Health
Cancer deaths and tax rates linked in surprising new study: Here's how

‘My dog detected my cancer before doctors did’
Breanna Bortner’s dog, Mochi, began fixating on her breast before she was diagnosed with stage 2B triple-negative breast cancer, showing unusual and intuitive behavior throughout her journey.
People who pay more in taxes could be less likely to die from cancer.
The link was revealed in a new study published in JAMA Network Open, which aimed to explore how state-level tax revenue impacts cancer screenings and mortality in the U.S.
Researchers from The Ohio State University, Emory University in Georgia and the University of Verona in Italy analyzed 1,150 state-years of tax data over a 23-year period, between 1997 and 2019. (A state-year refers to one year of data from one state.)
NEW PROSTATE CANCER TEST PINPOINTS DISEASE BETTER THAN PSA OPTION, STUDY FINDS
They also reviewed population-level cancer screening rates and cancer-related deaths from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) databases.
People who pay more in taxes could be less likely to die from cancer, according to a new study published in JAMA Network Open. (iStock)
The states with higher tax income were found to have increased cancer screening rates and decreased cancer mortality rates, the researchers found.
For each $1,000 increase in tax revenue per capita, the population had a 1.61% increase in colorectal cancer screening, a 2.17% increase in breast cancer screening and a 0.72% increase in cervical cancer screening rate, the research showed.
ALTERNATIVE CANCER TREATMENT COULD REPLACE CHEMO AND SURGERY, STUDY SUGGESTS
Among those who had cancerous tumors, each $1,000 increase in tax revenue per capita was linked to up to 4% decreased death rates among White patients. The same reduced risk was not found for racial and ethnic minority populations, according to the study.
“State-level tax policy is an underappreciated social determinant of health that may improve cancer screening and mortality rates,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers reviewed population-level cancer screening rates and cancer-related deaths from CDC databases. (iStock)
“These findings suggest that state-level tax revenue may serve as one aspect of a multifaceted approach to improve cancer-related outcomes in the U.S. and help bridge cancer care gaps, particularly in more progressive tax policy settings.”
Prior studies have identified tax policy as a predictor of public health, particularly for infant mortality risk and overall healthcare outcomes.
“One possible association could be that the higher your taxes, the more money you would have to buy healthier food and more luxury for relaxation and exercise.”
“Tax revenue may serve as funding that promotes the common good by ensuring access to safe, healthy environments and quality healthcare, while progressive taxes can substantially increase the disposable income of working-class households, thus enhancing their living standards and improving their health and cancer outcomes,” the study stated.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst, shared his external reaction to the study.
“One possible association could be that the higher your taxes, the more money you would have to buy healthier food and more luxury for relaxation and exercise,” he told Fox News Digital.

“Having more money to pay for extra treatment, earlier diagnosis and better care can also help prevent cancer death.” (iStock)
“Having more money to pay for extra treatment, earlier diagnosis and better care can also help prevent cancer death.”
The study did have some limitations, the researchers acknowledged — chiefly that the results show an association but do not prove that the high tax rates caused the decreased mortality.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
Cancer screening rates were also based on patient questionnaires, which could have some level of bias.
There is also the possibility of measurement errors in the data, the researchers cautioned.

Health
Denise Austin’s Easy Standing Ab Exercises Blast Menopause Belly Fat

Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Health
RFK Jr's HHS to end routine COVID vaccine guidance for children, pregnant women: report

The Trump administration is backing away from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations to vaccinate children and pregnant women against COVID-19, according to a new report.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is planning to pull federal recommendations that these groups get the COVID vaccine as a routine measure, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.
The CDC currently recommends that everyone aged 6 months and older get vaccinated, but that guidance may be scrapped in the coming days.
MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR BIDEN-ERA COVID-19 VAX PROJECT HALTED BY TRUMP’S HHS
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. testifies before the House Appropriations Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
It’s unclear whether HHS plans to drop the recommendation entirely or simply stop pushing it for everyone across the board, the report said.
The move would be a major shift in federal health policy and would mark a break from the blanket-vaccine approach that dominated the early years of the pandemic.
Few parents and expectant mothers have followed through with recent COVID boosters. As of April, CDC data shows just 13% of children and 14% of pregnant women had received the latest shot.
The change comes as the FDA, under Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, prepares to roll out a tougher approval process for vaccines.
TRUMP HEALTH SECRETARY NOMINEE RFK JR CLEARS SENATE FINANCE CONFIRMATION VOTE

A man receives the COVID-19 vaccine. (Steve Pfost/Newsday via Getty Images)
Speaking Thursday at a gathering of food and drug lawyers, Makary said, “We want to see vaccines that are available for high-risk individuals, and at the same time, we want some good science. We want some good clinical data.”
Kennedy has long been critical of mRNA vaccines and mass vaccination campaigns. As HHS secretary, he now has the authority to revise CDC guidance.
The Trump administration said it plans to drop routine COVID vaccination guidance for kids and pregnant women, marking a major shift in federal health policy, the WSJ reported.

Syringes and vials of COVID-19 vaccine. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The expected shift would undercut one of the most promoted health policies of the first Trump administration, Operation Warp Speed, and raise questions about whether insurers will continue covering the shots.
Critics of the move told the Journal it could discourage vaccination and leave immunocompromised people more vulnerable. Supporters say it brings policy back in line with science and common sense.
Both HHS and CDC did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
Health
Experts: How to Prevent Muscle Loss on Ozempic | Woman's World

Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
-
Austin, TX5 days ago
Best Austin Salads – 15 Food Places For Good Greens!
-
Technology1 week ago
Be careful what you read about an Elden Ring movie
-
Technology1 week ago
Netflix is removing Black Mirror: Bandersnatch
-
World1 week ago
The Take: Can India and Pakistan avoid a fourth war over Kashmir?
-
News1 week ago
Reincarnated by A.I., Arizona Man Forgives His Killer at Sentencing
-
News1 week ago
Jefferson Griffin Concedes Defeat in N.C. Supreme Court Race
-
Health1 week ago
N.I.H. Bans New Funding From U.S. Scientists to Partners Abroad
-
News1 week ago
Who is the new Pope Leo XIV and what are his views?