldi at The Grove in Los Angeles

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

10. Beverly Grove/Fairfax
The Grove shopping center, the Original Farmers Market, LACMA and the Academy Museum combine to give this part of Mid-City a solid score. The biggest hurdle here — literally in some cases — are the handful of root-busted, near impassable sidewalks. The only thing more quintessentially L.A. than posing for a photo in front of Chris Burden’s “Urban Light” installation (in front of LACMA) is doing it in a room full of Oscar statuettes at the Academy Museum next door. This is also where you’ll be able to amble through the grassy greenspace around the La Brea Tar Pits (super fun when you’re a little baked, BTW) where gooey asphalt can be seen bubbling up and oozing out of the ground, thick and smelling like a freshly resurfaced roadway. An alluring, distinctly Angeleno perfume, if I’ve ever smelled one.

Tourists checking out the stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)

9. Hollywood
Out of necessity — and opportunity — there’s a direct correlation between tourist popularity and walkability in L.A. neighborhoods. That puts Hollywood in the top half of this list — but just barely. It’s pedestrian-heavy and mass-transit-accessible with something to eat, buy or take a photo of at nearly every turn. Though A-list celebs are usually in short supply (but for the occasional movie premiere or awards show), there are legions of spider-folk, Jack Sparrows and other costumed characters along Hollywood Boulevard who will gladly play the part (for a “donation,” of course). And, no matter how skilled a driver you are, you’ll never be able to explore the Hollywood Walk of Fame from behind the wheel.

Unfortunately, the same draws that make it a walkable gawk for touristas of every stripe makes it a frustrating exercise in perambulation for locals — kind of like New York’s Times Square with balmier weather. A lot of the shops traffic in tacky souvenirs and most of the eateries are of the soggy pizza sort (beloved old-school Musso & Frank’s the rare exception). And, statistically, when you get that many people prowling the sidewalks, the chances for shenanigans are high. That’s how I found myself (in a somewhat altered state, I’ll admit) being screamed at — and I mean screamed at — by a ghoulish-looking clown in full face paint as we passed each other in a Hollywood Boulevard crosswalk.

The Culver City EverWalk Walking Club

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

8. Culver City
If you don’t immediately think of Culver City as walkable, it’s probably because you’ve only driven through it on the way to somewhere else. In addition to myriad dining and shopping options that are thickest where Washington, Culver and Venice boulevards intersect, there are also a few pieces of walk-by Hollywood history. One is the wedge-shaped Culver Hotel — where the actors who played the Munchkins stayed during the filming of “The Wizard of Oz,” and the Washington Boulevard entrance to Culver Studios, which can be seen in the opening titles of “Gone With the Wind.” A cliché photo op? Perhaps. But frankly, I don’t give a damn.

Hungry customers in line at Villa's Tacos in Highland Park

(Mariah Tauger / Los Angeles Times)

7. Highland Park
There’s a reason why L.A.’s legendary Bob Baker’s Marionette Theater decamped to Highland Park in 2019. Not only does it sit on York Street across from a children’s playground with a rattlesnake slide, but it’s also on the edge of a bustling commercial stretch where you can find gourmet bagels, lengua tacos at low prices and delightful trinkets for nearly every person in your life. The flow of pedestrian traffic is strong day and night both here and on Figueroa Street (where you can also access the Metro A Line). If you hang around enough, you might even pass by an NELA-dwelling celebrity or two (my colleagues have spotted the likes of John C. Reilly and Eric Warheim in these parts).

People walking around Echo Park Lake in Los Angeles

(Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times)

6. Echo Park
The crown jewel of this neighborhood — and the big pedestrian draw — is Echo Park Lake, where walking one loop will get you about a mile closer to your step goal (and it’s especially beautiful during lotus season). But that’s not all that makes this a good place to forgo your four-wheeled transportation; there’s also the vibrant, explorable bend in Sunset Boulevard that runs from Taix to to Quarter Sheets (past El Prado and the Time Travel Mart) and the stretch of Echo Park Avenue just north of Sunset (look for the mural-covered buildings at the corner) that takes you toward the Echo Park outpost of Jon & Vinny’s Cookbook market.

Advertisement

You might think that bordering the not-so-walkable Elysian Park (see above) would negatively impact Echo Park’s walkability, but several of my colleagues assure me it’s actually the opposite — using it as a kind of pedestrian base camp for a 20-minute walk to Dodger Stadium (gondola plans be damned). The one thing that does cut into the walkability (or at least some of the enjoyment of walking) around these parts are the steepness of some of the streets as they rise toward the hills north of Sunset.

The Swan Stairs zig-zag up the hillside from Westerly Terrace to Swan Place in Silver Lake.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

5. Silver Lake
The meat in Silver Lake’s walkabilty sandwich is Sunset Junction, where Santa Monica and Sunset boulevards converge and there’s plenty for pedestrians to peruse, including Mohawk General Store and Taiwanese noodle shop Pine & Crane, a twice-weekly farmers market and one of the best Erewhons to people-watch in. Bonus: There’s also the Silver Lake Reservoir — for that kind of walking — and some serious cardio-elevating staircases in the mix, including the historic Music Box Steps, made famous by the silent-film comedy duo Laurel and Hardy in the 1930s.

The Los Feliz Theatre

(Glenn Koenig / Los Angeles Times)

4. Los Feliz
What gives this neighborhood the walkability edge over its seemingly similar neighbors? Two retail- and restaurant-heavy streets for starters — Hillhurst and Vermont Avenues, home to a pedestrian-pleasing assortment of restaurants, (Little Dom’s), bars (Ye Rustic for some of the best chicken wings in the city, the so-hip-it-hurts Dresden Room bar and lounge for martinis and some live music) and shops (Skylight Books for the printed word). Keep your eyes peeled because you could easily find yourself downward dogging next to Sandra Oh in a Pilates class or bump into Aaron Paul at Albertsons. This urban walker’s paradise also gets extra points because of its location — right at the base of Griffith Park — making it a gateway, nay a biped’s launchpad, into one of the largest urban parks in North America.

Advertisement
People are entertained by a magician as they enjoy a sunny day at the Santa Monica Pier.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

3. Santa Monica
Thank the 10 million tourists that trek to the pier here for helping make the city — particularly the stretch along Ocean Avenue and the three car-free blocks of the Third Street Promenade — among the Southland’s most walkable. It gets extra points for the pedestrian bridges over the bustling Pacific Coast Highway that help folks get safely from the shops-and-restaurants part of town to the beach. Pro tip: Leave the pier and its immediate surroundings to the out-of-towners and channel your pedestrian energy on the less-trafficked, local parts of town. (There are plenty — Wilshire and Pico boulevards east of Lincoln Boulevard and stretches of Montana Avenue for starters.) Grab dinner at nearby old-school haunt Chez Jay or head a little farther afield for a knee-wobbling mai tai at the Galley. When you leave you’ll be happy you arrived on foot.

A surfer walking on the Venice Beach Boardwalk

(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

2. Venice
Another tourist-heavy, pedestrian-friendly part of town — with a view of the Pacific Ocean thrown in for good measure. You might need to get here by car, but the sooner you ditch it in a (probably overpriced) parking spot the better. That frees you up to dip into the human soup of the boardwalk for people-watching at its finest: pigeon-training, python-handling carnies, vendors who can write your name on a grain of rice or balance your chakras. (During one visit, I spent the better part of a half-hour doing nothing but watching a guy dressed like an escapee from a “Where’s Waldo?” book — bold-red-and-white-striped shirt, black knit cap, skinny-leg jeans — popping in and out of shops.) Who knows, you might even glimpse Arnold Schwarzenegger or Owen Wilson pedal past you on a bike.

From the strand it’s a win-win for the walking class no matter the direction, thanks to a wide swath of sandy beach and the mighty Pacific on one side and quaint, artsy neighborhoods with mural-covered walls and funky yarn art trees on the other. Another short stroll to the Venice Canals can transport you seemingly worlds away to a network of European-style canals and past a magical, people-powered carousel for kids — neither of which are accessible by car.

Advertisement
Illustrated pair of golden, sparkling new balance tennis shoes
A couple holding hands in West Hollywood

(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)

1. West Hollywood
I’ll admit it — I’m wildly biased about WeHo’s walkability for a couple of reasons. It was the the first place I lived when I moved to town more than a quarter-century ago and it was here — in a liquor store at the corner of Sunset Boulevard and Larrabee Street — that I had my very first celebrity sighting (“Goodfellas” actor Paul Sorvino eating a powdered donut). That felt like peak walkability — the original Spago, Tower Records, the Viper Room and Whiskey a Go Go all within walking (and occasionally stumbling) distance of each other. And the assortment of walkable wonderment has only increased in the years since. In addition to the dense concentration of places to eat and drink (heavily clustered along Sunset and Santa Monica boulevards) that make this a pedestrian-friendly destination any time of day and late into the night, this compact neighborhood/city , is home to five of the county’s six open cannabis consumption lounges — most clustered along a two-mile stretch of Santa Monica Boulevard. Being able to light up a joint at a place like the leafy jungle oasis that is the Woods (the dispensary and weed lounge co-owned by Woody Harrelson) or grab dinner and a bong hit at the sex-shop-adjacent PleasureMed and not have to climb behind the wheel makes West Hollywood the unbeatable holy grail of L.A. neighborhood walkability — and the recipient of the most vaunted honor of this unscientific endeavor: a pair of golden sneakers.

Standalone illustration of a person walking

Lifestyle

‘How to Rule the World’ explores education and power at Stanford University

Published

on

‘How to Rule the World’ explores education and power at Stanford University

Students walk on the Stanford University campus on March 14, 2019, in Stanford, Calif.

Ben Margot/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ben Margot/AP

When Theo Baker arrived at Stanford University a few years ago, he joined the student newspaper, following the path of his journalist parents, Peter Baker, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, and Susan Glasser, a writer for The New Yorker.

Through his reporting as a student journalist, he eventually broke a story about manipulated data in Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne’s neuroscience research that helped lead to the university president’s resignation.

Theo Baker’s book, How to Rule the World: An Education in Power at Stanford University was released May 19. In it, Baker describes Stanford as a place where proximity to Silicon Valley gives rise to a parallel system of influence, recruitment and money, with investors looking to identify promising students almost as soon as they arrive on campus.

Advertisement

He told Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep there was “a sort of Stanford inside Stanford,” where elite students are drawn into an “alternate reality” of excess and access to cut corners.

In the interview, he discusses how Stanford is not just a university but also a pipeline where status and power can matter as much as ideas.

We reached out to Stanford University for comment and have not heard back.

Listen to the interview by clicking play on the blue box above.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

OTB Takes Full Control of Viktor & Rolf

Published

on

OTB Takes Full Control of Viktor & Rolf
The Italian fashion group behind Diesel and Maison Margiela is taking full ownership of the avant-garde haute couture house, acquiring the remaining 30 percent it didn’t already own. Founders Viktor Horsting and Rolf Snoeren remain creative directors.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

How having zero points in tennis — or ‘love’ — came to sound so sweet

Published

on

How having zero points in tennis — or ‘love’ — came to sound so sweet

The scoreboard shows the results of the women’s singles final match between Iga Swiatek of Poland and Amanda Anisimova of the U.S. at the Wimbledon Tennis Championships in London, Saturday, July 12, 2025.

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP

Fifteen points in tennis? Nice. Thirty, 40 — even better. Advantage — that sounds good. “Love” — that also must be great, right? Well, not quite.

As the French Open rolls on and Serena Williams has announced her return to the sport, maybe you’ve been paying a little more attention to tennis. The sport’s scoring system is notably distinct, and can sometimes be hard to grasp for newcomers. But even tennis aficionados might not know why, or how, “love” became the unmistakable callout for zero points. For this installment of NPR’s Word of the Week, we’re exploring how a word that signifies trailing behind got such a sweet name.

“Love” comes from the heart — or an egg?

It’s hard to pinpoint when the first tennis ball went over the net. Tennis is a derivative of lots of other sports, such as “jeu de paume,” a handball game played in France, said JT Buzanga, the collections manager at the International Tennis Hall of Fame museum.

Advertisement

But tennis became a patented, official sport in 1874, said Steve Flink, a journalist whose tennis coverage got him inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame. It has retained its unique, mysterious scoring system ever since.

“By and large, the original system has held up almost entirely,” Flink said.

The use of “love” goes back to the late 18th century, said Jesse Sheidlower, a lexicographer. But it was used earlier than that in card games such as whist and bridge. Before the term made its way to tennis, the sport favored plain old “nothing,” or “nil,” he said.

Why love in the first place, though? Historians don’t really know for sure, but there are a few theories.

The French could have something to do with it. Some historians believe “love” derives from “l’oeuf,” which means “the egg” in French. Because eggs are shaped like zeros, terms such as “goose egg” and “duck’s egg” have been used in other contexts to mean zero, Sheidlower said.

Advertisement

It’s also possible English speakers mispronounced l’oeuf as “love.” But Sheidlower isn’t convinced that’s the answer.

“It’s the French equivalent of an English expression. But since that expression doesn’t appear in French, the French word wouldn’t have been used,” he said.

To be sure, France has had a lot of influence on tennis culture, Buzanga said. For example, “deuce” or a game tied at 40 points, comes from the French word for “two”: “deux.” But he prefers another prominent theory: that “love” comes from the idiom “for the love of the game.” Even if a player hasn’t scored, it doesn’t matter, because their heart is in it. It’s the theory Sheidlower said is the most plausible, because the idiom was used by the English before tennis was popularized.

Another variation of the “love of the game” theory is that the word could have come from the Dutch “lof,” or “honor” — or the Latin “amare,” meaning “to love,” Flink said.

But if tennis’ “love” doesn’t come from a French word, the theory at least has a French sensibility.

Advertisement

“I think the ‘for the love of the game’ is kind of romantic,” Buzanga said.

“Love” probably isn’t going anywhere

Tennis used to be a sport of leisure. The style of play has changed a lot over the years; players are more athletic and competitive, for instance, Flink said. But the rules of the sport are more steadfast, he said.

“There’s this incredible, enduring respect for tradition in tennis,” he said. “Changes are not made easily.”

There has been one major change in modern history: the tie-break. Matches can go on and on because players have to score two consecutive points to break a deuce, or by two games to break a tied set. But the onset of television meant matches would have to get shorter if the sport wanted to capture a larger audience, Flink said.

Change even came for “love.” An alternative sprouted up in the 1970s, and is still used today: “bagel,” named for its zero shape, Sheidlower said. Novices may say “zero,” and insiders will understand what they mean, but they “will needle them about it,” Flink said.

Advertisement

But “love” still prevails.

“People kind of like it,” Flink said. “It’s different. Why say zero when you can say love?”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending