Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘The Substance’ is a Body Horror Nightmare Mixed With a Cautionary Tale – Review

Published

on

‘The Substance’ is a Body Horror Nightmare Mixed With a Cautionary Tale – Review

The Substance, starring Demi Moore, has launched into theaters and we boldly went in to see if it is indeed everything it was hyped to be.

*note: minor spoilers follow for The Substance

Ever since the first trailer for The Substance dropped on the Internet, I felt an overriding need to see this story. That the film starred Demi Moore was more than enough to attract my attention, but it was especially what the trailers suggested and implied about the story that really made me curious.

And then there were the rumors I’d heard of how this film had been received at the Cannes Film Festival and elsewhere. Any film that can make an audience member faint has to be worth experiencing. After seeing the film in theaters I can confirm The Substance is very much worth seeing, nor will you forget it any time soon.

The Substance is set in the modern day and follows Elisabeth Sparkle, a celebrity aerobics instructor who is cruelly fired from her show on her fiftieth birthday as she is now considered “past her prime” by her sleazy boss (Dennis Quaid). Depressed, Elisabeth is seemingly offered a lifeline in the form of “The Substance”, a formula that uses the user’s own DNA to create a younger, more “perfect” version of oneself. Though everything seems to work fine at first, with Elisabeth now split between herself and her younger alter ego ‘Sue’, it quickly becomes apparent that creating a younger self isn’t exactly the help Elisabeth thought it would be.

Advertisement

One thing that must be discussed immediately is the amount of body horror in this film. While I gathered from the trailers that there would be a certain level of grotesqueness, that did not come close to preparing me for what I saw. Director Coralie Fargeat pulls no punches with the body horror, the first scene featuring it in particular was so intense, I actually felt mildly sick. I don’t say that as a negative, as I appreciate body horror films that can push boundaries (Titane is a prime example of this). However, fair warning should also be given that these scenes are incredibly intense and often come with little to no warning in the course of the story.

That being said, all praise needs to be given to Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley in their respective roles as Elisabeth and Sue. Demi Moore gives the performance of a lifetime as the aging Elisabeth, who remembers her glory days as a star and doesn’t want to let them go. You don’t have to be a celebrity to feel the pain Elisabeth exudes as she compares her body to what the industry wants from her, especially after Sue enters the picture. Anyone who has ever been put down for their appearance will be familiar with the pain Elisabeth feels throughout the story.

Then there’s Margaret Qualley as Sue. Once the younger version of Elisabeth gets her bearings, Sue sweeps into the story like a force of nature. You literally can’t stop looking at her. Sue epitomizes everything the entertainment industry demands to see: youth, perkiness, a slim body. It seems like a match made in heaven, except as the story goes on, it becomes increasingly plain how unhealthy and toxic this environment is. Even when someone is physically “perfect”, it’s still not enough.

As I watched The Substance, it struck me on more than one occasion that this story was in some ways an updated take on The Portrait of Dorian Gray. In that story, as in The Substance, a person’s singleminded quest to live the life they think they want seems to be going perfectly, except the damage is quietly building and building until the original body breaks down in total ruin. Once I made that connection, I knew there was only one way this story was going to end. But again, I was not prepared for how intense it would be.

This is where The Substance has one flaw. While the movie overall is phenomenal and deserves to be discussed come awards season, it doesn’t quite stick the landing in the final twenty minutes of the film. It’s hard to say if this is because the director went too far with the gore and body horror, or if it’s because they kept the story going too long after the climactic moment. Either way, the ending is not as satisfying as it could’ve been.

Advertisement

To conclude, The Substance is one of the best films to come out this year, and is certainly the best horror film I’ve seen in 2024. Demi Moore needs to be seriously considered for an Oscar. Even if you’re not a fan of body horror, The Substance is worth seeing at least once.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Published

on

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.


movie review

HOPPERS

Advertisement

Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.

Advertisement

“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine. 

Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”

Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”

What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence. 

Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.

What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”  

In Pixar’s “Hoppers,” a teen girl discovers a secret device that can turn her into a talking beaver. AP

Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity. 

The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared. 

So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.

Advertisement

From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out. 

Mabel (Piper Curda) meets King George (Bobby Moynihan). AP

Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power. 

Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”   

That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities. 

Mayor Jerry (Jon Hamm) plans to destroy a local pond to build an expressway. AP

No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression. 

Advertisement

Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it. 

But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.

AP

“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.

Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

Published

on

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

4/5 stars

Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.

The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.

Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.

Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.

Advertisement
“This is like Avatar,” Mabel coos, and, in truth, it is. Plugged into a headset, Mabel is reborn inside a robotic beaver. She plans to recruit a real beaver to help populate the glade, which is set to be destroyed by Jerry’s proposed road.
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘How to Make a Killing,’ ‘Pillion,’ and ‘Midwinter Break’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘How to Make a Killing,’ ‘Pillion,’ and ‘Midwinter Break’

‘How to Make a Killing’

Directed by John Patton Ford (R)

★★

Continue Reading

Trending