Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Thunderbolts’ Review: The Best Marvel Movie In A Long Time, With One Big Problem

Published

on

‘Thunderbolts’ Review: The Best Marvel Movie In A Long Time, With One Big Problem

Thunderbolts has rekindled some of the magic lost in the MCU, though it’s not without its problems. Then again, no Marvel film is without its flaws. At least this one seems to understand what audiences want better than most post-End Game efforts from the studio.

The MCU has been in rough shape. Outside of a few exceptions – Spider-Man: No Way Home, Guardians Of The Galaxy 3 and, to a lesser degree, Deadpool & Wolverine and Shang Chi – the film side of the Marvel Cinematic Universe has been pretty lackluster in its fourth and fifth phases. Some of the Disney+ shows have been excellent – WandaVision, Agatha All Along and especially Loki – but many of those have misfired as well. And a big problem with the project as a whole is tying everything together, including the TV shows, which makes it much harder for audiences to keep up, especially as more and more fans burn out and start skipping lackluster offerings.

Thunderbolts feels a bit more like old-school MCU fare. It’s leaps and bounds better than the other most recent Marvel movie, the cumbersome and unsatisfying Captain America: Brave New World. Spoilers follow.

Advertisement

The plot follows Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh) one of the Black Widows and sister to Natasha Romanoff. She’s burnt out in her job as a “cleaner” for Valentina Allegra de Fontaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus) and wants a more “public facing” role, inspired partly by her father, Alexei Shostakov aka Red Guardian (David Harbour) who dreams of bigger things.

When she poses this idea to de Fontaine, her shadowy boss agrees, so long as she’ll complete one final mission. De Fontaine has other ideas. She’s busy cleaning house while under a congressional investigation and wants all evidence of her misdeeds scrubbed, including her special operatives, who she pits against one another in a remote lab deep underground. Things don’t go her way, and our rag-tag band of heroes escapes with a mysterious man named Bob (Lewis Pullan) with equally mysterious powers and an adorably affable demeanor.

One thing leads to another, and the reluctant band of anti-heroes ends up teaming up to take down de Fontaine. Other members of the “Thunderbolts” include Wyatt Russell’s John Walker aka U.S. Agent, the once-Captain America whose rage issues led to his downfall and recruitment into de Fontaine’s cabal; Ava Starr’s Ghost, an assassin who can turn invisible and phase through walls; and, of course, Sebastian Stan’s Bucky Barnes aka the Winter Soldier, who becomes the de facto leader of the group. Barnes is also a newly minted congressman, though he has no patience for his colleagues’ committees and red tape.

Advertisement

The movie works on a lot of levels. It’s quite funny, for one thing, with a great blend of humor thanks to Harbour’s over-the-top Red Guardian and Yelena’s acerbic wit. The chemistry between Pugh, Harbour, Russell and Pullman is genuinely great. And Sebastian Stan gets to have one very cool action sequence to remind us how much of a badass the Winter Soldier really is, and how much he really deserves his own movie. (I’m still pulling for a Sebastian Stan Luke Skywalker movie also . . . .) The action is great throughout the film, and the whole thing is really well-paced, clocking in at just about two hours.

Where the film stumbles, rather badly, is in its third act. When things take a terrible turn for the worse, our heroes have to face off against Sentry, a superhero more powerful than all the original Avengers combined (according to de Fontaine). But Sentry quickly turns into his other, darker half: Void. It’s a great setup for an epic showdown, but everything that follows feels rushed and the resolution is too neat and tidy. Given the pretty fascinating history of these dueling personas, a lot more could have been done with the Sentry/Void character, and I hope we do see more in future films.

As it stands, this felt like too many other MCU films with strong opening arcs and a rushed conclusion. I often complain that superhero movies are too long, but this one might have benefited from a bit more screen time, or more economical use of time earlier on in the picture.

Advertisement

Still, I enjoyed this a great deal even if I wouldn’t include it with S-Tier MCU films like The Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, Captain America: The Winter Soldier or Spider-Man: No Way Home. Thunderbolts has a lot of heart, a great sense of humor and enough action to keep you on the edge of your seat. While it stumbles in the third act, it’s still worth a watch. And be sure to stick around for both the mid-credits and post-credits scene. The latter is actually pretty meaty, and sets up Phase 6 of the MCU.

P.S. I’ve seen some people saying the film engages too much in “girlboss” stuff or makes the male characters seem stupid compared to the female characters. While this has definitely been an issue in some MCU products (ahem, She-Hulk) I really don’t think it’s a very good critique of Thunderbolts. Characters like John Walker and Red Guardian are definitely played for laughs, but they also get some really great moments with heart and badassery. It felt like a pretty solid balance across the cast, with everyone flawed but ultimately likeable and heroic.

And I’m so glad that we aren’t doing multiverse stuff anymore! Only Loki and No Way Home handled this really well. Even Deadpool & Wolverine was bogged down by the multiverse garbage. But that’s just my personal opinion, shaped by overuse of the gimmick over the years. (The Spider-Verse films do it well also, but aren’t part of the MCU).

Have you seen Thunderbolts? What did you think? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Ella McCay

Published

on

Ella McCay

Other Noteworthy Elements

Ryan and Ella’s marriage appears to be on the rocks. Ella wonders if Ryan only married her for the perks of her career (even when they were young, it was clear Ella had a big future in store). And Ryan’s foul behavior suggests this is true.

When Ella forgets to thank Ryan for his support during a speech (because she gets flustered by unexpected interruptions from Governor Bill), Ryan essentially throws a temper tantrum. He uses the incident to try to convince Ella to get him a political position (egged on by his mother, who belittles her own husband). He then resorts to unscrupulous means to manipulate and embarrass Ella, holding the threat of divorce over her head.

We’re told that other politicians despise Ella. Her very presence reminds them of their own inadequacies as policymakers and compromises they’ve made as politicians. (At one point, Ella criticizes the majority of her fellow politicians for spending more time campaigning than they do reading proposed legislation.) Even Bill, when Ella asks him for advice, is hesitant to openly support Ella, since it could hurt his own career. As such, the film seems to serve as a commentary on the political state at large: Ella literally says, “You can’t be popular and fix anything.”

Not long after Eddie’s affairs come out, Helen hugs him and tells him she loves him but that she’ll never forgive him for cheating on his wife. Years later, Eddie seemingly tries to make amends with his children, but it’s fueled by a selfish desire, since his current girlfriend told him she wouldn’t marry him unless he made up with his kids. And when Helen tells Eddie that he needs to stop messing up long enough for his kids to forgive him and do the work required to fix his relationships, he retorts that his kids will “be better” once they forgive him.

We learn that Ella’s mom passed away young, though we’re not given the details of what caused her death. Eddie admits that he sent Casey to military school after her death because he “didn’t want the responsibility” and that he avoided Ella because he was scared of how she’d react to that decision. (At the film’s start, he and Ella haven’t spoken in 13 years.)

Advertisement

A politician uses a cheat sheet of sorts while calling donors to make it seem like he cares about them. People lie, scheme and manipulate others. We hear about political blackmail and bribery. Casey’s job involves advising people on sports betting. A trooper assigned to Ella’s protection unit purposely goes into overtime in spite of a budget crisis because he’s tight on cash and apparently going through an expensive divorce.

Casey is described as agoraphobic because he hasn’t left his house in 13 months. However, he insists that his reclusiveness is a choice—that he can leave whenever he wants. But he does seem to have some severe anxiety about leaving, and we learn that his self-imposed solitary confinement followed an embarrassing romantic mishap. His house is littered with dirty dishes and bags of trash.

A woman gets petty revenge against someone by calling the health department on his pizzeria and getting it shut down.

[Spoiler warning] Ryan, in a strange grab for attention, starts a political scandal for Ella involving blackmail and bribery. He gives Ella an ultimatum, and Ella responds that if he loved her—if he even liked her—he wouldn’t be doing this to her. Because Ryan doesn’t get what he wants, he blames the blackmail and bribery on Ella, telling the press that he’s divorcing her. And the scandal, though completely fabricated, is bad enough for her party to remove her from office.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: In Scarlet, transplanting Hamlet to an anime dreamworld | Mint

Published

on

Movie Review: In Scarlet, transplanting Hamlet to an anime dreamworld | Mint

The Japanese writer-director Mamoru Hosoda has made some amazing films that take profound leaps into dreamlike worlds.

Hosoda’s “Mirai” (2018) is about a 4-year-old boy who’s resentful of his newborn sister. But in his backyard garden, he meets his sister as a teenager. This is just the first of many domestic time travels, as the boy meets other relatives from other points in their lives. A new understanding begins to dawn.

In “Belle” (2022), a teenager who’s lived through tragedy finds a soaring catharsis in a virtual realm. I thought it was one of the best films of that year, and I still think it might be the best movie ever made about the internet. Either way, its song-and-soul-shattering climax is unforgettable.

Yet in Hosoda’s latest, “Scarlet,” the director’s enviable reach exceeds his grasp. In it, his female protagonist is a medieval princess who, after seeing her king father killed by her uncle, and dying herself, awakes in an expansive purgatory. In this strange afterlife, peopled by the dead from all time periods, she seeks revenge for her father.

Anyone, I think, would grant that a Japanese anime that transplants “Hamlet” to a surreal netherworld is a touch more ambitious than your average animated movie. Unlike the wide majority of cartoons, or even live-action movies, the problem with “Scarlet” isn’t a lack of imagination. It’s too much.

Advertisement

Hosoda, a former Studio Ghibli animator whose other films include “Wolf Children” and “Summer Wars,” has an extraordinary knack for crafting anime worlds of visual complexity while pursuing existential ideas with a childlike sincerity. But an excess of baroque design, of emotion, of scope, sinks Hosoda’s “Scarlet.” It’s the kind of misfire you can forgive. If you’re going to fail by overreach, it might as well be with a wildly ambitious rendering of “Hamlet.”

In the thrilling prologue, set in 16th century Denmark, Scarlet (Ashida Mana) watches as her uncle Claudius (Kôji Yakusho) frames her father as a traitor and has him executed. Enraged, Scarlet — without any visitation from her father’s ghost — goes to kill Claudius. Only he poisons her first, and Scarlet awakes in what she learns is called the Otherlands.

It’s a kind of infinite wasteland, full of wandering souls and marauding bandits. People are there for a time, and then they pass into nothingness. A stairway to heaven is rumored to exist somewhere. As she seeks Claudius, Scarlet is joined by a stranger she encounters named Hijiri (Okada Masaki). A paramedic from modern day, he spends most of his time in the Otherworld trying to heal the wounds of others, including Scarlet’s foes.

“Scarlet” can be meandering and tedious. Even Rosencrantz and Guildenstern turn up. If the Otherworld is laid out like Scarlet’s troubled conscience, the ensuing battle between vengeance and forgiveness feels dully simplified. It’s all a sea of troubles. Hosoda tries to build some interiority to the story (not a small aspect of “Hamlet”) through Hijiri’s backstory, telescoping Shakespeare’s quandaries to contemporary times.

Hosoda grafted “Beauty and the Beast” into “Belle,” to sometimes awkward, sometimes illuminating effect. But in “Scarlet,” he struggles to bridge “Hamlet” to today. It’s a big swing, the kind filmmakers as talented as Hosoda should be taking, but it doesn’t pay off. Still, it’s often dazzling to look at it and it’s never not impassioned. Hosoda remains a director capable of reaching trembling, operatic heights. In “Scarlet,” for instance, Claudius gets a spectacular death scene, a remarkable accomplishment considering he’s already dead.

Advertisement

“Scarlet,” a Sony Pictures Classics release, opens in limited release Friday and in wider theatrical release Feb. 6. Rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association for violence/bloody image. Playing in both Japanese with subtitles and English dubbed versions. Running time: 112 minutes. Two stars out of four.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘No Other Choice’ Review: Park Chan-wook’s Timely, Dark, Hilarious Comedic Satire That Slays with Style

Published

on

‘No Other Choice’ Review: Park Chan-wook’s Timely, Dark, Hilarious Comedic Satire That Slays with Style

Most people who have seen a few director Park movies will agree that he has one of the most creative and crazy minds out there. I’m happy to join the choir. This marks the 55-year-old filmmaker’s inaugural foray into the Black comedy subgenre, although we are cognizant of his cheekiness. 

Director Park’s examination of the economic class structures in South Korea, as evidenced by Man-soo’s dismissal, is as bleak as it is in any other urbanized capitalist nation. It is, after all, based on an American novel, but it exploits this premise to build a powerful Black comedy. With No Other Choice‘s straightforward plot, he deconstructs the conventions of masculinity under a capitalistic umbrella through a kooky but always funny atmosphere. One equally funny and depressing recurring gag is post-firing affirmations that many of the unemployed former breadwinners use as an excuse to continue their self-pity wallowing. Man-soo’s dubious scheme reflects himself in his fellow compatriots, who share the same ill fate. They all neglect their loving families, becoming real-time losers to the significant impact of the capitalist culture on the common man. As the plot develops, Park explores the twisted but captivating development of this man regaining his sense of self and spine… You know, through murder. 

As this social satire unfolds in dark, humorous ways, No Other Choice is a rare example of style and substance working together. Director Park throws every stylistic option he can at the wall, and almost everything sticks. Mainly because his imaginative lens – crossfades, dissolves, and memorable feats – is both visually captivating and enriching to Man-soo’s mission. The film encroaches on noir-thriller sensibilities, especially with its modern setting. Man-soo’s choices become more engrossing and inventive, proving timely even in its most familiar beats while personalizing every supporting character. 

Director Park and his reunion with director of photography Kim Woo-hyung from The Little Drummer Girl execute a distinctive vision that flawlessly captures the screwball comedy archetype with its own rhythmic precision and stunning visuals, particularly in contrast to the picturesque autumnal backdrop. Compared to Decision to Leave, it’s more maximalist, but it still makes you think, “Wow, this is how movies should look.” Nevertheless, the meticulous framework and blocking in the numerous chaotic sequences impart a unique dark-comedic tone that evokes a classic comedy from the height of silent era cinema, albeit in stunning Technicolor. 

In an exceptional leading performance, Lee Byung-hun channels his inner Chaplin.

Continue Reading

Trending