Finance
How Budget 2024 Reforms Shape Your Personal Finance – Forbes India Blogs
Budget Day is always a momentous occasion, sparking keen interest as we dissect its implications on our finances. While the certainty of taxes is something we all face, our primary concern is often how these changes impact our take-home pay, particularly for salaried individuals. Let’s break down this year’s Budget and see what it means for you.
As we adapt to these updates, keep your focus on what you can control: your personal growth and income. Investing in yourself and working to enhance your earnings can make a significant difference. Although taxes are a constant, steering your financial future lies in your hands.
Changes in your tax slab:
The Budget has revised the tax slabs in the new tax regime to enhance its appeal to taxpayers. Under this regime, the standard deduction is proposed to increase from ₹50,000 to ₹75,000.
Pay No Tax on an Income of up to ₹7.75 Lakh
The recent changes in tax slabs will result in significant savings for lower and middle-income groups, while those in higher-income brackets will see minimal impact. These adjustments allow salaried employees in the new tax regime to save up to ₹17,500 in income tax.
The higher standard deduction of ₹75,000 means that anyone with an annual income of ₹7.75 lakh will not have to pay any tax. Additionally, under the new regime, taxpayers with an annual income of up to ₹7 lakh are eligible for a full tax rebate under Section 87A.
This is the second change in the new tax regime’s slab structure in as many years. Last year’s Budget reduced the number of slabs from seven to six and extended the standard deduction to the new regime. Let me explain:
Improved Financial Stability for Pensioners
The Budget 2024 proposes increasing the family pension deduction from ₹15,000 to ₹25,000, providing greater financial stability for pensioners. Meanwhile, taxpayers who prefer the old tax regime will see no changes in their tax liabilities, as no updates were announced for that system.
Simplification of capital gains on real estate transactions:
The Budget 2024 has removed the indexation benefit for property sales, changing how capital gains are calculated. Previously, sellers could adjust their purchase price for inflation, reducing their taxable gains, and were taxed at 20 Percent on long-term capital gains (LTCG). Now, the LTCG tax rate is reduced to 12.5 percent, but without the inflation adjustment.
Here is an example to illustrate this change:
Mr. A bought a property for ₹50 lakh in FY 2004-2005. He sells the property in FY 2023-2024 for ₹1.5 crore. Under the previous rules, the purchase price of ₹50 lakh would be adjusted for inflation using the Cost Inflation Index (CII) numbers provided by the Income Tax Department. However, under the new rules, there will be no adjustment for inflation. The capital gains will be calculated by directly subtracting the purchase price from the sale price. Although the good news is that the LTCG tax rate has been reduced from 20 percent to 12.5 percent, the lack of indexation requires careful calculation to determine the actual tax impact.
Also Read- Budget 2024: Higher taxes for markets investors, F&O clampdown
The objective is to simplify capital gains taxation by reducing the LTCG tax rate to 12.5 percent and removing the indexation benefit. This change is intended to make capital gains calculations easier for both taxpayers and tax authorities.
How the Indexation Removal Affects Real Estate Investors
The elimination of indexation benefits poses a challenge for long-term real estate investors. Without this adjustment, taxable capital gains are likely to rise, increasing the tax burden on property sales. This could reduce net profits and potentially deter investment in real estate, especially for those who have held properties for an extended period where inflation has had a greater impact.
New Tax Relief for Multiple Properties and Short-Term Rentals
Under the new tax rules, individuals can now designate up to two properties as self-occupied. This change is advantageous for homeowners with multiple properties or those renting out homes on short-term platforms like Airbnb, providing relief and simplifying tax management.
Increased Long-Term Capital Gains Tax on financial assets
The long-term capital gains tax (LTCG) has been raised from 10 percent to 12.5 percent across all financial and non-financial assets. Short-term capital gains (STCG) on specific assets will now be taxed at 20 percent. The exemption limit for LTCG has also increased from ₹1 lakh to ₹1.25 lakh. The Budget clarifies that listed financial assets held for over a year will be deemed long-term, while unlisted financial assets and non-financial assets must be held for at least two years to qualify.
Also Read- Budget 2024 is a quest for equitable growth: CRISIL
I see these changes may create concerns about potential future tax increases, but it’s essential to remember that equity gains could offset some of these taxes. Equity mutual funds remain a compelling investment option. As I always say, “Death and taxes are certain,” so focusing on increasing income and controlling what you can is key.
Budget 2024 Highlights: STT Hike and NPS Enhancements
STT Increase for Futures and Options:
Futures and Options (F&O) traders will face a significant tax increase as the Security Transaction Tax (STT) rises from 0.01 percent to 0.02 percent. This adjustment will effectively double the tax on equity and index trades.
Boost in NPS Tax Deductions:
The deduction limit for employer contributions to the New Pension Scheme (NPS) is set to rise from 10 percent to 14 percent. This enhancement will benefit both public and private sector employees, aligning their tax advantages with those of government employees.
Introduction of NPS Vatsalya for Minors:
The new NPS Vatsalya scheme allows parents to contribute to a minor’s NPS account, which will convert to a regular NPS plan upon the child’s 18th birthday. This scheme fosters early financial discipline and seamlessly transitions to a standard NPS plan.
Changes to Buyback Taxation and Reporting Requirements
Buybacks Taxed as Dividends:
Starting October 1, buybacks will be taxed as dividend income, significantly reducing their appeal to investors. This proposal may alter investment strategies, making buybacks less attractive compared to before.
Relaxed Penalties for Foreign Assets:
The Budget introduces a relaxation in penalties for not reporting foreign assets up to ₹20 lakh. This change aims to ease the burden on small taxpayers who may have inadvertently overlooked reporting overseas assets.
Eased TDS for Salaried Employees:
From October 1, salaried employees will benefit from reduced Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) as they can now declare Tax Collected at Source (TCS) to their employers. This update will help manage cash flow better and allow any refunds due to be adjusted directly against TDS.
These changes bring both challenges and opportunities. The shift in buyback taxation may prompt investors to reconsider their strategies, while relaxed penalties and adjusted TDS rules offer significant relief to taxpayers. It’s crucial to stay informed and adapt to these updates to optimise your financial planning.
The writer is a Chartered Accountant and founder of NRP Capitals.
The thoughts and opinions shared here are of the author.
Check out our end of season subscription discounts with a Moneycontrol pro subscription absolutely free. Use code EOSO2021. Click here for details.
The Blueprint
- 2025 tariffs lifted U.S. import taxes to nearly 17%, generating $30B/month.
- Framework deals struck with EU, UK, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam; China deal remains unresolved.
- U.S. economy rebounded despite early contraction; AI investments and consumer spending helped growth.
- Key 2026 developments include Supreme Court rulings, U.S.-China talks, and NAFTA review.
President Donald Trump’s return to the White House in 2025 kicked off a frenetic year for global trade, with waves of tariffs on U.S. trading partners that lifted import taxes to their highest since the Great Depression, roiled financial markets and sparked rounds of negotiations over trade and investment deals.
His trade policies — and the global reaction to them — will remain front and center in 2026, but face some hefty challenges.
What happened in 2025
Trump’s moves, aimed broadly at reviving a declining manufacturing base, lifted the average tariff rate to nearly 17% from less than 3% at the end of 2024, according to Yale Budget Lab, and the levies are now generating roughly $30 billion a month of revenue for the U.S. Treasury.
They brought world leaders scrambling to Washington seeking deals for lower rates, often in return for pledges of billions of dollars in U.S. investments. Framework deals were struck with a host of major trading partners, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and others, but notably a final agreement with China remains on the undone list despite multiple rounds of talks and a face-to-face meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
The EU was criticized by many for its deal for a 15% tariff on its exports and a vague commitment to big U.S. investments. France’s prime minister at the time, Francois Bayrou, called it an act of submission and a “sombre day” for the bloc. Others shrugged that it was the “least bad” deal on offer.
Since then, European exporters and economies have broadly coped with the new tariff rate, thanks to various exemptions and their ability to find markets elsewhere. French bank Societe Generale estimated the total direct impact of the tariffs was equivalent to just 0.37% of the region’s GDP.
Meanwhile, China’s trade surplus defied Trump’s tariffs to surpass $1 trillion as it succeeded in diversifying away from the U.S., moved its manufacturing sector up the value chain, and used the leverage it has gained in rare earth minerals — crucial inputs into the West’s security scaffolding — to push back against pressure from the U.S. or Europe to curb its surplus.
What notably did not happen was the economic calamity and high inflation that legions of economists predicted would unfold from Trump’s tariffs.
The U.S. economy suffered a modest contraction in the first quarter amid a scramble to import goods before tariffs took effect, but quickly rebounded and continues to grow at an above-trend pace thanks to a massive artificial intelligence investment boom and resilient consumer spending. The International Monetary Fund, in fact, twice lifted its global growth outlook in the months following Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs announcement in April as uncertainty ebbed and deals were struck to reduce the originally announced rates.
And while U.S. inflation remains somewhat elevated in part because of tariffs, economists and policymakers now expect the effects to be more mild and short-lived than feared, with cost sharing of the import taxes occurring across the supply chain among producers, importers, retailers and consumers.
What to look for in 2026 and why it matters
A big unknown for 2026 is whether many of Trump’s tariffs are allowed to stand. A challenge to the novel legal premise for what he branded as “reciprocal” tariffs on goods from individual countries and for levies imposed on China, Canada and Mexico tied to the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in late 2025, and a decision is expected in early 2026.
The Trump administration insists it can shift to other, more-established legal authorities to keep tariffs in place should it lose. But those are more cumbersome and often limited in scope, so a loss at the high court for the administration might prompt renegotiations of the deals struck so far or usher in a new era of uncertainty about where the tariffs will end up.
Arguably just as important for Europe is what is happening with its trading relationship with China, for years a reliable destination for its exporters. The depreciation of the yuan and the gradual move up the value chain for Chinese companies have helped China’s exporters. Europe’s companies meanwhile have struggled to make further inroads into the slowing domestic Chinese market. One of the key questions for 2026 is whether Europe finally uses tariffs or other measures to address what some of its officials are starting to call the “imbalances” in the China-EU trading ties.
Efforts to finally cement a U.S.-China deal loom large as well. A shaky detente reached in this year’s talks will expire in the second half of 2026, and Trump and Xi are tentatively set to meet twice over the course of the year.
And lastly, the free trade deal with the two largest U.S. trading partners — Canada and Mexico — is up for review in 2026 amid uncertainty over whether Trump will let the pact expire or try to retool it more to his liking.
What analysts are saying:
“It seems like the administration is rowing back on its harshest stance on tariffs in order to mitigate some of the inflation/pricing issues,” Chris Iggo, chief investment officer for Core Investments and chair of the Investment Institute at AXA Investment Managers, said on a 2026 outlook call. “So less of a concern to markets. Could be marginally helpful to the inflation outlook if tariffs are reduced or at least not further increased.”
Ahead of midterm elections later in the year, “a confrontational trade war with China would not be great — a deal would be politically and economically better for the U.S. outlook,” he said.
Finance
Jack in the Box shut down more than 70 stores, expecting more to close amid financial struggle
Jack in the Box plans to close dozens of restaurants by the end of the year in an effort to cut costs and boost revenue.
The franchise said earlier this year it would shutter between 150 and 200 underperforming stores by 2026, including 80–120 by the end of this year, under a block closure program.
In May, Jack In The Box said it had closed 12 locations, which was followed by another 13 closures by August and 47 more reported in the company’s November earnings, according to the Daily Mail.
This brings the total to 72, which remains short of the company’s year-end goal with a week to go.
The company hopes the closures will improve its financial performance because stores are seeing fewer customers, beef prices are rising, and the company is carrying significantly more debt than it generates in annual earnings.
It reported a net loss of $80.7 million for the full fiscal year that ended in September. The franchise also reported that sales fell 7.4% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, reflecting a year-over-year drop compared to the same quarter in 2024 and marking the second consecutive quarter with a dip of more than 7%.
“In my time thus far as CEO, I have worked quickly with our teams to conclude that Jack in the Box operates at its best and maximizes shareholder return potential, within a simplified and asset-light business model,” CEO Lance Tucker said in April.
“Our actions today focus on three main areas: Addressing our balance sheet to accelerate cash flow and pay down debt, while preserving growth-oriented capital investments related to technology and restaurant reimage; closing underperforming restaurants to position ourselves for consistent net unit growth and competitive unit economics; and, an overall return to simplicity for the Jack in the Box business model and investor story.”
The company also announced this week that it has completed the sale of Del Taco to Yadav Enterprises for about $119 million as part of its turnaround plan.
Jack in the Box operates roughly 2,200 restaurants in the U.S., with most in California, Texas and Arizona.
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/shawmedia/6DU2AQZK7VH37JJYSRR6524XHY.jpg?ssl=1 "Extension offers farm finance guidance amid low profits")
University of Illinois Extension is guiding to help farmers understand their financial condition through balance sheet analysis as the Midwest agriculture sector faces another year of low profits.
A market-value balance sheet provides a snapshot of a farm’s financial condition by comparing current asset values to liabilities owed, according to Kevin Brooks, Extension educator in Havana.
Lenders use a traffic light system to evaluate farm financial health based on debt-to-asset ratios. Farms with debt ratios of 30% or less are considered financially strong, while ratios between 30% and 60% signal caution and may result in higher interest rates.
“A debt-to-asset ratio of more than 60% will make it challenging to secure a loan through traditional lenders,” Brooks said. Farms in this category may need to work with the Farm Service Agency as a lender of last resort.
Lenders also examine current ratios, calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities. A ratio of at least 2.0 is considered strong, meaning the farm has $2 to pay each $1 of current debt.
Working capital provides another critical measure, representing the cash cushion farms have above expenses. Lenders typically require a 30% to 40% cushion to cover unexpected challenges.
Brooks emphasized the importance of honest financial reporting and maintaining strong lender relationships, especially during challenging economic conditions.
“Falsifying information on the balance sheet is a criminal offense,” he said. “Farmers have been convicted and imprisoned for bank fraud.”
Brooks advised farmers to keep lenders informed about purchase and debt plans, use realistic asset values and ensure balance sheets are consistent across all lenders.
For more information, contact Brooks at kwbrooks@illinois.edu or visit the Extension Farm Coach blog.
Oregon City church catches fire on Christmas Day
The town that saved Christmas, Wellsboro Pa.
RI Lottery Lucky For Life, Numbers Midday winning numbers for Dec. 25, 2025
South Carolina Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for Dec. 25, 2025
SD Lottery Lucky For Life winning numbers for Dec. 25, 2025
Florida High School Football Rankings: Top 25 teams – Oct. 21
Cleary's 21 help Le Moyne down Central Connecticut State 69-64 in OT
How old is Bo Nix? What to know about Oregon quarterback ahead of 2024 NFL Draft
99th annual Pony Swim held in Virginia
Video: ‘It Didn’t Have to Happen This Way:’ U.Va. Faculty Call for Review of Police Response to Protests
Nonprofit uses underwater technology to search for missing service members
Best of 2025: Top five defining moments in the European Parliament
DOJ says it may need a ‘few more weeks’ to finish releasing Epstein files
Trump lists accomplishments, says ‘Radical Left Scum’ are ‘failing badly’ in Christmas message
Ukraine accepts demilitarised zone to end Russia war, but do DMZs work?
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMIT professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro, a 47-year-old physicist and fusion scientist, shot and killed in his home in Brookline, Mass. | Fortune
-
New Mexico1 week agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz and See How Much You Know About Jane Austen
-
World6 days agoPutin says Russia won’t launch new attacks on other countries ‘if you treat us with respect’
-
Maine1 week agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off
-
Minneapolis, MN1 week agoMinneapolis man is third convicted in Coon Rapids triple murder
-
Culture1 week agoRevisiting Jane Austen’s Cultural Impact for Her 250th Birthday