Connect with us

Movie Reviews

I Saw the TV Glow (2024) Review | The Film Magazine

Published

on

I Saw the TV Glow (2024) Review | The Film Magazine

I Saw the TV Glow (2024)
Director: Jane Schoenbrun
Screenwriter: Jane Schoenbrun
Starring: Justice Smith, Brigette Lundy-Paine, Ian Foreman, Helena Howard, Lindsey Jordan, Danielle Deadwyler, Fred Durst

Do you like girls?
I don’t know.
Boys?
I- I- I think that, I like TV shows.

Psychological thriller, coming-of-age story, spacey sci-fi – all categories that general audiences will try to fit I Saw the TV Glow into. In truth, the film embodies elements of these genres while also defying them. Through what many will consider a convoluted plot line overflowing with time jumps and interdimensional travel, director Jane Schoenbrun forces audiences to question their own perception of reality. On the surface, I Saw the TV Glow boasts a distinctive visual and sonic aesthetic that shuts down any notion of “less is more” in contemporary independent filmmaking. The film plays with visuals that evoke the look of 90s tube televisions, alternating between this compressed, distorted aesthetic to symbolize the seepage of TV fiction into reality. Fans of ‘Twin Peaks’ will resonate with the film’s Lynchian style of world building, where environments, artifacts, and inanimate features transcend their roles to become essential characters. From the bright white glow of a 90s television set to a haunting depiction of a suburban ice cream truck engulfed in neon smoke, the film allows us to enter what can only be described as an alluringly nostalgic nightmare.

We first meet the film’s protagonist, Owen (Justice Smith), with their eyes glued to the TV – an awkward child who yearns for the seemingly unattainable utopias on the other side of the screen. It is through this screen that Owen first discovers ‘The Pink Opaque’, a popular children’s television show similar to ‘Goosebumps’ and ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer‘. Due to their parents’ strict (and rather ridiculous) rules around bedtime, Owen finds themself unable to watch the show when it airs. By chance or fate, Owen discovers a sense of companionship through his new friend Maddie, whose tumultuous home life provides the freedom to explore everything ‘The Pink Opaque’ has to offer. As Owen and Maddie deal with the harsh realities of their lives, their perceptions of what is real and what is fantasy begin to fuse, setting the tone for the film’s jarring pacing and often leaving you to question whether or not to believe what is unfolding on screen.

One thing that is for certain, although seldom addressed outright, is the emergence of Owen’s transgender identity throughout their life. As with many queer youth, Owen finds solace in the fantasy that comes along with immersing oneself in fictional worlds, almost as if they feel more comfortable existing in an episode of ‘The Pink Opaque’ than in their own body. The bottling up of these feelings, to the point of mere combustion, drives the film to its rather heartbreaking yet equivocal ending.

To contextualize I Saw the TV Glow in contemporary filmmaking may prove a challenge, but it certainly lends itself as a natural follow-up to Schoenbrun’s directorial debut We’re All Going to the World’s Fair, an equally queer story that is similarly immersed in the digital world but doesn’t match the distinct identity and emotional resonance of its successor. The film’s horror elements walk a fine line, presenting an almost quirky mix of the childlike wonder reminiscent of the villains in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie (1995), all the while maintaining an overarching atmosphere of dread and suspense comparable to queer horror cinema such as Stranger by the Lake and Climax. While it may not have a long run at the box office, the film is bound to carve out a special place in the hearts of the queer cinema community, particularly among the vibrant community of trans cinephiles and horror fanatics.

A story that favors metaphor and surrealism over narrative, I Saw the TV Glow is the type of movie that demands a rewatch. It is clear that Schoenbrun had no intention of ensuring their viewers felt satisfied when watching the credits roll, a sentiment that is present throughout the sporadically paced and often ambiguous script. Like rediscovering a beloved childhood show, rewatching I Saw the TV Glow invites the possibility of uncovering new insights and subtle nuances that enrich the viewing experience.

Advertisement

Score: 20/24


























Rating: 4 out of 5.

Written by Jake Fittipaldi


You can support Jake Fittipaldi in the following places:

Instagram: @jakefittipaldi
Letterboxd: /jakefittipaldi

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Vaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale

Published

on

Vaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale

‘Vaazha’ found its footing in how sharply it reflected a certain kind of youth, boys dismissed as ‘vaazhas’, but carrying their own confusions and emotional weight. The second part returns to that space, again following a group of boys trying to figure themselves out.

Directed by Savin SA, the film tracks this gang through their higher secondary years, with Hashir and Alan among the central figures. It stays with them as they move through that in-between phase, dealing with early attraction, peer pressure and the pull of new experiences, the kind that often arrive before they fully understand them. The narrative is not built around a single arc, but around the shared rhythm of the group.

The first half is mounted as a high-energy stretch, driven by humour, action and a fast pace, with a background score that keeps it buoyant. The inclusion of contemporary content creators stands out here, and the response suggests it lands well with younger viewers, especially in the way the film taps into familiar emotions.

Vijay Babu, Aju Varghese and Sudheesh appear in key supporting roles, adding presence around the central group.

Advertisement

Where the first Vaazha had a more subdued, easygoing take on youth, the sequel is noticeably louder and more vibrant, holding on to the same core but pushing it with greater energy.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Are We Having Fun Yet?’

Published

on

‘Are We Having Fun Yet?’

Photo: Universal/Everett Collection

Like being asphyxiated in a ball pit filled with candy, the experience of watching The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is at once kaleidoscopic and nerve-wracking. It pantomimes the hallmarks of a good time, with a fast, forced cheeriness; the flashing lights, bright colors, sparkly design, and subplot-happy narrative are there to hold our attention and charm us, but they accomplish the opposite, instead making us worry about what we’re missing. At one point there’s a throwaway bit involving a roller coaster that dives into a pit of lava, eventually emerging with all its passengers transformed into happy skeletons; maybe we are supposed to be those happy skeletons, drained of life and loving it. The good news (or is it the bad news?) is that this is a kids’ movie and nobody cares what “we” think. Its predecessor, 2023’s Super Mario Bros. Movie, made more than $1.3 billion worldwide, and no one should be surprised if this one does something similar.

That first movie wasn’t particularly accomplished either, but it had a slick simplicity that one could sort of lose oneself in and some clever bits involving our heroes, Brooklyn plumber brothers Mario (Chris Pratt) and Luigi (Charlie Day), as well as a lively turn by Jack Black as the bloviating turtle-demon Bowser. The sequel, by contrast, is turbo-loaded with character, incident, themes, never pausing to let us appreciate anything. Though directors Aaron Horvath and Michael Jelenic do apparently want us to care: The Super Mario Galaxy Movie centers around families destroyed and reclaimed, a sentence I can’t believe I just typed. The film’s chief villain, the spasmodic Bowser Jr. (voiced by Benny Safdie), seeks to save his father, the now-docile Bowser, from neutered captivity. As part of his devious plan (I think?), Junior kidnaps Princess Rosalina (Brie Larson) from her space-faring observatory dominion, where she plays mother to a race of puffy, colorful star children known as Lumas. Rosalina loves to read her kids heroic stories about Princess Peach (Anya Taylor-Joy), her long-lost sister, ruler of the Mushroom Kingdom and Mario’s main object of desire. Such attempts to infuse depth into the film’s carnivalesque cacophony could have been something, but corporate flatness consumes all. The ideas about family aren’t explored or developed, merely repeated.

Advertisement

But like I said, it’s a kids’ film, and younger children will be distracted by the aforementioned cute little star-baby things, by the cute little mushroom-head guys, by the frantic speed at which everything comes at us, and by the film’s vision of the universe as a series of amusement parks, with each world in this galaxy seemingly its own funfair. If only all this chaos didn’t feel so strained, so polished and programmed, so, so … unchaotic. The movie is also filled with Easter eggs from many decades’ worth of Mario video games, which will surely reassure devoted fans of those games that all is right with the world and someone loves them. (Full disclosure: I haven’t played any of them. Back when I was a kid and had to cold turkey myself from video games entirely, I’m pretty sure Donkey Kong was as far as I got in the incipient Mario universe.) The best of these aforementioned callouts is the appearance of the Han Solo–like Star Fox (voiced by Glen Powell), a character from a different set of Nintendo games, who arrives accompanied by his own hand-animated, hyper credit sequence. More of that, please.

Of the rest of the star-laden voice cast, Safdie and Black are the only others who make an impression. As before, Bowser has been realized with an eye (and an ear) for Black’s own grandiose, mock-operatic mannerisms, and Safdie seems to have appropriated them for the character’s offspring. Black, of course, was also the star of last year’s entertaining hit A Minecraft Movie, which got a ton of mileage out of the actor’s unique mix of irony and roaring sincerity, using him to hold together its ramshackle, faux-DIY vibe. That film was a good example of this type of material handled with something resembling charm. We could also point to something older like The LEGO Movie as a model of a brand-management enterprise that managed to be irreverent and thoughtful (and, indeed, brilliant) at the same time. All The Super Mario Galaxy Movie has, unfortunately, is the messianic fervor with which it throws everything at us. Well, that, and the mountains of money it will surely make. Me, I’ll take my travel stipend and go home.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Blaming Reviews Won’t Save a Film – Gulte

Published

on

Blaming Reviews Won’t Save a Film – Gulte

At the success meet of Band Melam last night, several actors and the director voiced strong complaints about film reviews. Some said reviews are damaging films badly, while other actor even questioned producer satirically why reviewers were not “managed.” One speaker even suggested that critics should wait a few days before sharing their opinions.

However, the bigger issue seems to be something else. The team successfully brought back the hit “Court” pair, expecting that their previous popularity would automatically pull audiences to theatres. While the chemistry between the lead pair still works to an extent, that alone cannot guarantee success. Audiences today expect a strong story and engaging narration, not just familiar faces.

This argument about reviews also misses a basic point. Reviews, whether positive or negative, are usually based on how the film actually feels to the viewer. Audiences along with reviews, They also check trailers, songs, and public talk before making a decision.

If a film truly connects with people, no amount of negative reviews can stop it. Social media quickly reflects genuine audience reactions, and strong content always finds support.

When a film fails to create that impact, blaming reviews becomes an easy excuse. Instead of targeting critics, filmmakers need to focus on delivering better content.

Advertisement

At the same event, producer Bekkem Venugopal made a sensible point that everyone should do their own job. Filmmakers should focus on making good films, and critics should share honest opinions.

Continue Reading

Trending