Connect with us

Entertainment

Don’t look up: Close encounters of the disaster movie kind

Published

on

Don’t look up: Close encounters of the disaster movie kind

This isn’t a film. Or a drill.

However don’t be concerned. Apparently, we have this. Or not less than NASA does.

On Monday, the Double Asteroid Redirection Take a look at, or DART, spacecraft is meant to collide with Dimorphos, a small “moon” orbiting the near-Earth asteroid Didymos. NASA’s massive concept right here is to see whether or not utilizing such unmanned {hardware} to nudge incoming area particles out of hurt’s method goes to guard Earth sooner or later.

It is admirable however by some means feels a bit of deflating after a long time of what I name “Rooster Little” films, the place humankind is threatened from above by cosmic muddle that may’t be reasoned away besides by means of drastic means.

You realize the routine. Anyone finds unmistakable proof of a) an asteroid, b) a meteor, c) a comet, d) a rogue moon or e) a complete planet closing in on us. Who believes these warnings? Precisely no person, till the skies are riddled with rushing particles sliding and capturing off the looming object. Then we both a) panic, b) submit or c) fly a few of our personal people up there to save lots of us all.

Take the newest instance of this subgenre, “Do not Look Up.” Launched final 12 months in theaters and on Netflix, writer-director Adam McKay’s unruly political satire is about off by two Michigan State College astronomers (Jennifer Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio) who uncover a comet that appears to have popped out of nowhere and inside six months will collide with our planet arduous sufficient to extinguish all life.

Their findings initially set off incredulity and even ridicule from the federal government and media. However as soon as the inevitability units in, the world typically and the USA particularly interact the disaster the way in which they appear to interact in the whole lot else within the twenty first century: narcissism, denial and blame of all of the mistaken individuals. It is sufficient to make you assume the world as we all know it already ended earlier than it does.

Looming apocalypse has at all times been a workable metaphor for our seemingly inescapable folly. (Paging “Dr. Strangelove”?) However we weren’t at all times so cynical about going through pure disasters from area. As not too long ago because the flip of this century, we had been so solemn and single-mindedly gung ho about our capabilities to interact perils from above that it was typically, nicely, laughable.

In 1998, multiplexes had not one, however two massive, fats “Rooster Little” blockbusters: Michael Bay’s “Armageddon” and Mimi Leder’s “Deep Affect.”

Advertisement

The previous, whose risk was a Texas-size asteroid, was a crowded, bombastic motion thriller, rippling with broad humor and even broader set items with barely sufficient time for viewers members to catch their breath.

What will be visible when the DART spacecraft crashes into a tiny asteroid

The latter film, whose risk was, as with “Do not Look Up,” a comet, was a extra earnest, carefully assembled and much much less flustered variation on this theme.

Each did nicely on the field workplace, although Bey’s bombastic epic earned about $554 million, whereas Leder’s extra ruminative thrill journey picked up roughly $350 million, in response to the web site Field Workplace Mojo.

“Armageddon” offers with the hazard by establishing a few area shuttles (keep in mind them?) crewed by crack oil-drilling groups, the crack-iest of whom is Bruce Willis, neck-deep in John Wayne mode, as Harry Stamper. His motley help comes from, amongst others, Billy Bob Thornton (by far the good cat within the room as a NASA exec), Steve Buscemi, Will Patton, Michael Clarke Duncan, William Fichtner, Peter Stormare (uproarious as the one man left on a Russian area station), Ben Affleck (who’s been courting Willis’ daughter to dad’s violent displeasure) and Liv Tyler (the daughter).

'Don't Look Up' delivers a scathing satire that occasionally veers off course

The issues and idiosyncrasies of those and different characters swirl round lengthy sufficient to take our minds off watching components of Manhattan and all of Paris being leveled by items of the asteroid.

“Deep Affect’s” central character is an investigative TV reporter (Téa Leoni), who thinks she’s caught a Cupboard member in a intercourse scandal however finds out that the US President (Morgan Freeman, after all) is about to announce that the aforementioned comet is on a yearlong collision course with Earth. They struggle the whole lot, together with an area shuttle commanded by Robert Duvall loaded with nukes, to deflect the comet’s trajectory.

Robert Duvall, right, with Ron Eldard, commands a spaceship trying to plant nukes on a comet in "Deep Impact" (1998),

So, wherein model of impending extinction can we get to go on with our lives? That may spoil issues for many who have not seen both film. All we really feel protected in disclosing is that the science in “Deep Affect” is much extra dependable and reliable than in “Armageddon.” Or for that matter in “Do not Look Up.” Draw your individual conclusions from that.

By the way in which, I guess you are questioning whether or not a feature-length “Rooster Little” film was ever made. There certain was, a digitally animated movie launched in 2005 by Disney (sans Pixar). This model begins with the title character getting plonked on the pinnacle by what he thinks is a chunk of the sky. After panic units in throughout, the “piece of the sky” is recognized as an acorn, making Rooster Little a laughingstock for months till he finds surprising redemption by one other, extra ominous falling piece of an alien spaceship. All I am going to say right here is that it sounds much more attention-grabbing than the film turned out to be.

The title character in 2005's animated "Chicken Little" faces ridicule after warning that the sky is falling.

If the real-life DART succeeds in its mission, we could possibly sit back extra when asteroids begin coming too shut. However that does not essentially imply the films will altogether abandon “Rooster Little” themes.

In spite of everything, the rationale why the unique “The sky is falling!” phrase bought handed down from era to era is that sooner or later the story activates whether or not we earthlings imagine or, worse, care that catastrophe could also be imminent.

Advertisement

Gene Seymour is a critic who has written about music, films and tradition for The New York Occasions, Newsday, Leisure Weekly and The Washington Publish. Comply with him on Twitter @GeneSeymour.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Kalki 2898 AD’ Review: Lavish Tollywood Sci-Fi Epic Is an Unabashedly Derivative Spectacle

Published

on

‘Kalki 2898 AD’ Review: Lavish Tollywood Sci-Fi Epic Is an Unabashedly Derivative Spectacle

With “Kalki 2898 AD,” Telugu cinema filmmaker Nag Ashwin rifles through a century of sci-fi and fantasy extravaganzas to create a wildly uneven mashup of everything from Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis” to Marvel Comics movies, underpinned by elements from the Hindu epic poem “Mahabharata.” It’s billed, perhaps optimistically, as the first chapter of the Kalki Cinematic Universe franchise — which makes it part of a larger trend, since it launches the same weekend that Kevin Costner’s multi-film “Horizon” saga does in the U.S.

International viewers unfamiliar with the specifics of the ancient Kurukshetra War between the Kauravas and the Pandavas — think Hatfields and McCoys, only with chariots and spears — may want to brush up on Indian mythology before approaching “Kalki 2898 AD,” if only to make some sense of repeated references to that clash. Such foreknowledge could be especially useful during the CGI-amped opening scenes that illustrate how Lord Krishna cursed the warrior Ashwatthama to an eternal life as punishment for a grave misdeed, but allowed him a shot at redemption if he someday assisted in the birth of Kalki, the tenth and final avatar of the Hindu god Vishnu.

On the other hand, moviegoers throughout the world should have no trouble identifying (and in many cases appreciating) Ashwin’s numerous visual and narrative allusions to “Dune,” “The Handmaid’s Tale,” “Star Wars,” “Black Panther,” “Blade Runner,” “Mad Max,” the Harry Potter movies and a dozen or so other pieces of intellectual property. Extended and unwieldy hunks of “Kalki 2898 AD” are devoted to world-building and character-introducing in parallel plotlines that take a long time to intersect. As a result, there are too many sluggishly paced stretches where the passing of time is keenly felt and the storyline is obscured by confusion. But the aggressively spectacular (and, again, CGI-intensified) action set-pieces are generously plentiful and undeniably thrilling, and the lead players are charismatic enough, or over-the-top villainous enough, to seize and maintain interest. Will that be enough to justify two followup flicks? It’s hard to say from early box-office reports.

After the fateful encounter on the centuries-earlier Kurukshetra War battlefield, “Kalki 2898 AD” fast-forwards a few thousand years to Kasi, a familiar looking but impressively detailed dystopian slum described variously as the first and the last viable city on Earth. High above the huddled masses, there is the Complex, a humongous inverted pyramid where, not unlike the elites in “Metropolis,” an Emperor Palpatine lookalike ruler named Supreme Yaskin (Kamal Haasan) and other members of the in crowd savor an abundance of luxuries — including, no joke, their very own ocean — while served by manual laborers recruited from below.

Bhairava (Telugu superstar Prabhas), a roguish bounty hunter who rolls in a tricked-out faux Batmobile equipped with a robotic co-pilot, yearns to earn enough “credits” to buy his way into the Complex, where he can crash the best parties, ride horses through open fields and avoid all the debt collectors hounding him in Kasi. He seizes on the opportunity to make his dreams come true when a colossal reward is posted for the capture of SUM-80 (Deepika Padukone), an escapee from the Complex’s Project K lab, where pregnant women are routinely incinerated after being drained of fluids that can ensure Yaskin’s longevity.

Advertisement

While on the run through a desert wasteland, en route to the rebel enclave known as Shambala, SUM-80 is renamed Sumati by newfound allies and, more important, protected by the now-ancient Ashwatthama (Amitabh Bachchan), who has evolved into an 8-foot-tall sage with superhuman strength, kinda-sorta like Obi-Wan Kenobi on steroids, and a sharp eye for any woman who might qualify as the Mother, the long-prophesized parent of — yes, you guessed it — Kalki.

Bhairava and his droid sidekick Bujji (voiced by Shambala Keerthy Suresh) follow in hot pursuit, and are in turn pursued by an army of storm troopers led by Commander Manas (Saswata Chatterjee), a cherubic-faced Yaskin factotum who always seems to be trying a shade too hard to exude intimidating, butch-level authority. Ashwatthama swats away the storm troopers and their flying vehicles like so many bothersome flies, and exerts only slightly more effort by warding off Bhairava and his high-tech weaponry. (Shoes that enable you to fly do qualify as weaponry, right?)

For his own part, Bhairava has a few magical powers of his own, though it’s never entirely clear what he can or cannot do with them. After a while, it’s tempting to simply assume that, in any given scene, the bounty hunter can do whatever the script requires him to do.

But never mind: He and Ashwatthama do their respective things excitingly well during the marathon of mortal combat that ensues when just about everybody (including Manas and his heavily armed goons) get ready to rumble in Shambala for the climactic clash.

All of which may make “Kalki 2898 AD” sound a great deal more coherent than it actually is. Truth to tell, this is a movie that can easily lead you at some point to just throw up your hands and go with the flow. Or enjoy the rollercoaster ride. And if this really is, as reported, the most expensive motion picture ever produced in India, at least it looks like every penny and more is right there up on the screen.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: 'A Quiet Place: Day One' is the rare prequel that outclasses the original for mood

Published

on

Review: 'A Quiet Place: Day One' is the rare prequel that outclasses the original for mood

To watch “A Quiet Place: Day One” is to recalibrate your senses — not to the alien horror movie you know is in store but rather, to the intimate human drama it hangs onto, long after a lesser film would have given up. Among its lovely images, there’s the distant New York skyline seen beyond a Queens cemetery, a sight familiar to anyone who’s ever driven into town. There are the resigned glances of terminal patients in hospice. Mostly, we take in the exquisite face of Lupita Nyong’o as Sam, a young person in the prime of life stricken with cancer, who carries the unfairness of her situation just below the surface.

Sirens and fighter-jet shrieks ease their way into the sound mix, as they must in any prequel to 2018’s civilization-ending “A Quiet Place” and 2020’s more-of-the-same “A Quiet Place Part II.” But even as smoke and white ash fill the air (best to leave those Sept. 11 memories at home) and pissed-off creatures rampage like cattle down the city’s glass and steel canyons, there’s an unusual commitment to the darker fringes of postapocalyptic moviemaking. It’s less “Furiosa” and more “The Road.”

Sam is already prepared to die, lending the film an impressively bleak tone and sparing us the rote machinations of hardy-band-of-survivors plotting. All she wants to do is walk — very quietly — approximately 120 blocks north from Chinatown to Harlem, where she can scarf the last slices of pizza from Patsy’s before such delicacies become ancient history.

Joseph Quinn in the movie “A Quiet Place: Day One.”

(Gareth Gatrell / Paramount Pictures)

Advertisement

It’s a refreshing, near-radical concept to build a studio film around, and as Sam sets off, a tote bag on her arm and her black-and-white support cat Frodo beside her, you may be reminded of that other woman-and-feline survival story, “Alien,” stripped to the bone. (One also wonders, glumly, how NYC’s thousands of dogs fared with these tetchy sound-averse invaders.)

The person pulling all this off is director-screenwriter Michael Sarnoski, last seen evincing a recognizably human performance from Nicolas Cage as a crumpled, broken chef in “Pig,” which was also about facing a kind of personal catastrophe. (He’s now made two of the most downbeat foodie films in a row.) Sarnoski, who wrote the story with original creator John Krasinski, does fine enough by the James Cameron-like action sequences that probably were mandated by the powers that be: chase sequences in flooded subway tunnels — yuck — and abandoned landmarks.

But he’s stronger on personal moments, such as the finest take of Djimon Hounsou’s career, consumed in spiraling guilt and choking back a scream after accidentally killing someone for panicking too loud. There’s also a business-suited Brit (Joseph Quinn, last seen shredding to Metallica in “Stranger Things”) who only wants to join Sam on her pizza quest. With a minimum of words, we somehow understand that he’s devoted way too much of his time on the planet to not connecting with other human beings, and he may only get this one day to make up for it.

You can take or leave a subplot about Sam’s writing career and thwarted dreams. For this viewer, there’s more poetry in her stopping at an abandoned bookstore, as we all would do, picking up a used paperback (fittingly, Octavia E. Butler’s 1987 sci-fi novel “Dawn,” which you sense she has read) and sniffing the pages: a history captured in a scent. She too is savoring humanity’s last vestiges. This is a film that seems to know a lot about future psychology. May we never know such mournfulness outside of an ambitious summer blockbuster.

Advertisement

‘A Quiet Place: Day One’

Rating: PG-13, for terror and violent content/bloody images

Running time: 1 hour, 39 minutes

Playing: In wide release June 28.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

'Federer: Twelve Final Days' movie review: Federer’s sweet swansong is fascinating

Published

on

'Federer: Twelve Final Days' movie review: Federer’s sweet swansong is fascinating

July 3, 2022, was a Sunday for the ages. Having greeted all past champions at Wimbledon’s Centre Court with warmth and respect, the crowd erupted in frenzied joy and delivered a standing ovation as an eight-time champion walked into the arena. The same spirits which were lifted when the master raised hopes of a last hurrah at Wimbledon, were devastated months later when Roger Federer decided to hang his boots.

Asif Kapadia and Joe Sabia’s directorial venture Federer: Twelve Final Days is a gripping account of Federer’s final few days before retirement. Federer, a global tennis icon and arguably the biggest superstar of the game, plunged tennis fans into collective mourning with the shocking news, while the Alps shed its tears with bountiful rains. As he retires in view of his repeated knee surgeries and advancing age, he plans a grand exit.

The audience relives the iconic Laver Cup in London, where Federer caught up with arch-rivals Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic and other tennis stars on September 23, 2022, for a sweet swansong.

Interspersed with layers of old clips displaying his unmatched elegance on and off the court, the documentary’s biggest strength is its deep emotional connect. With timely interviews by the greatest of his rivals, his wife and parents, the audience gets a glimpse of Federer’s two roles — a sporting legend and a devout family man.

What stands out is the Swiss master’s bonhomie with his biggest rival Nadal. Despite only a few days to go for his wife’s first delivery, Nadal still makes it to London for Federer’s farewell. With the camaraderie, the duo gives sporting rivalry a refreshingly newer, nobler perspective. Being the oldest of the lot, Federer comes out as a class act when he says, “It feels right that of all the guys here, I am the first to go.”

Advertisement

However, with its emphasis on nuances, the documentary is best suited for a niche audience. The general public, who might be curious to discover Federer’s legacy before appreciating it fully, may be left a tad disappointed.

Editing by Avdhesh Mohla is top notch as it does justice to Federer’s majestic on-court grace. With slick visuals and a fine script, the documentary does justice to Federer’s legacy, which, as Nadal says “Will live forever.”

It’s a must-watch if you are a Federer fan. But even if not, don’t miss it as Federer was for decades synonymous with tennis.

Cut-off box – Federer: Twelve Final Days
English (Prime Video)
Director: Asif Kapadia Joe Sabia
Rating: 4/5

Published 29 June 2024, 01:17 IST

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending