Connect with us

Entertainment

‘F9’ producers fined $1 million after stunt performer suffers ‘life-changing’ injuries

Published

on

‘F9’ producers fined  million after stunt performer suffers ‘life-changing’ injuries

The production company behind “F9” has been fined about $1 million after a stunt performer was severely injured in an accident on the set of the Universal Pictures action film.

District Judge Talwinder Buttar imposed the £800,000 penalty and ordered FF9 Pictures Limited to pay £14,752.85 (about $16,000) in costs at Luton Magistrates Court in the United Kingdom on Friday, according to a news release published by the country’s Health and Safety Executive.

The punishment came after the production company pleaded guilty to breaching the U.K.’s Health and Safety at Work Act.

An investigation conducted by the Health and Safety Executive found that stunt performer Joe Watts suffered “life-changing” injuries while filming a fight scene in July 2019 for the ninth installment of the “Fast and Furious” franchise at Warner Bros. Studios in Leavesden.

The HSE reported that Watts plummeted 25 feet and landed on the concrete floor after a line on his stunt vest became detached. Watts sustained a fractured skull and severe traumatic brain injury, which left him permanently impaired and disabled, according to the HSE.

Advertisement

After investigating the accident, the HSE determined that FF9 Pictures Ltd., whose parent company is Universal Pictures, “failed to address the potential issue of a rope snap or a link failure” while shooting the scene. The government agency reported that the company did not take steps to ensure that the link had been properly secured and tightened, nor did it check the link for signs of wear and tear between takes.

Additionally, the HSE discovered that the link manufacturer’s website had deemed it “forbidden for use” as personal protective equipment and that Watts’ harness had not been inspected in six months, violating inspection requirements. The agency also concluded that FF9 Pictures Ltd. failed to extend the crash matting “needed to mitigate the consequences of an unintended fall” after changes were made to the stunt sequence and set.

Watts “could have easily been killed,” HSE inspector Roxanne Barker said in a statement. “In stunt work, it is not about preventing a fall but minimising the risk of an injury.” Buttar expressed her shock at the lack of adequate crash matting and remarked during the sentencing that Watts was lucky to be alive, according to the news release.

Watts also sued FF9 Pictures in 2022 for personal injury. Representatives for Universal Pictures did not immediately respond Monday to The Times’ request for comment.

Multiple on-set accidents have rocked the entertainment industry in recent years.

Advertisement

In December 2019, an Atlanta jury awarded $8.6 million in damages to the family of a stunt performer who died after falling 22 feet off a balcony and landing on unpadded ground while working on the hit TV series “The Walking Dead.” Two years later, cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was killed and director Joel Souza was injured by a bullet from a gun handled as a prop by actor Alec Baldwin on the New Mexico set of the film “Rust.”

In January 2023, New Mexico prosecutors charged Baldwin with two counts of involuntary manslaughter in Hutchins’ death. Those charges have since been dropped. Prosecutors in October said they would ask a grand jury to consider whether Baldwin should again be criminally charged.

“Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed also was charged with involuntary manslaughter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: BRING HER BACK

Published

on

Movie Review: BRING HER BACK
Rating: R Stars: Billy Barratt, Sora Wong, Sally Hawkins, Jonah Wren Phillips, Mischa Heywood, Sally-Anne Upton, Stephen Phillips Writers: Danny Philippou and Bill Hinzman Directors: Danny Philippou & Michael Philippou Distributor: A24 Release Date: May 30, 2025 BRING HER BACK begins with a jolting sequence in a filthy room, where people are being tortured and murdered. A woman with a video camera calmly wanders through the chaos, recording the goings-on. We gradually find out what bearing this has on the main action in BRING HER BACK. We meet young step-siblings Piper (Sora Wong) and Andy (Billy Barratt) at a bus […]Read On »
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Loretta Swit, who played libido-driven Maj. 'Hot Lips' Houlihan on 'M*A*S*H,' dies at 87

Published

on

Loretta Swit, who played libido-driven Maj. 'Hot Lips' Houlihan on 'M*A*S*H,' dies at 87

Loretta Swit, the Emmy-winning actor best known for her time as Maj. Margaret “Hot Lips” Houlihan on the TV version of “M*A*S*H,” died Friday in her New York City apartment, her representative confirmed to The Times. She was 87.

Swit was found by her housekeeper around 10 a.m., according to publicist Harlan Boll, who said he had been on the phone with her at 11 p.m. local time Thursday night — 2 a.m. Friday in New York. Her doorman saw her drop something in the mail at 4 a.m. Friday, New York time, Boll said, and six hours later, she was gone.

The actor — born Loretta Jane Szwed on Nov. 4, 1937, in Passaic, N.J. — loved playing Hot Lips so much that she was the only performer other than Alan Alda who stayed on the series from its pilot in 1972 through its much-watched finale in 1983. “M*A*S*H,” set during the Korean War, was a sitcom but also more than that to Swit.

“There is, I think, an intelligence behind the humor,” she told The Times in 1977. “The audience is huge, and they deserve to be entertained on the highest level we can achieve.”

Though her portrayal of the libido-driven blond in fatigues and Army boots catapulted Swit to household-name status, she had been in acting since before her 8th birthday in stage productions and musicals in New York. She left home at 17 to work in the theater, temping at secretarial jobs while studying at the American Academy of Dramatic Arts.

Advertisement

A confessed workaholic, Swit moved easily from comedy to drama, acting in “Same Time, Next Year,” “Mame” and “The Odd Couple” before moving to Los Angeles to star in “M*A*S*H.” She appeared in iconic series such as “Hawaii Five-O,” “Mission: Impossible” and “Mannix,” and had a productive television career until very recently.

Her most recent TV appearance was as herself in the 2024 Fox tribute special “M*A*S*H: The Comedy That Changed Television.”

Her theater work was plentiful, and in addition to Broadway, off-Broadway, regional and national work, included shows in Southern California. She joined Harry Hamlin in “One November Yankee” at the NoHo Arts Center in 2012, three years after doing a reading of the play with a different actor at the Pasadena Playhouse.

“M*A*S*H” filmed its outdoor scenes at Malibu Creek State Park, where the set was re-created for fans’ enjoyment in 2008.

“It’s thrilling to be honored in this way,” Swit told The Times that year. “I think if I had to sum it up, what we’re most proud of is that we made everybody come together. And I think this will also bring people together.”

Advertisement

Swit was nominated for 10 Emmys for her Hot Lips role and won for supporting actress in a comedy, variety or music series in 1980 and 1982. She garnered four Golden Globe nominations for her work on “M*A*S*H,” in the lead and supporting actress categories, but did not win.

She was given a star on Hollywood’s Walk of Fame in 1989, near what is now the home of Amoeba Music.

An animal lover, Swit set up the SwitHeart Animal Alliance to prevent cruelty and end animal suffering. The alliance worked with numerous nonprofit organizations and programs to protect, rescue, train and care for animals and preserve their habitat, while raising public awareness about issues that concern domestic, farm, exotic, wild and native animals.

She created an art book, “SwitHeart: The Watercolour Artistry & Animal Activism of Loretta Swit,” which includes 65 of her full-color paintings and drawings and 22 of her photographs. Proceeds went to animal causes, and the 2016 Betty White Award from the group Actors and Others for Animals was but one of the many honors she received for her philanthropic work.

Former freelance writer T.L. Stanley contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Verdict Movie Review: When manipulation meets its match

Published

on

The Verdict Movie Review: When manipulation meets its match
The Verdict Movie Synopsis: A woman acquitted of murder orchestrates an elaborate trap to expose her husband’s deadly schemes, using his own deceptions against him.

The Verdict Movie Review:
The best chess matches happen when both players think they’re winning, and The Verdict serves up exactly that kind of strategic showdown wrapped in courtroom proceedings. Director Krishna Shankar’s thriller, set entirely in the US and half in English, starts as a conventional murder trial before revealing itself as something more cunning – a battle of wits where the real game begins after the gavel falls.

The film opens with Namrutha aka Nami (Sruthi Hariharan) facing trial for the murder of wealthy Miss Eliza Sherman (Suhasini Maniratnam) in an American courthouse. These early courtroom scenes, following US procedural conventions with jury deliberations and cross-examinations, feel distinctly theatrical. The dialogue sounds more like position statements than actual conversation, coming across as stiff portraits rather than living drama. Maya Kannappa (Varalaxmi Sarathkumar), Nami’s formidable attorney, works through these proceedings with visible competence, though even her presence can’t entirely mask the procedural dryness that makes you check your watch.

Thankfully, the real movie emerges post-acquittal. Nami reveals herself as more than just a defendant – she’s a strategist who suspects her nurse husband Varun (Prakash Mohandas) orchestrated Eliza’s death for inheritance money. Through flashbacks, we see Eliza’s genuine bond with Nami, making her murder more personal and calculated. Suhasini Maniratnam brings gravitas to these glimpses, creating a fully-realized character despite limited screen time. Even Raphael, Eliza’s long-time caretaker, becomes a pawn in this game, manipulated by Varun to provide false testimony that nearly seals Nami’s fate.

What transforms the film is the alliance between three women against one manipulative man. When Pragya, Varun’s pregnant colleague, realizes his true nature after he casually suggests abortion as a first response to her news, she becomes the third player in this game. The dynamics shift as Nami, Maya, and Pragya orchestrate an elaborate trap using the early COVID pandemic as cover. It’s here that the initially plastic characterizations start to make sense – these people were always performing for each other, hiding their true intentions behind carefully constructed facades.

The film’s strength lies in how it treats manipulation as a double-edged sword. Varun believes he’s the puppet master, but the women around him have been pulling different strings all along. Using his arrogance against him, they create a scenario where his need to boast becomes his undoing. The recording scene where Varun confesses his crimes to Maya, believing her to be another conquest, is particularly well-executed – a predator caught by his own vanity.

Advertisement

Varalaxmi Sarathkumar commands every scene as Maya, bringing both legal authority and street-smart cunning to her role. She’s the film’s anchor, making even the stiff courtroom sequences watchable through sheer presence. Sruthi Hariharan impressively navigates Nami’s transformation from victim to victor, while Prakash Mohandas delivers a compelling performance that truly comes alive in the second half. The supporting cast are adequate.

Krishna Shankar shows promise in handling the thriller elements, particularly in the second half where psychological warfare replaces legal procedures. The screenplay excels at revealing character through action rather than exposition – watch how each person reacts when cornered, and you’ll understand who they really are. The film cleverly positions its reveals to maximize impact, letting us discover alongside the characters that trust is the most dangerous game of all. After all, Varun himself is the real infection that needs eliminating.

The Verdict works best when it abandons the courtroom for the messier arena of human duplicity, where justice wears a different face entirely. It’s a reminder that sometimes the best verdict isn’t delivered by a jury but orchestrated by those who refuse to remain victims.

Written By:
Abhinav Subramanian

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending