Connect with us

Health

Trump Administration Begins Layoffs at CDC, FDA and Other Health Agencies

Published

on

Trump Administration Begins Layoffs at CDC, FDA and Other Health Agencies

The Trump administration laid off thousands of federal health workers on Tuesday in a purge that included senior leaders and top scientists charged with regulating food and drugs, protecting Americans from disease and researching new treatments and cures.

Layoff notices began arriving at 5 a.m., workers said, affecting offices responsible for everything from global health to food safety. Senior officials based in the Washington area and Atlanta were reassigned to the Indian Health Service and asked to choose among locations including Alaska, Oklahoma and New Mexico — a tactic to force people out, employees said.

The layoffs and reassignments touch every aspect of the federal Department of Health and Human Services, and are part of what the administration has said is a vast restructuring of the agency. Entire units focused on reproductive health and preventing gun injuries were wiped out. So was a vaccine research program aimed at preventing the next pandemic.

On Tuesday afternoon, Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana and chairman of the Senate health committee, summoned Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to testify about the agency reorganization at a hearing on April 10.

Outside experts and former officials said the loss of expertise was immeasurable. Many described it as a “bloodletting.” Hundreds of people, many carrying handmade signs, gathered in the lobby of a National Cancer Institute building in the Maryland suburbs on Tuesday morning to witness the exodus of fired workers, but were dispersed so they could walk out without fanfare. Some employees, both current and former, were in tears.

Advertisement

But as staff members reeled and comforted one another, Mr. Kennedy posted a video on social media that showed him swearing in the new heads of the Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Martin A. Makary, and the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“Welcome aboard,” Mr. Kennedy said. “The revolution begins today.”

The cuts were intended to fulfill Mr. Kennedy’s plan, announced last week, to shrink his department from 82,000 to 62,000 employees. Tuesday’s layoffs affected 10,000 employees, on top of 10,000 who had already been fired or left voluntarily. The department did not respond to a request for comment on the record.

The restructuring is intended to bring communications and other functions directly under Mr. Kennedy, who has vowed to “make America healthy again.” It includes collapsing a number of agencies into a new division called the Administration for a Healthy America. Mr. Kennedy said last week that the department was “going to do more with less.”

Jessica C. Henry, 40, said she had been fired along with her entire team of communications and health education specialists at the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, a small branch of the National Institutes of Health with a budget of about $500 million. Their work focused on educating people about childhood dental health, including birth defects like cleft lips and palate, as well as water fluoridation and instructions on oral health maintenance as an aging adult.

Advertisement

Ms. Henry said she logged into her computer at her desk at N.I.H. headquarters in Maryland around 7 a.m., only to see an email notifying her of her termination.

“I also just feel so confused, and honestly kind of angry, because we hear a lot about how the administration wants to increase transparency,” she said in an emotional interview. “They want accountability to the American people for how their tax dollars are being spent. And from what I can tell, they just fired all of us who do that.”

Layoff notices began arriving at 5 a.m., workers said, affecting offices responsible for everything from global health to medical devices to communications at agencies including the F.D.A., the N.I.H. and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Mr. Kennedy is also eliminating entire but lesser known parts of his department, such as the Administration for Community Living, which supports programs that help older Americans and people with disabilities live independently. Advocates for disability rights say the cuts could deprive the most vulnerable Americans of housing, personal care and other services.

At the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, cuts hollowed out entire offices including the internal policy lab, the team that administers a national survey of drug use, an office of behavioral health equity, the contracts management division and all 10 regional offices, according to Miriam Delphin-Rittmon, the former assistant health secretary for mental health and substance use. She left the agency on Jan. 20 and has been hearing from former colleagues.

Advertisement

The policy lab was established as part of the 21st Century Cures Act, a law passed by Congress in 2016.

“It’s not clear really the strategy,” Ms. Delphin-Rittmon said. “Those are important content areas.”

The cuts also fell on senior leaders, including the director of the center for mental health services, Dr. Anita Everett, who was hired into a senior position at the agency during the first Trump administration, and Michelle Greenhalgh, the agency’s director of legislative affairs, according to multiple people with direct knowledge of the filings.

“Today was simply a tragedy,” said Michael T. Osterholm, who directs the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, and has advised presidents of both parties. “There is so much intellectual capital that literally got swept under the rug today in this country, and we are going to pay a price for this for years to come.”

Dr. Bhattacharya, on his first day of work, sent an email to staff saying the layoffs would “have a profound impact on key N.I.H. administrative functions, including communications, legislative affairs, procurement and human resources.” He expressed his appreciation for the “scientists and staff whose work has contributed to lifesaving breakthroughs in biology and medicine.”

Advertisement

A number of top health officials received notice that they were being reassigned to regional offices of the Indian Health Service, which is responsible for providing federal health services to Native Americans and Alaska Natives.

At N.I.H., several institute directors — including Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the institute formerly led by Dr. Anthony S. Fauci — were reassigned. So were Dr. Fauci’s wife, Christine Grady, the head of the N.I.H. Office of Bioethics, and Dr. Clifford Lane, a close ally of Dr. Fauci’s who oversaw clinical research.

At the F.D.A., the top tobacco regulator, Brian King, was reassigned. At the C.D.C., several leaders, including Kayla Laserson, who ran the global health center, also were reassigned to the Indian Health Service.

The health service is chronically understaffed and underfunded; the reassignment notices said it has an “untenable vacancy rate” of 30 percent. Mr. Kennedy recently lamented that it has been “treated as the redheaded stepchild at H.H.S.” and said President Trump wants him to “rectify this sad history.”

Those who received the reassignments were given until Wednesday to decide whether to accept the offer, or leave their jobs.

Advertisement

Some workers knew that they would be affected by the layoffs. At the department headquarters in Washington, officials responsible for minority health and infectious disease prevention were told Friday that their offices were being eliminated, according to employees.

Others were caught off guard. At the F.D.A., senior leaders were pushed out and offices focused on food, drug and medical device policy were hit with deep staff reductions amounting to about 3,500 agency staff members. On Friday, the agency’s top vaccine regulator, Dr. Peter Marks, was forced to resign under pressure. He lashed out at Mr. Kennedy afterward, saying the secretary “doesn’t care about the truth.”

Some F.D.A. workers said that they discovered they had been fired when they attempted to scan their badges to get into the building early Tuesday. The office of the center director for veterinary medicine was wiped out, according to a person familiar with the cuts. That included veterinarians leading bird flu response for the agency.

Employees of several F.D.A. labs around the United States were also let go, including those who test medical products in Detroit and San Juan, Puerto Rico, and those who test food in San Francisco and Chicago.

“The F.D.A. as we’ve known it is finished, with most of the leaders with institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of product development and safety no longer employed,” Dr. Robert Califf, who ran the Food and Drug Administration during the Biden administration, wrote on social media. He said “history will see this” as “a huge mistake.”

Advertisement

At the C.D.C., which Mr. Kennedy wants to pare back to focus only on infectious disease, the reorganization is likely to have immediate effects. Offices devoted to the study of other programs, including reproductive health, chronic disease and gun violence prevention, were disbanded.

The administration has eliminated offices dedicated to protecting workers in various industries, including those that inspect mines for safety. A two-year project to study the effects of radiation was eliminated, as was an ongoing project on lead contamination in Milwaukee.

“These cuts to agency experts and programs leave our country less safe, less prepared and without the necessary talent and resources to respond to health threats,” Dr. Mandy Cohen, who led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the Biden administration, said in a text message.

Some infectious disease teams were also laid off. A group focused on improving access to vaccines among underserved communities was cut, as was a group of global health researchers who were working on preventing transmission of H.I.V. from mother to child.

H.I.V. prevention was a big target overall. The Trump administration had been weighing moving the C.D.C.’s division of H.I.V. prevention to a different agency within the health department. But on Tuesday, teams leading H.I.V. surveillance and research within that division were laid off. It was unclear whether some of those functions would be recreated elsewhere.

Advertisement

Employees laid off at the agency included those studying injuries, asthma, lead poisoning, smoking and radiation damage, as well as those that assess the health effects of extreme heat and wildfires.

Communications offices were hit particularly hard across agencies including the N.I.H., C.D.C. and F.D.A. Renate Myles, the communications director at the National Institutes of Health, received a notice of reassignment. At the C.D.C., specialists in tuberculosis communications and education were laid off.

Mr. Kennedy, who promised “radical transparency,” has said he wants to consolidate communications under his purview.

The H.H.S. “is centralizing communications across the department to ensure a more coordinated and effective response to public health challenges, ultimately benefiting the American taxpayer,” Emily Hilliard, deputy press secretary for the department, said in an email on Friday.

But other divisions responsible for providing the public with information were hit, too.

Advertisement

The team that responds to Freedom of Information Act requests at the C.D.C. was eliminated, and a similar team at the F.D.A. was deeply cut, according to sources familiar with each office. They spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal.

Processing such requests is required by law, but can be a painstaking process, given rules requiring the redaction of information such as a company’s trade secrets.

Benjamin Mueller, Gina Kolata, Aishvarya Kavi and Margot Sanger-Katz contributed reporting.

Health

The Latest on Natural Ozempic Alternatives: How To Lose Weight Without GLP-1s

Published

on

The Latest on Natural Ozempic Alternatives: How To Lose Weight Without GLP-1s


Advertisement




Natural Ozempic Alternatives That Boost GLP-1 for Weight Loss | Woman’s World




















Advertisement





Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

Punch the monkey, viral star, experiences dramatic breakthrough among zoo mates

Published

on

Punch the monkey, viral star, experiences dramatic breakthrough among zoo mates

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In a dramatic turn of events that’s captured the attention of animal lovers worldwide, Punch — the young macaque at a zoo in Japan famous for his inseparable bond with a stuffed orangutan toy — has reached a major milestone in his journey toward social integration.

On Thursday, visitors and staff at the Ichikawa Zoological and Botanical Garden witnessed a breakthrough: Punch was seen cuddling with and hitching a ride on the back of a fellow macaque.

Punch’s story began with hardship. He was abandoned by his mother shortly after his birth in July 2025 — and to ensure his survival, zookeepers stepped in to hand-rear the primate.

On Jan. 19, 2026, the zoo officially began the process of reintegrating Punch into the “monkey mountain” enclosure.

Advertisement

The transition was initially fraught with tension. 

Punch’s story began with hardship when he was abandoned by his mother shortly after he was born. To help him, zookeepers gave him a stuffed toy that he began dragging around everywhere he went.  (David Mareuil/Anadolu via Getty Images)

As a hand-reared infant, Punch was bullied and ignored by the established group of monkeys.

He was often seen huddled alone with his orange plush companion while the rest of the troop interacted.

BABY MONKEY CARRIES FAITHFUL STUFFED COMPANION EVERYWHERE HE GOES, DRAWING CROWDS AT ZOO

Advertisement

In an official statement released Feb. 27, the Ichikawa Zoological and Botanical Garden detailed the meticulous care behind this process.

Previous viral videos showed Punch bullied by the rest of the troop, running to his plushy toy for comfort. (David Mareuil/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“From an animal welfare perspective, our primary goal is to reintegrate Punch with the troop,” the zoo said. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES

The strategy involved nursing Punch within the enclosure, so the troop could recognize him as one of their own, and pairing him with a gentle young female macaque prior to his full release to build his confidence.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The latest footage, captured by X user @tate_gf, suggested the zoo’s patience is paying off. 

The video shows Punch seeking physical contact not from his toy, but from another monkey — eventually climbing onto its back for a vital social behavior for young macaques: the “piggyback ride.”

The zoo’s strategy appears to be paying off: Punch, shown at far left, was recently seen riding on the back of a fellow macaque. (David Mareuil/Anadolu via Getty Images)

While Punch still carries his stuffed toy for comfort during moments of perceived danger, the zoo remains optimistic about his progress. 

Advertisement

The organization cited the successful 2009 case of Otome, another hand-reared macaque who eventually outgrew her stuffed toy, successfully integrated — and went on to raise four offspring of her own.

The zoo has had crowds coming to see Punch, with hundreds of people lining up to get inside to see the young star, according to reports. 

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“I’m hoping Punch has a good life like everybody else does, and think he’s a cute little guy,” one person commented online. 

Advertisement

“Such a precious baby,” another person wrote. 

Related Article

Orphaned baby monkey finds comfort in stuffed animal after being abandoned by mother at birth
Continue Reading

Health

ChatGPT could miss your serious medical emergency, new study suggests

Published

on

ChatGPT could miss your serious medical emergency, new study suggests

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255).

Artificial intelligence has been touted as a boon to healthcare, but a new study has revealed its potential shortcomings when it comes to giving medical advice.

In January, OpenAI launched ChatGPT Health, the medical-focused version of the popular chatbot tool. 

The company introduced the tool as “a dedicated experience that securely brings your health information and ChatGPT’s intelligence together, to help you feel more informed, prepared and confident navigating your health.”

Advertisement

But researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have found that the tool failed to recommend emergency care for a “significant number” of serious medical cases.

The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine on Feb. 23, aimed to explore how ChatGPT Health — which is reported to have about 40 million users daily — handles situations where people are asking whether to seek emergency care.

Artificial intelligence has been touted as a boon to healthcare, but a new study has revealed its potential shortcomings when it comes to giving medical advice. (iStock)

“Right now, no independent body evaluates these products before they reach the public,” lead author Ashwin Ramaswamy, M.D., instructor of urology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, told Fox News Digital.

“We wouldn’t accept that for a medication or a medical device, and we shouldn’t accept it for a product that tens of millions of people are using to make health decisions.”

Advertisement

Emergency scenarios

The team created 60 clinical scenarios across 21 medical specialties, ranging from minor conditions to true medical emergencies.

Three independent physicians then assigned an appropriate level of urgency for each case, based on published clinical practice guidelines in 56 medical societies.

WOMAN SAYS CHATGPT SAVED HER LIFE BY HELPING DETECT CANCER, WHICH DOCTORS MISSED

The researchers conducted 960 interactions with ChatGPT Health to see how the tool responded, taking into account gender, race, barriers to care and “social dynamics.”

While “clear-cut emergencies” — such as stroke or severe allergy — were generally handled well, the researchers found that the tool “under-triaged” many urgent medical issues.  

Advertisement

The team created 60 clinical scenarios across 21 medical specialties, ranging from minor conditions to true medical emergencies. (iStock)

For example, in one asthma scenario, the system acknowledged that the patient was showing early signs of respiratory failure — but still recommended waiting instead of seeking emergency care.

“ChatGPT Health performs well in medium-severity cases, but fails at both ends of the spectrum — the cases where getting it right matters most,” Ramaswamy told Fox News Digital. “It under-triaged over half of genuine emergencies and over-triaged roughly two-thirds of mild cases that clinical guidelines say should be managed at home.”

PARENTS FILE LAWSUIT ALLEGING CHATGPT HELPED THEIR TEENAGE SON PLAN SUICIDE

Under-triage can be life-threatening, the doctor noted, while over-triage can overwhelm emergency departments and delay care for those in real need.

Advertisement

Researchers also identified inconsistencies in suicide risk alerts. In some cases, it directed users to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline in lower-risk scenarios, and in others, it failed to offer that recommendation even when a person discussed suicidal ideations.

“ChatGPT Health performs well in medium-severity cases, but fails at both ends of the spectrum.”

“The suicide guardrail failure was the most alarming,” study co-author Girish N. Nadkarni, M.D., chief AI officer of the Mount Sinai Health System, told Fox News Digital.

ChatGPT Health is designed to show a crisis intervention banner when someone describes thoughts of self-harm, the researcher noted.

OpenAI launched ChatGPT Health, the medical-focused version of the popular chatbot tool, in January 2026. (Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

“We tested it with a 27-year-old patient who said he’d been thinking about taking a lot of pills,” Nadkarni said. “When he described his symptoms alone, the banner appeared 100% of the time. Then we added normal lab results — same patient, same words, same severity — and the banner vanished.” 

“A safety feature that works perfectly in one context and completely fails in a nearly identical context … is a fundamental safety problem.”

CHATGPT HEALTH PROMISES PRIVACY FOR HEALTH CONVERSATIONS

The researchers were also surprised by the social influence aspect.

“When a family member in the scenario said ‘it’s nothing serious’ — which happens all the time in real life — the system became nearly 12 times more likely to downplay the patient’s symptoms,” Nadkarni said. “Everyone has a spouse or parent who tells them they’re overreacting. The AI shouldn’t be agreeing with them during a potential emergency.”

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Open AI, creator of ChatGPT, requesting comment.

Physicians react

Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst, called the new study “important.” 

“It underlines the principle that while large language models can triage clear-cut emergencies, they have much more trouble with nuanced situations,” Siegel, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. 

ChatGPT and other LLMs can be helpful tools, a doctor said, but they “should not be used to give medical direction.” (iStock)

“This is where doctors and clinical judgment come in — knowing the nuances of a patient’s history and how they report symptoms and their approach to health.”

Advertisement

ChatGPT and other LLMs can be helpful tools, Siegel said, but they “should not be used to give medical direction.”

“Machine learning and continued input of data can help, but will never compensate for the essential problem – human judgment is needed to decide whether something is a true emergency or not.”

BREAKTHROUGH BLOOD TEST COULD SPOT DOZENS OF CANCERS BEFORE SYMPTOMS APPEAR

Dr. Harvey Castro, an emergency physician and AI expert in Texas, echoed the importance of the study, calling it “exactly the kind of independent safety evaluation we need.”

“Innovation moves fast. Oversight has to move just as fast,” Castro, who also did not work on the study, told Fox News Digital. “In healthcare, the most dangerous mistakes happen at the extremes, when something looks mild but is actually catastrophic. That’s where clinical judgment matters most, and where AI must be stress-tested.”

Advertisement

Study limitations

The researchers acknowledged some potential limitations in the study design.

“We used physician-written clinical scenarios rather than real patient conversations, and we tested at a single point in time — these systems update frequently, so performance may change,” Ramaswamy told Fox News Digital.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Additionally, most of the missed emergencies happened in situations where the danger depended on how the condition was changing over time. It’s not clear whether the same problem would happen with acute medical emergencies.

Because the system had to choose just one fixed urgency category, the test may not reflect the more nuanced advice it might give in a back-and-forth conversation, the researchers noted. 

Advertisement

ChatGPT Health is designed to show a crisis intervention banner when someone describes thoughts of self-harm. (iStock)

Also, the study wasn’t large enough to confidently detect small differences in how recommendations might vary by race or gender.

“We need continuous auditing, not one-time studies,” Castro noted. “These systems update frequently, so evaluation must be ongoing.”

‘Don’t wait’

The researchers emphasized the importance of seeking immediate care for serious issues.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

“If something feels seriously wrong — chest pain, difficulty breathing, a severe allergic reaction, thoughts of self-harm — go to the emergency department or call 988,” Ramaswamy advised. “Don’t wait for an AI to tell you it’s OK.”

The researchers noted that they support the use of AI to improve healthcare access, and that they didn’t conduct the study to “tear down the technology.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“These tools can be genuinely useful for the right things — understanding a diagnosis you’ve already received, looking up what your medications do and their side effects, or getting answers to questions that didn’t get fully addressed in a short doctor’s visit,” Ramaswamy said. 

“That’s a very different use case from deciding whether you need emergency care. Treat them as a complement to your doctor, not a replacement.”

Advertisement

“This study doesn’t mean we abandon AI in healthcare.”

Castro agreed that the benefits of AI health tools should be weighed against the risks.

“AI health tools can increase access, reduce unnecessary visits and empower patients with information,” he said. “They are not inherently unsafe, but they are not yet substitutes for clinical judgment.”

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“This study doesn’t mean we abandon AI in healthcare,” he went on. “It means we mature it. Independent testing and stronger guardrails will determine whether AI becomes a safety net or a liability.”

Advertisement

Related Article

ChatGPT dietary advice sends man to hospital with dangerous chemical poisoning
Continue Reading

Trending