Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Column: Ending the underrated cult classic phenomena

Published

on

Column: Ending the underrated cult classic phenomena

It has turn out to be commonplace amongst audiences to kind a film title right into a search bar, simply to catch a glimpse of three arbitrary ranking numbers and quick critiques. They then use this to determine whether or not to observe a film or not. Nevertheless, does this methodology truly profit audiences?

Movie is subjective. It’s doable that others might have disliked a film that you just cherished, however that wouldn’t instantly make you alter your stance on the movie. Nevertheless, in case you noticed the critiques earlier than watching stated movie, perhaps your stance on it could’ve shaped earlier than you may give the film an opportunity.

It is a drawback. 

Valuing the quick, biased, opinionated takes of others earlier than viewing a movie for the primary time impairs the viewing expertise as a consequence of its inherent ignorance of items’ subjectivity. 

What does one specific movie imply to you? How do you relate to its characters? How do you interpret its motifs? These questions rooted in emotion might be answered solely by you, not a 280-character assessment stuffed with emojis. 

Advertisement

Not solely does this development of following critiques have an effect on your capability to determine what movies to see, nevertheless it additionally impacts the filmmaking course of. Utilizing precedent within the trade, studios and distributors can attribute previous failure or success to doable future outcomes whereas deciding to provide or distribute movies. Whereas this mannequin works in instances the place critics and audiences actually agree, it’s value noting that critics’ views don’t at all times align with these of audiences. 

That is the “Underrated Cult Traditional Phenomena” during which movies upon launch are panned by critics to an extent that it impacts their box-office efficiency — nonetheless, months or years later, audiences lastly have the voice to talk for themselves as soon as liberated from the pressures of critics’ opinions by residence video. Audiences lastly declare motion pictures that they love as underrated cult classics, no matter their essential failure.

Victims of this phenomenon could also be movies you like reminiscent of Battle Membership (1999), Blade Runner (1982), and Mulholland Drive (2001). Every of those trailblazing movies debuted to essential failure or polarization and field workplace failure earlier than audiences had the prospect to assign them the “cult basic” title.

In the summertime of 1982, Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner was declared a field workplace flop after accumulating $26 million. The poor tempo of box-office restoration may very well be attributed to the damaging critiques the movie earned. Movie critics on the time said that the movie was too dirty, gradual, and area of interest. The summer time of its launch, Pauline Kael, former American movie critic for The New Yorker journal, wrote, “Scott appears to be trapped in his personal alleyways, and not using a map.”  In 1982, Robert Ebert wrote that the movie was “a failure as a narrative.”

Battle Membership was disliked by studio executives, forcing director David Fincher to restructure the movie’s advertising marketing campaign. The executives had been confirmed proper because the movie turned one of the crucial controversial movies of the 12 months. Premiering on the 56th Venice Movie Pageant, the movie’s essential reception was poor because it was booed and walked out of. Two months following its movie pageant premiere, Battle Membership premiered globally to polarizing essential opinion and yielded underwhelming field workplace figures contemplating its spectacular solid and crew. It earned solely $11 million {dollars} on its opening weekend in Canada and the USA.

Advertisement

Mulholland Drive was met with polarizing critiques by critics. Printed earlier than the U.S. theatrical launch of the movie, The New York Observer’s Rex Reed wrote, “The worst film I’ve seen this 12 months is Mulholland Drive, a load of moronic and incoherent rubbish from David Lynch…” Considered as an enigma by some, the movie was criticized for being seemingly incohesive.

So, had been preliminary critiques of those movies indicators of whether or not audiences loved them?

No. These movies stood the check of time and have been declared cult classics.

The explanation?

Audiences had the precise to observe the movies unbiased of a assessment’s strain by residence video, permitting them to specific their very own genuine opinions.

Advertisement

The strain of critics’ critiques for residence video viewing is way decrease than that of a theatrical expertise. Audiences’ appraisal after their residence video launch has established them as cult classics, however one can’t assist however want that the movies would’ve succeeded on the proper time: in theaters. 

If audiences had the chance to present these movies an opportunity, unbiased of critiques marring the picture of them earlier than watching them, filmmakers might have inspired related, path-breaking movies over time.

This doesn’t go to say that film critiques are the demise of cinema. Film critiques supply a platform for public discourse concerning the works of a big and influential trade, and folks ought to have the chance to specific and have interaction with others to debate these vital items of labor. 

As a substitute, the answer ought to come from audiences. Recognizing that critiques are private opinions, audiences ought to give each movie an opportunity to kind their very own opinions.

This fashion, audiences might be heard, guaranteeing movies they love are profitable on the proper time.

Advertisement

@dthopinion

opinion@dailytarheel.com

To get the day’s information and headlines in your inbox every morning, join our e mail newsletters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Sathyam Sundaram Movie Review – Gulte

Published

on

Sathyam Sundaram Movie Review – Gulte

3/5


2 hrs 57 mins   |   Slice-of-life   |   28-9-2024


Cast – Arvind Swamy, Karthi, Sri Divya, Devadarshini, Jayaprakash and others

Director – C Premkumar

Advertisement

Producer – Jyothika, Surya

Banner – 2D Entertainment

Music – Govind Vasantha

Advertisement

96-fame director C Prem Kumar returns to the director’s chair after nearly five years to helm Sathyam Sundaram, a slice-of-life film on relationships and nostalgia. The film stars Aravind Swamy and Karthi in lead roles, who play the titular characters of Sathyam and Sundaram respectively. Sathyam and Sundaram is originally titled Meiyazhagan in Tamil. While the Tamil film is set in Thanjavur and Chennai, the Telugu film’s locations have been changed to Guntur and Vizag respectively. Sathyam Sundaram is produced by Jyothika and Suriya, who have previously backed critically acclaimed films like Soorarai Pottru (Aakasame Nee Haddura in Telugu) and Jai Bhim.

What is it about?

Sathyam (Aravind Swamy) and his family lose their beloved ancestral house in Guntur due to a property litigation in 1996, following which they tearfully leave the town and move to Chennai. 22 years later, Sathyam makes a trip back to Guntur to attend his sister’s wedding. What happens when Sathyam bumps into an overly friendly childhood acquaintance in the village (Sundaram) forms the crux of the story.

Advertisement

Performances

Karthi is the heart and soul of the film and he is the reason why everyone connects with the story. He also elicits the most laughs out of the audience. Aravind Swamy plays an introverted character with a lot of trauma. His screen presence fades a bit when he is with Karthi, but nevertheless, he delivers a strong performance.

Sri Divya and Devadarshini play the wives of these main characters. Despite their limited screentime, they are both endearing and memorable. Rajkiran, as Sathyam’s uncle Sukumar, is extremely relatable and effective, reminding a lot of us of our uncles.

Technicalities

The film has extremely emotional and soul stirring music by Govind Vasantha. The intent and meaning of the original Tamil lyrics of the songs have also been translated competently by Rakendu Mouli.

Advertisement

The film’s original location Thanjavur, with its ancient temples, plays a major role in determining the film’s overall production values. Though the makers of the film have changed the location in the Telugu version to Guntur, it is hard to miss the effect of Thanjavur in the film.

In addition to the friendship between Sathyam and Sundaram, the film also emphasises the relationship these actors share with animals of all kinds, ranging from cats, parrots to bulls and snakes. It adds a wholesome and heartwarming flair to the overall narrative.

The cinematography, by Mahendiran Jayaraju, plays a huge role in conveying the film’s soothing-yet-hard hitting themes. The result makes the film look both real and cinematically beautiful at the same time.

Thumbs up

Karthi & Aravind Swamy
90s nostalgia
Writing
Worldbuilding
Music

Advertisement

Thumbs down

Runtime
Slow paced narrative

Analysis

Sathyam Sundaram is a beautiful trip down the memory lane. Much like the director’s previous film 96 (and its Telugu remake Jaanu), a majority of the film takes place in the space of one night with just two characters.

Movies that take place entirely within the span of a single night fit well in the thriller genre, but clearly, 96 and Sathyam Sundaram are exceptions to this rule. Each dialogue, scene, sub-plot and arc in the film leaves a person with a smile and a good feeling in their hearts.

Advertisement

The film slowly but steadily wins the heart of everyone with its sincere emotions. A couple of scenes in particular, have the potential of making the audience tear up, due to their highly effective and relatable emotionality.

The makers have taken good care to ensure that it appeals well to Telugu audience, with attention to detail given to the dialogues, comedy and lyrics. This film will particularly impress 90s kids, with its bicycle sub-plot, flashback portions in the village and the actors humming iconic 90s songs like Singarala.

The film could have been much easier to enjoy though, had it been 30-40 minutes shorter (the runtime is 177 minutes long). The film’s makers could have also gone for a different title since it gives a spoiler to one of the film’s biggest mysteries. All in all, Sathyam Sundaram is a positive step in the direction of good, soulful cinema. However, those who do not enjoy slice-of-life emotional dramas or three-hour long films must definitely think twice before watching Sathyam Sundaram.

Verdict: Emotional Journey Of Pure Hearts

Rating: 3/5

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Satyam Sundaram Telugu Movie Review, Karthi, Aravind Swamy

Published

on

Satyam Sundaram Telugu Movie Review, Karthi, Aravind Swamy

Movie Name : Sathyam Sundaram

Release Date : September 28, 2024

123telugu.com Rating : 3.25/5

Starring : Karthi, Arvind Swamy, Sri Divya, Devadarshini, Swathi Konde and others

Director : C. Prem Kumar

Producers : Jyotika Sadanah, Suriya Sivakumar

Advertisement

Music Director: Govind Vasantha

Cinematographer: Mahendiran Jayaraju

Editor: R.Govindaraj

Related Links : Trailer

Karthi and Arvind Swamy’s Meiyazhagan made its debut in cinemas yesterday, and the Telugu version, Sathyam Sundaram, released today. Take a look at the review to know how this Prem Kumar directorial performs.

Advertisement

Story:

In 1996, Sathyam (Arvind Swamy) and his family are forced to leave their home in Guntur and start afresh in Vizag. Two decades later, Satyam returns to Guntur for his cousin’s wedding, where he encounters Sundaram (Karthi), a spirited individual who seems unusually attentive to him. Sathyam feels puzzled and uneasy, as he doesn’t recognize Sundaram or understand his actions. As events unfold during the wedding, Sathyam prepares to return to Vizag, but a series of dramatic incidents between the two reveal hidden emotions and long-lost connections, leading Satyam to discover Sundaram’s true identity.

Plus Points:

In an era where deeply emotional stories are becoming rare, Satyam Sundaram stands out as a heartwarming film that relies on genuine expressions and simple, meaningful conversations. The film’s strength lies in its ability to connect with the audience through its beautifully crafted characters and the subtle emotions they convey.

Karthi and Arvind Swamy’s performances are a major highlight. Both the actors sink into their characters so naturally that their on-screen presence feels effortless. Karthi’s outgoing and energetic persona blends well with Arvind Swamy’s quiet, introverted nature, creating a delightful contrast. Their chemistry, mixed with humor, brings a sense of lightheartedness that is engaging and enjoyable.

Advertisement

The supporting cast also adds value, delivering strong performances that enhance the emotional depth of the film. Another major asset is Govind Vasantha’s music, which amplifies the film’s emotional tone, making certain moments even more impactful.

Minus Points:

Advertisement

Though the film is emotionally engaging, its slow pace and reliance on lengthy dialogues may not appeal to everyone. Some viewers might find the narrative dragging in places, particularly because the story focuses more on conversations and small gestures rather than a gripping plot.

The absence of major twists or high intensity moments might leave those looking for a fast-paced drama feeling underwhelmed. Additionally, the extended runtime could test the patience of some viewers, as certain scenes feel unnecessarily prolonged.

Technical Aspects:

One of the film’s technical achievements is its seamless adaptation from Tamil to Telugu. The attention to detail – from signboards to banners and even the opening and closing credits—is impeccable, making it feel like a straight Telugu film. The team deserves credit for ensuring the authenticity of the language and setting.

Director C Prem Kumar once again proves his ability to explore human emotions with finesse, much like his work in 96. He masterfully portrays the journey of self-discovery through the perceptions of others, though the slow pace of his films may not suit every viewer’s taste.

Advertisement

The Telugu dialogues are skillfully dubbed, and the cinematography beautifully captures the charm of rural life. The production values, while modest, are used effectively to maintain authenticity throughout. Although the editing is decent, trimming some extended sequences would have improved the film’s overall flow.

Verdict:

On the whole, Sathyam Sundaram is a heartfelt drama about human relationships. Karthi and Arvind Swamy’s performances add warmth to their characters, making their interactions enjoyable. While the slow pace and long runtime might not suit everyone, the film offers a thoughtful look at memories and connections. If you’re in the mood for something reflective, Sathyam Sundaram is worth considering.

123telugu.com Rating: 3.25/5

Reviewed by 123telugu Team

Advertisement

Click Here For Telugu Review

Advertisement




Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Devara Part 1 movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Devara Part 1 movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

A number of unanswered questions plague “Devara: Part 1,” the fine, but familiar Telugu-language Indian action drama and star vehicle for “RRR” co-lead N.T. Rama Rao Jr. For starters, does this nautical-themed melodrama need to be the first part of a series, and will the heavily foregrounded promise of a sequel leave anyone but NTR’s fans wanting more? It’s hard to know in either case, and not because “Devara: Part 1” doesn’t provide sufficient answers.

First, some good news. Writer/director Kortala Siva (“Acharya”) succeeds at making his ensemble cast, including Saif Ali Khan and Janhvi Kapoor, look great, especially during meme-ready action scenes and dance numbers. The movie’s plot also unfolds at such a deliberate pace that it’s hard to argue that the movie’s either too slow or too predictable to warrant its 176-minute runtime. Which brings me to the bad news.

Too often, the familiar and unchallenging nature of “Devara: Part 1”’s stock tropes and twists hold the movie back from unqualified success. Variations on established themes aren’t necessarily the worst things in the world, but it does get frustrating when you’re watching a giant-sized pirate drama that so regularly swings from perfunctory to rewarding gestures and usually within the same scene.

It’s easy to forget and doesn’t ultimately matter, but most of “Devara: Part 1” is presented as a dramatized cautionary tale for a group of hapless Bombay cops who, in 1996, try to hustle their way into a community of butch seamen. Local storyteller Singappa (Prakash Raj) eulogizes Devara (Rao) and later his son Vara (also Rao), both of whom lead a divided group of villagers near the Ratnagiri mountains. For a while, piracy serves as the community’s main source of income, as we see in an over-inflated but fitfully rousing opening scene where Rao launches out of the water in slow-motion like he’s the second coming of Esther Williams. Eventually, Devara changes his mind about piracy after learning more about the guns he and his crew smuggle for shifty middleman Muruga (Murali Sharma).

Tensions periodically flair between Devara, a selfless leader who can also fight and dance, and Bhaira (Khan), his generically contrary rival. They fight to a standstill during an annual weapons ritual, where four burly men duke it out to decide which of their four villages will control a cache of weapons. Even this establishing brawl takes a spell to catch fire, but it does once Devara and Bhair tie their wrists together and take turns bashing each other into various hard surfaces.

Advertisement

This and a few more conventional pleasures make the first half of “Devara: Part 1” a pleasant enough sit. The plot moseys more than it charges forward, and the movie only arrives at a dramatic precipice before its pre-intermission break. At this point, the drama stops being about Devara and Bhaira’s rivalry and starts concerning Vara, now an adult and the uneasy bearer of his father’s legacy. This back half of the movie occasionally capitalizes on its initial promise, especially whenever the relatively timid Vara tries to fill his dad’s mega-sized shoes. That struggle sets up a rather obvious twist, which then corkscrews into a more novel twist, ultimately laying the groundwork for the implicitly promised sequel. Sure, sure, but why aren’t there more fight scenes in the water? Couldn’t there have been punchier dialogue, and maybe some more dancing and less exposition?

These burning questions threaten to eclipse the most charming parts of “Devara: Part 1,” particularly supporting performances from diligent character actors like Sharma and Srikanth, as well as Kapoor’s scene-stealing turn as Thangam, Vara’s flirtatious love interest. A packed matinee screening in Times Square took a bathroom break during Thangam’s prescribed solo dance number; they missed the movie’s best musical number. My audience did not, however, forget to roar with applause whenever Rao performed a heroic flex or danced along to songs that they’d already committed to memory. Rao’s emotional range still isn’t vast, but he does unleash a devastating charm offensive whenever he fights (with great posture) or dances (with disarming exuberance). A few set pieces also feature a couple of stand-out images and effects, but only a few have enough momentum and flair to sustain their entire length.

So how badly do we need a “Devara: Part 2”? Siva rarely challenges his charming ensemble cast to step outside of their comfort zones, but he and his collaborators still deliver a lot of what you might want from an action-musical about a pack of murderous, but righteous pirates. A sequel could be a thrilling improvement on what this middling tentpole riser sets up. It could also sink beneath the heavy weight of viewers’ otherwise reasonable expectations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending