Connect with us

Finance

The year ahead in ESG: Assurance, transition finance and natural capital | GreenBiz

Published

on

The year ahead in ESG: Assurance, transition finance and natural capital | GreenBiz

Is it officially too late to wish you a Happy New Year? As we return to work, here are three sustainable finance trends that are top of mind for me, along with three themes that sustainable finance and ESG community members say they would like prioritized in 2024. 

My hot topics for 2024 build on progress made in 2023: regulations for ESG assurance; international agreements for transition finance; and the development of standards and instruments to monitor investment in nature and biodiversity. Here’s where I see things headed.

Corporations are prepping for ESG assurance mandates 

What was once a voluntary exercise for disclosing climate and social goals has evolved into a full-fledged industry of ESG reporting. Up next: the introduction of third-party assurance requirements for certain ESG disclosures. 

California and the European Union are leading the way with the Golden State’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, which requires large companies doing business in the state to get third-party assurance for Scope 1 and 2 emissions starting in 2026. (Companies will need to collect 2025 metrics, and file them in 2026). 

That means 2024 will be a big prep year: Companies will need systems to collect and manage data to meet those assurance requirements, and that means businesses must establish and test their ESG controllership strategy this year. 

Advertisement

How? Some companies are building internal teams to oversee ESG data collection and management for regulatory reporting. That includes hiring for the newly created position of ESG controller. Many large banks have added this role. Expect to see more companies hiring an ESG controller this year to manage regulatory demands. 

Transition finance will take the wheel 

An estimated $4 trillion in clean energy investment will be needed each year between now and 2030 to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, according to the International Energy Agency. 

That’s why climate finance was a key agenda item at COP28. More than $85 billion in new commitments were made, with the host country, the United Arab Emirates, launching a $30 billion global finance solutions fund that will allocate $5 billion to spur additional investment in the Global South. 

This year, we can expect the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to continue providing funding opportunities. An example is the $97 billion available through the Department of Energy for clean energy projects. The IRA has also contributed to an increase in cleantech investments, which totaled $176 billion in the first three quarters of 2023, or $50 billion more than the same period in 2022. 

Another key IRA provision to watch this year is for transferable clean energy tax credits. Through this facility, developers can monetize credits they receive for clean energy projects by selling them at a slight discount to companies that face large tax bills. This provides a much-needed source of capital for financing clean energy project development. 

Advertisement

Finally, better data for navigating natural capital 

The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive took effect Jan. 1. It requires large and publicly traded companies to disclose environmental and social risks. The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures released its recommendations for doing so in September, guiding how companies should discuss nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities. 

As companies embrace digital technologies to collect these nature-related metrics, we’ll see the development of the “planet economy,” predicts Lucas Joppa, the former Microsoft chief environmental officer turned private equity investor. Those insights and data pools will give investors more of the tools and infrastructure needed to invest in nature at scale, he said. 

What 3 sustainable finance leaders see on the horizon 

What ESG accounting or sustainable finance challenge would sustainable finance and ESG experts like to see prioritized in 2024? Why? I put that question to subject matter experts late last year. Here are three of their responses. 

Marina Severinovsky — Head of Sustainability, North America, Schroders 

“The future of fossil fuels, which was a focus of COP 28, should remain a priority in 2024, as reaching net zero will require a wholesale transformation of energy systems. Energy is an important part of many portfolios, and investors need to assess whether companies can adapt and transition their business models at a pace that can be profitable on their path to lower emissions. Given the demands on the energy system over the next 10-30 years, without significant investment, we will be short energy. Conventional energy companies are an important part of the investment in the energy transition sector and are needed to provide the transition fuels for the global clean energy transition. We expect that they will adapt their business model to capitalize on the growth in new energy transition technologies. Many of the major oil companies are already starting to change where they allocate capital and are already invested in hydrogen, carbon capture, biofuels, and wind and solar. Sustainable finance investment and engagement should focus on encouraging and accelerating this transition.” 

Advertisement

Andrew Behar — CEO, As You Sow 

“There are 100 million people with $10 trillion in retirement accounts invested in an unlivable planet they can’t retire on. This is the year for every individual to realize that the person who earns the money has the right to invest it aligned with their values and to vote their proxies to shape a company’s trajectory toward justice, sustainability and financial outperformance. Click your heels together, Dorothy, it’s your money — use your power wisely.” 

Jeff Mindlin — Chief Investment Officer, ASU Foundation 

“At the ASU Foundation, our viewpoint has always been that we are fiduciaries first and want to avoid politicizing the endowment. To that end, in 2024, my hope is that we will have passed the greenwashing and greenhushing phases to make actual progress on the matter at hand. I also would want to see standardization of reporting at the company and fund level become a priority.” 

[For more news on green finance and ESG issues, subscribe to our free GreenFin Weekly newsletter.]

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Stamford Finance Students Wow Judges, Take Home Trophy in Regional CFA Competition – UConn Today

Published

on

Stamford Finance Students Wow Judges, Take Home Trophy in Regional CFA Competition – UConn Today

A tenacious team of finance majors, who sacrificed most of their winter break to prepare for the CFA Institute Research Challenge, took first place in that regional competition last week.

Students Hunter Baillargeon, Dylan Fischetto, Richard Opper, Philip Ochocinski and Rushit Chauhan were tasked with researching and analyzing a major utility company, and then producing a 10-page report about whether to buy, hold, or sell its stock. They chose to sell.

One of the CFA judges said both the team’s report and presentation were among the best he had seen in many years.

“As a team, we were thrilled our hard work paid off and our many hours of work allowed us to achieve what we did,’’ Baillargeon said. “What we accomplished couldn’t have been done without working with such a cohesive and collective unit.’’

“From a technical perspective, I realize how valuable true analysis is and the importance of looking where others don’t for a differentiated approach,’’ Baillargeon said.

Advertisement

The first round of competition featured 24 college teams from the Stamford-Hartford-Providence region. The Stamford team, composed of seniors all of whom all participate in UConn’s Student Managed Fund program, received its first-place award Feb. 26 in a ceremony in Hartford. The team will advance to the East Coast competition later this month.

Stamford Finance Program is Robust

“The Stamford team’s advancement in this competition reflects not only the students’ exceptional talent and work ethic, but also the rigor and applied focus of the UConn finance curriculum,’’ said professor Yiming Qian, head of the Finance Department.

“Our Stamford campus hosts approximately 200 financial management majors. The Stamford program is a vital part of the School and continues to demonstrate outstanding strength,” she said.

Professors Steve Wilson and Jeff Bianchi, who combined have 75 years of experience in the investment industry, were the team’s advisers and were supported by academic director Katherine Pancak.

Wilson said the task of analyzing a utility is particularly complex because of the company’s structure and the regulatory environment in which it operates.

Advertisement

“I believe the Stamford team stood out because of the depth of their research, and willingness to take a bold stand, including the decision to ‘go out on a limb’ and recommend selling the stock,’’ he said. “They didn’t ‘play it safe.’’’

“This clean-sweep was a true team effort. They were tireless throughout, and sleepless too often, but they never wavered from their desire to always dig deeper and uncover any information that would strengthen our investment case,’’ he said. “What a phenomenal job they did!’’

Competition in Hong Kong Is Ultimate Goal

The Stamford team will compete against Loyola, Canisius, Sacred Heart; Seton Hall, Villanova, St. Michaels, Western New England, University of Maine, Fordham and Penn State next. In total, some 8,000 students are expected to participate in various competitions worldwide, culminating in a championship round in Hong Kong in May.

Wilson said the financial industry is always welcoming of new talent. And when one of the judges told him that the Stamford team produced some of the best work that he’d seen in years, Wilson felt tremendous pride for the students.

“Finance is an open playing field. In investments, the best idea wins,’’ he said.

Advertisement

Baillargeon said he will always appreciate the whole team’s dedication.

“What I’ll remember most is the help of our advisers and our cohesive, close-knit team where everyone pulled their weight,’’ Baillargeon said. “We put in long hours, did a tremendous amount of research, and collaborated well together. I hope when I enter the workforce I get to work with a team as committed as this one is.’’

Continue Reading

Finance

Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath

Published

on

Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath



Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers – Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath
















Advertisement





Advertisement







Advertisement

Advertisement

Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers


Board Advances Motion to Address LAHSA’s Failure to Pay Service Providers


1024
888



Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath







Advertisement



Advertisement

Continue Reading

Finance

How “impact accounting” can integrate sustainability with finance

Published

on

How “impact accounting” can integrate sustainability with finance

Around three years ago, Charles Giancarlo, CEO of data platform Pure Storage, came back from Davos and asked his sustainability team to look into an idea he’d encountered at the meeting: Impact accounting, a method for integrating emissions and other externalities into company balance sheets. 

The idea had been slowly picking up adherents in Europe for around a decade, but Pure Storage, which rebranded this month to Everpure, would go on to become the first U.S. company to join the Value Balancing Alliance (VBA), a group of 30 or so companies developing the approach. Trellis checked in last week with Everpure and the VBA for an update.

How does impact accounting work?

At the heart of the approach are a set of “valuation factors,” developed by third-party experts, that are used to convert activity data for emissions, water use, air pollution and other externalities into dollar figures that can be integrated into balance sheets. In the case of emissions, for example, the VBA uses $220 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, a figure based on the estimated social impact of rising greenhouse gases levels. 

At Everpure, one long-term goal is to have cost centers be aware of the dollar impact of relevant externalities. After an initial focus on identifying and collecting the most material data, the team is now rolling out a dashboard containing several years of impact accounting numbers.

“It’s catered to different personas,” explained Adrienne Uphoff, Everpure’s ESG regulations and impact accounting manager. Finance was an initial use case, with product managers also on the roadmap. “You can compare it to financial numbers to really understand the impact intensity.”

Advertisement

What value does the approach bring?

“The essence of impact accounting is that you’re translating all these different metrics in the sustainability space into the language the decision makers understand,” said Christian Heller, the VBA’s CEO. “Everyone understands what you’re talking about, and you get a sense of the magnitude of your impact and the risks and opportunities.”

This has allowed Everpure to calculate what Uphoff called the “environmental costs of goods sold” and to estimate the impact of circular strategies, such as refurbishing hardware. The analysis reveals “impact savings across the full value chain across five different environmental topics all in a single dollar unit,” she said. 

Analyses like that can then be shared with customers and used to distinguish Everpure from competitors. “The long-term winners in this space are going to be those that can perform against sustainability goals,” said Kathy Mulvany, Everpure’s global head of sustainability. “Impact accounting gives us a way to bring comparability, so companies can understand how they’re truly stacking up.”

What does it take to implement impact accounting?

A great deal of technical work goes into creating valuation factors, but the system is designed so that outside experts create the numbers and hand them to sustainability professionals for use. Still, not every company will have the in-house environmental data that is also needed. Many companies have been collecting emissions data for five years or more, for example, but detailed datasets for water use are less common.

Internal teams also need to be familiar with the concepts. “One of the key learnings from our impact accounting implementation is that the socialization curve is longer than you expect,” said Uphoff. “Attaching monetary values on externalities introduces new metrics and mental models, and that can naturally make people a little nervous at first. It takes time and dialogue for teams to build confidence in how to interpret this new lens on performance.” 

Advertisement

What’s next?

In the early days of impact accounting, companies and consultancies worked independently on different methodologies. Now that work is coalescing, said Heller. The International Standards Organization will start work on a standard this summer, he added, and the VBA is having conversations with the IFRS Foundation, which creates international financial reporting standards.

The approach may also be integrated into mandatory disclosure standards. Heller noted that the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive mentions the potential benefits of companies putting a dollar figure on some environmental impacts. “It’s the next evolutionary step of any kind of sustainability disclosure regulations,” he said.

.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending