Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu’ movie review: Simbu and Gautham Menon are superb in this very ordinary gangster drama

Published

on

‘Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu’ movie review: Simbu and Gautham Menon are superb in this very ordinary gangster drama

Simbu is as invisible as Gautham Menon in ‘Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu’ and it is a welcome departure for them. But, one thing feels incomplete

Simbu is as invisible as Gautham Menon in ‘Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu’ and it is a welcome departure for them. But, one thing feels incomplete

The dying embers of a forest hearth find yourself elsewhere as a flame-throwing machine.

At the least this appears to be the lyrical concept that should have ignited a spark in Gautham Menon to adapt Jeyamohan’s brief story, now as Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu ( VTK). At the least that’s how VTK opens, with Muthu (Silambarasan) being the ember in a dying hearth who will get thrown out of it, as if to suggest that he’s a survivor. Or slightly, he’s a ball of fireplace himself. The latter sounds extra plausible.

Let’s get this out of the way in which: Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu isn’t your common gangster movie. In reality, it doesn’t even declare to belong to the gangster style. As a substitute, we get a pleasant procedural drama that’s each a blessing and a curse. Extra about that later. And Gautham Menon anyway isn’t concerned with telling the story of a gangster; he appears content material with the journey itself. He appears concerned with capturing the lifetime of Muthu in actual time. By doing so, Gautham creates a temper piece with area and leisure that makes it laborious to inform whether or not I loved it to its entirety or if one thing felt misplaced in translation. However what I can confidently say is that the world VTK tries to assemble within the first half is beautiful — each by way of writing and course. 

Advertisement

Gautham often has this urgency to get into the protagonist’s head and ‘narrate’ his story, however that has been course-corrected. He has been utilizing voice-over as a tool to additional the narrative. To replenish screenplay gaps. In VTK, the narrative itself is procedural in nature. Subsequently, there is no such thing as a urgency to hurry over the story, no urgency for fast pay-offs. In different phrases, it may be argued that Muthu’s story might be instructed solely this fashion. Once you adapt a literary piece of textual content for display screen, there’s a tendency to trim reams of pages that may take up the majority of the screentime. Some filmmakers may present this gradual development of life in montages or transition results; Gautham himself has carried out it. 

Think about this: for Muthu to go away his village in Naduvakurichi, Tirunelveli, to work as a migrant labourer in Chembur, Mumbai, just about takes about half an hour. And the following 40-odd minutes is devoted to the everydayness of Muthu’s life; the folks he meets, the tales he listens to. It might be stated that a few of these bits felt by-product and repetitive. Maybe that was the purpose. To point out the ordinariness of their lives, identical to Vasantha Balan’s Angadi Theru

Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu

Solid: Silambarasan, Siddhi Idnani, Raadhika Sarathkumar and Neeraj Madhav

Director: Gautham Vasudev Menon

Advertisement

Storyline: The journey of Muthu by way of his adolescence as a gangster in Mumbai

In Mumbai, Muthu works at a parotta store run by a Tamil. His co-workers are all from completely different villages from Tamil Nadu however with very comparable tales. They’re all invisible those that make a metropolis look seen. However Muthu doesn’t know that the store is an underbelly of the underworld. His superboss is Gaarji, a gangster from Tirunelveli, who has a beef with Kutty Bhai (Siddique), a Malayali gangster. Muthu and his associates virtually stay twin lives. They look ahead to the order to execute and every time they do it, dying performs its course and a brand new occupant arrives on the scene.

We get this terrific line from Muthu’s buddy Saravanan (Appukutty): “They’re like large machines and we’re identical to screws on them, not realizing something in regards to the machine.” Come to think about it, the “machine analogy” will get fully-realised within the interval block when Muthu is compelled to take a pistol to defend. As if to counsel that: “He’s not a screw however a machine. Somewhat, a bullet.”

The tactic of VTK is sluggish enlargement and you’ll’t assist however get partially soaked in it. Gautham appears to actually respect Jeyamohan’s writing and that reveals all by way of the primary half. In reality, the movie ended for me on the intermission. It felt full. It felt like VTK had made its level already. 

The purpose it was attempting to make till now might be traced in Thamarai’s lovely line within the music ‘Marakuma Nenjam’: “Adangadha rattinaththil yerikitu mela mela mela poghum. Adhil ninnu keezha paartha pullipilliya thaane thonum. Adhu pola bodha unda engum.”

Advertisement

This “adangatha rattinam” turns into a metaphor on Muthu when he will get sucked into the circle of violence. And how he falls into the pit is the place a lot of the meat is. Proper up so far, VTK was straight up my alley. Up until now, it felt not like something we’ve got seen in a Gautham Menon movie. And the second the second half begins, it heads in direction of a slippery slope and again into the Gautham Menon zone. However that isn’t the principle concern.

The issue with VTK is… it’s simply too atypical for an expansive gangster saga. Written by Jeyamohan and Gautham Menon for the display screen, VTK’s screenplay wanted higher dramatic factors. This isn’t to be mistaken with “mass” moments. Please, no. Examine the intermission scene of VTK with what Vetri Maaran did in Vada Chennai and you’ll realise the place I’m going with this. The staging ought to have been carried out in such a method that we really feel participative and never distant from the character. Right here, we simply observe Muthu taking over the revolver. It does nothing. However you get the thought of the second half. It’s in Thamarai’s lyrics once more: “Engu thodangum. Engu mudiyum. Aatrin payanam.” The selection that Muthu has made is “aatrin payanam”. He doesn’t know the place it’s going to finish, so can we. Once more, VTK is just too atypical. Too by-product.

There are, nonetheless, positives. That is Simbu’s greatest appearing in ages for the easy motive that we, fortunately, don’t see Simbu within the movie. The actor is really exceptional as Muthu, particularly within the Mumbai portion. Put him in a body crowded with folks and it’s very doubtless it’s possible you’ll not even discover him. That’s how a lot we don’t see Simbu on this movie. He even will get the Tirunveli dialect proper and there appears to be a acutely aware effort to make sure that the character doesn’t slip into conversational Tamil. Early on, when somebody asks Muthu to put on slippers, he says, “pirakku pottukaren” versus the standard “apprum”.

Simbu is as invisible in VTK as Gautham Menon. This can be a welcome departure for the filmmaker who has usually come below hearth for making the identical movies once more. Gautham too has tried doing one thing completely different this time — actually! There are a number of lengthy pictures that merely didn’t work for me. However my favorite shot is when Muthu goes to a textile store the place he meets Pallavi (Siddhi Idnani, in a badly-acted and bad-written romance) for the primary time. We see them having a chat till cinematographer Siddhartha Nuni turns the digicam away — it’s a mirrored image in a mirror. Gautham does this once more in a later scene for the alternative impact, as if to close Muthu’s advances.

The filmmaker has additionally taken a number of criticisms of his earlier movies — with regard to normalising stalking —  for the higher. So, when Muthu stalks Pallavi, she shoots him down. Not precisely that however we a minimum of get to listen to the lady say, “That is mistaken” and never fall for his charms. Likewise, in a later scene, when Muthu throws a wad of money in entrance of Pallavi’s father, asking for his approval to marry her, we get to see Pallavi calling this behaviour out. For, solely a scene earlier, we see Muthu saving Pallavi from her boss’ sexual harassment.

Advertisement

The largest optimistic has obtained to be how well-rounded the screenplay construction is: the place it begins is the place the movie additionally ends. Which is why I’m not precisely certain what to make of the final 10 minutes that teases for a second installment. For me, the movie ended in the course of the intermission.

Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu is at present operating in theatres

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Wicked movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Wicked movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

The razzle-dazzle that’s Jon M. Chu’s bread and butter is on glorious display in “Wicked,” the big-screen version of the beloved Broadway musical.  

When it’s all about the spectacle of big, splashy production numbers, this prequel to “The Wizard of Oz” is thrilling, whether we’re in Munchkinland, the Emerald City or the campus of Shiz University, where a young Wicked Witch of the West and Glinda the Good Witch of the North first cross paths. As we’ve seen from the director’s previous films including “Crazy Rich Asians” and “In the Heights,” Chu is uniquely adept at presenting an enormous song-and-dance extravaganza without getting lost in it. His sense of pacing and perspective draw us in and center us within the swirling fantasy. 

It helps greatly that he has deeply talented stars in Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande: magnetic multi-hyphenates who can meet every physical and emotional challenge of these iconic characters. Following in the footsteps of Idina Menzel and Kristin Chenoweth would seem like a daunting task, but Erivo and Grande bring their own vocal power and dramatic interpretation to the roles of Elphaba and Glinda, respectively. You truly feel the friendship between these opposites, particularly in one beautiful, wordless dance sequence where they forge their unlikely bond, which is moving in its understatement. That’s the foundation of this story, so it’s crucial that we know their connection is true for its destruction to be meaningful. 

Far less effective is the way Chu, working from a script by Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox, based on the novel by Gregory Maguire, wedges in the movie’s heavier themes of authoritarianism. Yes, they are baked into the story: We know from watching 1939’s “The Wizard of Oz” countless times that the wizard is a con artist who rules by fear. His deception is literally one of smoke and mirrors. That’s all in the source material of the “Wicked” stage production, as well, for which Holzman wrote the book and Stephen Schwartz wrote the music and lyrics. Here, in film form, the tone swings awkwardly between upbeat wonder and dark oppression. This is a world in which minorities are hunted, placed in cages and prevented from speaking, where a charismatic leader (a playfully evil Jeff Goldblum) persecutes a woman of color. It is not subtle, and it feels all-too relevant to our times, despite originating decades ago. It also drags down the energy of this epic tale. 

And yet, overstuffed as the film is at 2 hours and 40 minutes, this is only part one: “Wicked” ends where the intermission occurs in the stage show, with part two coming in November 2025. It’s a lot to ask of an audience. Still, people who love this story and these characters will be delighted, and there’s much here for people who aren’t familiar with the musical but are looking for a cinematic escape around the holidays. 

Advertisement

“Wicked” begins with Grande’s Glinda descending majestically into Munchkinland to inform her enthusiastic fans that the rumors are true: The witch really is dead. Then it flashes back to how she and the green-hued Elphaba (the Wicked Witch’s first name) became unlikely allies in college. Elphaba has always been bullied and ostracized because of the color of her skin; Glinda—or Galinda, as she’s known at this point—is a pretty, pampered mean girl who’s always gotten her way. (Bowen Yang is a hoot as one of her loyal sycophants.) 

But once they’re forced to room together, they eventually realize, to their surprise, that they genuinely see each other in a way no one ever has before. Galinda’s makeover anthem “Popular”—one of the most popular songs from the show—is among the film’s highlights, and a great example of the technical prowess “Wicked” offers. The costume design from Paul Tazewell (“West Side Story”) and production design from longtime Christopher Nolan collaborator Nathan Crowley are exquisite throughout but especially here. Alice Brooks’ cinematography is consistently wondrous, but her use of hot pink lighting as Galinda’s at the height of her power is really evocative.  

Chu’s usual choreographer, Christopher Scott, delivers again with vibrant, inspired moves, particularly in the elaborate “Dancing Through Life,” which takes place in the school’s rotating, multilevel library. “Bridgerton” star Jonathan Bailey gets a chance to show off his musical theater background here, and he’s terrifically charming as the glib Prince Fiyero, the object of both Elphaba and Galinda’s romantic interests. Michelle Yeoh brings elegance and just a hint of danger to her role as Madame Morrible, the university’s sorcery professor. And Peter Dinklage lends gravitas as the resonant voice of Dr. Dillamond, a goat instructor who, like other talking animals in Oz, finds himself increasingly in peril. 

But it’s that connection between Erivo and Grande that gives the film its emotional heft. Erivo does do much with her eyes to convey Elphaba’s sadness and loneliness and, eventually, her hope and determination. There’s a directness about her screen presence that’s immediate and engaging, and of course she can sing the hell out of these demanding songs. Grande meets her note for note and once again displays her comic chops, but it’s the little choices that make her portrayal of the perfect Galinda feel human: a jerky perkiness that’s slightly dorky. The blonde tresses and array of pink dresses scream confidence, but deep down she’s a try-hard whose desire to be liked is her driving motivation. 

As undeniably crowd-pleasing as “Wicked” is in its big moments, these smaller and more intimate details are just as magical. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Kishkindha Kaandam Movie Review

Published

on

Kishkindha Kaandam Movie Review

The Malayalam film Kishkindha Kaandam, directed by Dinjith Ayyathan, hit theaters on September 12, 2024, and quickly became a box office success, earning over ₹70 crore on a modest ₹7 crore budget. With a stellar cast including Asif Ali, Aparna Balamurali, and Vijayaraghavan, this movie has now begun streaming on OTT platform Disney plus Hotstar. Let’s dive into the Kishkindha Kaandam Movie Review to see what makes it stand out.

Plot Overview
Set in a village bordering a forest, the story revolves around Appu Pillai (Vijayaraghavan), a retired army officer living with his son Ajay Chandra (Asif Ali), daughter-in-law Praveena (Vaishnavi Raj), and grandson Chachu (Aarav). Tragedy strikes when Praveena passes away, and Chachu mysteriously disappears.

While the investigation into Chachu’s disappearance forms a crucial part of the narrative, the police station instructs Appu to surrender his licensed gun due to the upcoming elections. However, the gun has been missing for a long time, complicating matters further. The police warn that even a single missing bullet could lead to serious consequences.

As Ajay remarries Aparna (Aparna Balamurali), she moves into the family home and learns that Appu suffers from memory loss. Aparna grows suspicious of Appu’s behavior, particularly his reluctance to let anyone enter his room and his habit of burning items in a secluded area. Her investigation into Chachu’s disappearance and the missing gun forms the crux of the film.

Analysis
Kishkindha Kaandam revolves around three key characters: the father, the son, and the daughter-in-law. Aparna’s desire to find Chachu and bring happiness back to her family drives the first half of the movie. As she uncovers clues linking Appu to Chachu’s disappearance and the missing gun, the tension escalates in the second half.

Advertisement

The narrative cleverly intertwines memory loss, a missing gun, and a child’s disappearance, keeping the audience guessing until the very end. The film’s strength lies in its minimalist approach, focusing on a small cast and localized settings. The title, Kishkindha Kaandam, reflects the village’s unique connection to monkeys, adding a symbolic layer to the plot.

Director Dinjith Ayyathan skillfully maintains suspense without relying on exaggerated drama, keeping the story grounded in realism. This approach makes the twists and turns feel natural and engaging.

Performances
Vijayaraghavan delivers a standout performance as the enigmatic and suspicious Appu Pillai. His portrayal of a man struggling with memory loss while harboring secrets is both compelling and nuanced. Asif Ali shines as Ajay, caught between family responsibilities and professional duties. Aparna Balamurali impresses with her natural acting, convincingly portraying a new bride navigating the complexities of her new family while trying to uncover the truth.

Technical Aspects
Cinematography: Ramesh’s visuals beautifully capture the lush, forested village, enhancing the story’s atmosphere.
Music: Mujeeb Majeed’s haunting background score elevates the suspense.
Editing: Suraj’s crisp editing ensures a tight narrative, particularly in the second half.
Malayalam cinema continues its tradition of seamlessly integrating stories with authentic locations, making the events on screen feel believable and immersive.

Verdict
Kishkindha Kaandam is a captivating mystery thriller with strong performances, a well-crafted screenplay, and stunning visuals. It’s a testament to the power of storytelling and naturalistic filmmaking. This is a movie that can be enjoyed with the whole family.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet’ Review: A Loving, Insightful Documentary Tribute to an Underrated Actress

Published

on

‘Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet’ Review: A Loving, Insightful Documentary Tribute to an Underrated Actress

Andrew Stevens pays loving but not hagiographic tribute to his late mother, famed actress Stella Stevens, in his documentary recently showcased at the Fort Lauderdale International Film Festival. The film convincingly makes the case that its subject, best known for her performances in such pictures as The Poseidon Adventure and The Nutty Professor, is severely underrated, both as an actress and social activist. Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet aims to rectify that perception and, thanks to numerous clips of her work and effusive commentary by the likes of Quentin Tarantino and Vivica A. Fox, it succeeds beautifully.

The filmmaker (who appears frequently) admits that his relationship with his mother was rocky, to say the least, in the early years. Born in Yazoo City, Mississippi, Stevens got married at age 16 and had Andrew, her first and only child, six months later. The marriage soon dissolved, and when she moved to Hollywood to pursue an acting career, she took Andrew to California with her illegally. His father and grandfather later showed up and spirited him away, resulting in an ugly custody battle and Andrew not having a real relationship with his mother until he turned 16.

Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet

The Bottom Line

A well-deserved and long overdue cinematic portrait.

Advertisement

Venue: Fort Lauderdale International Film Festival (American Indie)
Director-screenwriter: Andrew Stevens

1 hour 39 minutes

Stevens was soon signed to 20th Century Fox, where she was groomed to be a starlet in the mold of Marilyn Monroe and Mamie Van Doren. Her sexpot image was further confirmed when she appeared as a Playboy centerfold, though she had desperately tried to purchase the nude images back from Hugh Hefner, who refused.

Her career quickly took off thanks to such films as Li’l Abner, in which she played the wonderfully named “Appasionata Von Climax,” and the musical Say One for Me with Bing Crosby, for which she received a Golden Globe award for New Star of the Year.

Advertisement

“Some of the most fun parts I’ve played are nymphomaniacs,” Stevens amusingly points out in one of many interviews featured here. Some of them are shown via archival clips from various talk show appearances, while others are recreated using a lookalike actress (Lindsie Kongsore). While the device is jarring at first, it admittedly breathes life into Stevens’ words. But the filmmaker gets too carried away with it at times, as when he unnecessarily uses an actor to play a film critic reading an excerpt from a review.

There are plenty of juicy anecdotes and revelations in the documentary, one of the most priceless being Stevens’ account of co-star Bobby Darin getting a much noticeable erection while they shot a kissing scene. She also reveals that she had no desire to appear with Elvis Presley in Girls! Girls! Girls! and only agreed to do it after she was promised that she would get to play opposite Montgomery Clift in her next film. The Clift project never materialized, and she could never bring herself to watch the Presley one.

We learn of her many romances, including an affair with the notorious and very much married Hollywood fixer Sidney Korshak and a lengthy relationship with actor Skip Ward, who took financial advantage of her and was frequently unfaithful.

The documentary makes a strong case for Stevens’ talent — particularly her formidable comic chops, as illustrated in numerous clips of her work, including from an episode of Bonanza for which she won acclaim. She held her own opposite Jerry Lewis in The Nutty Professor and sparkled in the old-fashioned comedy How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life opposite Dean Martin, with whom she had previously appeared in the Matt Helm spy spoof The Silencers. She received critical acclaim for her exuberant turn in Sam Peckinpah’s 1970 The Ballad of Cable Hogue, though the film was a flop. When she did appear in hits, such as the hugely popular disaster pic The Poseidon Adventure, it didn’t give her career much traction.  

She later became an iconic figure for Black audiences, thanks to her groundbreaking interracial love scene with Jim Brown in the blaxploitation hit Slaughter and her campy villainous turn in Cleopatra Jones and the Casino of Gold. But what she really wanted to do, as they say, was direct. She finally got her chance in 1989 with an indie feature called The Ranch, starring her son Andrew (he later returned the favor, directing her in the 1991 B-movie The Terror Within II), and a feminist-themed documentary, The American Heroine, which was never released.

Advertisement

Besides the ample clips from her roles and television appearances, the documentary includes fascinating home movies, personal photographs, and insightful commentary from various figures including film historians Leonard Maltin and Courtney Joyner. But it’s Tarantino who unsurprisingly proves the highlight, articulately gushing about Stevens’ performances with the passion of a true fan. (Introducing The Last Starlet at the festival, Andrew admitted that he basically handed the ball to Tarantino and let him run with it.)

While Stevens’ big-screen career eventually fizzled, she never stopped working, appearing in dozens of direct-to-video movies and TV series until her final appearance in something called Megaconda in 2010. “If the idea of being an actress is to work, she worked. She worked a lot,” Tarantino points out.

Her final days were sad ones, as she slowly succumbed to Alzheimer’s disease until her death at 84 in 2023. Much to the consternation of her son and her many fans, she was not included in the Academy Awards’ annual “In Memoriam” segment and never received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. The latter is a rebuff that should be corrected — especially if Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet gets the exposure it deserves.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending