Movie Reviews
Time Bomb Y2K Movie Review – Book and Film Globe
A found-footage documentary on Max about when we thought the world was going to end, but actually took steps to prevent that from happening
Documentaries editorialize. No one likes to admit it, but it’s true. With the right emphasis and the right omissions, a documentary can make nearly any kind of partisan argument while pretending to be objective, and these days most of them do. So Time Bomb Y2K from Max is a remarkably pleasant surprise in that it copiously avoids trying to making any kind of clear thesis statement. Instead, the documentary relies entirely on nineties-era archival material to present the situation of what exactly Y2K was, why it was such a big deal, and why nothing came of it.
A short primer: Early computer programs in the 70s tended to assume that the date of the year consists of only two digits as a sort of space-saving measure for limited operating systems. So when the internal calendars on these computers hit the year 2000, they’d actually roll over and assume they were back in the year 1900. While the problem sounds cosmetic at worst, computers are finicky devices. Y2K stress tests conducted throughout the 90s showed that many important systems, like timed sewage-release valves, would react unpredictably and often disastrously in response to this simulated time travel.
Actual computer engineers were well aware of the problem, and even in the earliest days pushed for a full four digits, but managers who mainly needed software that worked until the end of their six-year contracts, and needed that software as quickly as possible, bullied them out of permanent solutions. The flawed software became the foundation for later software, magnifying the potential scope of the problem.
There was a lot of panic about Y2K, much of it deliberate, that nearly anyone who was alive during this time period at least vaguely remembers. The famed Y2K Czar Peter de Jagar was constantly out on the media telling anybody who would listen about the Y2K bug and the need to fix it. Here’s where the story gets muddy–Peter de Jagar actually succeeded in getting major corporations and governments to listen to him. Much of the footage in Time Bomb Y2K is of then-president Bill Clinton and then-vice president Al Gore talking about Y2K, and what they and others are doing to fix the problem. News reports also discuss the small armies of bug hunters who test Y2K simulations and, in the end, manage to solve nearly all of the potential knock-on effects.
We should see what happened with Y2K as one of the greatest success stories of the information era, of humanity identifying a potentially major problem, treating it seriously, and ultimately solving it. Yet Y2K lives on in the modern zeitgeist as an example of extreme hysteria over nothing. Much of this is justified because in the final days of 1999, Y2K was a bunch of extreme hysteria over nothing. Peter de Jagar stops being an alarmist and instead goes on television to say that yes, all of this could have been very bad, but it won’t be now.
But the news media didn’t take this approach. Alarmism was the far more popular story. So it is that, come 2023, we remember Y2K far more for the negative outgrowths of this hysteria, showing up in shows like The Righteous Gemstones as a cause of extreme religious militancy. Everyone remembers the doomsday prepper industry that got a boost due to Y2K. Nobody remembers how people manufactured the Y2K crisis in 1999 by rehashing the arguments Peter de Jagar made in previous years without contextualizing the ultimate responses to these arguments.
Time Bomb Y2K is very careful not to editorialize. But it’s difficult to watch Time Bomb Y2K and not make some very obvious takeaways about the crises of yesteryear and the crises of today. For starters, it feels bizarre that Bill Clinton and Al Gore could go on TV just looking and sounding like normal people with a basic layman’s understanding of how the bug works. We are, in this country, very far removed from a political situation where our leaders could sound basically cogent, and at the current rate, it’ll be at least five years before there’s even a chance that could change.
But more than the image of political and corporate leadership, the actions of nineties-era leaders to Y2K stands out as being a bit incomprehensible. The status quo of our public life right now is that we acknowledge a crisis exists and…that’s it. We argue about whether or not a crisis exists. And even the people who claim to believe the crisis exists don’t seem especially interested in actually doing anything about it. Whether our imminent demise is supposed happen because of climate change, or COVID, Russia winning the war in Ukraine, or Trump retaking the presidency, the people making the strongest claims support remarkably weak measures when it comes to preventing these crises, and prioritize attacking so-called deniers over pushing any kind of actual proactive agenda.
Contrast this to Peter de Jagar in Time Bomb Y2K, asserting simply, and forcefully, that crisis will come unless an army of bug testers assembles to repair all the flawed code. The argument this documentary makes, entirely passively, is that crises are solvable as long as we’re willing to put in the hard work to actually solve them. This statement is so tautological it’s easy to see why the memory of what exactly happened with Y2K has fallen by the wayside. By contrast, we live in an era where of unsolvable chronic crisis; the notion that we can solve problems seems like sheer magical thinking.
Indeed, the sheer mundanity of Time Bomb Y2K’s archival footage underscores how alien the ideas of yesteryear seem to us today. Peter de Jagar scared people, but he wasn’t an alarmist, nor did he much care about the limelight, disappearing from public life entirely once we averted the crisis he was warning people about. Does Time Bomb Y2K fail to interview Peter de Jagar in the modern day because he refused, or because the documentary’s concept is to focus on how society perceived Y2K at the time, rather than in retrospect? Did Peter de Jagar disappear out of humility, or because in the wake of nothing really happening, he seemed like a fraud?
Time Bomb Y2K doesn’t answer questions like this. Instead, it makes two simple assertions. Y2K was real. That didn’t make it unstoppable.
Movie Reviews
Movie review: The Drama
The Drama is a psychological horror film masquerading as a romcom. From the jump, something feels a little off about the “meet-cute.” At a coffee shop, Charlie (Robert Pattinson) sees Emma (Zendaya) reading a novel (The Damage by Harper Ellison, a truly excellent fake title and author). Taken with her, he does a quick google search of the book and approaches her.
“I love that book,” he says.
She ignores him. All of a sudden, he feels like all eyes in the coffee shop are on him, judging him for this hapless pick-up attempt. Time seems to freeze.
Finally, she removes her single earbud and looks at him. She explains that she’s deaf in one ear and had no idea he was even talking to her. They decide to have a do-over, a cute practice that is repeated throughout their romance. He sits back down and tries again.
Later, over dinner, he continues the ruse when she asks him for his thoughts on the ending of the novel.
“Is she dead?” Emma asks.
“Um, yeah, I think she’s dead,” Charlie says.
“And what about the mirrors?”
“Uh…the mirrors?…I think they’re, um, metaphors,” he sputters.
She stares at him, quizzically, until he finally comes clean: He hasn’t read the book. He just wanted to talk to her.
That lie, while seemingly innocent, was actually pretty dark: He wooed her under false pretenses, pretending to be something he wasn’t. Not necessarily a dealbreaker, but a red flag to be sure. What else would he lie about to get his way?
But here’s the thing: This film isn’t actually about Emma’s safety or whether or not Charlie can be trusted. It’s the opposite. You see, Charlie has told a tiny lie. Emma has been hiding a whopper.
IF YOU DON’T WANT TO BE SPOILED COME BACK AND READ THE REST OF THE REVIEW AFTER YOU’VE SEEN THE FILM!
Okay, so Emma and Charlie get engaged. They’re in love—and they’re happily planning their wedding. Over a tasting dinner of mushroom risotto and too much wine with Charlie’s best man, Mike (Mamoudou Athie) and his wife, Emma’s maid of honor, Rachel (Alana Haim), they play an ill-advised game of “What is the worst thing you’ve ever done?” (I can’t emphasis enough how much you should never play this game.)
They go around the table, admitting some genuinely messed up things, until they get to Emma, who is quite drunk at this point.
“I planned a school shooting,” she says.
Charlie laughs nervously.
Then, with mounting horror, everyone around the table realizes she’s serious.
“I didn’t do it, of course,” Emma says quickly. But the damage has been done.
It’s Rachel, played with exquisite haughtiness by Haim, who storms away in disgust. As far as she’s concerned, Emma is canceled. The wedding is obviously off. And a freaked out Mike essentially agrees with her.
It’s up to Charlie to navigate his conflicting emotions. In the wedding speech he was writing, he extols Emma’s unimpeachable character, but now he thinks, does he ever know her? (There’s a wonderful scene where he begins editing out words like “kindness” and “empathy” in the speech.) He can’t reconcile the woman he thinks he is marrying with a person who would plan such an evil act.
So yes, The Drama is about the impossibility of really knowing someone. And I like the idea of a romcom morphing into a kind of “hell is other people” horror film.
But something about this film really put me off. It’s reminiscent of Tár, a film I actually loved that nonetheless had one glaring flaw. As we know, most so-called “geniuses” who get away with sexual predation are men, but Tár dared to ask the question: What if it was a woman? Flipping that paradigm seemed like provocativeness for its own sake.
It’s worse with The Drama, mostly because it’s not nearly the film Tár is. The majority of school shooters are boys. More specifically, white boys. Why on earth have a movie about a Black woman who considered such violence?
The answer is simple: It’s to center Charlie’s dilemma, his pain, his confusion. I knew without even checking that the film had been written by a man, writer/director Kristopher Borgli (Dream Scenario). The film is entirely from Charlie’s perspective as he drives himself slightly mad with uncertainty.
Pattinson, who burst on the scene playing a heartthrob vampire, has spent the rest of his career trying to undo that fact. He specializes in men on the verge of a nervous breakdown—I feel like I’ve almost never seen him in a film where he doesn’t twitch and sweat—so this is right in his wheelhouse. He’s good at playing Charlie’s increased agitation. Should he go through with the wedding or not?
The ever-captivating Zendaya has the trickier part because her inner life is intentionally opaque—that’s part of the puzzle of the film. We’re supposed to at least entertain the notion that Emma could actually be psychopath, not just a woman who had a troubled adolescence who briefly lost her way.
Zendaya does the best she can with this cryptic character, but I found the whole premise of The Drama off-putting.
Yes, the otherness of our lovers is rich material to mine. But the shock value of this film overpowered its ideas. (It’s like that old fashion insult: “You’re not wearing the jacket. The jacket is wearing you.”) By embracing an outlier and taking the premise to such an extreme, the film lost its grip—both on reality and my interest.
Movie Reviews
‘Leader’ Twitter review: Netizens call Legend Saravanan starrer a watchable commercial entertainer | Tamil Movie News – The Times of India
The action film ‘Leader,’ starring Legend Saravanan, released in theatres worldwide today (April 3). Directed by Durai Senthilkumar, the film features an ensemble cast including Andrea Jeremiah, Lal, Shaam, and Payal Rajput. The film opened in more than 300 theatres across Tamil Nadu and is already trending on social media with audience reactions. After facing heavy trolling for his debut film ‘The Legend,’ Saravanan returned with ‘Leader,’ hoping to prove himself as a commercial action hero. Fans quickly took to social media to share their reviews of the film.
Fans praise the action moments and the second half
Several viewers called ‘Leader’ a watchable commercial entertainer. According to fans, the movie takes time to pick up but becomes interesting as it progresses. Several social media users said the second half is enjoyable after the first half. Several reviewers also noted that the film becomes more entertaining in the second half. The interval block and some action sequences are considered the best parts. The train fight in the climax also caught the attention of online fans, who described the sequence as a brilliant ride that adds to the movie’s overall excitement.
Mixed reactions from viewers on performances and story
While some viewers focused on the amazing action sequences, many considered it a typical mainstream commercial film. Viewers further complained that the first half of the film took too long, and some plot points were too predictable. Nonetheless, many fans agreed that Legend Saravanan’s acting in this film is much better than in his last project. The works of Andrea Jeremiah, Shaam, and Lal have also earned applause from fans. Music director Ghibran has been praised for his background score, which many fans mention added life to several scenes.
‘Leader’ – Plot and cast
‘Leader’ is set in the Thoothukudi port city; the lead character is a car mechanic who works in a large gangster dock. It presents the lead hero’s views on polar opposites and features thrilling battles with the villain. A recent flashback details the hero’s difficult past and differences, offering insight into his main reason for being at the dock. Legend Saravanan, along with Andrea Jeremiah, Shaam, Lal, and Payal Rajput, are in the lead cast. It is an action-packed mass film for commercial movie lovers.
Movie Reviews
Sharwanand Biker Movie Review
39
Movie Name : Biker
Release Date : April 03, 2026
123telugu.com Rating : 3.25/5
Starring : Sharwanand, Dr Rajashekhar, Malvika Nair & Others.
Director : Abhilash Reddy
Producers : Vamsi Krishna Reddy, Pramodh Uppalapati
Music Director : Ghibran Vaibodha
Cinematographer : J Yuvraj
Editor : Anil Pasala
Related Links : Trailer
Sharwanand has now come up with the sports drama Biker. Directed by Abhilash Reddy, the movie stars Rajasekhar in a key role. Let’s see how the film is.
Story:
Vikas Narayan aka Vikky (Sharwanand) is a top-class motocross racer.. Since childhood, he is trained rigorously by his father Sunil Narayan (Rajasekhar). However, Vikky suddenly leaves the sport, putting his father in a tough spot.
Why did Vikky leave racing? How is he connected to Ananya (Malavika Nair)? What is her role in his life? What happened after Vikky left the sport? This forms the crux of the story.
Plus Points:
We have already seen multiple sports dramas in Tollywood, but motocross racing has never been explored before, and that becomes the USP of Biker. Even though a few moments appear familiar, the unexplored territory in Telugu cinema keeps the proceedings engaging, and credit where it’s due.
The sport sequences are superbly shot and choreographed. Some moments truly keep us on the edge of our seats. To make a film on a less popular sport in India by weaving emotional moments around it, the director does a pretty good job in helping the movie connect with the regular audience.
Sharwanand looks in his best shape, and it’s good to see him try his hand at multiple genres. He brings sincerity to his performance as a professional racer and is effective in the emotional segments as well. His scenes with Rajasekhar work well. With Biker, Rajasekhar (Angry Man) reaches a new level, playing his part with utmost dignity and elegance.
When veterans play their age and become an integral part of the story instead of trying to outshine others, it’s a pleasure to watch. From here on, Rajasekhar could become the go-to actor for character roles in Telugu cinema. The second half is comparatively more engaging with decent emotional depth. Malavika Nair is fine in her role.
Minus Points:
Biker plays it safe in key moments with familiar tropes, which prevents it from reaching the next level. The vulnerability of the protagonist should have been explored more during the actual racing portions to make it stand apart from regular sports dramas. Some elements feel too easy for the hero to achieve, which takes away from the realism.
Instead of external factors, if the hero had been troubled by his own internal thought process during the racing, the impact could have been much higher. The episodes involving the hero’s sponsorship needed better execution.
The racing scenes are no doubt solid, but the moments leading up to them could have been still better. The conflict point between the lead pair is meaningful, but it is underutilized. The first half is slow at times, and isn’t upto the mark on the whole.
Technical Aspects:
Ghibran’s background score is solid in the thrilling moments, and the sound design is excellent. Cinematographer Yuvraj does a fabulous job in picturizing the racing sequences. The editing is fine in the latter half, but needed improvement in the first half.
The production values are solid. Director Abhilash Reddy takes up a not-so-popular sport and delivers an engaging film with a fair number of good moments. Had he avoided a few clichés, the movie could have reached a whole new level.
Verdict:
On the whole, Biker is an engaging sports drama with a never-before-explored motocross racing backdrop and good performances. The racing scenes are brilliant, and the film is carried by Sharwanand and Rajasekhar with their impressive performances. The first half is slow, and there are a few convenient moments. The use of certain tropes could have been avoided for better impact. Nonetheless, if you enjoy sports dramas, Biker turns out to be a satisfactory watch.
123telugu.com Rating: 3.25/5
Reviewed by 123telugu Team
-
South-Carolina6 days agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Culture1 week agoWhat Happens When We Die? This Wallace Stevens Poem Has Thoughts.
-
Miami, FL1 week agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
Minneapolis, MN1 week agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Transgender Athletes Barred From Women’s Olympic Events
-
Vermont6 days ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Politics6 days agoTrump’s Ballroom Design Has Barely Been Scrutinized
-
Atlanta, GA6 days agoFetishist ‘No Kings’ protester in mask drags ‘Trump’ and ‘JD Vance’ behind her wheelchair