Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Eva Hausmann's  Willy and Me – A Failed Vanity Exercise in Filmmaking – SM Mirror

Published

on

At the Movies With…

Lady Beverly Cohn
Editor-at-Large

Wearing multiple hats – writing, directing, and acting – requires a huge amount of both the technical and ancillary skills necessary to create an excellent film. A handful of actors, going back to Charlie Chaplin, have had the massive talent necessary to take on these multiple roles.

Among those actors who have successfully worn several hats include the most prolific Woody Allen, whose massive 50-feature portfolio began in 1966 with What’s Up Tiger Lily, with his last film being with Rifkin’s Festival. Unfortunately, his private life was impacted negatively later on in his career, and we have not heard from him in the recent past. Still, in my opinion, he is the master of multi-tasking.

Although there are too many to list, here is a sampling of an elite group of other actors who have successfully worn multiple hats: Orson Welles (Citizen Cane,) Bradley Cooper (A Star is Born, Maestro,) Clint Eastwood (Million Dollar Baby, Gran Torino,) Mel Gibson (Braveheart,) Spike Lee (Malcolm X, Do the Right Thing,) Barbara Streisand (Yentl, The Prince of Tides,) George Clooney (The Monuments Men, Michael Clayton,) Ben Affleck (Argo, The Town,) Quentin Tarantino: (Reservoir Dogs, Django Unchained, Pulp Fiction,) Kevin Costner: (Dances with Wolves, The Postman, Open Range,) Tyler Perry (Diary of a Mad Black Woman and multiple Madea films.)

Advertisement

Why, you might wonder, did I devote so much ink to listing these talented filmmakers? The reason is simple. Before your vanity tricks you into thinking you can walk in those footsteps, you better be sure to have the massive talent required to pull it off. I’m afraid in the case of German actress Eva Hassmann, who tried wearing multiple hats in her first feature, monumentally failed to write a believable script, and who, despite being mentored by the late Peter Bogdonavich, her skills on all levels were pretty much at beginner level.

The story: Hassmann plays Greta Weingarten, a supposedly unhappy housewife who has been obsessed with Willy Nelson since she was a child. She learns that Mr. Nelson is going to give his last concert in Las Vegas, and she makes up her mind that she has to go. Without discussing this with her husband, played by Thure Riefenstein, she sells his Porsche for $7,500 and sneaks out of the house, leaving a candle burning, which causes a massive fire.

So, the husband is bereft of his Porche and is living in the charred remains of his home. In the meantime, Greta arrives in New York and is met by a very friendly desk clerk played by the one and only Bogdonavich, who gives the only believable performance. This is contrasted by mostly indicating and mugging* by Hassmann and the rest of the cast, who basically give line readings, indicate** emotions, and were sorely in need of a skilled director to help them navigate their roles. Greta hides her money under the mattress, and as I watched that scene knew that money was going to disappear, and indeed it did following a night of heavy drinking with a man she met at a bar.

Anyway, she meets Nick, a friendly Elvis impersonator played by Blaine Gray, who becomes her guardian angel, eventually lending her his car to drive to Las Vegas. During that drive, she encounters a mother (Darby Stanchfield) and her three children, who appear to be having car trouble and offers them a lift.

It is telegraphed that these Christian do-gooders are scammers and are up to no good. Sure enough, they eventually steal her car and strand her in the middle of the desert, where she is left to die. (Acting level: beginners.) But she survives and winds up on a road (don’t ask me how) where she refuses a lift from two unsavory characters. The scammer family winds up in New York, where Nick is walking along in his Elvis costume, and the kids want his autograph. But wait. Nick recognizes his truck, and the scammers make a hasty exit.

Advertisement

Being the guy that he is, he sets out to find her but doesn’t. In the meantime, through some sort of a miracle, she survives the deadly desert and arrives in Las Vegas just in time for Willy’s concert but alas doesn’t have the $300 for a ticket. So, guess what? She climbs up a pipe, I kid you not and tries to watch the show through a window but falls down just as Willy is emerging with his entourage.

Battered-looking, with dirt on her face and her dress ragged, Willy, of course, gives her his autograph. That’s basically it in a nutshell. Oh, one other observation. There is a group of old ladies who are ardent Elvis fans who swoon over Nick. Their acting is, let’s see, maybe at an eighth-grade level. They needed direction in developing their characters, but alas, director Hassmann didn’t have the directorial skills to direct herself, them, or any of the actors in the film. Alas, the lack of skills applied to production values starting with Ting Yu’s spotty editing where locations were confusing and interchangeable.

Marco Cappetta and Alexa Ihrt’s camera work was adequate but certainly not outstanding. Russell Boast’s casting is quite questionable, and one wonders how he found these mostly unskilled actors. One positive note is the outstanding soundtrack by Gerry Gershman, who, throughout the film, incorporated a few of Willy Nelson’s greatest hits, including “Whiskey River,” “On the Road Again,” and “Always on My Mind.” There’s an old show biz axiom that says: “I left the theatre humming the set.” In this case, you’ll leave the theatre humming Willy Nelson’s fabulous music.

“Willy and Me”
Writer, Producer, Director:  Eva Hassmann
Producer: Hans Georg Naeder
Starring:  Eva Hassmann and Blaine Gray, with Darby Stanchfield, Peter Bogdanovich, 
Thure Riefenstein, Carlos Leal, and Willie Nelson
Distributed by:  Quiver Distribution
Running Time:  87 Minutes
Language:  English

Genre:  Comedy, Adventure, Drama
Rating:  Not Rated
Release Date:  Theaters & Streaming: Feb. 9, 2024

Advertisement

*Mugging:  Make silly or exaggerated faces in front of an audience or on camera. 
**In acting, “indicating” means faking the emotion vs. being a truthful, organic moment.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Big Break (2026) – Review | Horror-Comedy | Heaven of Horror

Published

on

Big Break (2026) – Review | Horror-Comedy | Heaven of Horror

Looking for a teeny tiny favor…

Big Break is the story of a sketch comedy collective reuniting years after it was disbanded. The collective was called “Simple Town”, and while three of them have gone on to live ordinary lives, one of them made it big.

The four old friends and former sketch collective members have a lot to talk about. There’s Will (Will Niedmann), Caroline (Caro Yost), Felipe (Felipe Di Poi Tamargo), and their estranged ex-collaborator Sam (Samuel Lanier).

Oh yeah, the estranged one, Sam, is the only one of them to have become successful in Hollywood. He made the box office hit The Gummy Bears Movie. Now, he’s working on a sequel, and his three college friends are all desperate to get cast in the upcoming sequel.

On the way there, the three friends are trying to come up with a plan for how to go about asking for this favor. The conversation in the car shows that their improv and sketch talent may not be as impressive as they think. However, it’s fun for us outsiders to watch them “hard at work”.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Published

on

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Share this with a friend!

During the opening ceremony of the Fantasia International Film Festival, Her Private Hell director Nicolas Winding Refn was awarded a Cheval Noir Career Achievement Award for his contributions to cinema. He made an impassioned plea on the importance of a festival like Fantasia and genre cinema as a whole:

“In the mid-90s, when I began, we really couldn’t make genre movies; we had to make important movies. But we were like, f— that! How do you piss off your parents? Make a horror movie! How to tell the politicians to f— off? Make something violent! A little fun, some sexy stuff? It’s the best thing in the world! Genre is cinema!”

“Genre is cinema” may be the truest statement the Danish provocateur has ever made, which is why it felt so painful to follow such an electric and impassioned speech with one of the least impressive movies Refn has crafted. A movie that attempts to provoke and elicit strong reactions out of us but isn’t nearly as aesthetically and thematically interesting as it should be.

With characters soaked in bisexual lighting and neon colors, one would think that Refn would want to continue in the trajectory that has defined his eclectic body of work. But dying for twenty-five minutes before being brought back to life gives him a new outlook on the world, as he’s not only stated at Fantasia but during its Cannes world premiere as well.

Advertisement

In a way, the harrowing event he experienced mirrored a lot the character he portrayed in Hideo Kojima‘s Death Stranding, which he acknowledged during the Q&A session following the screening. Unfortunately, this shift in his thematic and aesthetic conventions yielded a movie that has nothing tangible to say about any of the images it presents or the movies it references.

Plot and critical reception of Her Private Hell

One even wonders why Her Private Hell received such vitriolic reactions at Cannes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not a very good movie, but it’s also not the kind of movie that will piss people off. People may be inclined to walk out of it, not because of its strong and explicit violence, both physical and sexual (none of them go as far as some of Refn‘s previous movies), but because of how boring it is. It attempts to morph the giallo into a cyberpunk/futuristic visual language while sprinkling in a dash of Hong Kong-inspired action, but none of these elements coalesce into anything meaningful or significant.

An astute moviegoer might notice his inspirations (Roger Vadim, Mario Bava, Seijun Suzuki, and even Kojima), but there isn’t a single one that feels decidedly singular or meaningful enough to yield a reaction from us. Oh, sure, there are plenty of scenes where the audience may be inclined to react, but once they see how little payoff it has, they might not react to them at all.

It’s even difficult to describe what Her Private Hell is about because Refn now prefers to throw the “three-act” structure out of the window and create movies that don’t necessarily adhere to preconceived audience expectations.

In fact, when pressed on this during a Q&A moderated by film critic Katie Rife the following day, Refn scoffed at the idea of a movie having an “ending,” simply stating, “What is an ending?” While some might have laughed at such a response worthy of David Lynch‘s greatest moments, it does reveal how one has to watch Her Private Hell; which is about letting yourself be absorbed by the hallucinatory images of Refn‘s storytelling and try to see the parallels he makes between the stories of Elle (Sophie Thatcher) and Private K (Charles Melton).

Advertisement

A perplexing and uninteresting film from Nicolas Winding Refn

Even then, the viewing experience of Her Private Hell remains perplexing. And from a purely thematic viewpoint, it isn’t a movie worth parsing or spending your time attempting to find meaning in what’s on screen.

It’s also very loud. Perhaps too loud. Definitely the loudest movie I’ve watched in a cinema since Christopher Nolan‘s Tenet. Unlike that movie, however, the sound isn’t a character but a deterrent. Refn is convinced he must make the audience suffer agonizingly to get a reaction out of us, but, again, there’s not much here that warrants any form of reaction. Sure, some of it is violent, and a lot of it is painfully unpleasant.

In fact, Her Private Hell might be extremely misogynistic and depicts many difficult scenes with such a regressive attitude. Again, he’ll present something provocative but never do anything with it. What changed for Refn after he died? He’s still doing the same old stuff, but with nary a thing to excavate beyond the graphic violence and depictions of alpha masculinity. That treads on similar ground to Refn‘s most well-known movies, the Pusher trilogy, Drive, and Only God Forgives. It’s violence for the sake of violence, à la Michael Winner, but without any point behind said violence.

Even the cast can’t save Her Private Hell

None of the performances from a star-studded ensemble is any good, either. Sophie Thatcher, Kristine Froseth, and Havana Rose Liu are all accomplished actors in their own right and have always been pretty great in everything they do. The latter, in particular, has such a magnetic screen presence and old-school appeal that it feels perfectly suited to Refn‘s vision for elevating her innate talents.

Advertisement

Charles Melton was recently nominated for an Emmy for his career-best work in the second season of Beef. Their talents are all wasted. If you like to see them howl like wolves, I’ve got the movie for you. Even when viewed through a giallo lens, their respective portrayals never seem fully in tune with the unwieldy, dense image-making at play.

Only Pino Donaggio‘s ethereal music gives Her Private Hell its only signs of life. At 84 years old, the Italian composer, mostly known for his collaborations with Brian De Palma (which, according to Fantasia’s Mitch Davis, is ongoing, as he’s working on his latest movie), delivers one of the most stirring and affecting scores of his entire career, one that words can barely describe. As someone who repeatedly listens to Donaggio’s Carrie and Blow Out soundtracks, Her Private Hell is destined to be relistened to on repeat in my household. However, I will never watch the movie again.

Also check out: Fantasia Fest 2026: Our Five Most Anticipated Films

 

Share this with a friend!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

Published

on

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

If you love movies, chances are you’ve read a review or two before deciding what to watch. Most people keep things pretty simple—they talk about the acting, the storyline, or whether the film is worth your time. But then there’s Letterboxd, a popular social platform where movie lovers log, rate, and review the films they watch. While plenty of reviews are thoughtful and insightful, others take a… much more chaotic approach.

That’s exactly what the Letterboxd Reviews With Threatening Auras account celebrates. It rounds up the platform’s funniest, most unhinged, and wonderfully cursed reviews—the kind that make you stop mid-scroll and wonder what was going through the reviewer’s mind. These definitely aren’t your standard “Loved it, 4 stars” takes. They radiate such a bizarrely threatening energy that it’s almost impossible not to keep scrolling to see what wild review comes next.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

We’ve all been there—sitting through a film, hoping it gets better, only for the credits to roll and leave you wondering what on earth you just watched. But if there’s one silver lining, it’s the internet’s reaction afterward. Sometimes the reviews are so funny, dramatic, or brutally honest that they’re more entertaining than the movie itself.

Advertisement

Whether it’s an accidental masterpiece of comedy or a hilariously savage one-liner, people have a remarkable talent for putting their thoughts into words. The truth is, movie reviews come in all shapes and sizes. They vary depending on who’s writing them, where they’re published, and what they’re hope to achieve. Some are designed to help you decide what to watch on a Friday night, while others dig deep into themes, symbolism, and filmmaking techniques.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

One of the most familiar formats is the capsule review. These are the short reviews you’ll often spot in newspapers, magazines, streaming platforms, or entertainment websites. Usually just one or two paragraphs long, they quickly summarize the story, highlight a few strengths and weaknesses, and end with a clear recommendation or star rating. They’re ideal for people who don’t want spoilers or lengthy analysis—they simply want to know whether a movie is worth their time. Writing one isn’t always as easy as it looks, though. Condensing an entire film into just a few sentences while still being informative takes real skill. That’s why some of the best capsule reviews manage to say more in 100 words than others do in 1,000.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Professional critics often take a different approach. Publications such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and major newspapers publish what are commonly known as trade reviews. These aren’t just personal opinions; they also consider a film’s broader impact, commercial appeal, performances, direction, cinematography, and where it fits within the industry. Their reviews are often read by moviegoers, filmmakers, studios, and even award voters. While audiences don’t always agree with the critics, these reviews provide a structured, informed perspective that goes beyond simply saying whether a movie was enjoyable. They aim to explain why a film succeeds—or why it falls flat.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Then there are academic film reviews, which take things to an entirely different level. These aren’t written for casual viewers but for students, researchers, and people who study cinema professionally. Rather than focusing on entertainment value, they examine symbolism, storytelling techniques, historical context, editing, cinematography, and cultural influence. It’s less about asking, “Was this movie good?” and more about exploring what the film is trying to communicate and how it fits into the history of cinema. They can be dense, detailed, and surprisingly fascinating, often revealing layers that the average viewer might never notice. Even a blockbuster superhero movie can become the subject of serious academic discussion.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Of course, not every review is carefully researched. Some of the most popular today are instant reaction reviews—the videos, podcasts, TikToks, or tweets people post immediately after leaving the theater. They’re fast, emotional, and completely unfiltered. You can usually tell within seconds whether someone loved the movie or absolutely hated it. Because there’s no time to overthink anything, these reactions often feel refreshingly genuine. Sure, opinions may change after a second viewing, but that’s part of the fun. They capture that immediate emotional response we all have after watching something memorable, whether it’s excitement, disappointment, confusion, or complete disbelief.

Advertisement

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And then there’s arguably the internet’s favorite category: user reviews. Platforms like Letterboxd, IMDb, and Rotten Tomatoes have given everyday movie lovers a place to share whatever is on their minds. Some people write thoughtful essays that rival professional critics, while others somehow manage to steal the spotlight with a single sentence. One review might offer a heartfelt personal story about how a film changed someone’s life, while the next simply says something so absurd that thousands of people can’t stop laughing. Because anyone can contribute, there’s an endless variety of voices, personalities, and senses of humor. That’s exactly what makes scrolling through user reviews so addictive.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

In recent years, these reviews have taken on a life of their own. Thanks to social media, the funniest ones are regularly shared far beyond the platforms where they were originally posted. Sometimes the review becomes more famous than the movie itself. A perfectly timed joke, an oddly specific observation, or an outrageously dramatic reaction can spread across the internet within hours. It’s a reminder that people aren’t just reviewing movies anymore—they’re entertaining each other in the process. For many film fans, reading the reviews afterward has become almost as enjoyable as watching the movie itself.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And that’s exactly where today’s collection comes in. Instead of looking at traditional movie criticism, we’re diving into the wonderfully chaotic world of Letterboxd, where movie lovers often express themselves in the most unpredictable ways imaginable. They aren’t polished critiques or carefully balanced opinions; they’re pure internet gold. Keep scrolling, Pandas, and see which review made you laugh the hardest—or left you wondering what on earth the reviewer had just watched.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending