The upcoming 2024 blockbuster movie Twisters is earning fantastic early reviews, which are coming from meteorologists watching for more than just entertainment.

Led by Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones, Twisters takes inspiration from the epic adventure seen in 1996’s Twister, although it is not seen as a sequel or a reboot.

This film sees a new team of storm-chasers and weather experts joining forces to investigate massive tornadoes in the farmland, risking their lives in the name of science.

Meteorologists Share Strong Reactions to 2024’s Twisters

On June 20, Universal invited real-world meteorologists to a special early screening of Twisters at AMC Northpark 15 in Dallas, Texas.

Star Daisy Edgar-Jones also attended the screening as a special guest, after which the guests shared their reactions on Facebook.

It is important to note that these meteorologists’ public reviews of the movie are more likely to be positive rather than negative or mixed ones due to Universal’s special invite.

WFAA meteorologist Kyle Roberts described the movie as “very entertaining,” making it clear that it used a Hollywood-influenced view of storm chasing. 

He praised the special effects and its entertainment value regardless of its accuracy:

“Very entertaining!… It is Hollywood’s portrayal of storm chasing, so don’t go into it expecting anything more than that. It’s not a documentary. While there are callbacks to the original, it is not a remake or a sequel. The special effects are fantastic and it is an entertaining watch.”

He admitted it was “less realistic than the first one” in terms of storm-chasing and safety, although it did not take away from his enjoyment:

“In response to someone asking ‘how was it?’ very entertaining! Not really realistic but it’s a movie and a fun watch! And then in response to someone asking ‘Is it less realistic than the first one???’ HAHA well…from a storm-chasing and safety standpoint? Absolutely.”

WFAA meteorologist Mariel Ruiz reflected on how the original Twister “solidified [her] love for meteorology,” feeling that Twisters will do that on a greater level for new viewers.

She also praised Daisy Edgar-Jones’ performance, saying she did “an incredible job taking on the role of Kate” and calling the film “a must-see” outing:

“The original ‘Twister’ solidified my love for meteorology. I think ‘Twisters’ will inspire the next generation of meteorologists/scientists/so much more. A must-see this summer! It was a pleasure getting to chat with and introduce moviegoers to Daisy Edgar-Jones before the screening. She did an incredible job taking on the role of Kate, a meteorologist changing the name of the game 10/10.”

Freelance meteorologist Lauren Bostwick told fans they will “LOVE the new Twisters movie” if they liked the original, emphatically saying she would watch the new one multiple times:

“If you liked the original you’ll LOVE the new ‘Twisters’ movie that’s coming out July 19!!! I am so thrilled that Universal Pictures invited us to the screening…definitely will be watching again…and again!”

Freelance meteorologist Jeanette Gallardo called Twisters “pretty great,” sharing a similar plan to watch it “over and over in theaters:”

“Had the cool opportunity to attend a screening of ‘Twisters’… and I gotta say… it was pretty great. I will definitely be watching this one over and over in theaters”

Additionally, independent reviewer Lynne Loves Movies shared her reaction to the film after a separate screening, calling it “a blast” and recommending it to fans. 

After doubting it could top the original, she praised the 2024 movie for putting people like her “in there far more” than its predecessor:

“‘Twisters’ is a blast!!! In theaters July 19th. I  recommend it. I was at a Sneak screening. Didn’t know so many folks from Chicago were involved. I thought to myself: No way they can top the original ‘Twister,’ but they really did by focusing on the actual power of the storms themselves. They really put us in there far more than the original and it’s the power and destruction of the tornado that is the villain. The sound is awesome. I bet they’ll get recognition for sound editing.

Her only major complaint was “the romance they hint at between Kate (Daisy Edgar-Jones) and Tyler (Glen Powell),” but she praised Powell’s portrayal “as the cowboy Storm Wrangler:”

“I’m not too crazy about the romance they hint at between Kate (Daisy Edgar-Jones) and Tyler (Glen Powell) and thankfully they don’t focus on that because the chemistry between the two leads seemed lackluster but since they were mostly about storm chasing it didn’t distract from my absolute enjoyment of the movie.  I thought Glen Powell did a great job as the cowboy Storm Wrangler. He has the same motley crew of storm chasing characters vs the corporate crews that exist in “Twisters,” but they don’t build on that too much – thank goodness. Its about those monstrous tornadoes. It’s a thrilling ride for sure. Spielberg exec produces.”

How Will Fans React to 2024 Twisters Movie?

Outside of some minor confusion about Twisters being a sequel or reboot, these early reviews should do plenty to get the general public, especially coming from those who know what the characters are supposed to be doing.

On top of the star power from Glen Powell (Top Gun: Maverick) and co-stars like Anthony Ramos (Ironheart) and David Corenswet (Superman), the film appears to have no shortage of epic action. Just like its predecessor, it’s the kind of movie tailor-made to succeed as a summer blockbuster.

The 2024 movie also has the advantage of bringing much more believable special effects than 1996’s original outing, which seemed to be a big part of why the meteorologists enjoyed it so much.

Now, the big question is if fans will be open to something new from this legacy franchise, particularly in a year with only a few big winners in theaters.

It also has the challenge of coming out amongst heavy competition, with Despicable Me 4 releasing on July 3 and Deadpool and Wolverine debuting on July 26.

Should these reviews be a sign of things to come, however, moviegoers will hopefully respond to that positivity and put forth a good showing.

Twisters spins into theaters on Friday, July 19.

Read more about other Universal projects below:

Will Oppenheimer 2 Ever Release? Universal Boss Gives Perfect Response

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 Movie: Release Date, Cast and Everything We Know

New Despicable Me 4 LEGO Set Includes ‘Mega’ Spoiler from Movie

It is hard to know what is the future of Studio Ghibli as co-founder Hayao Miyazaki might have made his final masterpiece last year with The Boy and the Heron. In the meantime, animators who had formerly worked for Ghibli had formed Studio Ponoc. Starting with 2017’s Mary and the Witch’s Flower. While being more enjoyable and magical than most western children’s movies, it does seem like the staff of Ponoc are doing Ghibli karaoke. We had to wait seven years for another feature and can they escape the shadow of their renowned predecessor? 

Based on the 2014 British children’s novel of the same name by A. F. Harrold, The Imaginary is about a small girl, Amanda (Rio Suzuki), and her imaginary friend, Rudger (Kokoro Terada), as their shared existence is confined to the attic of Amanda’s residence, where they delve into her vibrant imagination. However, upon being confronted by the Imaginary-hunting Mr. Bunting (Issey Ogata), which leads to a tragic accident, Amanda and Rudger are suddenly separated, leaving the latter to find himself in a sanctuary for forgotten Imaginaries.

Considering it was originally released in Japan last December, The Imaginary now being released internationally via Netflix could not have been at a better time as 2024 is already the year of the imaginary friend movie IF and Imaginary, both of which were not well-received. Directed by Yoshiyuki Momose, who worked as an animator on Ghibli classics like Spirited Away and Whisper of the Heart, his latest feature embraces the flights of fancy that don’t hold back on how wild a child’s imagination, as seen in Amanda and Rudger’s initial adventure. 

As we delve more into “the town of Imaginaries”, don’t bother trying to make sense of the world-building, which does allow the animators from Ponoc to present imaginative worlds through stunning hand-drawn animation. The town itself is the standout set-piece as not only do you have the varying designs of the Imaginaries themselves – showing that they didn’t all originate from a child’s mind – but also this world changes every day ranging from European cityscapes to Japan’s Edo period. 

For as much beauty that The Imaginary can throw, there is an element of darkness lurking in the corner, best personified by the creepy adult Mr. Bunting who will surely give kids nightmares, as well as his own imaginary, which could rival the ghostly girls that you often see in J-horror. Contrasting the imaginative worlds with the realistic-drawn English background, you also have the story of a girl and her widowed mother who are grieving over the passing of Amanda’s father, and out of that grief came the creation of Rudger. Although there is a priority of being a thrilling fantasy adventure over a story that challenges with profound themes, there is enough of an emotional core that pays off in the climatic minutes.

Join the AIPT Patreon

Want to take our relationship to the next level? Become a patron today to gain access to exclusive perks, such as:

Advertisement

• ❌ Remove all ads on the website
• 💬 Join our Discord community, where we chat about the latest news and releases from everything we cover on AIPT
• 📗 Access to our monthly book club
• 📦 Get a physical trade paperback shipped to you every month
• 💥 And more!

Sign up today

Sign up for our newsletter

Ti West’s X Trilogy: From divine horror success to “MaXXXine” conclusion.

Trilogies pose a formidable challenge. Achieving success once in filmmaking is a feat, but achieving it across three films where each complements and builds upon the last is akin to divine intervention. This challenge is particularly amplified in the horror genre, where great trilogies are rare and prized. Unlike other genres, horror retains elements of cinema’s attraction-based past, drawing audiences into darkened theaters with the promise of profoundly unsettling experiences that linger long after the credits roll.

Achieving success once in the horror genre takes considerable talent, but doing so three times in a row is an extraordinary accomplishment. Creating three installments of a horror series that are distinct enough to stand alone yet cohesive enough to form a unified whole is a daunting task. Ti West and his collaborators confront this challenge boldly with the X trilogy. While the trilogy-capping “MaXXXine“ may not entirely meet expectations, it remains consistently entertaining and compelling to witness.

5. MaXXXimal Filmmaking

With “X,” Ti West and his team immersed viewers in a film deeply steeped in the gritty ’70s aesthetic, blending elements of low-budget horror with adult film sensibilities. Transitioning to “Pearl,” they skillfully crafted a vibrant, Technicolor experience reminiscent of the whimsical delights from the 1940s, evoking the spirit of Powell and Pressburger. Now, with “MaXXXine,” West and his collaborators boldly delve into the excess and lunacy-driven style of the 1980s, fully embracing its over-indulgent ethos.

In an era where ’80s nostalgia has already had its moment, “MaXXXine” emerges like an irrepressible overdose. With the largest budget of the trilogy, production designer Jason Kisvarday meticulously reconstructs a glamorous yet debaucherous Hollywood of the 1980s. The results are breathtaking, a testament to the filmmaking prowess evident throughout the entire film. “MaXXXine” stands as a triumphant victory lap following the successes of “X” and “Pearl,” granting Ti West unprecedented access to Hollywood’s resources. From expansive soundstage sets to A-list co-stars and elaborate lighting setups, the film showcases West and his team at the peak of their creative powers.

The outcome is a wonderfully maximalist piece of filmmaking, where every dollar spent translates directly onto the screen. Ti West and cinematographer Eliot Rockett craft an immersive and visually stunning experience. “MaXXXine” authentically embodies the ’80s aesthetic, overflowing with nostalgia, and it’s immensely satisfying to witness West harness these tools to capture something so deeply personal and beloved to him.

4. The Big-Name Scenery-Chewers

As mentioned, with its much larger budget, “MaXXXine” also has a whole host of big-name stars who pop up throughout the film, all of whom seem to be having an infectious blast while doing so. Everyone from Lily Collins to Bobby Cannavale to Michelle Monaghan to Halsey turns up in roles of varying sizes and leaves their mark, but the true MVPs, in my opinion, are Kevin Bacon, Giancarlo Esposito, and Elizabeth Debicki.

Bacon is in the film a substantial bit more than I initially assumed he would be, and it is wonderful to see an actor as entrenched in audiences’ collective consciousness show up and remind us exactly why he’s so well-known in the first place. As a private eye with questionable morals, Bacon exudes sleaze and devours every morsel of dialogue he’s given. Esposito is indelibly commanding as something of a parody of the cliché Hollywood agent character archetype, and threatens to steal the show every time he shows up. And Debicki’s performance is easily the most reserved and understated of the bunch, but that winds up working in her favor. There’s a quiet intensity to her conversations with Mia Goth’s Maxine. Her character is ultimately saddled with spouting off some of the film’s biggest themes, and what could have easily sounded hack in another performer’s hands plays with gravitas from Debicki.

3. WEAK SPOT: The Passive Tale of Maxine Minx

So what’s wrong with “MaXXXine?” I’ve already talked about how much I enjoyed the filmmaking craft on display, and I’m going to praise both Mia Goth’s lead performance and Ti West’s direction. But what doesn’t work for me about the film? Sadly, it’s the story.

For as gloriously indulgent and well-crafted as much of “MaXXXine” is, it is ultimately in service of a story that never comes together. By overtly embracing the ‘80s aesthetic and setting, Ti West’s script intertwines various real-world ‘80s elements into the story, from Satanic Panic to the Night Stalker. Unfortunately, this approach is ultimately to the detriment of the film, as it never really develops a coherent narrative of its own. These various threads lead to a fracturing and fragmentation of the plot.

The biggest casualty of all of this is Maxine Minx herself. The titular character is left entirely passive within her own film, burdened with a story that doesn’t embrace the central conflict of want vs. need at the heart of her internal journey across the trilogy. Instead, MaXXXine leaves the character stranded, not playing an active role in her own story. She spends most of the film willfully ignoring the story beats unfolding around her, and the climax quite literally sees her tied up and uninvolved in every single action beat that plays out.

By the time the film reaches its conclusion, it can’t help but feel deflating.

2. Mia Goth’s Performance

Having said all of that, Mia Goth continues to deliver an incredible performance as Maxine Minx even under these circumstances. I wish she had been given a greater chance to shine through involvement in the actual story here, but Goth so thoroughly and articulately elevates what she is given that it remains astounding.

For what it’s worth, I found Goth to be incredible in her dual role in X and even better in Pearl. Goth’s performance in Pearl, right down to its final shot, is absolutely immaculate. In comparison, I don’t find her performance in “MaXXXine” to be as compelling simply because she didn’t have the same level of enthralling material to work with. However, I do absolutely adore the opening scene of “MaXXXine,” which serves as this film’s equivalent to Pearl’s final shot. In it, Goth delivers a masterclass performance and then immediately subverts it. Great stuff.

1. Ti West’s Direct and Editing

While I wish the story felt more motivated and coherent in driving toward its central themes, I would be lying if I said I didn’t thoroughly enjoy the vast majority of “MaXXXine.” Ti West, handling directorial and editing duties on his own as he did with the prior two installments, showcases his graduation to big-budget giallo-influenced ‘80s horror filmmaking while retaining the meticulous visual craft of his earlier work. West is a supremely talented filmmaker, and even if “MaXXXine” serves as a big victory lap for him, Goth, and the team behind these films, that’s fine by me. They’ve earned the right to bask in the limelight, and I genuinely hope West continues to operate at this level for future films. Having crafted great low-budget horror films for decades, seeing him play in a larger playground is undeniably enticing.

(C+)

Overall, “MaXXXine” doesn’t quite stick the landing. It feels less like a cohesive and satisfying film in its own right and more like an epilogue to the prior two films. The story lacks a driving passion and instead seems to follow the inevitable fallout from events set in motion by the earlier installments. It’s hard to argue that “MaXXXine” is the strongest of the trilogy, and viewers unfamiliar with “X” or “Pearl” may not find it satisfying on its own.

That said, despite these shortcomings, “MaXXXine” features great performances, stupendous production design, Mia Goth’s exceptional lead role, and is driven by Ti West’s phenomenal filmmaking craft. It stands as a cinema-of-attractions delight in its own right.