Finance
Empower Finance Buys Petal. What’s That Mean for Petal Credit Card Users?
Key takeaways
- Empower Finance, best known as a cash-advance app, is buying credit card issuer Petal.
- Petal touted its credit cards as a solution for those with less-than-stellar credit but came under fire last year when it downgraded some customers to annual-fee cards.
- Cardholders can wait and see if an influx of money improves benefits or apply for a new card before changes come.
Empower Finance is buying Petal, the credit card issuer that originally made a splash with the promise of helping customers build their credit inexpensively but ended up downgrading some of those same customers to cards charging numerous fees.
When it launched in 2016, Petal credit card company touted itself as an affordable way to access credit for anyone with a less-than-stellar credit history. Its approval process used alternative data like banking information instead of just credit scores and credit history.
And unlike some credit-builder cards, Petal doesn’t charge a security deposit. Plus, you could earn 1% to 10% in cash back — depending on the card you were approved for — a rarity for a credit-builder card with no annual fee.
But the company stumbled amid financial woes with users reporting issues that included some customers being downgraded to a version of the card that charged an annual fee.
If you’re a current Petal cardholder or are interested in using one of this company’s cards to boost your credit, here’s what the acquisition could mean for you.
Who is Empower Finance?
Empower Finance is best known as a cash-advance app (it is not affiliated with Empower, which offers investment and retirement planning services). A cash advance is basically a short-term loan you can access without having to apply for a loan through a bank or online lender. Depending on where you borrow from — like a predatory lender — cash advances can charge sky-high interest rates.
Empower doesn’t charge interest or late fees on its cash advances, but you must subscribe to its app, which costs $8 per month. Instead of your credit history, Empower says it uses your income and spending habits to determine how much you can borrow, up to $250. The amount borrowed is deducted from your bank account on your scheduled repayment date.
Empower Finance also offers other financial products and money management tools on its app, including a credit product called Thrive, as well as credit monitoring and savings and budgeting tools.
Empower plans to complete its acquisition of Petal by the end of June and is expected to integrate both companies’ offerings into one product experience, although it’s unclear how that might play out.
What does this mean for Petal cardholders?
Petal customers could potentially benefit by getting access to all of the Empower Finance products and money management tools. But it could also mean they get charged Empower’s $8-per-month subscription fee.
And while Empower’s cash advances offer potential value, if borrowers need more time to repay, they might be tempted to use the Thrive credit service instead, said Jason Steele, credit card expert and CNET expert review board member.
“Empower advertises cash advances with no interest or fees, but if you choose your repayment date instead of the default or select a split payment option, then you’ll incur interest at an annual percentage rate of 35.99%,” he said. “This isn’t as predatory as some payday loans, but it’s higher than many credit cards.”
Despite users’ dissatisfaction with Petal’s downgrading practices, the credit card company is still well-known for its cash flow underwriting technology, offering an alternative for people who either have no credit or have poor credit reports and scores, according to credit expert John Ulzheimer, formerly of FICO and Equifax.
Petal’s technology appears to align with Empower’s underwriting business that assesses consumers using nontraditional data rather than credit histories.
“While it’s unknown what Empower will maintain from their Petal acquisition, it seems to make sense to fold in their cash flow tech to existing underwriting practices,” Ulzheimer said.
Credit cards typically charge an upfront fee for cash advances, and they come with a higher interest rate — typically 24.99% to 29.99% or higher — than a card’s standard APR.
What happened to Petal last year?
The acquisition was announced earlier this month, nearly a year after the Petal card brand came under fire for downgrading customers to an annual-fee card. Some customers who had either the Petal® 1 “No Annual Fee” Visa® Credit Card* or Petal® 2 “Cash Back, No Fees” Visa® Credit Card, both of which have no annual fee, reported that the company had downgraded them to the new Petal 1 Rise* card, which charges a $59 annual fee and has a higher variable APR than the other two cards.
The Petal 1 Rise also included a 3% cash-like transaction fee with a $10 minimum (cash-like transactions include money orders, person-to-person cash transfers like Venmo or CashApp, lottery tickets and gift card purchases), a late fee of up to $40 and a returned payment fee of up to $29.
For a company that promoted itself as an inexpensive way to build credit, the new terms were much different than the previous Petal cards. Users who signed up for one card were ultimately forced into an ultimatum: They could either accept the new terms and pay the annual fee, which could be difficult on a limited budget, or cancel their card, which could damage their credit score.
What’s more confusing is that both the Petal 1 and Petal 2 cards are still available with no annual fee. And while both cards are still great credit building options for users, CNET no longer recommends them since there’s no guarantee you won’t be downgraded to the lower-tier Petal Rise.
What happens next?
For now, Petal cardholders will likely not see much change immediately, but the new influx of money from an acquisition could change users’ experience, according to Steele.
“Petal has been struggling as a company and its acquisition could offer it new resources, or it could result in a significant change to its business model,” Steele said.
In the meantime, current Petal cardholders can wait it out to see if there are positive improvements or find a new credit card altogether.
If you decide to close your Petal account and apply for a card from a different issuer, consider keeping your Petal account open during the application process so your current credit line can help demonstrate your creditworthiness.
Card alternatives for Petal users
If you’re looking to trade in your Petal card because of the downgrade or acquisition and your credit score is still low, you may want to consider applying for a secured credit card, which typically requires a security deposit.
“I strongly recommend those with fair or poor credit consider a secured card with no annual fee, rather than an unsecured card with numerous fees,” Steele said.
Specifically, Steele recommends cardholders with fair or poor credit get a secured credit card like the Capital One Platinum Secured Credit Card* or the Discover it® Secured Credit Card*. The Capital One Platinum Secured Credit Card lets users begin building credit with a security deposit as low as $49 and no annual fee. The Discover it® Secured Credit Card has a credit limit range of $200 to $2,500 that is directly proportional to the deposit amount. It doesn’t charge an annual fee, and it lets users earn cash-back rewards.
If you’re a Petal cardholder who’s been using your card responsibly for at least a year, you may qualify for an unsecured credit card with no annual fee. If you’re going this route, Steele recommends applying for a simple card from your bank or credit union.
*All information about the Petal 1 “No Annual Fee” Visa Credit Card, the Petal 1 Rise, the Capital One Platinum Secured Credit Card and the Discover it Secured Credit Card has been collected independently by CNET and has not been reviewed by the issuer.
Recommended Articles
The editorial content on this page is based solely on objective, independent assessments by our writers and is not influenced by advertising or partnerships. It has not been provided or commissioned by any third party. However, we may receive compensation when you click on links to products or services offered by our partners.
Finance
Is inflation killing romance as Gen Z skips dating to save money?
Finance
From employee perks to asset management: Hitechzone expands into finance | CTech
The consumer club Hitechzone and the financial firm Mor Langermann are acquiring control of the investment house Kivun at a valuation of NIS 5 million. In the first stage, the two acquiring entities will each hold 30% of the company (60% in total). They will later be joined by Gabi Dishi, one of the owners of hedge fund firm Alpha, who will initially hold 9%, with the option to increase his stake to up to 20%.
The agreement also includes an option to raise the combined holding to 83%. In addition, capital will be injected into the investment house to support growth and expand its operations. The transaction is expected to close within the coming month.
Kivun is currently owned by founder Beni Mozes (40%), Dr. Jan Reuven (16%), CEO Avi Meir (5%), and additional minority shareholders. The acquiring group will purchase all of Mozes’ shares, part of Reuven’s holdings, and the remaining shares from smaller investors. Mozes, aged 83, has been seeking a buyer for his stake for the past year. Despite the change in control, Mozes and Meir are expected to continue managing the company’s mutual funds and portfolio management activities. Mozes declined to comment on the deal but confirmed that control is being sold.
The company manages approximately NIS 350 million in assets, of which about NIS 250 million is in mutual funds, with the remainder in managed investment portfolios. The mutual funds are not operated independently but are managed under a “hosting” model, with operational services provided by Ayalon Investment House. The mutual fund industry remains one of the public’s main savings channels for the short- and medium-term and currently manages a record NIS 835 billion in assets.
Hitechzone’s acquisition of control over the investment house comes as a surprise to industry observers. According to senior mutual fund executives, the consumer club, which targets employees in the high-tech sector, may in the future seek to market investment management services and portfolio products to its members, with a focus on the technology sector. Hitechzone already maintains collaborations with financial institutions across banking and long-term savings, meaning its management will likely need to reassess its policy regarding the distribution of financial products.
Hitechzone is controlled by Ronen Dagan (25.2%) and Noam Busidan (24.2%) and is operated under its parent company, High Biz. It is considered one of Israel’s largest and most influential consumer clubs. The club serves employees in the high-tech industry and has more than 370,000 members across over 2,500 companies. Unlike other consumer clubs, membership is not open to the general public and is limited to organizational affiliation.
Over the years, the club has expanded beyond consumer discounts into a range of business activities. In e-commerce, it operates an online retail platform that grew following the acquisition of the Walla Shops website and is supported by an independent logistics network and a large distribution center.
In addition, the core of the club’s financial activity is based on a dedicated credit card issued in partnership with Cal. Its broader influence is also reflected in strategic collaborations in capital markets and retail. Among other initiatives, the club operates a joint banking service with Bank Hapoalim under the “Poalim Hitechzone” brand, offering members preferential account terms. It is also active in the automotive sector through Hitechzone Motors, which provides new vehicle purchases on discounted terms, and periodically organizes real estate and mortgage initiatives for members.
Hitechzone’s shareholders also include the Menora Mivtachim Group, through Menora Mivtachim Pension and Provident Funds (12.9%) and Menora Mivtachim Insurance (4.4%). The transaction therefore marks an indirect return of the group to the mutual fund sector, after it previously merged its mutual fund operations with Altshuler Shaham in 2017.
For Mor Langermann, the deal is expected to broaden its activity base. Mor Langermann Capital is a relatively new participant in the underwriting sector, while the banking firm itself was founded in 2015 by Uri Mor and Etty Langermann.
The strategic rationale behind the joint acquisition remains unclear. Sources involved in the transaction say the main driver was the relatively low valuation at which the investment house was offered. The investment management industry, particularly mutual funds, has undergone significant consolidation in recent years.
Ronen Dagan said: “We at Hitechzone are committed to maximizing the purchasing power of high-tech employees. Our strategy includes developing ventures and investments in key areas such as real estate, automotive, and finance. These are the categories where club members spend the most, and therefore where we can create the greatest savings and value for them.”
Finance
Campaign finance reports show big contributions in Lubbock council race
The five candidates for Saturday’s Lubbock City Council District 4 special election filed campaign finance reports showing political contributions from some notable area organizations and community leaders.
The June 27 special election will determine who will replace Councilman Brayden Rose in the south-central Lubbock council seat. Rose announced his resignation earlier in the year and will formally vacate his seat on the Lubbock City Council once the district elects his successor.
Which candidates are on the ballot for District 4?
Here is the list of candidates as they appear on the ballot for the City of Lubbock special election:
- Gary Boren — retired businessman, former city councilmember and member of the Brazos River Authority Board.
- Stephanie Ferran — Lubbock small business owner and life coach.
- Tim Green — local homebuilder, owner of Tim Green Homes and former fireman.
- Bill Curnow — cybersecurity professional with Plains Cotton Cooperative Association and community volunteer.
- Boyd Goodloe — Lubbock Area Director for Access Rentals, former Lubbock ISD school board candidate and a youth minister.
Who led in fundraising for the District 4 special election?
Here’s a look at campaign contributions and in-kind donations the five candidates reported in their 30-day and 8-day campaign finance reports, according to documents from the Lubbock City Secretary’s Office.
Green came into Saturday’s special election leading the fundraising battle during the relatively short election cycle that began in the spring.
According to their 8-day campaign finance reports filed with the city, Green reported $16,235.80 in contributions in June compared to $10,400 for Boren during the period.
Their 30-day reports filed in May showed Green reported $21,600 in contributions compared to $0 for Boren during the initial reporting period through late May. Curnow reported $1,740.11 in contributions during the initial reporting period, with Goodloe reporting $378 in contributions and Ferran $0 at that time.
Curnow reported $183.23 in contributions in his eight-day report, while Ferran reported $0 and Goodloe reported $87.45 during the period.
Notable contributions for Boren included $5,000 from businessman and Texas Tech System Regent Dusty Womble, $1,000 from Carl and Gloria Toti and $1,000 from Mike and Suzie Liner, among other smaller contributions.
Notable contributions for Green included $5,000 from the 806 Advantage PAC, $4,000 from Scott Leach along with several $1,500 or $1,000 contributions from other area businesses people and entrepreneurs. Green also reported $10,500 in in-kind contributions from the Lubbock Professional Firefighters Association.
Curnow reported a $1,000 contribution from psychologist Philip Davis among several other smaller contributions.
In their 8-day reports, the candidates also included total expenses for the period, including: Boren with $19,032.57 ($3,948.07 in his 30-day report), Curnow with $886.69 ($1,494.14 in his 30-day), Ferran with $0 ($464 in her 30-day), Goodloe with $673.43 ($266.67 in his 30-day), and Green with $10.90 ($12,864.20 in his 30-day).
Adam D. Young is the Editor of the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal and Amarillo Globe-News in Texas. Have a news tip for him? Email him at ayoung@lubbockonline.com.
-
Maryland3 minutes agoSTEM Exploration Zone during SAIL250 MD provides hands-on activities for families
-
Michigan10 minutes agoInside a 168-year-old Michigan estate frozen in time listed at $1.49M
-
Massachusetts13 minutes ago8 Picture-Perfect Main Streets In Massachusetts
-
Minnesota18 minutes agoCold Spring man fatally stabbed, suspect in custody, police say
-
Mississippi25 minutes agoCould Texas Be Facing Another Trap Game vs. Mississippi State in 2026?
-
Missouri28 minutes agoUPDATE: Well-known mid-Missouri attorney charged after sting expected to request home detention | 93.9 The Eagle
-
Montana33 minutes agoMontana nurse and Guard member earns national Air Force recognition
-
Nebraska40 minutes agoFormer OSU, Nebraska wrestler AJ Ferrari arrested after police pursuit in Nebraska