Connect with us

Entertainment

How Questlove’s ‘Summer of Soul’ win got lost in Oscars’ ugliest moment

Published

on

The winner of this 12 months’s Oscar for documentary function was “Summer season of Soul ( … or, When the Revolution May Not Be Televised),” Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson’s chic, ecstatic movie concerning the 1969 Harlem Cultural Competition. Few have been shocked; even fewer appeared to take discover. For these within the Dolby Theatre and people of us watching at house, Questlove’s speech was drowned out amid the shock and confusion of maybe the ugliest second ever to play out throughout an Academy Awards telecast.

Had all of us actually simply seen Will Smith, beloved film star and bet-the-farm favourite for the lead actor Oscar for “King Richard,” strike Chris Rock onstage, after which curse him out from his seat, after Rock made a crude joke about Smith’s spouse, Jada Pinkett Smith? (We had.) Would Smith be requested to depart or charged with assault, or would he be allowed to remain and settle for the Oscar everybody knew he was momentarily about to win? (The latter.) If the movie academy and ABC needed to make the Oscars must-see TV once more, was this what they’d had in thoughts? What’s the alternative of an #OscarsCheerMoment?

The seeming incomprehension of these in attendance, their mixture of nervous laughter and applause, made it even worse. For sheer what-just-happened madness, what previous Oscar snafu might start to check? The “La La Land”/“Moonlight” mix-up from 2017? That was stomach-churning in its personal means, but it surely was additionally a second the place grace in the end gained out, the place well-intentioned individuals who revered each other tried to carry one another up and assuage their emotions of shock and harm. There was no grace on this second.

Smith did try for grace later, throughout his acceptance speech. With tears streaming down his face, he invoked his real-life character, Richard Williams, the daddy of Venus and Serena Williams, describing him as “a fierce defender of his household.” He mentioned, “I do know, to do what we do, we received to have the ability to take abuse. You gotta have the ability to have individuals discuss loopy about you. On this enterprise, you gotta have the ability to have individuals disrespecting you and also you gotta smile and fake like that’s OK.” He mentioned what Denzel Washington had informed him throughout a industrial break: “At your highest second, watch out, that’s when the satan comes for you.” He mentioned he needed to apologize to the movie academy and his fellow nominees. (He didn’t apologize to Rock.) He ended his speech: “Love will make you do loopy issues.”

It felt trustworthy, wrenching, defensive, confessional — and crushingly insufficient. Smith’s ache was itself painful to see, the elements of it he uncovered and the elements of it he didn’t. In a single second, he’d ruined the best night time of his profession and probably the best night time of his fellow winners’ careers. The Oscars telecast could have all of a sudden turn into newsworthy once more, however the Oscars themselves — the successful performers, artists and movies — all however pale into insignificance.

Advertisement

Gone was the likelihood that one of many night’s most noteworthy achievements — two actors of colour, Smith and Ariana DeBose (“West Facet Story”), successful Oscars the identical night time — may lead the subsequent day’s headlines. Gone, too, amid the lingering rawness and ugliness of the preliminary assault, was the wonderful second that “Summer season of Soul” and Questlove and his producers, Joseph Patel, Robert Fyvolent and David Dinerstein, deserved.

Nina Simone performs on the Harlem Cultural Competition in 1969, featured within the documentary “Summer season of Soul (…Or, When the Revolution May Not Be Televised).”

(Searchlight Footage)

“Summer season of Soul’s” win was one of many worthiest of the night time, and Questlove proceeded to offer one of many night’s most lovely speeches. Replaying that second, you needed to marvel what should be going by means of his thoughts as he made his solution to the stage, hugging many congratulators, together with Will Smith, earlier than accepting his trophy from Rock. If the debacle had distracted him, it didn’t present; he targeted on what mattered, the explanation he was there.

Advertisement

He started by graciously singling out the “highly effective work” of the opposite nominated documentaries by title: “Attica,” “Ascension,” “Flee” and “Writing With Hearth.” He turned choked with emotion as he acknowledged his “lovely mom,” Jacquelin Thompson, weeping from her seat within the crowd, and his late father, the doo-wop singer Lee Andrews.

He talked about what the Harlem Cultural Competition, also known as “Black Woodstock,” ought to have been, a nationwide phenomenon, one thing his mother and father ought to have taken him to when he was 5 years outdated. It was the competition’s misplaced legacy that “Summer season of Soul” — painstakingly and brilliantly constructed from 40 hours’ value of competition footage that had sat, unedited and unaired, in a basement for half a century — had gone a ways towards restoring.

“That is such a surprising second for me, proper now,” he mentioned, earlier than instantly including, “This isn’t about me. That is about marginalized individuals in Harlem that wanted to heal from ache.”

It wasn’t about him, however we would have liked him all the identical. This was “Summer season of Soul’s” second to shine; it didn’t get it, but it surely shone anyway. An ideal movie, one which immortalized a transcendent musical spectacle of Black pleasure, was forged apart by a queasily intimate spectacle of Black ache and anger. But when that was one of many night time’s many injustices, it additionally supplied one in all its few redeeming, even clarifying moments. Perhaps right here, in Questlove’s phrases, was a measure of the grace we have been on the lookout for. In time, we’ll have the ability to return to that second and recognize it, give it its due. However we couldn’t final night time.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Catherine Breillat Is Back, Baby

Published

on

Catherine Breillat Is Back, Baby

The transgressive French filmmaker is in fine, fucked-up form with Last Summer, about a middle-age lawyer who starts sleeping with her stepson.
Photo: Janus Films

When Anne (Léa Drucker) has sex with her 17-year-old stepson, she closes and sometimes covers her eyes. It’s a pose that brings to mind what people say about the tradition of draping a napkin over your head before eating ortolan, that the idea is to prevent God from witnessing what you’re about to do. Théo (Samuel Kircher) is as fine-boned as any songbird — “You’re so slim!” Anne gasps in what sounds almost like pain during one of their encounters, as she runs her hands up his rangy torso — and just as forbidden. And despite the fact that what she’s doing could blow up her life, she can’t stay away. It wouldn’t be fair to say that desire is a form of madness in Last Summer, a family drama as masterfully propulsive as a horror movie. Anne remains upsettingly clear-eyed about what’s happening, as though to suggest otherwise would be a cop-out. But desire is powerful, enough to compel this bourgeois middle-age professional into betraying everything she stands for in a few breathtaking turns.

Last Summer is the first film in a decade from director Catherine Breillat, the taboo-loving legend behind the likes of Fat Girl and Romance. Last Summer, which Breillat and co-writer Pascal Bonitzer adapted from the 2019 Danish film Queen of Hearts, could be described as tame only in comparison to Rocco Siffredi drinking a teacup full of tampon water in Anatomy of Hell, but there is a lulling sleekness to the way it lays out its setting that turns out to be deceptive. Anne and her husband Pierre (Olivier Rabourdin) live with their two adopted daughters in a handsome house surrounded by sun-dappled countryside, a lifestyle sustained by the business dealings that frequently require Pierre to travel. Anne’s sister and closest friend Mina (Clotilde Courau) works as a manicurist in town, and conversations between the two make it clear that they didn’t grow up in the kind of ease Anne currently enjoys. It’s a luxury that allows her to pursue a career that seems more driven by idealism than by financial concerns. Anne is a lawyer who represents survivors of sexual assault, a detail that isn’t ironic, exactly, so much as it represents just how much individual actions can be divorced from broader beliefs.

Advertisement

In the opening scene, Anne dispassionately questions an underage client about her sexual history. She informs the girl that she should expect the defense to paint her as promiscuous before reassuring her that judges are accustomed to this tactic. The sequence outlines how familiar Anne is with the narratives used to discredit accusers, but also highlights a certain flintiness to her character. Drucker’s performance is impressively hard-edged even before Anne ends up in bed with her stepson. There’s a restlessness to the character behind the sleek blonde hair and businesswoman shifts, a desire to think of herself as unlike other women and as more interesting than the buttoned-up normies her husband brings by for dinner. Anne enjoys her well-coiffed life, but she also feels impatient with it, and when Théo gets dropped into her lap after being expelled from school in Geneva for punching his teacher, he triggers something in her that’s not just about lust. Théo is still very much a kid, something Breillat emphasizes by showcasing the messes he leaves around the house as much as on his sulky, half-formed beauty. But that rebelliousness speaks to Anne, who finds something invigorating in aligning herself with callow passion and impulsiveness instead of stultifying adulthood — however temporarily.

This being a Breillat film, the sex is Last Summer’s proving ground, the place where all those tensions about gender and class and age meet up with the inexorability of the flesh. The first time Anne sleeps with Théo, it’s shot from below, as though the camera’s lying in bed beside the woman as she looks up at the boy on top of her. It’s a point of view that makes the audience complicit in the scene, but that also dares you not to find its spectacle hot. Breillat is an avid button-pusher responsible for some of the more disturbing depictions of sexuality to have ever been committed to screen, but Last Summer refuses to defang its main character by portraying her simply as a predatory molester. Instead, she’s something more complicated — a woman trying to have things both ways, to dabble in the transgressive without risking her advantageous perch in the mainstream, and to wield the weapons of the victim-blaming society she otherwise battles when they are to her advantage. It’s not the sex that harms Théo; it’s the mindfuck of what he’s subjected to. After dreamily playing tourist in Théo’s youthful existence, Anne drags him into the brutal realities of the grown-up world. The results are unflinching and breathtakingly ugly. You couldn’t be blamed for wanting to look away.

See All

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: In the underpowered 'Daddio,' the proverbial cab ride from hell could use more hell

Published

on

Review: In the underpowered 'Daddio,' the proverbial cab ride from hell could use more hell

The art of conversation has been a casualty in these deeply divided days of ours, and the poor state of talk in the movies — so often expositional, glib or posturing — is an unfortunate reflection of that. The new film “Daddio” is an attempt to put verbal discourse front and center, confining to a yellow taxi a pair with different life paths, as you would expect when your leads are Sean Penn and Dakota Johnson. (Guess which one is the cabbie.)

Johnson’s coolly elegant, nameless traveler, a computer programmer returning to New York’s JFK airport from a trip visiting a big sister in Oklahoma, may be getting a flat rate for her journey, but the meter’s always running on the mouth of Penn’s gleefully crusty and opinionated driver, Clark. He’s a twice-married man prone to streetwise philosophizing about the state of the world and, over the course of the ride, the unsettled romances of his attractive fare. And as she drops clues about her life — sometimes unwittingly, then a little more freely — she gives back with some probing responses of her own, trying to pry him open.

Writer-director Christy Hall, who originally conceived the scenario as a stage play, lets the chatter roll — there’s a significant stretch in which the cab isn’t even moving. And when silence sets in, there’s still an exchange to tend to, as Johnson occasionally, with apprehension, responds to a lover’s insistent sexting. This third figure (unseen, save one predictable picture sent to her phone) becomes another source of conjectural bravado for Clark, a self-proclaimed expert in male-female relations, who makes eye contact through the rearview mirror.

Sean Penn in the movie “Daddio.”

(Sony Pictures Classics)

Advertisement

Watching the unremarkable “Daddio,” you’ll never worry that anything untoward or combustible will happen between the chauvinist driver with a heart of gold and the smart if vulnerable young female passenger who “can handle herself,” as Clark frequently observes. That lack of tension is the problem. The movie is less about a nuanced conversation between strangers than a writer’s careful construction, designed to bridge a cultural impasse between the sexes. Hall is so eager to stage a big moment that upends expectations and triggers wet-eyed epiphanies — He’s a compassionate blowhard! She can laugh at his crassness! — that we’re never allowed to feel the molecules shift from moment to moment in a way that isn’t unforced. Life may be the subject, but life is what’s missing.

It doesn’t help that in directing her first feature, Hall has given herself one of the hardest jobs, getting the most out of only two ingredients and one container. It’s probably why Jim Jarmusch went the variety route with five different tales for his memorable 1991 taxi suite “Night on Earth.” That film conveyed a palpable sense of time and space.

“Daddio,” on the other hand, is nowhere near as assured visually or in its pacing. Hall has an experienced cinematographer in Phedon Papamichael (“Nebraska,” “Ford v Ferrari”) but chooses an unfortunate studio gloss that suggests utter control, rather than a what-might-happen vibe. Not that there’s anything wrong with a movie so clearly made on a set. But Johnson’s well-rehearsed poise and Penn’s coasting boldness make them seem like the stars of a commercial for a scent called Common Ground rather than flesh-and-blood people. At times, they hardly seem to be sharing the same car interior, leaving “Daddio” feeling like a safe space, when what it needs is danger.

‘Daddio’

Advertisement

Rating: R, for language throughout, sexual material and brief graphic nudity

Running time: 1 hour, 41 minutes

Playing: In limited release Friday, June 28

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Kunddala Puranam’ Review | A simplistic tale featuring an in-form Indrans, Remya Suresh

Published

on

‘Kunddala Puranam’ Review | A simplistic tale featuring an in-form Indrans, Remya Suresh

‘Kunddala Puranam’, starring Indrans and Remya Suresh in the lead, is the kind of movie you might want to watch for its focus on village folk and their everyday lives, offering a break from the bustling city. However, its far too simplistic approach may not work for all, especially at a time when filmmakers are trying to break new ground with experimental storytelling, unique styles, and mixing genres.
‘Kunddala Puranam’, directed by Santhosh Puthukkunnu, is set in Kasaragod, where a family opens up their private well to their neighbors. The well is an often-used trope in Malayalam cinema, with women characters gathering around it for water and some gossip. Venu (Indrans) and Thankamani (Remya Suresh) have a school-going daughter who yearns to wear gold earrings but can’t because of an ear infection. When her condition improves, Venu, who works as a security guard at a local bar, decides to purchase a pair for her. The gold earrings soon become the source of both happiness and unhappiness for the family.

The Kasaragod dialect, explored in films since the latter half of the last decade, has a certain charm, but what is particularly interesting is how Indrans effortlessly mouths his dialogues in the dialect. He is a masterclass in emotional acting and nails his role as a resolute father in this film. Remya Suresh, who played a prominent role in last year’s acclaimed movie ‘1001 Nunakal’, performs exceptionally well in this movie. Unni Raja, best known for ‘Thinkalazhcha Nishchayam’, also plays an interesting character. However, it is the child actor Sivaani Shibin who manages to capture the audience’s hearts with her playful innocence, a quality sadly missing in characters written for children in recent years.
Though the writers have tried their hand at humor in the movie, most of the dialogues fall flat, except for some scenes involving a drunkard and the other villagers. The story, though interesting, is stretched too long for comfort. Sound designer and musician Blesson Thomas manages to capture the mood of the story well through his music.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending