Connect with us

Movie Reviews

The Last Supper (Christian Movie Review) – The Collision

Published

on

The Last Supper (Christian Movie Review) – The Collision

About the Film 

Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ (2004) was a monumental cinematic event. Two decades later, Jesus is thriving in Hollywood. With the mega-hit series The Chosen, Angel Studios’ upcoming animated feature King of Kings, and various other adaptations, there’s a “Jesus movie” for everyone these days. In a now-crowded genre, The Last Supper struggles to distinguish itself in any memorable way beyond simply offering “more Jesus” (not that many Christians are likely to bemoan having “too much Jesus” in their entertainment). The Last Supper offers a decent but unexceptional adaptation of the greatest story ever told; the film isn’t groundbreaking, but it should satisfy audiences looking for a new cinematic way to meditate on the familiar gospel story this Easter season.

Movies about Christ should never get a free pass on quality. Yet in several fundamental ways, they are not really like any other movies. More than offering mere popcorn-munching entertainment, The Last Supper serves a more sacred and worshipful function. (For more on the purpose of the film, you can check out my interview with Chris Tomlin and Michael Scott, CEO of Pure Flix and Pinnacle Peak Pictures).

From a purely cinematic perspective, The Last Supper forgoes many of the pillars of moviemaking (three-act plot, character development, etc.). The film presupposes that the audience already has an emotional attachment to the story and the characters. Despite some end credits title cards offering a gospel pitch, I’m not sure the film really works as an evangelistic experience. Instead, The Last Supper is primarily geared toward audiences who are looking for a fresh perspective on a narrative they know well.

Advertisement

The film tells the story from the point of view of the disciples, not Jesus. Judas Iscariot is present in all gospel retellings, but he has rarely (if ever) been given a central role. The Last Supper juxtaposes Judas with Peter, fleshing out their storylines to demonstrate their parallel (but ultimately diverging) paths. The film attempts to “humanize” the characters and explores Judas as a friend and member of the disciples, not merely as the man destined to betray Jesus.

Most Jesus films focus on the crucifixion and the resurrection, but this one dwells on the Last Supper and explores the religious roots of the Passover feast. For Christians who regularly partake in communion, there is value in meditating on its historical context. At times, the film is a bit clunky in how it handles this exploration, such as when a character explains the function of the blood painted over the door for Passover, exposition clearly included for the audience’s sake since Jewish characters would presumably already know the backstory.

For the most part, the film doesn’t alter the biblical narrative. It simply expands the story around the edges and fills in the gaps. As far as I could tell, most (if not all) of Jesus’ dialogue was taken directly from the Bible (which I appreciated, as I’m uncomfortable with filmmakers attributing their own words to Christ). 

In other areas, the film goes beyond recorded Scripture. The relationship dynamic between Peter and Judas is interesting, but it is original to the film, as is much of the dramatization of Judas being tormented and tempted by Satan. One of the most glaring additions is that rather than having Peter strike a servant with a sword and cut off his ear (John 18:10), a mini battle ensues between the disciples and the soldiers. The scene offers another unfortunate example of filmmakers including unnecessary Hollywood action rather than elevating the compelling dramatic tension already present in the biblical text (see also Netflix’s Mary). 

While not always the focal character, Jesus remains the story’s pivotal figure. Depicting the hypostatic union (Christ as both “fully God” and “fully man”) is cinematically impossible, and adaptations usually emphasize one aspect over the other. In some ways, The Last Supper offers a more reverent—at times, even “distant”—adaptation of Jesus than the more human version portrayed in shows like The Chosen. Though there are moments when Jesus appears surprisingly earthly and vulnerable in ways I didn’t always appreciate. For example, the “cleansing of the temple” (Mark 11:15-18) narrative is depicted more as Jesus losing control and throwing a tantrum rather than as a righteous, purposeful anger.  

While Hollywood mainstays like Star Wars and Marvel are faltering, biblical adaptations are on the rise. A byproduct of faith-based entertainment’s newfound success is that Christian viewers have plenty of options. The Last Supper doesn’t feel like an essential contribution to the genre, but that’s not to say that it is without merit. Familiarity can breed apathy, and there is power in approaching the gospel from subtly difference perspectives. At a time when films like Anora are celebrated as the best Hollywood has to offer, having a little more Jesus sprinkled into our entertainment isn’t a bad thing.    

On the Surface

Advertisement

For Consideration

Beneath The Surface

Engage The Film

Grace and Forgiveness

As an adaptation of the gospel, the film’s themes largely align with those of the biblical narrative itself—Jesus’ love, grace, and salvation. More specifically, the film attempts to unpack the similar experiences of Peter and Judas. Despite having spent years as followers of Jesus, arguably both characters’ most famous deed was denying their Lord. The film depicts both characters under the torment of Satan, who preys on their fear and guilt. Whereas Judas ultimately succumbs, Peter finds forgiveness and is restored.

Another theme the film’s producers specifically highlighted in my interview with them is the importance of the table. As many Christians partake in communion at church, the significance of the table has been somewhat forgotten. But there is power in being reminded that Jesus instituted the ritual while sitting around a table in intimate fellowship with friends. The Last Supper reminds audiences that the ultimate purpose of communion is not just to remember that Jesus died on the cross on our behalf but to dwell on the beautiful truth that he sacrificed himself to bring us back into a deep, loving fellowship with him.

Advertisement




  • Daniel holds a PhD in “Christianity and the Arts” from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is the author/co-author of multiple books and he speaks in churches and schools across the country on the topics of Christian worldview, apologetics, creative writing, and the Arts.

    Advertisement



    View all posts



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: The Cat (1991) – 88 Films Blu-ray – HorrorFuel.com: Reviews, Ratings and Where to Watch the Best Horror Movies & TV Shows

Published

on

Movie Review: The Cat (1991) – 88 Films Blu-ray – HorrorFuel.com: Reviews, Ratings and Where to Watch the Best Horror Movies & TV Shows
Holy shit… Ngai Choi Lam’s The Cat… Honestly that should (and could) be the entirety of this review, but you need to hear more, believe me… Author/paranormal scholar Wisely (Waise Lee, Bullet in the Head) writes novels based in part on his exploits… exploits that include an absolute hum-fucking-dinger that includes his pal Li Tung […]
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

1985 Movie Reviews – Bad Medicine, King Solomon’s Mines, and One Magic Christmas | The Nerdy

Published

on

1985 Movie Reviews – Bad Medicine, King Solomon’s Mines, and One Magic Christmas | The Nerdy
by Sean P. Aune | November 22, 2025November 22, 2025 10:30 am EST

Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1985 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was also the start to a major shift in cultural and societal norms, and some of those still reverberate to this day.

We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly four dozen.

Yes, we’re insane, but 1985 was that great of a year for film.

The articles will come out – in most cases – on the same day the films hit theaters in 1985 so that it is their true 40th anniversary. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory. In some cases, it truly will be the first time we’ve seen them.

Advertisement

This time around, it’s Nov. 22, 1985, and we’re off to see Bad Medicine, King Solomon’s Mines, and One Magic Christmas.

Bad Medicine

Steve Guttenberg really was having a moment in the 1980s. Sadly, this film was part of that moment.

Jeffrey Marx (Guttenberg), comes from a medical family, but he has been able to get into a medical school due to low scores. His father finally sets up to go to a school in Central America. Once there he makes a few new friends, and eventually discovers not only does he actually like medicine, but he’s good at it.

This film had a few ingredients to be fun, but it lost it’s way with too many sub-plots. We didn’t need the owner of the school (Alan Arkin) lusting after Liz (Julie Hagerty). It added absolutely nothing to the overall story, and only served to slow the pace of the film down in several spots.

Advertisement

There may have been a decent film hiding in here, just no one knew how to get to the meat of it, apparently.


King Solomon’s Mines

Kids love Indiana Jones, so lets make our own!

Jesse Huston (Sharon Stone) wants to find her father, and hires Allan Quatermain (Richard Chamberlain) to help her. Her father had been looking for the fabled King Solomon’s Mines, so naturally they end up on the path to looking for them as well, running into every obstacle imaginable along the way.

Lets make no mistake, this is not a good movie. It is an out-and-out ripoff of everything that made Indiana Jones cool and successful. But despite it not being good, Chamberlain is so blasted charming as Quatermain that it’s hard not to root for the film a bit.

What kept tearing me out of the film was the stunts. Realistically, you know Indiana Jones should be dead about 20 times a movie, but the stunts were so good that you could believe he survived it. And it’s just not the same here. The scene where Quatermain gets dragged behind the train hitting all of the boards of the track was just too far to even be believable for a moment, and that really pulled me out of the film.

Advertisement

I give them points for trying, but they just never quite make it over the line.


One Magic Christmas

Hey kids! Christmas is coming! Who’s ready to get depressed?

Christmas angel Gideon (Harry Dean Stanton) gets assigned to help Ginnie Grainger (Mary Steenburgen) find the Christmas spirit… and so what if she watches her husband get killed along the way and she believes at one point both her kids are dead the same day?

Merry Christmas, everyone!

The film is unflinchingly sad for the majority of its runtime, making it difficult to fathom how it was made. In the end, Ginnie does get her Christmas spirit as Santa rewinds time so that her husband never dies. Of course, he doesn’t remove her memory of watching him get shot and him dying in front of her, but, you know, it was the 80s, who cared about trauma?

Advertisement

Just a bleak film that is baffling how it got made.

1985 Movie Reviews will return on Nov. 29, 2025, with Rocky IV and Santa Claus: The Movie.


Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Sisu: Road to Revenge

Published

on

Sisu: Road to Revenge

The lethal and tenacious Aatami Korpi returns in this sequel to 2022’s Sisu. Like its predecessor, Sisu: Road to Revenge offers up nonstop, gory hyper-violence as the old soldier shoots and stabs his way through the Soviet Union’s Red Army to avenge his family’s murder. Paired with all the bloodshed is a handful of f-words and some drinking, as well.

Continue Reading

Trending