Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Andor’: The 12-Hour Movie Comes for Star Wars

Published

on

‘Andor’: The 12-Hour Movie Comes for Star Wars

Within the press notes for Andor, the newest Disney+ Star Wars collection, star Diego Luna says he was drawn to reprise his position from Rogue One as Insurgent spy Cassian Andor “as a result of I used to be informed it is going to be a 12-episode collection that can be as very similar to a movie as it may be.” Later, he says, “It seems like we’re making a really lengthy film.”

It is a depressingly frequent sentiment in TV as of late, suggesting one or two issues. Someway, 20-plus years after The Sopranos elevated the thought of what tv storytelling could possibly be, movie individuals are nonetheless on some stage embarrassed by the thought of working in TV, and/or(*) they merely don’t perceive the ways in which the 2 mediums are totally different — nor that “a really lengthy film “is nearly by no means a good suggestion.

(*) To not be confused with this present’s title character.

Until you might be David Simon or have labored extensively with David Simon, you might be virtually actually setting your self as much as fail with this strategy. A season of tv was not designed to be an eight-to-22-hour film. Tv having particular person episodes is a function, not a bug. Whether or not you might be telling one huge story or a collection of smaller ones, episodes are supposed to operate as particular person narrative items. Characters have particular goals which might be on some stage resolved inside that unit, and the motion is finest served constructing to some sort of climax, even when that climax is in the end “To Be Continued.” There are methods to do that which might be virtually completely serialized (once more, see The Wire). There are methods to do that which might be largely standalone (your typical well-made cop/physician/lawyer procedural). And there are methods to mix the 2 (which Breaking Unhealthy and The Sopranos, amongst others, did expertly), in order that there are loads of distinct, memorable episodes that operate as their very own entertaining factor, whilst they’re servicing an enormous overarching plot.

The nice majority of people that discuss the “we consider our season as a 10-hour film” discuss are typically screenwriters who haven’t any earlier expertise in tv. Typically, they’re taking an concept they couldn’t promote as a function movie and easily elongating it, with none thought or care given to how tedious and repetitive a film’s three-act construction feels when stretched over that period of time. (Even famously lengthy movies like Lawrence of Arabia or The Godfather Half II knew to cap themselves at a shade over three hours.) However even some TV veterans can fall into this lure, just like the showrunners of the assorted Netflix Marvel collection, who stored kneecapping themselves by being unable or unwilling to pause the principle plot of their seasons and simply present the heroes being heroes for an hour.

But when that is such a widespread plague, you might marvel, why am I choosing on poor Diego Luna and his collaborators? First, the 4 episodes of Andor given to critics for evaluate are a very irritating instance of this strategy, with the format continuously undercutting the attention-grabbing issues the collection is doing. Second, you’ll assume that the folks at Lucasfilm would by now perceive the worth of creating tv that truly features as tv.

The Mandalorian kicked off each the existence of Disney+ and this new section of the Star Wars franchise. It’s unquestionably a TV present. Every week, Mando and Child Yoda Grogu go to a special planet and have a special journey that’s largely resolved over the course of that week’s installment. Even when the seasons construct to a extra serialized climax, the person chapters nonetheless have some sort of self-contained mission for our heroes.

Advertisement

This was adopted by The E book of Boba Fett, which did some notable particular person episodes but additionally blurred the traces extra usually about the place one a part of the story was meant to finish and one other was meant to start. (It had different issues, too — notably that it had no purpose to exist as soon as Mando had been given every little thing that followers as soon as beloved about Boba Fett — however the construction didn’t assist.) Obi-Wan Kenobi was fairly actually based mostly on a film concept that Lucasfilm couldn’t make for some purpose or different, so it acquired become a six-hour blob of (largely nonsensical) plot.

If Mandalorian isn’t universally beloved by its viewers, it’s as shut as something can come on this fractured pop-culture age. Its success ought to have taught the keepers of the franchise a lesson or three about how you can inform tales for TV versus films.

And but.

Now comes Andor, a Rogue One prequel created by that film’s co-writer Tony Gilroy. Gilroy is a hell of a screenwriter. However apart from a consulting producer credit score on a few seasons of Home of Playing cards (a present that always fell prey to pretending it was only a lengthy film), Gilroy has no expertise in TV, and it reveals. There’s barely any form to those first 4 episodes. Three of them don’t even construct to any sort of actual climax, however simply appear to cease at a random level, as if Gilroy, director Toby Haynes, and their editors shrugged and stated, “Eh, no one will care as soon as the autoplay operate activates.”

The primary two episodes are particularly missing in any sort of considerable kind. Maybe not surprisingly, Disney+ is launching the present this week with the primary three episodes, because the third is the one the place issues lastly begin occurring, in addition to the one one that truly has one thing that seems like a conclusion to 1 section of the story. 

Advertisement

It’s a disgrace, not solely as a result of Luna’s Cassian Andor occupies an attention-grabbing place throughout the bigger Star Wars universe, however as a result of Andor will get off to a promising begin earlier than issues rapidly start to tug.

Rogue One was the primary Star Wars movie to be solely tangentially linked to the Skywalker household. As Cassian leads a group of mismatched, emotionally broken allies on a suicide mission to acquire the plans for the primary Demise Star, the film takes on a a lot darker tone than those about Luke, Anakin, and Rey, whereas nonetheless demonstrating the aptitude for journey and informal world-building that made the franchise so big to start with.

Soller as company safety officer Syril Karn.

Lucasfilm Ltd.

Andor appears to be pushing this even additional at the beginning. It’s 5 years earlier than the occasions of Rogue One. Cassian isn’t but a part of the Riot, however merely a person with a tragic previous making an attempt to get by underneath the tough rule of the Empire. The present opens with a sequence owing extra to Blade Runner than Star Wars, as Cassian visits the crimson gentle district of a corporate-run mining planet, strolling fastidiously via a wet night time, questioning a intercourse employee at a brothel in regards to the whereabouts of somebody he as soon as knew, and getting right into a nasty struggle when two different clients take a dislike to his look. (Somebody will later say, “They clearly harassed a human with darkish options.”)

Advertisement

However as soon as Cassian returns to his present dwelling on one other industrial planet, Ferrix, issues start to float. We meet different colourful characters: Cassian’s adorably anxious droid B2EMO (the franchise’s most on-the-nose identify since Elan Sleazebaggano tried to promote dying sticks to Obi-Wan in Assault of the Clones); his mechanic buddy Bix (Adria Arjona); his adoptive mom Maarva (Fiona Shaw); Bix’s mysterious buying and selling companion Luthen Rael (Stellan Skarsgård); and Syril Karn (Kyle Soller), a company safety officer who’s mainly the Star Wars equal of a mall cop determined to be handled like the real article.

It’s an attention-grabbing group of supporting characters. Soller is fairly nice as we watch Syril wrestle with the huge gulf between his heroic fantasies and the uglier realities of life within the Empire, and Stellan Skarsgård is having himself a palpably nice time enjoying a chameleonic determine like Luthen. But Gilroy struggles to justify the necessity to give Cassian Andor his personal collection. Luna’s wonderful, however Cassian wasn’t one of many individuals who most popped off the display screen in Rogue One. Right here he comes throughout as a extra muted Han Solo, quietly in it for himself, whilst folks like Luthen maintain making an attempt to recruit him for extra vital issues just like the Insurgent Alliance. He’s virtually completely reactive, following the agendas of different folks. We all know the place that is all going, and whereas that’s not routinely a crippling drawback (see Higher Name Saul), Cassian in these early episodes doesn’t appear price such a protracted origin story.

Like Star Trek: Picard, Andor appears a case of a principally family-friendly franchise taking over the superficial trappings of extra grownup storytelling — along with the brothel, there are phrases that Hayden Christensen was by no means allowed to say — with out feeling appreciably extra refined in storytelling or theme than what got here earlier than. And like Picard, Andor rapidly will get slowed down in an ongoing plot it doesn’t fairly know how you can break down from one episode to the subsequent.

Skarsgård as Luthen Rael, left, and Genevieve O’Reilly as Mon Mothma.

Lucasfilm Ltd.

Advertisement

It’s promising that the third episode will get issues transferring and appears extra targeted total. (It’s additionally by far the perfect use of flashbacks to Cassian’s traumatic childhood.) The fourth episode then shifts into a completely new section of issues, with a change in locale, a number of new characters — notably Genevieve O’Reilly reprising her Rogue One position as secret Insurgent chief Mon Mothma — and a brand new goal involving a heist. However even that one meanders fairly a bit and once more stops at a totally random level.

This entire “12-hour film” mess began as a result of movie studios have largely stopped making entire genres, notably these for/about adults who don’t have superpowers. Consequently, the individuals who wish to inform these tales should do it on tv. However the upshot is that each mediums are diminished. Films are missing selection, whereas TV is now being flooded by reveals which might be too lengthy, too sluggish, and too amorphous, solely as a result of they have been initially supposed to be informed in a a lot tighter kind. And these reveals are made by individuals who act like they’d a lot moderately be doing this for the massive display screen. 

Whereas we’re nonetheless totally on Ferrix, Gilroy and Haynes introduce a anonymous character whose job is basically to be the native bell ringer. He has no spoken dialogue, but we see him getting ready for his twice-daily responsibility with nice vigor and pleasure. It’s maybe the franchise’s finest use of such a minor character because the rancor keeper cried in Return of the Jedi, providing a way that every one the folks on this galaxy far, far-off have their very own internal lives and tales, even when we’re principally specializing in the identical group over and over. However as the person who alerts the beginning and finish of each day on Ferrix, he additionally sarcastically represents the sort of construction that Andor is so sorely missing.

The primary three episodes of Andor premiere Sept. 21 on Disney+, with extra episodes releasing weekly. I’ve seen the primary 4 of 12 episodes.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: All the World’s a Gamescape — “Grand Theft Hamlet”

Published

on

Movie Review: All the World’s a Gamescape — “Grand Theft Hamlet”

Making art in the middle of the apocalypse is the literal and figurative ethos of “Grand Theft Hamlet,” one of the cleverest “What can we do during lockdown?” pandemic picture projects.

A couple of British actors — Sam Crane and Mark Ooosterveen –– stared into the same gutting void of everybody who was unable to work during the pandemic lockdowns. As they killed some time meeting in the online gamescape of “Grand Theft Auto,” they stumbled into the Vinewood (Hollywood) Bowl setting of that Greater L.A. killing zone. And like actors since the beginning of time, thought they’d put on a play.

As they wander and ponder this brilliant conceit, they wrestle with whether to attempt casting, setting and directing this play amidst a sea of first-person shooters/stabbers/run-you-over-with-their car. They face fascinating theatrical problem solving. How DO you make art and recruit an online in-the-game audience for Shakespeare in a world of self-absorbed, bloody-minded avatars, some of whom stumble upon their efforts and ignore their “Please don’t shoot me” pleas?

Crane and Oosterveen, both white 40somethings Brits, grapple with “what people are like in here,” as in “people are violent in the game.” VERY violent. But “people are violent in Shakespeare.” Pretty much “everybody dies in ‘Hamlet,’” after all.

Putting on a play in the middle of a real apocalypse set in a CGI generated apocalypse is “a terrible idea,” Oosterveen confesses (in avatar form). “But I definitely want to try to do it.”

Advertisement

Crane, struggling with the same mental health issues tens of millions faced during lockdown, enlists his documentary filmmaker wife Pinny Grylls to enter the game and film all this.

And as their endeavors progress, through trial and many many deaths (“WASTED,” the game’s graphics remind you), everybody interested in their idea trots out favorite couplets from Shakespeare as “auditions.” They round up “actors” from all over (mostly Brits, though), they remind us of the power of Shakespeare’s words.

“To be, or not to be, that is the question. Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles And by opposing end them. To die—to sleep…”

Dodging would-be gamer/killers and recruiting others, they will see how a marriage can be strained by work or video game addiction and fret over the futility of it all.

The film, co-scripted and directed by Crane and Grylls, with Crane playing Hamlet, and narrated and somewhat driven by Oosterveen, who portrays Polonius, is a mad idea but a great gimmick, one that occasionally transcends that gimmick.

Advertisement

We’re reminded of the visual sophistication of CGI landscapes — they try out a lot of settings, and use more than one, a scene staged on top of a blimp, seaside for a soliloquy. The limitations of jerky-movement video game characters, lips-moving but not syncing up to dialogue, are just as obvious.

And if all the gamescape’s “a stage, and all the men and women merely players,” some folks — MANY folks — need to buy better headset microphones. The distorted audio and staticky dynamic range of such gear spoils a lot of the dialogue.

In a production where the words matter as much as this, as “acting” in avatar form is a catalog of limitless limitations, one becomes ever more grateful that the film is a documentary of the “making” of a “Grand Theft Auto” “Hamlet,” and not merely the play. Because inventive settings and occasional murderous “distractions” aside, that leaves a lot to be desired.

Rating: R, video game violence, profanity

Cast: The voices/avatars of Sam Crane,
Mark Oosterveen, Pinny Grylls, Jen Cohn, Tilly Steele, Lizzie Wofford, Dilo Opa, Sam Forster, Jeremiah O’Connor and Gareth Turkington

Advertisement

Credits: Scripted and directed by Sam Crane and Pinny Grylls, based on “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare. A Mubi release.

Running time: 1:29

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A Real Pain review – Jesse Eisenberg and Kieran Culkin take a Holocaust tour of Poland

Published

on

A Real Pain review – Jesse Eisenberg and Kieran Culkin take a Holocaust tour of Poland

This isn’t the easiest moment in history to be launching a film exploring its author’s Jewish heritage, thanks to the violent repercussions of events in the Middle East, but the historical baggage that comes with that heritage is all part of Eisenberg’s theme. Set to an eloquent and frequently melancholy soundtrack of Chopin’s piano music, A Real Pain is a bittersweet story about two Jewish cousins, Benji and David Kaplan (Kieran Culkin and Eisenberg), who take a trip to Poland in memory of their beloved grandmother, a recently-deceased Holocaust survivor. Beneath the wisecracks and one-liners there’s a subtle and penetrating analysis of family bonds and the burden of shared history.

The film’s gentle ripple of underlying sadness stems from the fact that the cousins were previously very close, but have drifted apart. They’re about as dissimilar as it’s possible to be, but glimpses of their odd-couple bond gradually resurface as the narrative develops. Eisenberg’s David is quiet and introverted, but is successful as both family man and in his Manhattan-based career in computing. On the other hand, we gradually learn that Benji is drifting rootlessly through his life out in the suburbs. He’s searching desperately for something meaningful, and is struggling to keep himself on the rails. He has been hit hard by his grandmother’s death, confessing that “she was just my favourite person in the world.”

In any event, the role gives Culkin carte blanche to charge recklessly through the gears, in a bravura performance which gives the film its centrifugal force. Some of the time he’s a babbling extrovert who effortlessly dominates any social gathering, for instance persuading everybody in their touring party to pose for selfies on a statue commemorating the Warsaw Uprising, but the flipside is that he can’t tell where the boundaries are (and has little interest in finding them). David is aghast when they’re heading for the boarding gate for their flight to Poland, and Benji cheerfully announces that he’s carrying a stash of dope (“I got some good shit for when we land”.)

One moment everybody loves Benji, then suddenly he becomes an insufferable asshole. He’s prone to wildly inappropriate outbursts, like the moment when the tour party are travelling in a first class railway carriage and Benji goes into an emotionally incontinent display of guilt about the contrast with his Jewish antecedents being transported to death camps in cattle trucks.

Fortunately their travelling companions (who include Dirty Dancing veteran Jennifer Grey, pictured top, and Kurt Egyiawan as a survivor of the Rwandan genocide) show superhuman patience, not least their English tour guide James (Will Sharpe), who graciously accepts Benji’s tactless critique of his guiding technique (Sharpe and Eisenberg pictured above). The fact that James is a scholar of East European Studies from Oxford University, not Jewish himself but “fascinated by the Jewish experience”, is a crafty little comic narrative all of its own.

It’s a difficult film to categorise, being part comedy, part road movie, part psychotherapy session and part personal memoir. Perhaps Woody Allen might have called it a “situation tragedy”. It’s a clever, complex piece, but Eisenberg has made it look breezily simple.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review | Power Play Stationing

Published

on

Film Review | Power Play Stationing

On the index of possible spoil alert sins one could make about the erotic thriller Babygirl, perhaps the least objectionable is that which most people already know: The film belongs to the very rare species of film literally ending with the big “O.” Nicole Kidman’s final orgasmic aria of ecstasy caps off a film which dares to tell a morally slippery tale. But for all the high points and gray zones of writer-director Halina Reijn’s intriguing film, the least ambiguous moment arrives at its climax. So to speak.

The central premise is a maze-like anatomy of an affair, between Kidman’s Romy Mathis, a fierce but also mid-life conflicted 50-year-old CEO of a robotics company, and a sly, handsome twenty-something intern Samuel (Harris Dickinson, who will appear at the Virtuosos Tribute at this year’s Santa Barbara International Film Festival). Sparks fly, and mutually pursued seduction ensues behind closed doors and away from the prying eyes of her family (and husband, played by Antonio Banderas).

From the outset, though, it’s apparent that nefarious sexual exploits, though those do liberally spice up the film’s real estate, are not the primary subject. It’s more a film steeped with power-play gamesmanship, emotional extortion, and assorted manipulations of class and hierarchical structures. Samuel teases a thinly veiled challenge to her early on, “I think you like to be told what to do.” She feigns shock, but soon acquiesces, and what transpires on their trail of deceptions and shifting romantic-sexual relationship includes a twist in which he demands her submission in exchange for him not sabotaging her career trajectory.

Kidman, who gives another powerful performance in Babygirl, is no stranger to roles involving frank sexuality and complications thereof. She has excelled in such fragile and vulnerable situations, especially boldly in Gus Van Sant’s brilliant To Die For (also a May/October brand dalliance story), and Stanley Kubrick’s carnally acknowledged Eyes Wide Shut. Ironically or not, she finds herself in the most tensely abusive sex play as the wife of Alexander Skarsgård in TVs Big Little Lies.

Compared to those examples, Babygirl works a disarmingly easygoing line. For all of his presumed sadistic power playing, Dickinson — who turns in a nuanced performance in an inherently complex role — is often confused and sometimes be mused in the course of his actions or schemes. In an early tryst encounter, his domination play seems improvised and peppered with self-effacing giggles, while in a later, potentially creepier hotel scene, his will to wield power morphs into his state of vulnerable, almost child-like reliance on her good graces. The oscillating power play dynamics get further complicated.

Advertisement

Complications and genre schematics also play into the film’s very identity, in fresh ways. Dutch director (and actress) Reijn has dealt with erotically edgy material in the past, especially with her 2019 film Instinct. But, despite its echoes and shades of Fifty Shades of Gray and 9½ Weeks, Babygirl cleverly tweaks the standard “erotic thriller” format — with its dangerous passions and calculated upward arc of body heating — into unexpected places. At times, the thriller form itself softens around the edges, and we become more aware of the gender/workplace power structures at the heart of the film’s message.

But, message-wise, Reijn is not ham-fisted or didactic in her treatment of the subject. There is always room for caressing and redirecting the impulse, in the bedroom, boardroom, and cinematic storyboarding.

See trailer here.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending