Connect with us

Finance

RCap lenders hive off home finance, NBFC into separate trust for resolution

Published

on

RCap lenders hive off home finance, NBFC into separate trust for resolution



With a view to expedite the sale strategy of bankrupt agency Reliance Capital, its lenders have determined to carve out Reliance Industrial Finance and Reliance Housing Finance clusters right into a belief for a separate decision course of. The proceeds of the sale of those two corporations in future will circulate on to the lenders of the Reliance Capital which is presently present process a chapter course of.


An asset sale committee, which will likely be shaped to oversee the sale of those two corporations, will encompass three members of the CoC, the administrator and a consultant of Deloitte. The bidders had been instructed that within the occasion of failure or delay within the implementation of the decision strategy of the housing finance and NBFC arm, the trustee, together with the asset sale committee members, will resolve on the alternate sale course of within the subsequent one yr or as determined by the committee.


The mixed debt of those two entities, RCF and RHF, is about Rs 25,000 crore and the proposed Belief construction would make sure the bidders of RCAP should not have to cope with this debt. A number of lenders, together with Life Insurance coverage Company of India, have made complete claims of Rs 25,333 crore towards Reliance Capital.

Advertisement


In July 2021, the lenders had chosen Authum Funding, a Mumbai-based agency, because the profitable bidder for RCF and RHF, with a bid of Rs 1,600 crore and Rs 2,911 crore respectively. However after the RBI despatched the dad or mum agency, Reliance Capital to the chapter courtroom final December, your complete course of restarted once more, monitored by an RBI-appointed administrator and the Nationwide Firm Legislation Tribunal.


After the administrator sought expressions of curiosity, 54 corporations submitted their EoIs. However of those, solely two — Piramal group and Sure Financial institution — are actually actively partaking with the CoC whereas the remainder have misplaced curiosity.

Advertisement


As per sources, the poor response to the decision plan has compelled the COC to increase the monetary bids by 4 occasions within the final couple of months. Now the contemporary date for plan submission is August 10.


The RCAP decision has been fraught with regulatory hurdles because the starting of the method. The precondition of forming a consortium by the totally different bidders, for the bidding of RCAP’s a number of enterprise clusters, and the precondition to make all money bids drove the vast majority of bidders away.


In reality, one of many lenders, LIC’s plan to promote its publicity in bonds price Rs 3,400 crore issued by Reliance Capital (RCap) didn’t discover any takers amongst asset reconstruction corporations (ARCs), because the deadline to submit expressions of curiosity (EoIs). A supply stated IDBI Capital, which has been mandated to promote the bonds, will lengthen the deadline to July 22. The bonds are buying and selling at 70 per cent low cost.

Advertisement

Pricey Reader,

Enterprise Customary has at all times strived laborious to supply up-to-date data and commentary on developments which might be of curiosity to you and have wider political and financial implications for the nation and the world. Your encouragement and fixed suggestions on easy methods to enhance our providing have solely made our resolve and dedication to those beliefs stronger. Even throughout these troublesome occasions arising out of Covid-19, we proceed to stay dedicated to holding you knowledgeable and up to date with credible information, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical problems with relevance.

We, nonetheless, have a request.

As we battle the financial influence of the pandemic, we want your assist much more, in order that we are able to proceed to give you extra high quality content material. Our subscription mannequin has seen an encouraging response from lots of you, who’ve subscribed to our on-line content material. Extra subscription to our on-line content material can solely assist us obtain the targets of providing you even higher and extra related content material. We consider in free, truthful and credible journalism. Your assist by means of extra subscriptions might help us practise the journalism to which we’re dedicated.

Help high quality journalism and subscribe to Enterprise Customary.

Digital Editor

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Q&A: how can finance leaders steer companies through uncertainty?

Published

on

Q&A: how can finance leaders steer companies through uncertainty?

A combination of global elections, geo-political tensions and economic uncertainty has created a challenging landscape for finance leaders, who are often looked upon to navigate through tumultuous times. 

James Simcox, chief product officer and managing director international at Equals Money, discusses overcoming challenges to international expansion and the importance of hedging risk.

Q

What impact are elections across the globe having on businesses and their international growth plans?

A

Advertisement

The number one challenge for any business in this environment is uncertainty. I think the election in the UK will bring an element of much-needed stability, which will really benefit the UK economy and businesses. If Labour is elected, they have shown themselves to be pro-business and it will be really important for business leaders to have that reassurance that the current status quo will be maintained. 

However, we are facing much more uncertainty on an international level, particularly with how things will play out in the US as well as France. Donald Trump has already signalled that he will seek to devalue the dollar should he come into power, which would certainly be an interesting development as currency has already proved something of a rollercoaster over the last couple of years. 

As a result, we’re seeing an increasing number of finance leaders take steps to mitigate risk where they can, particularly around currency movements. When transactions involve different currencies, businesses are exposed to the risk of exchange rates moving against their favour, which can impact the value of international dealings. To deal with this, businesses need to hedge their currency risk by securing exchange rates for future transactions

One of the best tools available to help finance leaders balance their risk is booking forward contracts

Q

Advertisement
With potential changes to policy, how can leaders act with authority and make confident decisions for the future?

A

In business, you will always need to take a bet in some shape or form as that’s the nature of growing a business and making money. I don’t believe businesses should put off making investment decisions, but instead think about ways to manage risk around those decisions and return profits in a fixed way. 

One of the best tools available to help finance leaders balance their risk is booking forward contracts. From a budgeting perspective, having a set price for a number of contracts provides a level of stability for the company and reduces currency risk. Similarly, locking in tax rebates at a fixed price can be hugely important in helping businesses plan for the future. 

Leaders can also take steps to manage costs such as spending in local currency. We see many businesses use their corporate credit card in local offices when they’re expanding but this is not an effective way of managing costs. It’s much better to manage operations in the local currency at a better rate using a currency card.

Advertisement

Q

What are the barriers that businesses seeking to expand internationally face and how can they overcome those?

A

Businesses need to think carefully about the nuances and rules of the jurisdictions they are looking to expand into, including employment laws, the local tax structure and even ways of working. A mistake that businesses often make is believing that they can run an overseas business from the UK but it simply does not work like that. One of the most important things that businesses can do is employ people on the ground who have an understanding of the region. 

Advertisement

Finance leaders should also not underestimate the importance of product market fit. As you expand, you need to be aware that a product that works in one market may need to be tailored to suit the needs and wants of customers in another region and this is where market research can prove invaluable. 

Not surprisingly, currency can be a huge challenge when expanding internationally. A lot of international businesses still prefer to transact in US dollars rather than their local currency so finance leaders need to think about how they can collect payment in various different currencies. 

This is where a multi-currency product, such as the one we offer at Equals Money, can be of fantastic use, providing customers with a single account to receive payments in up to 38 different currencies. Customers also benefit from support and the ability to speak to someone on the phone, which can be much harder to access through traditional banking overseas.

Q

Advertisement
How important is it that finance leaders are seen as an anchor and inspire confidence in others?

A

It’s great that we are seeing finance evolve from a service function to a business partner and it’s key that finance leaders are involved in conversations about international expansion from the get-go. They need to take the lead on risk mitigation and that means understanding how to transact in different currencies, how to report back to the core business and how to plan across multiple markets and multiple currencies. 

There’s a lot of research that needs to be done and this should happen upfront, so finance leaders are well prepared to overcome the different challenges from FX rates to transfer pricing. All too often, we see finance teams involved far too late and this can create panic and uncertainty around certain decisions. 

Finance leaders should also pay attention to the political landscape in their local markets by keeping their ear to the ground and understanding what changes could potentially impact the business, such as interest rate movements or changes to local tax policy. There’s a huge value to employing advisers or specialist business consultants in local markets. Similarly, having someone from that region to work within the finance function who understands local accounting rules is key.

Advertisement

Q

How can finance leaders ensure they are effectively using technology and payment platforms to drive better decision-making?

A

Data is key but it can be a challenge gathering the right information if you’re using multiple different providers across various different jurisdictions. Where you can, you should try and use a uniform technology payment stack across the entire business. 

Advertisement

Of course, it’s not always possible to access that kind of service and in those instances, finance leaders need to think carefully about how they’ll integrate their accounting data into the business. Is there a standardised standard you can use to pull information from different systems and partners? Cross-border services can be really helpful, with lots of providers now offering the ability to transact from one place across lots of different markets. 

It is also worth considering how cards can be used as a payment method. As long as the card provider supports payment in the currency you want, cards can be used to carry out domestic payments where banking may not support those. Interestingly, we are all quite happy to adopt new payment methods in our personal lives, but there’s much more reticence among businesses. 

For businesses to thrive in international markets, I think we will need to see finance leaders embrace new ways of thinking and new methods of payment.

Find out more about how Equals Money can help simplify your finance processes and support international growth here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

The relationship between states and banks that shaped modern finance

Published

on

The relationship between states and banks that shaped modern finance

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Tourists wandering beside the canals of Venice or visiting the Tintorettos at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco probably do not often have the history of banking at the forefront of their minds.

But Paolo Zannoni, author of Money and Promises: Seven Deals that Changed the World and himself a banker by trade, adviser to Goldman Sachs and on the board of Prada Group, would like to put it higher on their agenda. For those interested in the niche history of how early banking promises between states, lenders and traders were made from 15th century Venice to the founding of the Bank of England in the 17th century and on to the Russian Revolution in 1917, this is the book for them.

Much of Money and Promises focuses on the historical development of different types of banks and governments, and how they evolved ways of exchanging physical coins with promises to pay, often driven by costly wars that made financial innovation a necessity.

Advertisement

Zannoni states in the opening chapter that debt is not a bad thing; that states have, in fact, used the debts of banks to help their citizens survive and prosper. The case is made for this subtly, through multiple historical examples, rather than hammering home a central thesis.

We learn about the early microfinance schemes of the Franciscan monks in the 15th century, who took coins from wealthy donors and loaned them out to the poor in temporary need of assistance.

These schemes led to the establishment of the banking charities of Naples, and the development of the unusual “credit pledges” — once cashed in by none other than the painter Caravaggio to be spent on gambling and women. We learn about the group of “wily” European exchange bankers who pegged the ecu de marc currency to stable gold coins in the 16th century, a move that foreshadowed by hundreds of years the Bretton Woods agreement in 1944.

Interesting historical titbits about accounting and banking include a chapter devoted to the use of tally sticks as an accounting tool, which led to the emergence of successful London banking houses, such as Hoare & Co, in the 17th century. It was literally a method of passing broken sticks around in place of money or promises to pay, some of which survive in the Bank of England’s vaults today. Zannoni recounts how the Bank used tallies to improve the country’s public finances by the early 18th century.

While much of the historical content is second hand, as the lengthy bibliography for each chapter attests, the author also does extensive original research of his own, such as finding the ledger covering the earliest months of Venice’s Banco Giro in 1619. In a separate investigation, he reveals that 18th-century economist Ferdinando Galiani had a taste for the finest chocolate in Naples — which he paid for using bank debts.

Advertisement

That Zannoni is excited by visits to old archives to examine ledgers is clear, describing at one point his discovery of how banking charities in Naples operated as “thrilling, fascinating, occasionally bewildering”.

But, this is not an explainer book or one hugely accessible to the lay reader, despite the inclusion of some simple diagrams in the first chapter to show how traders in Pisa in the Middle Ages promised to pay each other by writing it down in bank ledgers. Relatively high-level economic issues are discussed: the drawbacks to a system of exchanging public debt for bank debt is raised in various chapters through a historical lens.

Most of the book deals with different banking systems in European cities but, for the last two chapters, it looks at the emergence of money as debt in colonial America and Lenin’s early thoughts on Bolshevik banking at the time of the Russian Revolution. Here, Zannoni charts the development of the State Bank and makes the point that: “in different cultures, at different times, under different regimes, and yet in very similar ways, states and nations deal with banks to achieve their purposes and goals, paying for goods with banks’ promises to pay”.

Zannoni says this book is his apologia pro vita sua — a reference to English theologian John Henry Newman’s history of his religious opinions, a 19th-century series of texts whose success saw the Catholic convert’s reputation repaired. It is not clear that Zannoni would have reason to seek a similar rehabilitation — unless, perhaps, it is a wry reference to being a banker. But, in any case, this book is less personal and more a quirky history of early lending practices and how nascent states and financial institutions have developed together, to enable functioning economies and societies. 

Money and Promises: Seven Deals that Changed the World by Paolo Zannoni (Bloomsbury, £25)

Advertisement

This article is part of FT Wealth, a section providing in-depth coverage of philanthropy, entrepreneurs, family offices, as well as alternative and impact investment

Continue Reading

Finance

Financial markets are pricing in more inflation under another Trump presidency—and bond yields are surging

Published

on

Financial markets are pricing in more inflation under another Trump presidency—and bond yields are surging

Financial giants from Goldman Sachs & Co. to Morgan Stanley and Barclays Plc. are taking a fresh look at how a Donald Trump victory in November could play out in the bond market.

After last week’s debate hurt President Joe Biden’s chances of winning reelection, Wall Street strategists are urging clients to position for sticky inflation and higher long-term bond yields. 

At Morgan Stanley, strategists including Matthew Hornbach and Guneet Dhingra in a weekend note argued that “now is the time” to wager on long-term interest rates rising relative to short-term ones. 

Trump’s rise in the polls since Thursday’s debate means investors have to contemplate economic policies that could lead to more rate cuts from the Federal Reserve, along with a Republican sweep that leads to fiscal expansion and pressures longer-term bond yields higher, Morgan Stanley said. 

Barclays, meanwhile, said that the best response to the rising prospect of a Trump victory is to hedge against inflation. Strategists Michael Pond and Jonathan Hill wrote Friday that the clearest expression is a wager that five-year Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, will outperform standard five-year notes. 

Advertisement

Buy-side investors like Jack McIntyre, a portfolio manager at Brandywine Global Investment Management, are increasingly taking note. 

McIntyre said he “is worried that the bond vigilantes are coming out early in response to the debate fall out.” The odds of a Republican sweep in November will increase from a combination of “Biden’s performance, weaker data, higher oil prices.”

US Treasuries fell on Monday, pushing yields to the highest levels in more than a week, in what traders said was ongoing fallout from last week’s bump in the odds of a second Trump term.

Treasuries extended their losses after the Supreme Court ruled in a case that will limit the chances that Trump will face trial before the November election on charges for attempting to reverse the 2020 election results.

The uptick in Treasury yields was led by the longest maturities, with 30-year bonds up more than eight basis points to 4.65%, the highest level since May 31.

Advertisement

Not all on Wall Street are convinced that higher long-term Treasury yields and steeper curves are inevitable.

“While a term premia-driven sell-off has been consensus for how US yields should react to a Republican victory, we see arguments for flattening risk,” Goldman Sachs strategists led by George Cole and William Marshall wrote after the debate. They see investor focus shifting away from fiscal spending and towards the risks of higher tariffs, which are likely to weigh on productivity and growth as the election comes into view.

With the makeup of Congress after November unclear, assumptions about how Trump policies will impact markets are on shaky ground, Kathy Jones, chief fixed-income strategist at Charles Schwab said. 

“A shift in the narrative about what policy will be after the election is probably the biggest risk to the Treasury market,” Jones told Bloomberg Television Monday. “I just think it’s too early. Presidential candidates can say a lot of things on the campaign trail, but they have to get those things through Congress.”

Subscribe to the Fortune Next to Lead newsletter to get weekly strategies on how to make it to the corner office. Sign up for free.
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending