Connect with us

Finance

Wall Street’s 2025 outlook for stocks

Published

on

Wall Street’s 2025 outlook for stocks

The targets range from 6,400 to 7,007. This implies returns between +5% and +15% from Friday’s close. It’s a tighter range than last year’s targets, with many clustering in that 8%-10% return expectation.

Before we move on, I’d once again caution against putting too much weight into one-year targets. It’s extremely difficult to predict short-term moves in the market with any accuracy. Few on Wall Street have ever been able to do this consistently. DataTrek’s Nicholas Colas recently pointed out that the standard deviation around the mean annual total return for the S&P 500 is nearly 20 percentage points! More here.

I do however think the research, analysis, and commentary behind these forecasts can be very informative.

In summary: The fundamentals supporting earnings growth are firm. Valuations are above historical averages but are not cause for alarm. As usual, there’s plenty of uncertainty. But on balance, the outlook for stocks is favorable.

Below is a roundup of 14 of these 2025 targets for the S&P 500, including highlights from the strategists’ commentary.

Advertisement
  • UBS: 6,400, $257 earnings per share (as of Nov. 18): “After a rally this year through Trump’s cabinet appointments, we see mild downside in equities in H1 next year amid a step down in US growth. Once earnings estimates have fallen to more realistic levels, H2 ’25 should be better.”

  • Morgan Stanley: 6,500, $271 (as of Nov. 18): “Looking forward to 2025, we think it will continue to be important for investors to remain nimble around market leadership changes, particularly given the potential uncertainty that the recent election outcome introduces. This is also a reason why we are maintaining a wider than normal bull versus bear-case skew — base case: 6,500; bull case 7,400; bear case 4,600.”

  • Goldman Sachs: 6,500, $268 (as of Nov. 18): “We estimate net margins will expand by 78 bp to 12.3% in 2025 followed by a further 35 bp increase to 12.6% in 2026. Our economists assume the Trump administration will impose targeted tariffs on imported automobiles and select imports from China. They also assume a 15% corporate tax rate on domestic manufacturers. On net, the impact of these policy changes on our EPS forecasts roughly offset one another.”

  • JPMorgan: 6,500, $270 (Nov. 27): “US equities should remain supported by the expanding business cycle, US Exceptionalism that is helping broaden the AI cycle and earnings growth, ongoing easing by global central banks and the wind-down of Fed’s QT in 1Q. At the same time, US households are benefiting from a tight labor market, sitting on record wealth (+$10T over the past year to ~$165T as of 2Q24, +$50T since Covid), and potentially lower energy prices. Heightened geopolitical uncertainty and the evolving policy agenda are introducing unusual complexity to the outlook, but opportunities are likely to outweigh risks. The benefit of deregulation and a more business-friendly environment are likely underestimated along with potential for unlocking productivity gains and capital deployment.”

  • CFRA: 6,585 (as of Nov. 20): “This new target incorporates fundamental, technical, and historical considerations, influenced by a 2.4% projected growth in U.S. real GDP and a 13% rise in S&P 500 operating earnings, supported by a continued decline in inflation readings and interest rates. Historical returns during the third year of bull markets following two successive years of double-digit increases, combined with stretched valuations relative to 10-year averages (using the current forward P/E ratio, market-cap to total revenue, and total enterprise value to forward EBITDA metrics), temper our optimism, leading to the below-average projected full-year price gain.”

  • RBC: 6,600, $271 (as of Nov. 25): “The story the data tells us is that another year of solid economic and earnings growth, some political tailwinds, and some additional relief on inflation (which should keep the S&P 500’s P/E elevated) can keep stocks moving higher in the year ahead.”

  • Barclays: 6,600, $271 (as of Nov. 25): “For U.S. equities, we think macro positives outweigh the negatives heading into next year. … We expect most sectors to be impacted by disinflationary margin pressure and slowing ex-US growth in 2025, while Big Tech continues offsetting to the upside.”

  • BofA: 6,666, $275 (as of Nov. 26): “Get ready for a cyclical inferno. Nine reasons: (1) Red sweep, (2) Fed cuts, (3) accelerating profits, (4) re-shoring, (5) productivity cycle, (6) shift from everyone spending on Tech to Tech spending on everything, (7) municipalities refurbishing to court corporates, (8) tight capacity / decades of underspend in manufacturing, and (9) lightest positioning in cyclical sectors since at least the GFC.”

  • BMO: 6,700, $275 (as of Nov. 18): “Bull markets can, will, and should slow their pace from time to time, a period of digestion that in turn only accentuates the health of the underlying secular bull. So, we believe 2025 will likely be defined by a more normalized return environment with more balanced performance across sectors, sizes, and styles.”

  • HSBC: 6,700 (as of Dec. 6): “We expect next year’s equity returns to be focused on earnings growth as valuations are more stretched… Overall, we expect earnings to grow by 9% incorporating a slower but still resilient U.S. economy and some margin expansion.”

  • Deutsche Bank: 7,000, $282 (as of Nov. 25): “Attention is focused on late cycle indicators, while early cycle indicators have been turning up. We see various aspects of the cycle yet to kick in, including de- to re-stocking; capex outside Tech; capital markets and M&A; loan growth; and rest of the world growth. With potential policy changes by the incoming administration having both positive and negative implications for growth, sequencing will be key, but we expect growth to remain the priority. Over several rounds of the last trade war, escalations saw equity selloffs which then prompted de-escalations.”

  • Yardeni Research: 7,000, $290 (as of Nov. 10): “Just after Donald Trump won the presidential race on November 8, 2016, we observed that the economy and stock market were charged up with “animal spirits,” a term coined by John Maynard Keynes meaning spontaneous optimism. Animal spirits are back now that Trump won a second term on November 5…”

  • Capital Economics: 7,000 (as of Nov. 7): “These projections, which rest on the assumption that the US economy will not stand in the way of a bubble in the stock market inflating amid hype around AI, are looking much less bold than they once did. But we aren’t minded to push up the forecasts just because the index has risen and reacted very favorably to the news of Trump’s victory. A key reason is our view that his policies would be a net negative for growth in the US and elsewhere. What’s more, if we’re right to exclude a major fiscal expansion from our list of working assumptions, US firms’ profits probably won’t get a boost from a further cut in corporation tax. Nonetheless, we are sticking to our existing projections for the S&P 500 because we don’t see Trump’s election derailing the economy or preventing the bubble in AI from inflating.”

  • Wells Fargo: 7,007, $274 (as of Dec. 3): “On balance, we expect the Trump Administration to usher in a macro environment that is increasingly favorable for stocks at a time when the Fed will be slowly reducing rates. In short, a backdrop where equities continue to rally.”

Donald Trump looks on as Fed Chair Jerome Powell speaks at the White House. (REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Archive) · Reuters / Reuters

Most of the equity strategists TKer follows produce incredibly rigorous, high-quality research that reflects a deep understanding of what drives markets. Consequently, the most valuable things these pros have to offer have little to do with one-year targets. (And in my years of interacting with many of these folks, at least a few of them don’t care for the exercise of publishing one-year targets. They do it because it’s popular with clients.)

So first off, don’t dismiss their work just because a one-year target is off the mark.

Second, I’ll repeat what I always say when discussing short-term forecasts for the stock market:

It’s incredibly difficult to predict with any accuracy where the stock market will be in a year. In addition to the countless number of variables to consider, there are also the totally unpredictable developments that occur along the way.

Strategists will often revise their targets as new information comes in. In fact, some of the numbers you see above represent revisions from prior forecasts.

Advertisement

For most of y’all, it’s probably ill-advised to overhaul your entire investment strategy based on a one-year stock market forecast.

Nevertheless, it can be fun to follow these targets. It helps you get a sense of the various Wall Street firms’ level of bullishness or bearishness.

I think RBC’s Lori Calvasina said it best in her outlook report: The price target “should be viewed as a compass as opposed to a GPS. It is a construct that helps to articulate whether we believe stocks will move higher and why.”

Good luck in 2025!

Below is a sampling of what Wall Street is saying about the economy in 2025.

Advertisement
Nora Carol Photography via Getty Images

BofA (Dec. 2): “We expect stable growth (2.3% in 2025, 2.0% in 2026), slightly elevated inflation (2.5-3%) and a terminal rate of 3.75-4%. Cuts in Dec, Mar, Jun. Even before tariffs or fiscal easing, data warrant slower cuts. The US economy went into the elections with structural and cyclical tailwinds. Structural: productivity and potential growth appear to have picked up, supporting higher policy rates. Cyclical: consumer remarkably resilient. Solid real income growth, healthy balance sheets. Fiscal policy has buoyed private and public investment. The labor market is the main concern. Bad news: narrow and slowing job gains, downward revisions, Sahm rule triggered, falling vacancies. Good news: low layoffs (and claims)…”

Deutsche Bank (Nov. 25): “We ultimately anticipate that modest tax cuts, a strong deregulation push, and more supportive financial conditions will produce faster growth in 2025, which we now see at 2.5% (Q4/Q4) versus 2.2% previously. Beyond next year, adverse effects from the trade war and a more restrictive monetary policy setting reduce our growth estimates modestly.”

Goldman Sachs (Nov. 17): “The Republican sweep in the recent elections will likely bring policy changes in three key areas. First, we expect tariff increases on imports from China and autos that raise the effective tariff rate by 3-4pp. Second, we expect tighter policy to lower net immigration to 750k per year, moderately below the pre-pandemic average of 1mn per year. Third, we expect full extension of the expiring 2017 tax cuts and modest additional tax cuts. These changes are significant, but we do not expect them to substantially alter the trajectory of the economy or monetary policy.”

JPMorgan (Nov. 21): “The election has sparked dueling boom-bust narratives on the path ahead. There are now upside risks to growth from deregulation and tax cutting and downside risks from tariffs and general policy uncertainty. But one shouldn’t lose sight of the business cycle, which has been performing well. We look for only a mild downshift in growth in 2025 to 2%, with a small additional rise in the unemployment rate to 4.5%. Core PCE inflation expected to decelerate a half-point next year to 2.3%. We look for the Fed to cut 25bps in December and another 75bps by the end of 3Q25, then stop at 3.75%.”

Morgan Stanley (Nov. 17): “Lower immigration flows and more tariffs slow GDP growth and make inflation stickier. Nascent inflationary pressures and broad policy uncertainty spark greater Fed caution, leading to a pause in 2Q. As higher tariffs hit growth and job gains almost stop in 2H26, rate cuts resume.”

UBS (Nov. 8): “We expect the new administration is inheriting a moderate economic slowdown, and as it is, the pace of nonfarm payroll employment gains has slowed from the brisk over 200K per month pace of 2023, to 148K per month over the six months ending in September. Inflation progress is projected to resume as we move through 2025. We expect that backdrop keeps the FOMC on track for lowering rates. Many crosscurrents such as potential deregulation and slower population growth move into the mix, with uncertain net impacts. We assume fiscal policy changes largely affect 2026 and beyond, based on existing agreements for the fiscal year ending in September 2025. The new tariffs we expect to be phased in with mostly a 2026 impact too. However, we did take out one rate cut in 2025, leaving monetary policy the tiniest bit more restrictive as the rollout of China tariffs begins.”

Advertisement

Wells Fargo (Nov. 21): “American trade policy likely will change in a more restrictive direction. During his campaign for president, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to impose a 10% across-the-board tariff with a 60% levy applied to China. The cost of tariffs, which are a tax on imported goods, are generally borne by consumers. Tariff increases of Trump’s threatened magnitude would lead to a marked increase in inflation next year, while significantly reducing the rate of economic growth, not only in the United States but in many foreign economies as well. We have bumped up our U.S. inflation forecast for next year, while shaving down our U.S. real GDP growth outlook.”

There were a few notable data points and macroeconomic developments from last week to consider:

👍 The labor market continues to add jobs. According to the BLS’s Employment Situation report released Friday, U.S. employers added 227,000 jobs in November. The report reflected the 47th straight month of gains, reaffirming an economy with growing demand for labor.

Total payroll employment is at a record 159.3 million jobs, up 7 million from the prepandemic high.

The unemployment rate — that is, the number of workers who identify as unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force — ticked up to 4.2% during the month. While it continues to hover near 50-year lows, the metric is near its highest level since October 2021.

Advertisement

While the major metrics continue to reflect job growth and low unemployment, the labor market isn’t as hot as it used to be.

Wage growth ticks lower. Average hourly earnings rose by 0.37% month-over-month in November, down from the 0.42% pace in October. On a year-over-year basis, this metric is up 4.0%.

Job openings rise. According to the BLS’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, employers had 7.74 million job openings in October, up from 7.37 million in September.

During the period, there were 6.98 million unemployed people — meaning there were 1.1 job openings per unemployed person. This continues to be one of the more obvious signs of excess demand for labor. However, this metric has returned to prepandemic levels.

Layoffs remain depressed, hiring remains firm. Employers laid off 1.63 million people in October. While challenging for all those affected, this figure represents just 1.0% of total employment. This metric remains at pre-pandemic levels.

Advertisement

Hiring activity continues to be much higher than layoff activity. During the month, employers hired 5.31 million people.

That said, the hiring rate — the number of hires as a percentage of the employed workforce — has been trending lower, which could be a sign of trouble to come in the labor market.

People are quitting less. In October, 3.33 million workers quit their jobs. This represents 2.1% of the workforce. While the rate ticked up last month, it continues to trend below prepandemic levels.

A low quits rate could mean a number of things: more people are satisfied with their job; workers have fewer outside job opportunities; wage growth is cooling; productivity will improve as fewer people are entering new unfamiliar roles.

Job switchers still get better pay. According to ADP, which tracks private payrolls and employs a different methodology than the BLS, annual pay growth in November for people who changed jobs was up 7.2% from a year ago. For those who stayed at their job, pay growth was 4.8%

Advertisement

Unemployment claims tick higher. Initial claims for unemployment benefits rose to 224,000 during the week ending November 30, up from 215,000 the week prior. This metric continues to be at levels historically associated with economic growth.

Consumer vibes improve. From the University of Michigan’s December Surveys of Consumers: “Consumer sentiment improved for the fifth consecutive month, rising about 3% to its highest reading in seven months. A surge in buying conditions for durables led Current Economic Conditions to soar more than 20%. Rather than a sign of strength, this rise in durables was primarily due to a perception that purchasing durables now would enable buyers to avoid future price increases.”

Consumer sentiment readings have lagged resilient consumer spending data.

Politics clearly plays a role in peoples’ perception of the economy: “The expectations index continued the post-election re-calibration that began last month, climbing for Republicans and declining for Democrats in December. Independents were, as usual, in the middle between the two major parties, with readings close to the national average. This adjustment process is consistent with a response to actual underlying changes in expectations for the national economy, and not merely an expression of partisanship. For example, throughout this month’s interviews, Democrats voiced concerns that anticipated policy changes, particularly tariff hikes, would lead to a resurgence in inflation. Republicans disagreed; they expect the next president will usher in an immense slowdown in inflation. As such, national measures of sentiment and expectations continue to reflect the collective economic experiences and observations of the American population as a whole.”

Notably, expectations for inflation appear to be a partisan matter.

Advertisement

Card spending data is holding up. From BofA: “In the week ending Nov 30, retail ex-autos spending per HH was up 2.0% vs. the week ending the day after Black Friday in 2023. Online retail spending was particularly strong around the Thanksgiving period, while brick & mortar retail was soft. A later Thanksgiving this year means we need to wait at least another week to get a clean read on holiday spending.”

From JPMorgan: “As of 29 Nov 2024, our Chase Consumer Card spending data (unadjusted) was 1.9% above the same day last year. Based on the Chase Consumer Card data through 29 Nov 2024, our estimate of the US Census November control measure of retail sales m/m is 0.28%.”

Gas prices tick lower. From AAA: “Like a glacier grinding its way to the sea, the national average for a gallon of gas is closing in on the $3 mark, shedding three cents since last week to $3.03. It has been less than a dime away from $3 for over a month as the waffling decline has been agonizingly slow. The last time the national average was below $3 was May 11, 2021.”

Mortgage rates tick lower. According to Freddie Mac, the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 6.69%, down from 6.81% last week. From Freddie Mac: “This week, mortgage rates decreased to their lowest level in over a month. Despite just a modest drop in rates, consumers clearly have responded as purchase demand has noticeably improved. The responsiveness of prospective homebuyers to even small changes in rates illustrates that affordability headwinds persist.”

There are 147 million housing units in the U.S., of which 86.6 million are owner-occupied and 34 million (or 40%) of which are mortgage-free. Of those carrying mortgage debt, almost all have fixed-rate mortgages, and most of those mortgages have rates that were locked in before rates surged from 2021 lows. All of this is to say: Most homeowners are not particularly sensitive to movements in home prices or mortgage rates.

Advertisement

Offices remain relatively empty. From Kastle Systems: “Peak day office occupancy was 57% on Thursday last week, as many workers stayed home in the days leading up to Thanksgiving. Tuesday occupancy was down 18.9 points to 42.8%, and even Monday fell more than seven points, down to 41.8%. The average low was 26.4% on Wednesday, less than half of the prior week’s 61.1%.”

Supply chain pressures remain loose. The New York Fed’s Global Supply Chain Pressure Index — a composite of various supply chain indicators — ticked higher in November but remains near historically normal levels. It’s way down from its December 2021 supply chain crisis high.

Business investment activity trends at record levels. Orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft — a.k.a. core capex or business investment — declined 0.6% to $73.7 billion in October.

Core capex orders are a leading indicator, meaning they foretell economic activity down the road. While the growth rate has leveled off a bit, they continue to signal economic strength in the months to come.

Services surveys still point to growth. From S&P Global’s November Services PMI: “Companies have reported stronger demand for services thanks to the clearing of political uncertainty following the election, as well as brighter prospects for the economy in 2025 linked to the incoming administration and hopes for lower interest rates. The latter, alongside strong market gains in recent weeks, has helped drive an especially strong surge in demand for financial services, though November also saw robust growth for business and consumer services.”

Advertisement

The ISM Services PMI reflected growth but at a cooling rate.

Manufacturing surveys look less bad. From S&P Global’s November Manufacturing PMI: “Optimism about the year ahead has improved to a level not beaten in two and a half years, buoyed by the lifting of uncertainty seen in the lead up to the election, as well as the prospect of stronger economic growth and greater protectionism against foreign competition under the new Trump administration in 2025.”

Similarly, the ISM’s November Manufacturing PMI improved from the prior month.

Keep in mind that during times of perceived stress, soft survey data tends to be more exaggerated than actual hard data.

Construction spending ticks higher. Construction spending increased 0.4% to an annual rate of $2.17 trillion in October.

Advertisement

Near-term GDP growth estimates remain positive. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model sees real GDP growth climbing at a 3.3% rate in Q4.

Putting it all together

The long-term outlook for the stock market remains favorable, bolstered by expectations for years of earnings growth. And earnings are the most important driver of stock prices.

Demand for goods and services is positive, and the economy continues to grow. At the same time, economic growth has normalized from much hotter levels earlier in the cycle. The economy is less “coiled” these days as major tailwinds like excess job openings have faded.

To be clear: The economy remains very healthy, supported by strong consumer and business balance sheets. Job creation remains positive. And the Federal Reserve — having resolved the inflation crisis — has shifted its focus toward supporting the labor market.

Advertisement

We are in an odd period given that the hard economic data has decoupled from the soft sentiment-oriented data. Consumer and business sentiment has been relatively poor, even as tangible consumer and business activity continue to grow and trend at record levels. From an investor’s perspective, what matters is that the hard economic data continues to hold up.

Analysts expect the U.S. stock market could outperform the U.S. economy, thanks largely due to positive operating leverage. Since the pandemic, companies have adjusted their cost structures aggressively. This has come with strategic layoffs and investment in new equipment, including hardware powered by AI. These moves are resulting in positive operating leverage, which means a modest amount of sales growth — in the cooling economy — is translating to robust earnings growth.

Of course, this does not mean we should get complacent. There will always be risks to worry about — such as U.S. political uncertainty, geopolitical turmoil, energy price volatility, cyber attacks, etc. There are also the dreaded unknowns. Any of these risks can flare up and spark short-term volatility in the markets.

There’s also the harsh reality that economic recessions and bear markets are developments that all long-term investors should expect to experience as they build wealth in the markets. Always keep your stock market seat belts fastened.

For now, there’s no reason to believe there’ll be a challenge that the economy and the markets won’t be able to overcome over time. The long game remains undefeated, and it’s a streak long-term investors can expect to continue.

Advertisement

A version of this story first appeared at TKer.co

Finance

When making travel plans, timing and financing are major considerations

Published

on

When making travel plans, timing and financing are major considerations

For the true travel fan, there’s often a built-in conflict on how best to plan for your next adventure.

On the one hand, the world awaits. Spin the globe, cover your eyes and point. Or, throw a dart at the map! Then it’s time to dig in and research your next dream destination.

On the other hand, getting the best bargain can be a last-minute proposition. There may be a fare sale today, but not tomorrow. How does that mash up with your bicycle tour in Italy? Or your friend’s wedding in Hawaii?

Spreading out all the options on the table can be daunting. It’s a bit like taking a sip from the fire hose. And we all have varying degrees of tolerance for changing prices, tiny seats and geopolitical uncertainty.

So let’s take a snapshot of what’s happening now, knowing you won’t likely drink from the same river, or fire hose, twice.

Advertisement

Since most of today’s snapshots are on the phone, there are some handy settings: You can zoom in for a closer look at that fruit and cheese platter, frame it up nicely for a good shot of your seatmate, or look out the window and get a nice view from 30,000 feet.

Fares we love. There are just a few fares to zoom in on right now.

Anchorage-Chicago. Three airlines will offer nonstop flights this summer: Alaska, United and American. Alaska and United fly the route year-round. There are just a couple of months where travelers have to stop in Denver or Seattle on the way. Right now, the Basic price is $349 round-trip. United has the least-expensive Main price of $429 round-trip. Alaska charges more: $449-$469 round-trip.

The rate to Chicago is steady throughout the summer, as long as you’re open to flying on other airlines, including Delta and now Southwest, starting May 15.

Anchorage-Dallas. Choose from four airlines with competitive prices. United and Delta offer great rates starting on March 30, for travel all summer and into the fall for $331 round-trip in basic economy. Remember: Basic economy means you’ll be sitting in the middle seat back by the potty. There are few, if any, advance seat assignments permitted and you’re the last to board. Don’t expect to accrue many frequent flyer points. Alaska will give you 30%. Delta and American offer none. United is axing MileagePlus points for basic travelers soon.

Advertisement

Delta and United offer the chance to pay $100 more for pre-reserved seats and mileage credit. Of course, they may charge you more for a nicer seat on the plane. But that’s another story.

American Airlines charges a little bit more, about $20 more for a round-trip, to fly nonstop. It’s a nice flight.

Anchorage-Albuquerque. Delta is targeting this route with a nice rate: $281 round-trip in Basic or $381 in Main. But it’s just between May 23 and June 29. Why? Well, it lines up nicely with Southwest’s launch on May 15. Who knows why airlines cut their fares during a traditionally busy season? It’s just a hunch.

Looking at airfares more broadly, there are a few more bargain rates out there, but most only go through May 20. Airlines are hoping for a robust summer — so prices go up after that.

For example, between March 29 and May 20, Alaska Air offers a nonstop from Anchorage to Los Angeles for $257 round-trip in basic. For pre-assigned seats and full mileage credit, the main price is $337 round-trip. Prices go up to $437 round-trip in the summer.

Advertisement

The view from 30,000 feet is pretty clear, although past performance is no guarantee of future results. Several carriers, including American, Delta, United, Southwest and Alaska are adding flights for the summer. There will be robust competition, which means lower fares. Just last week, Alaska Air dropped the price from Anchorage to Seattle to $210 round-trip. That rate is gone, but others will come along.

Charge it. Banks own the airlines by virtue of their popular credit cards. Do they own you, too?

Sifting through the various credit card offers and bonus points emails, it’s easy to forget that banks, not travelers, are the airlines’ biggest customers. At a Bank of America conference last year, Alaska Airlines reported it receives about 15% of its total revenue from its loyalty plan. That adds up to more than 1.7 billion in 2024. Delta has a similar deal with American Express, which paid the airline about $8.2 billion last year.

Think about that the next time the flight attendants are handing out credit card applications in the aisle.

Zooming in, if you’re going to play the Atmos loyalty game on Alaska Airlines, you have to have an Alaska Airlines credit card from Bank of America.

Advertisement

I carry the plain-old Alaska Air card. I used to have two of them, primarily for the $99 companion fare. That’s still a compelling offer. But to get that benefit, you have to charge it on an Alaska Airlines Visa card.

So the question is: Is it worth it to pay $395 per year for the new Summit Visa card from Bank of America?

If you use your credit card for your business or if you regularly charge thousands of dollars every month, the Summit card may be the card for you.

One of the foundational benefits is for every $2 you charge, you earn one status point toward your next elite tier, such as titanium. It’s possible to charge your way to the top tier of the frequent flyer ladder without ever stepping on a plane. If that’s your level of charge-card use, then the Summit is for you. For the lesser Ascent card like mine, you earn one status point for every $3 spent.

For a little wider view, consider that your other travel costs, including accommodations, can hit your budget a lot harder than an airline ticket. It’s one reason I carry a flexible spend credit card in addition to my Alaska Airlines card. Here’s a snapshot of some popular options:

Advertisement

1. Bilt Rewards. I finally signed up for a Bilt account, although I haven’t yet received my card. There are two big benefits with Bilt: You can charge your rent and transfer points to Alaska Airlines. There also is a scheme to charge your mortgage, but it’s more convoluted. But the charge-your-rent option is a stand-alone gold star for the Bilt program, even if you don’t fly Alaska Airlines.

In addition to the link with Alaska Airlines, Bilt points transfer to other oneworld carriers like British, Japan Airlines and Qatar Air. Hotel partners include Hyatt, my favorite, and Hilton. A big bonus comes with the “Obsidian” card, $95 per year: three points for every dollar spent on groceries.

But there’s also a Bilt card with no annual fee. And there are no extra fees incurred when you charge your rent.

2. American Express. If you fly on Delta, the American Express card is a natural choice.

The two companies really are joined at the hip. The last American Express card I had was a Delta “Gold” card, which included a 70,000-point signup bonus. Cardholders get a free checked bag, although Delta offers two free checked bags for SkyMiles members who live in Alaska, and 15% off award tickets.

Advertisement

The Delta card is free for the first year, then $150 per year thereafter.

There is a dizzying array of American Express cards available, including some with no annual fee. But with Delta there is a narrowed-down selection, including one that’s more than $800 per year. That includes lounge access and some other benefits, including a companion pass.

American Express cardholders also can transfer their points to Hilton and Bonvoy as well as to 15 other airlines.

Capital One offers the Venture X card, which offers cardholders 75,000 points plus a $300 travel credit at their in-house travel service. The cost is $395 per year. Get the slimmed-down Venture card for just $95 per year. You still can earn the 75,000 bonus points after spending $4,000 in the first three months. Plus, there’s a $250 credit with Capital One Travel.

Airline partners include EMirates, Singapore Air, Japan Air and EVA Air, from Taiwan. Hotel partners include Hilton and Marriott.

Advertisement

I’ve carried several Chase cards for years. Right now I have the Chase Sapphire Preferred card, for which I received 80,000 bonus points. But that was several years ago. More recently, I got the Chase-affiliated Ink Business Cash card to harvest a 90,000 point bonus. Previously, I carried the Chase Sapphire Reserve. I got a 100,000 point bonus for that. But I dropped that card when the fee went up to $795 per year.

Stacking the cards like that — getting more than one — has helped me to get more bonus points, both for American Express and for Chase.

The best value for Chase points that I’ve found is for Hyatt Hotels. Right now, it’s the best redemption ration, but that can change. Chase also allows for transfers to Emirates, United, Singapore Air and Southwest, among others. The Chase travel portal is managed by Expedia, so you can redeem points for other hotels at a lower redemption rate.

The long view: All airline mileage plans are now credit card loyalty plans. Terms and conditions change, along with signup bonuses and other features of the cards. Last year, Chase dropped its airport restaurant feature, which offered $29 per person at select restaurants in Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland. A couple of years ago, the Priority Pass affiliated with Chase dropped the Alaska Airlines lounges as a partner.

It takes some time and effort to keep up with the programs and get the best value. But airline credit card plans are here to stay, even if the frequent-flyer programs are watered down year after year.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Finance

Lawmakers target ‘free money’ home equity finance model

Published

on

Lawmakers target ‘free money’ home equity finance model

Key points:

  • Pennsylvania lawmakers are considering a bill that would classify home equity investments (HEIs) and shared equity contracts as residential mortgages.
  • Industry leaders have mobilized through a newly formed trade group to influence how HEIs are regulated.
  • The outcome could reshape underwriting standards, return structures and capital markets strategy for HEI providers.

A fast-growing home equity financing model that promises homeowners cash without monthly payments is facing mounting scrutiny from state lawmakers — and the industry behind it is mobilizing to shape the outcome.

In Pennsylvania, House Bill 2120 would classify shared equity contracts — often marketed as home equity investments (HEIs), shared appreciation agreements or home equity agreements — as residential mortgages under state law.

While the proposal is still in committee, the debate unfolding in Harrisburg reflects a broader national effort to determine whether these products are truly a new category of equity-based investment — or if they function as mortgages and belong under existing consumer lending laws.

A classification fight over home equity capture

HB 2120 would amend Pennsylvania’s Loan Interest and Protection Law by explicitly including shared appreciation agreements in the residential mortgage definition. If passed, shared equity contracts would be subject to the same interest caps, licensing standards and consumer protections that apply to traditional mortgage lending.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Arvind Venkat after constituent Wendy Gilch — a fellow with the consumer watchdog Consumer Policy Center — brought concerns to his office. Gilch has since worked with Venkat as a partner in shaping the proposal.

Gilch initially began examining the products after seeing advertisements describe them as offering cash with “no debt,” “no interest” and “no monthly payments.”

Advertisement

“It sounds like free money,” she said. “But in many cases, you’re giving up a growing share of your home’s equity over time.”

Breaking down the debate

Shared equity providers (SEPs) argue that their products are not loans. Instead of charging interest or requiring monthly payments, companies provide homeowners with a lump sum in exchange for a share of the home’s future appreciation, which is typically repaid when the home is sold or refinanced.

The Coalition for Home Equity Partnership (CHEP) — an industry-led group founded in 2025 by Hometap, Point and Unlock — emphasizes that shared equity products have zero monthly payments or interest, no minimum income requirements and no personal liability if a home’s value declines.

Venkat, however, argues that the mechanics look familiar and argues that “transactions secured by homes should include transparency and consumer protections” — especially since, for many many Americans, their home is their most valuable asset. 

“These agreements involve appraisals, liens, closing costs and defined repayment triggers,” he said. “If it looks like a mortgage and functions like a mortgage, it should be treated like one.”

Advertisement

The bill sits within Pennsylvania’s anti-usury framework, which caps returns on home-secured lending in the mid-single digits. Venkat said he’s been told by industry representatives that they require returns approaching 18-20% to make the model viable — particularly if contracts are later resold to outside investors. According to CHEP, its members provide scenario-based disclosures showing potential outcomes under varying assumptions, with the final cost depending on future home values and term length.

In a statement shared with Real Estate News, CHEP President Cliff Andrews said the group supports comprehensive regulation of shared equity products but argues that automatically classifying them as mortgages applies a framework “that was never designed for, and cannot meaningfully be applied to, equity-based financing instruments.”

As currently drafted, HB 2120 would function as a “de facto ban” on shared equity products in Pennsylvania, Andrews added.

Real Estate News also reached out to Unison, a major vendor in the space, for comment on HB 2120. Hometap and Unlock deferred to CHEP when reached for comment. 

A growing regulatory patchwork

Pennsylvania is not alone in seeking to legislate regulations around HEIs. Maryland, Illinois and Connecticut have also taken steps to clarify that certain home equity option agreements fall under mortgage lending statutes and licensing requirements.

Advertisement

In Washington state, litigation over whether a shared equity contract qualified as a reverse mortgage reached the Ninth Circuit before the case was settled and the opinion vacated. Maine and Oregon have considered similar proposals, while Massachusetts has pursued enforcement action against at least one provider in connection with home equity investment practices.

Taken together, these developments suggest a state-by-state regulatory patchwork could emerge in the absence of a uniform federal framework.

The push for homeowner protections

The debate over HEIs arrives amid elevated interest rates and reduced refinancing activity — conditions that have increased demand for alternative equity-access products. 

But regulators appear increasingly focused on classification — specifically whether the absence of monthly payments and traditional interest charges changes the legal character of a contract secured by a lien on a home.

Gilch argues that classification is central to consumer clarity. “If it’s secured by your home and you have to settle up when you sell or refinance, homeowners should have the same protections they expect with any other home-based transaction,” she said.

Advertisement

Lessons from prior home equity controversies

For industry leaders, the regulatory scrutiny may feel familiar. In recent years, unconventional home equity models have drawn enforcement actions and litigation once questions surfaced around contract structure, title encumbrances or consumer understanding.

MV Realty, which offered upfront payments in exchange for long-term listing agreements, faced regulatory action in multiple states over how those agreements were recorded and disclosed. EasyKnock, which structured sale-leaseback transactions aimed at unlocking home equity, abruptly shuttered operations in late 2024 following litigation and mounting regulatory pressure.

Shared equity investment contracts differ structurally from both models, but those episodes underscore a broader pattern: novel housing finance products can scale quickly in tight credit cycles. Just as quickly, these home equity models encounter regulatory intervention once policymakers begin examining how they fit within existing law — and the formation of CHEP signals that SEPs recognize the stakes.

For real estate executives and housing finance leaders, the outcome of the classification fight may prove consequential. If shared equity contracts are treated as mortgages in more states, underwriting standards, return structures and secondary market economics could shift.

If lawmakers instead carve out a distinct regulatory category, the model may retain more flexibility — but face ongoing state-by-state negotiation.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Published

on

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Cornell University administrator Warren Petrofsky will serve as the Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ new dean of administration and finance, charged with spearheading efforts to shore up the school’s finances as it faces a hefty budget deficit.

Petrofsky’s appointment, announced in a Friday email from FAS Dean Hopi E. Hoekstra to FAS affiliates, will begin April 20 — nearly a year after former FAS dean of administration and finance Scott A. Jordan stepped down. Petrofsky will replace interim dean Mary Ann Bradley, who helped shape the early stages of FAS cost-cutting initiatives.

Petrofsky currently serves as associate dean of administration at Cornell University’s College of Arts and Sciences.

As dean, he oversaw a budget cut of nearly $11 million to the institution’s College of Arts and Sciences after the federal government slashed at least $250 million in stop-work orders and frozen grants, according to the Cornell Daily Sun.

He also serves on a work group established in November 2025 to streamline the school’s administrative systems.

Advertisement

Earlier, at the University of Pennsylvania, Petrofsky managed capital initiatives and organizational redesigns in a number of administrative roles.

Petrofsky is poised to lead similar efforts at the FAS, which relaunched its Resources Committee in spring 2025 and created a committee to consolidate staff positions amid massive federal funding cuts.

As part of its planning process, the committee has quietly brought on external help. Over several months, consultants from McKinsey & Company have been interviewing dozens of administrators and staff across the FAS.

Petrofsky will also likely have a hand in other cost-cutting measures across the FAS, which is facing a $365 million budget deficit. The school has already announced it will keep spending flat for the 2026 fiscal year, and it has dramatically reduced Ph.D. admissions.

In her email, Hoekstra praised Petrofsky’s performance across his career.

Advertisement

“Warren has emphasized transparency, clarity in communication, and investment in staff development,” she wrote. “He approaches change with steadiness and purpose, and with deep respect for the mission that unites our faculty, researchers, staff, and students. I am confident that he will be a strong partner to me and to our community.”

—Staff writer Amann S. Mahajan can be reached at [email protected] and on Signal at amannsm.38. Follow her on X @amannmahajan.

Continue Reading

Trending